Follow-up ProstaScint scans verify detection of occult soft-tissue recurrence after failure of primary prostate cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: A reliable imaging modality is required to uncover occult soft- tissue recurrence after failure of primary prostate cancer therapy. This retrospective study was done to evaluate the ability of the (111)Indium-labeled monoclonal antibody (ProstaScint(R)) scan in detection of prostatic bed recurrence and/or metastases to regional and/or distant lymph nodes. METHODS: One hundred sequential patients were evaluated with repeated ProstaScint(R) scans because of evidence of recurrence during the course of their disease. These 100 patients were followed closely from November 1994 and April 1999, and had concurrent bone scans and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluations. They have had hormone therapy (n = 53) and/or experienced a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy (n = 38) or after radiation therapy (n = 56). Scan images were scored 0-3, where score 0 = negative, score 1= prostate bed uptake, score 2 = regional lymph node uptake, and score 3 = distant lymph node uptake. In each patient, the uptake of the follow-up scan(s) was compared to that of the initial scan. RESULTS: The median age was 70 years (range, 45-87), and 23 patients had a positive bone scan. The average PSA was 40.5 ng/ml (standard deviation, 223.5). There was 257 scans representing 100 patients. All patients had at least 2 scans, 35 patients had 3 scans, and 11 patients had 4 scans. No individual exhibited detectable adverse clinical reactions during or after the scan. The findings of the initial and consecutive scans were anatomically consistent in 79%, whereas in 21% there were skip metastases. In 24 patients the lesions progressed by scan and PSA, 10 patients showed progression of scan but no PSA progression, 49 patients showed no change, and 17 patients showed a remission related to adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The consistency on repeating the scan (79%) and the high percentage of patients showing persistent uptake at the prostate bed (43%) as well as the percentage of detection of regional nodes (20%) and distant nodes (32%) reflects the importance of using the ProstaScint(R) scan in finding occult recurrences after primary treatment failure of prostate cancer. These results are similar to those reported earlier in autopsy series studies in similar populations.

Follow-up evaluation of a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial, involving infusions of autologous dendritic cells (DC) and two human histocompatibility antigen (HLA-A2)-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides, was recently completed. Thirty percent of the participants, including subjects with hormone-refractory metastastic disease, and those with suspected local recurrence of prostate cancer, were identified as clinical responders. This report describes the follow-up evaluation of 19 responders in the two study groups. METHODS: After conclusion of the study, study participants were subjected to follow-up evaluations at 6-8-week intervals. Each responder was reevaluated for response status, and duration of response was determined. RESULTS: Subjects were observed for an average of 291 days (metastastic group, group A-2) and 557 days (local recurrence group, group B), which included the treatment and follow-up periods. The average duration of response was 149 days for group A-2, and 187 days for group B. A majority of responders (11/19; 58%) were still responsive at the end of the current follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed may be significant and relatively durable. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines in the future may provide an additional therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

GM-CSF as a systemic adjuvant in a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leukine [sargramostim], Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA) was administered to a subgroup of 44 patients in a phase II clinical trial for prostate cancer using DC pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides. Our purpose was to determine if GM-CSF caused any enhancement of patients' immune responses, including enhancement of clinical response to the DC-peptide treatment. This report compares the clinical responses to DC-peptide infusions with and without systemic GM-CSF treatment. METHODS: GM-CSF was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 75 microg/m2/day for 7 days with each of six infusion cycles. Prefilled syringes were supplied to the patients for self-administration. RESULTS: One complete and 8 partial responders were identified among 44 patients who received GM-CSF, as compared to 2 complete and 17 partial responders among 51 patients who did not receive GM-CSF. For patients who received GM-CSF and were tested by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test, 3 cases of improved immune response were identified, compared to 5 cases of improvement in patients who did not receive GM-CSF. The main GM-CSF side effects reported were local reactions at the site of injection, fatigue, pain, and fever. Most reported side effects were of mild severity, with some cases of moderate severity leading to discontinuation of GM-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest GM-CSF as employed in this trial did not detectably enhance clinical response to DC-peptide infusions, or significantly enhance the measured immune response.

Phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial: report of a study involving 37 patients with disease recurrence following primary treatment.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes the evaluation of 37 subjects admitted with presumed local recurrence of prostate cancer after primary treatment failure. METHODS: All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at 6-week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post-phase II study. Data included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as other assays to monitor cellular and humoral immune responses. RESULTS: One complete and 10 partial responders were identified from this group based on National Prostate Cancer Project criteria, or on a 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or on a significant resolution in lesions (biopsy-proven when possible) on ProstaScint scan. CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose primary treatment failed.

Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific PSMA peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes thirty three subjects with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer without prior vaccine therapy history who were evaluated and reported as a group. METHODS: All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at six week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post- phase II study. Data collected include: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, chest x-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Six partial and two complete responders were identified in the phase II study based on NPCP criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or resolution in previously measurable lesions on ProstaScint scan. CONCLUSIONS: Over 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggested that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose disease no longer responds to hormone therapy.

ProstaScint scan may enhance identification of prostate cancer recurrences after prostatectomy, radiation, or hormone therapy: analysis of 136 scans of 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Primary extraprostatic spread or failure after prostate cancer treatment can occur locally in the prostatic fossa and/or metastasize to regional and/or distant lymphatics and/or in bone. We evaluated the ability of the ProstaScint (Cytogen Corp., Princeton, NJ) scan to identify soft tissue recurrence of prostate cancer in patients who failed primary treatment, and we monitored their responses to a secondary treatment. METHODS: The 111indium-labeled monoclonal antibody (ProstaScint) was evaluated in a series of 136 consecutive scans associated with a complete set of relevant clinical and biochemical data. These scans represented 100 patients, imaged between November 1994-May 1998, who underwent a definitive prostate cancer treatment followed by evidence of recurrence. All patients had serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Western-blot serum prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and bone scans. Prostatic fossa and/or lymph node biopsies were available in 33 patients. RESULTS: Overall, no adverse reactions were related to any of the radioactive antibody infusions. The average age was 69 years (range, 48-89 years), serum PSA was 55.9 ng/ml (range, 0-2,185 ng/ml), and serum PSMA was 0.32 (relative intensity levels range, 0.04-0.55). The initial therapies given were radical prostatectomy (55 scans), prostate radiation (74 scans), and/or hormonal therapy (77 scans). Twelve patients exhibited a negative scan. Local recurrence alone was identified in 58 scans (42.6%). Lymph node metastases were identified in 66 scans (48.5%). Of these, 21 had regional metastases alone, and 45 had distant lymph node metastases. Ten scans showed skip lymph node metastases without regional failure. PSA significantly correlated with negative, pelvic, and extrapelvic scan findings (P < or = 0.02). PSMA correlated best with pelvic recurrence and extrapelvic metastases in prostatectomized patients. Thirty-four patients had repeated scans for monitoring treatment response. Of these patients, 19 (56%) showed progression on the second scan, consistent with persistent increase in PSA and PSMA levels in all but 2 patients. Another 11 patients showed no change, and 4 patients showed partial remission, suggesting a response to the salvage treatment. All 20 positive prostate biopsies and 4 of the 7 positive lymph node biopsies correlated with ProstaScint findings, whereas 4 of the 6 patients with a negative biopsy had negative scans (i.e., 89% sensitivity and 67% specificity). Bone metastases were identified in 42 bone scans; 45% of these showed no lymph node metastasis on ProstaScint. In another 24 patients (57%), bone metastases were detected on ProstaScint examinations.

Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: A phase I trial involving patients with advanced prostate cancer was conducted to assess the safe administration of dendritic cells (DC) and HLA-A0201-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 or -P2). Thirty-three of the phase I participants were subsequently enrolled in a phase II trial, which involved six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 peptides. METHODS: Clinical monitoring was conducted up to 770 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Nine partial responders were identified in the phase II study based on National Prostate Cancer Project (NPCP) criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen. Four of the partial responders were also responders in the phase I study, with an average response duration of 225 days. Their combined average total response period was over 370 days. Five other responders were nonresponders in the phase I study. Their average partial response period was 196 days. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in the phase I and II clinical trials were significant and of long duration. The partial-responder group included patients who continued to respond from phase I, as well as those who started to respond during the phase II trial.

Comparison of serum PSMA, PSA levels with results of Cytogen-356 ProstaScint scanning in prostatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Stored serum from clinical trial cases undergoing ProstaScint (CYT-356) scanning were available for Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) assay. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels had already been determined. This provided an opportunity to see what correlations existed between the serum markers and the ProstaScint scan. A group of patients had the studies preprostatectomy, whereas another group had the studies postprostatectomy. METHODS: The scan results, serum PSA, serum PSMA, and clinical data were separately analyzed. PSMA serum levels were determined by Western blot. RESULTS: Preoperatively, radical prostatectomy patients showed a correlation between serum PSA or PSMA levels and the ProstaScint scan in the total group (n = 86), or in an untreated group (n = 38). Preoperatively, PSMA correlated with the pathological stage, whereas PSA correlated with the scan. Postoperatively, only PSMA serum levels correlated with the scan in an untreated group (n = 40). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively or postoperatively, Western blot PSMA serum levels predict the stage of disease or local, regional, or distant metastases, as shown by ProstaScint scan. Both the scan and the serum tests provide prognostic information and evaluate the extent of disease to a more significant degree than previously possible.

Evaluation of PSA, free PSA, PSMA, and total and bone alkaline phosphatase levels compared to bone scans in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer clinical evaluation is difficult. A revaluation of new prostate markers with regard to bone scans was performed. METHODS: Serial markers, including bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), total alkaline phosphatase (TAP), prostate-specific antigen, total (PSA) and free (fPSA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), were obtained in patients under evaluation and treatment for possible or known metastatic prostate cancer. These were correlated with bone scan results (BSR). RESULTS: Seventy patients were observed from mid-October 1996-January 1997, during which time 171 serum samples were obtained and correlated with semiquantitative bone scan status. PSA and fPSA provided some correlation with BAP and BSR, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml). Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that BAP and TAP had a significant discriminating ability for positive and negative bone scans (> .78), compared to PSMA, PSA, and fPSA. However, percent BAP and TAP only correlated with BSR at a level above six lesions. As the lesions detected by BSR increased, the correlation increased. CONCLUSIONS: BAP is a valuable marker for clinical response evaluations to use in the serial follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and correlates well with the bone scan as the number of lesions increase to > 6. PSA or fPSA show comparable results, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml).

Follow-up evaluation of prostate cancer patients infused with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: We recently conducted a phase I clinical trial administering autologous dendritic cells pulsed with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides to advanced prostate cancer patients. Participants were divided into 5 groups receiving 4 or 5 infusions of peptides alone (PSM-P1 or -P2; groups 1 and 2, respectively), autologous DC (group 3), or DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2 (groups 4 and 5, respectively). Seven partial responders were observed. Follow-up evaluation of these responders is presented in this report. METHODS: Clinical monitoring for hematological studies and prostate markers was conducted up to 370 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected include: lymphocyte, hematocrit, alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PSMA levels. RESULTS: Groups 4 and 5 (patients infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2) represented 5/7 responders. The length of response was between 100 days (1 patient) to 200 days or above (6 patients). Four patients still remained responsive at the end of the period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in this phase I clinical trial are significant and of long duration. Most of the responders were in treatment groups infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2, suggesting the requirement of both components for effective immunotherapy.