[Evaluation of hospital stays linkage quality to study health spatial variation. a feasibility study in three French regions]. / Évaluation de la qualité du chaînage des séjours hospitaliers pour l'étude des variations spatiales de santé à partir des données du PMSI. Étude de faisabilité dans trois régions françaises.

BACKGROUND: Since 2001, the French hospital stay databases (Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information, PMSI) have included a unique and anonymous identifier in order to cross-link discharge abstracts from a given patient, within and across hospitals. These data could be used to estimate prevalence for some diseases at a territorial level provided that linkage quality is good enough. Few morbidity data are available at this scale. This study analyzes the link between linkage quality and hospitalization rates in three French regions (Picardy, Brittany and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur-Paca). METHODS: We studied short stays in medicine-chirurgical-obstetrical units for the 2004-2005 period (all stays, and stays with mention of cancer or asthma). To study linkage quality, the percentage of linkable stays (no error during the production of the anonymous identifier) was calculated at regional and territorial levels (areas used by regional health authorities). The interquartile range (IQR=third quartile-first quartile) of the percentage of linkable stays was calculated and the link between this percentage and standardized rates of people hospitalized at least once in 2004 or 2005 tested by Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: For all stays, percentages of linkable stays were 94.4%, 96.6% and 97.0% in Picardy, Paca and Brittany respectively in 2004-2005. Geographical variation at the territorial level was higher in Picardy (IQR between 4 and 6) than in the two other regions (IQR between 1 and 2). The percentage of linkable stays was positively and significantly associated with the hospitalization rate for all stays and those with mention of cancer in Picardy only. CONCLUSION: According to these results, PMSI data earlier than 2006 should be used with precaution; linkage quality should be analyzed before making geographical or time comparisons of hospitalization rates. Comparisons cannot always be made. Other studies should be carried out in other regions, and to analyze recent trends in linkage quality.

[Mass screening programs for breast cancer in France. Comparative evaluation]. / Les programmes de dépistage de masse du cancer du sein en France. Evaluation comparative.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to comparatively assess the results of mass screening programs for breast cancer implemented in six French departments in 1986, within the scope of the National Fund for Health Prevention, Education and Information of the National Health Insurance Office of Salaried Workers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data collected by the screening centres were analyzed by ten assessment teams that were independent from the program promotion staff, all using the same evaluation form. A complementary population study performed in eight French districts then, allowed assessing the frequency of self-referred screening (mammography performed out of program). RESULTS: The rate of participation in screening programs, in relation to the invited population, ranged from 21 to 48%, according to the district (36% in average). This low participation was probably related to the extent of self-referred screening. In fact, 19 to 40% of women, according to the district, had previously had a screening mammographic coverage: rate was around 68% in women aged 50 to 69 years. Positive findings with mammography ranged from 4.5 to 15.8% (10.1% in average), while intervention rates ranged from 0.7 to 1.6% and detection rates from 3.8 to 6.2%. The ratio between benign tumors and cancers ranged from 0.7 to 2.1 according to the district. In order to enlighten the judgement on French results, we propose a comparison with the international standards in force. CONCLUSION: The various experiences with breast cancer screening in France show that this screening is technically feasible on the basis of existing medical structures. However, some criteria are still below the expected values, especially if compared with international standards. This result is probably accounted for by the high rate self-referred screening before age 40 in France. In these conditions, the question is whether extending breast cancer screening programs in France is an appropriate course of action.

Mass screening programs for breast cancer in France--average values of assessment criteria.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Many studies have been performed worldwide to assess the effectiveness of screening in terms of reduced mortality due to breast cancer. Since the end of 1989, 10 breast cancer mass screening programs using mammography have been carried out in France under the sponsorship of the National Fund for Health Prevention, Education, and Information (FNPEIS) from the National Health Insurance of Salaried Workers (CNAMTS). These 10 campaigns, which are on a district scale, are organized according to variable methods and are assessed using a common procedure. Four groups of criteria are measured in this procedure, which investigates the impact, quality, effectiveness, and costs of screening programs. The average and extreme values of each criterion as calculated from the campaigns are presented in this paper. In order to enlighten the judgment on the French results, a comparison with the international standards in force and with the results of foreign screening programs is proposed.

