Dose management software implementation in mammography.

PURPOSE: This work aimed to evaluate the use of a dose management software (DMS) in mammography and analyse the clinical practice in terms of radiation exposure in screening and diagnostic mammography. METHODS: Mean glandular dose (MGD) from approximately 10,000 images were collected and analysed taking into account anode/filter combination, projection, compressed breast thickness (CBT) and compression force. Causes of increased MGD were investigated and actions were taken when malpractice was detected. RESULTS: MGD values for craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) exposures for different CBT were defined. The average MGD for CBT of 60-69 mm was 1.84 mGy for CC images and 1.85 mGy for MLO images for screening examinations, while for diagnostic examinations the MGD was 1.95 mGy for CC and 2.01 mGy for MLO images. As no national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography exist in Switzerland, typical mean glandular dose (MGD) values were defined as a first step towards their establishment for both screening and diagnostic examinations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DMS facilitated immensely the analysis of all clinical and technical parameters, the evaluation of radiation dose received by the patients, as well as the overall evaluation of radiographers' performance. The DMS disclosed the role of the medical physicist in dose management and optimization.

Management of difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate bile duct structures: Reduced ERCP radiation exposure with adjunct use of digital single-operator cholangioscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) is an well-established endoscopic procedure for the management of biliary diseases. The use of fluoroscopy during ERCP has often raised concerns regarding potential risks from radiation exposure, particularly in complex cases. We investigated whether a new digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) system, used adjunctively to ERCP, actually reduces patient radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective database (April 2016 to October 2018) including consecutive patients who underwent successful management of difficult-to-treat biliary stones or indeterminate biliary strictures by using either conventional ERCP (ERCP cohort) or ERCP in conjunction with D-SOC (ERCP/D-SOC cohort). The overall patient radiation exposure outcomes were compared in terms of Kerma Area Product (KAP), Fluoroscopy time (T) and the total number of films (F). RESULTS: Overall, 47 patients (mean 71.8 years, 59.6% males) were included (ERCP cohort = 29, ERCP/D-SOC cohort = 18), referred either for difficult bile duct stones (n = 36) or indeterminate biliary strictures (n = 11). The median KAP, T and F in the ERCP/D-SOC cohort were 12.3 Gycm2, 3.7 min and 4 films respectively, compared with 52.1 Gycm2, 8.4 min, and 5 films respectively in the ERCP cohort. Statistically significant differences (P = 0.0001) were found for KAP and T. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct use of a digital cholangioscopy platform appears to significantly reduce radiation exposure in patients undergoing ERCP for the management of difficult bile stones or indeterminate biliary strictures.

CONE BEAM CT IN DENTAL IMPLANT PLANNING: HOW CLOSE ARE PATIENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS WITH DATA FROM PHANTOM STUDIES FOUND IN LITERATURE?

Advantages of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) include high-quality 3D imaging and reduced radiation exposure with relatively low cost. In this study, patient radiation exposure in CBCT implant planning dentistry was measured in terms of Kerma Area Product (KAP). Data were obtained from 217 CBCT scans on 168 individuals using a CS9300 Carestream system. Scans were made using 80-90 kVp, 4-5 mA, 8 and 13.3 s exposure time (depending on voxel size) and a fixed field of view (FOV) of 10 × 10 cm2 (medium). Mean KAP was estimated using two voxel sizes 180 × 180 × 180 µm3 and 200 × 200 × 200 µm3 and found to be 399 and 314 mGycm2, respectively. Corresponding KAP values found in literature ranged between 210 and 2140 mGycm2. Mean E was estimated using conversion coefficient factors found in literature, according to FOV size and tube voltage value and found to range between 24 and 161 µSv.

The International Atomic Energy Agency action plan on radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures: Achieving change in practice.

