Medication Discrepancies among Older Hospitalized Adults Discharged from Post-Acute Care Facilities to Home.

OBJECTIVES: The epidemiology of medication discrepancies during transitions from post-acute care (PAC) to home is poorly described. We sought to describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies among hospitalized older adults transitioning from PAC to home. DESIGN: A nested cohort analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Included participants enrolled in a patient-centered deprescribing trial, for patients (aged ≥50 years and taking at least 5 medications) transitioning from one of 22 PACs to home. METHODS: We assessed demographic and medication measures at the initial hospitalization. The primary outcome measure was medication discrepancies, with the PAC discharge list serving as reference for comparison to the participant's self-reported medication list at 7 days following PAC discharge. Discrepancies were categorized as additions, omissions, and dose discrepancies and were organized by common medication classes and risk of harm (eg, 2015 Beers Criteria). Ordinal logistic regression assessed for patient risk factors for PAC discharge discrepancy count. RESULTS: A total of 184 participants had 7-day PAC discharge medication data. Participants were predominately female (67%) and Caucasian (83%) with a median of 16 prehospital medications [interquartile range (IQR) 11, 20]. At the 7-day follow-up, 98% of participants had at least 1 medication discrepancy, with a median number of 7 medication discrepancies (IQR 4, 10) per person, 4 (IQR 2, 6) of which were potentially inappropriate medications as defined by the Beers Criteria. Higher medication discrepancies at index hospital admission and receipt of caregiver assistance with medications were 2 key predictors of medication discrepancies in the week after PAC discharge to home. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Older patients transitioning home from a PAC facility are at high risk for medication discrepancies. This study underscores the need for interventions targeted at this overlooked transition period, especially as patients resume responsibility for managing their own medications after both a hospital and PAC stay.

Implementation of a Quality Metrics Competition to Improve Panel Management Among Internal Medicine Residents.

Background Panel management is essential for residents to learn, yet challenging to teach. To our knowledge, prior literature has not described curricula utilizing a financially incentivized competition to improve resident primary care metrics. Objective We developed a panel management curriculum, including a financially incentivized quality competition, to improve resident performance on quality metrics. Methods We developed a cancer screening and diabetes metric quality competition for internal medicine residents at Vanderbilt University Medical Center for their primary care clinics for the 2020-2021 (pilot) and 2021-2022 academic years. Residents received several educational tools, including a 1-hour introduction to the health maintenance dashboard within the electronic medical record (EMR) and instructions on how to access the quality dashboard outside the EMR, and were encouraged to discuss panel management with preceptors. Chief residents distributed measures to trainees 3 times annually, so residents were aware of their competition ranking. Residents' composite metrics at year end were compared to baseline to determine top performers. The top 15 performers received $100 gift cards as incentives. We also assessed the curriculum's impact on the residents' metrics in aggregate. Results At curriculum completion, residents (n=100) demonstrated an average improvement of 1.9% from baseline composite metrics for the percent of patients receiving screening. In aggregate, residents improved in every measure except HbA1c testing. Breast cancer screening had the largest improvement from 69.5% (1518 of 2183) to 75.6% (1646 of 2178) of all patients receiving recommended screening. Conclusions The curriculum resulted in more patients receiving recommended cancer and diabetes screenings.

Addition of price transparency to an education and feedback intervention reduces utilization of inpatient echocardiography by resident physicians.

Previous studies have demonstrated the impact of appropriate use criteria (AUC) education and feedback interventions in reducing unnecessary ordering of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by trainees. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the impact of the addition of price transparency to this education and feedback model on TTE utilization by resident physicians. We performed an education and feedback quality improvement initiative combining charge transparency data with information on AUC. We hypothesized that the initiative would reduce the number of complete TTE ordered and increase the number of limited TTE ordered, anticipating there would be substitution of limited for complete studies. Residents rotating on inpatient teaching cardiology ward teams received education on AUC for TTE, indications for limited TTE, and hospital charges for TTE. Feedback was provided on the quantity and charges for complete and limited TTE ordered by each team. We analyzed the effects of the intervention using a linear mixed effects regression model to adjust for potential confounders. The post-intervention weeks showed a reduction of 4.6 complete TTE orders per 100 patients from previous weekly baseline of 31.3 complete TTE orders per 100 patients (p value = 0.012). Charges for complete TTE decreased $122 from baseline of $980 per patient (p value = 0.040) on a per-week basis. Secondarily, there was no statistically significant change in limited TTE ordering during the intervention period. This initiative shows the feasibility of a house staff-driven charge transparency and education/feedback initiative that decreased medical residents' ordering of inpatient TTE.

Deimplementation of Routine Chest X-rays in Adult Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Choosing Wisely® is a national initiative to deimplement or reduce low-value care. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to influence ordering patterns. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce daily chest X-ray (CXR) ordering in two intensive care units (ICUs) and evaluate deimplementation strategies. DESIGN: We aimed to describe the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce daily chest X-ray (CXR) ordering in two intensive care units (ICUs) and evaluate deimplementation strategies. SETTING: The study was performed in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) of an academic medical center in the United States from October 2015 to June 2016. PARTICIPANTS: The initiative included the staff of the MICU and CVICU (physicians, surgeons, nurse practitioners, fellows, residents, medical students, and X-ray technologists). INTERVENTION COMPONENTS: We utilized provider education, peer champions, and weekly data feedback of CXR ordering rates. MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed the CXR ordering rates and factors facilitating or inhibiting deimplementation. RESULTS: Segmented linear time-series analysis suggested a small but statistically significant decrease in CXR ordering rates in the CVICU (P < .001) but not in the MICU. Facilitators of deimplementation, which were more prominent in the CVICU, included engagement of peer champions, stable staffing, and regular data feedback. Barriers included the need to establish goal CXR ordering rates, insufficient intervention visibility, and waning investment among medical residents in the MICU due to frequent rotation and competing priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention modestly reduced CXRs ordered in one of two ICUs evaluated. Understanding why adoption differed between the two units may inform future interventions to deimplement low-value diagnostic tests.

Missed Opportunities for Vaccination in the Dominican Republic: Results of an Operational Investigation.

Background. Despite the success of the Dominican Republic's National Immunization Program, homogenous vaccine coverage has not been achieved. In October 2012, the country implemented a study on missed opportunities for vaccination (MOVs) in children aged <5 years. Methods. A cross-sectional study of 102 healthcare facilities was implemented in 30 high-risk municipalities. Overall, 1500 parents and guardians of children aged <5 years were interviewed. A MOV is defined as when a person who is eligible for vaccination and with no contraindications visits a health facility and does not receive a required vaccine. We evaluated the causes of MOVs and identified risk factors associated with MOVs in the Dominican Republic. Results. Of the 514 children with available and reliable vaccination histories, 293 (57.0%) were undervaccinated after contact with a health provider. Undervaccinated children had 836 opportunities to receive a needed vaccine. Of these, 358 (42.8%) qualified as MOVs, with at least one MOV observed in 225 children (43.7%). Factors associated with MOVs included urban geographic area (OR = 1.80; p = 0.02), age 1-4 years (OR = 3.63; p ≤ 0.0001), and the purpose of the health visit being a sick visit (OR = 1.65; p = 0.02). Conclusions. MOVs were associated primarily with health workers failing to request and review patients' immunization cards.