Use of mammography as a breast cancer screening tool in six districts in France.

Mass screening programs to detect breast cancer are currently under way in many countries. In France, several districts have been running mammographic screening programs since 1989. A survey was conducted in five of these districts and in a sixth district where no screening program was implemented. Using a self-addressed questionnaire mailed to a sample of 1500 women aged over 20 years, the survey was aimed at assessing women's use of mammography as well as their knowledge and perception of mammographic breast cancer screening. According to district, the compliance of the women replying to the questionnaire ranged from 72 to 82%. The proportion of women who had at least one mammography during their life ranged from 41 to 54%, according to district. The percentage of women aged 50 to 69 who had one mammography within 3 years before the survey ranged from 57 to 78% in the experimental districts and was only 48% in the control district. In all districts, women did not know exactly at what age it is recommended to start screening and with what periodicity, but, when invited to do so, they were satisfied with the program and intended to participate again.

Is selective abortion for a genetic disease an issue for the medical profession? A comparative study of Quebec and France.

This article discusses the results of a study of the stand and attitudes of physicians from the Picardie, Nord-Pas-de-Calais region in France and the province of Quebec (Canada) regarding abortion following the diagnosis of a fetal anomaly by ultrasound, amniocentesis, or chorionic villus sampling. The study examined the degree of acceptability of abortion for several specific conditions as well as the physicians' perceptions of their role in the women's decision to abort. The study shows a consensus (over 75 per cent of the physicians surveyed) for aborting a fetus with trisomy 21. There is a similar consensus, except among Francophones in Quebec, for muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, and Huntington disease. Conversely, there is no consensus (below 60 per cent) for several anomalies. In these cases, Quebec Anglophone physicians find abortion more acceptable than Quebec Francophone or French physicians. Concerning the role of the practitioners in the decision to abort, physicians in France tend to be much more directive than their overseas colleagues. Several hypotheses are suggested to explain the difference between the three groups surveyed.

PIP: Attitudes toward selective abortion following prenatal diagnosis of various genetic diseases were compared in 3 groups of physicians: 588 gynecologists from northern France (Picardie region, Nord-Pas-de-Calais), 631 Francophone obstetricians-gynecologists and radiologists from Quebec, and 115 Quebec Anglophones. A mail questionnaire included items on indications for prenatal diagnosis technology, the perceived severity of a spectrum of physical and intellectual birth defects, and attitudes toward social and ethical issues implicit in prenatal testing. The acceptability of selective abortion was found to vary greatly depending on the fetal condition. Over 75% of physicians in all 3 settings supported abortion when the fetus is a carrier of trisomy 21. Also supported, but not as strongly, was abortion in cases of muscular dystrophy, cystic fibrosis, and Huntington disease. For most conditions, Quebec Francophones were least supportive of abortion and Quebec Anglophones were most supportive, with French physicians in an intermediate position. Conditions entailing limited autonomy were perceived as more severe than those associated with behavior problems or physical disabilities. In Quebec. physicians who were English-speaking, less religious, and with a more technical orientation in their specialization were most accepting of selective abortion. In France, the level of religious practice was the only attitudinal predictor. Finally, French physicians were most likely to believe that they, not parents, should play the major role in the decision regarding selective abortion, while Quebec Anglophones advocated physician neutrality. Despite cultural differences, all 3 groups of physicians tended to share a view that the prevention of the birth of a child who would be dependent on parents and the State throughout the lifespan is acceptable; also shared was opposition to selective abortion for nonutilitarian purposes, especially sex selection.