INTRODUCTION: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) organized the 3rd international conference on radiation protection (RP) of patients in December 2017. This paper presents the conclusions on the interventional procedures (IP) session. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The IAEA conference was conducted as a series of plenary sessions followed by various thematic sessions. "Radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures" session keynote speakers presented information on: 1) Risk management of skin injuries, 2) Occupational radiation risks and 3) RP for paediatric patients. Then, a summary of the session-related papers was presented by a rapporteur, followed by an open question-and-answer discussion. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (67%) of papers came from Europe. Forty-four percent (44%) were patient studies, 44% were occupational and 12% were combined studies. Occupational studies were mostly on eye lens dosimetry. The rest were on scattered radiation measurements and dose tracking. The majority of patient studies related to patient exposure with only one study on paediatric patients. Automatic patient dose reporting is considered as a first step for dose optimization. Despite efforts, paediatric IP radiation dose data are still scarce. The keynote speakers outlined recent achievements but also challenges in the field. Forecasting technology, task-specific targeted education from educators familiar with the clinical situation, more accurate estimation of lens doses and improved identification of high-risk professional groups are some of the areas they focused on. CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturers play an important role in making patients safer. Low dose technologies are still expensive and manufacturers should make these affordable in less resourced countries. Automatic patient dose reporting and real-time skin dose map are important for dose optimization. Clinical audit and better QA processes together with more studies on the impact of lens opacities in clinical practice and on paediatric patients are needed.

Radiation protection in dental radiology - Recent advances and future directions.

Dental radiology uses X-ray technology to diagnose and design treatment of various clinical problems related to the oral cavity and surrounding tissues. As technology quickly evolves, there are numerous X-ray modalities using different tools in the attempt to best image and treat efficiently these diseases, disorders or other related clinical conditions. The reported numbers of dental X-rays, the fact that these may be under-reported in many countries and because dental X-rays are performed more on younger individuals, whose teeth and dentition are still developing, calls for increased need on radiation protection. The objectives of this paper are to report on the latest technology updates and related radiation protection issues, to present future directions and define gaps. Most of existing radiation protection national and international guidelines are more than a decade old. Update is needed to account for newer technologies such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital imaging. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), a well established method for dose optimization, are not yet defined for CBCT and have to be set for various clinical indications. As far as shielding is concerned, recent data confirm that use of lead apron, even in pregnant patients, or gonadal shielding are not recommended, due to negligible radiation dose reduction. Thyroid lead shielding should be used in case the organ is in or close to the primary beam. Specifically for CBCT, leaded glasses, thyroid collars and collimation (smaller field of view (FOV) especially for paediatric patients) minimize the dose to organs outside the FOV.

Patient radiation doses in various fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic procedures.

All orthopaedic fluoroscopic procedures performed using C-arm guidance were monitored for 1 y. The type of procedure, fluoroscopy time (T), kerma-area product (KAP) values and number of radiographs (F) were recorded. The two most often performed techniques were as follows: intramedullary nailing (IMN) of intertrochanteric/peritrochanteric (IP) fractures (101 cases, 49.3 %) and antergrade IMN of femur or tibia shaft (TS) fractures (28 cases, 13.7 %). For the remaining procedures, none accounted for >5 %, categorised as 'various' (76 cases, 37 %). Large variations in T, KAP and F were observed. For IMN of IP fractures, antergrade IMN of femur and TS fractures and for various procedures, respectively, median values were T--2.1, 2.2 and 0.6 min, KAP--6.3, 6.3 and 0.6 Gy cm(-2) and F--21, 2.2 and 6.7. The patient doses during fluoroscopically guided procedures are relatively low compared with other interventional procedures.

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.

PURPOSE: To estimate the mean glandular dose of contrast enhanced digital mammography, using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code and female adult voxel phantom. METHODS: Automatic exposure control of full field digital mammography system was used for the selection of the X-ray spectrum and the exposure settings for dual energy imaging. Measurements of the air-kerma and of the half value layers were performed and a Monte Carlo simulation of the digital mammography system was used to compute the mean glandular dose, for breast phantoms of various thicknesses, glandularities and for different X-ray spectra (low and high energy). RESULTS: For breast phantoms of 2.0-8.0 cm thick and 0.1-100% glandular fraction, CC view acquisition, from AEC settings, can result in a mean glandular dose of 0.450 ± 0.022 mGy -2.575 ± 0.033 mGy for low energy images and 0.061 ± 0.021 mGy - 0.232 ± 0.033 mGy for high energy images. In MLO view acquisition mean glandular dose values ranged between 0.488 ± 0.007 mGy - 2.080 ± 0.021 mGy for low energy images and 0.065 ± 0.012 mGy - 0.215 ± 0.010 mGy for high energy images. CONCLUSION: The low kV part of contrast enhanced digital mammography is the main contributor to total mean glandular breast dose. The results of this study can be used to provide an estimated mean glandular dose for individual cases.

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.

Mammography is a standard procedure that facilitates breast cancer detection. Initial results of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) are promising. The purpose of this study is to assess the CEDM radiation dose using a Monte Carlo code. EGSnrc MC code was used to simulate the interaction of photons with matter and estimate the glandular dose (Dg). A voxel female human phantom with a 2-8-cm breast thickness range and a breast glandular composition of 50 % was applied. Dg values ranged between 0.96 and 1.45 mGy (low and high energy). Dg values for a breast thickness of 5.0 cm and a glandular fraction of 50 % for craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique view were 1.12 (low energy image contribution is 0.98 mGy) and 1.07 (low energy image contribution is 0.95 mGy), respectively. The low kV part of CEDM is the main contributor to total glandular breast dose.

Radiation dose in repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the cumulative effective and skin doses in patients that underwent repeated CT guided radiofrequency ablations (RFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all patients that had undergone RFA during a five years period those which had three or more RFAs were selected. Using the CT images DICOM data, the dose length product (DLP), effective dose (E), skin dose profiles as well as the peak skin dose (PSD) were calculated, using appropriate methods and software developed for this purpose. For each patient, cumulative DLP and E were also calculated from the sum of the respective figures of each individual procedure. To calculate PSD, the skin dose profiles of each procedure were overlaid on the same Z-axis scale using anatomical landmarks for reference and the skin doses to each point were summed up. RESULTS: Five patients were studied; four had undergone 3 RFAs and one 10 RFAs. Cumulative DLP, E and PSD ranges were 5.6-22.3 Gy cm, 0.08-0.36 Sv and 0.8-3.4 Gy, respectively. Median E and PSD values per RFA were 35 mSv and 0.4 Gy, respectively. For comparison purposes it must be noted that in this CT department a routine abdomen-pelvis scan results to an E of about 10 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that undergo repeated RFAs are exposed to considerably high radiation exposure levels. When these patients are in the final stage of malignant diseases, stochastic effects may not be of major concern. However, optimization of the exposure factors and monitoring of these patients to avoid skin injuries are required.

Radiation protection in digestive endoscopy: European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.

This article expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) about radiation protection for endoscopic procedures, in particular endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Particular cases, including pregnant women and pediatric patients, are also discussed. This Guideline was developed by a group of endoscopists and medical physicists to ensure that all aspects of radiation protection are adequately dealt with. A two-page executive summary of evidence statements and recommendations is provided. The target readership for this Guideline mostly includes endoscopists, anesthesiologists, and endoscopy assistants who may be exposed to X-rays during endoscopic procedures.

Radiation doses in a newly founded Interventional Cardiology department.

Coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) radiation doses were investigated in a recently founded Interventional Cardiology (IC) department. The study includes 336 procedures (177 CAs and 159 PTCAs) carried out with a Philips digital flat detector monoplane system. Patient dose was measured in terms of kerma-area product (KAP) and cumulative dose. Using appropriate conversion factors, peak skin dose (PSD) and effective dose (E) were estimated. Median values of KAP (Gy cm(2)), PSD (mGy) and E (mSv) were: 34 478 and 6.1, respectively for CA and 80 885 and 14.4 for PTCA, within European and international reference levels. Only 1.5 % of patients received radiation dose over the 2 Gy threshold (PTCA procedures) for deterministic effects and none reported any skin effect. Radiation doses were within international standards and comparable with other radiological examinations. The percentage of the high-risk patients for radiation skin effects is extremely low.

Evaluation of radiation dose during pacemaker implantations.

The purpose was to evaluate patient radiation doses and compare with other interventional procedures. One hundred and twenty-eight procedures were carried out with a recently installed mobile undercouch C-arm machine with a 23-cm diameter image intensifier. The radiation dose is provided by the X-ray machine, in terms of cumulative dose (CD). Kerma-Area product (KAP) was then estimated from CD and the X-ray field size. Other patient parameters recorded were patient weight, age, kilovolt, milliampere and fluoroscopy time (T). Median (range) CD, KAP and T were 15.2 mGy (3.2-110 mGy), 6.3 Gy cm(2) (1.3-45.7 Gy cm(2)) and 5.2 (1.5-27.4 min) min, respectively. Median E was 1.1 mSv (conversion factor: 0.18 mSv per Gy cm(2)), which corresponds to approximately one lumbar spine X-ray radiography. The effective dose is much lower than a coronary angiography (8 mSv) or an electrophysiology study (6 mSv). Radiation dose is low compared with other interventional cardiology procedures.

Patient and endoscopist radiation doses during ERCP procedures.

The aim of the study was to calculate radiation doses for patients and staff during interventional Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Patient age (A), kerma-area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (T) and total number of films (F) were collected for 157 interventional ERCP procedures. One endoscopist (>10 y of experience) monitored using a thermoluminescent dosemeter worn over the lead apron performed the ERCPs. Median (range) KAP was 3.1 Gy cm(-2) (0.1-106.7 Gy cm(-2)). Median (range) A, T and F were 72 y, 2.6 (0.2-26.0) min and 2 (1-4) images, respectively. No correlation was observed between KAP and A, T or F. Monthly endoscopist dose was negligible due to the use of lead apron, collar and two lead-articulated ceiling mounted shields. The endoscopist dose is minimal when using appropriate protective measures. Patient doses showed large variation that has to be further investigated.

Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the techniques currently used for screening mammography in Greece, to estimate the mean glandular dose (MGD) for establishing a baseline radiation dose database, to analyse the effects of various factors on MGD, and to compare the results with others in the literature. Five mammographic facilities and 250 women having as a routine screening mammogram one craniocaudal (CC) and one mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection in each breast were included in the study. The parameters recorded were age, weight, compressed breast thickness (CBT), tube potential (kV), tube loading (mA s) and MLO projection angle. Large differences were observed among the different mammography facilities, mainly in terms of the tube potential setting and the MLO angle used. The average MGD per exposure was 1.4 +/- 0.6 mGy while the respective averages separately for the CC and MLO projections were 1.2 +/- 0.5 and 1.5 +/- 0.7 mGy, respectively. The average MGD values recorded in this study were below the limit of 2 mGy established for the reference medium-sized breast of 4.5 cm CBT. However, the variety of techniques observed revealed the need for a nationwide survey concerning screening mammography in Greece.

High patient doses in interventional cardiology due to physicians' negligence: how can they be prevented?

Interventional cardiology procedures are usually associated with high patient doses and even deterministic radiation effects may occur. Expensive digital flat panels are preferably used to lower doses, and Athens General Hospital has recently installed one. However, this study shows that it is the cardiologists' practice that lowers patients' doses. Doses delivered to patients during two time periods (pre and after radiation protection training) on a total of 1196 coronary angiographies and 506 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties were measured and analysed per cardiologist. Local reference levels (LRLs) were assessed and compared with the preliminary RLs provided by the European Research Program DIMOND. Results showed that although after the training patients' dose area product, fluoroscopy time, cumulative dose and number of images acquired were lowered, the situation remained unchanged for the cardiologist who delivered the highest doses. The question to answer next is how this bad practice can be prevented since no dose constraints apply to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures using ionising radiation.

Patient skin dose assessment during CT-guided interventional procedures.

The purpose of this study was to investigate patient skin doses in the most frequent computed tomography-guided interventional radiology procedures. The study includes 14 abdominal biopsies and 15 radiofrequency (RF) ablations. Patient skin dose was assessed by slow verification films. The technical factors recorded were: tube kilovoltage (kVp), tube load (mAs), slice thickness and the total number of slices (S). The median value of maximum entrance skin dose (ESD(M)) in biopsy was 108 mGy (9.5-282 mGy). S had a range of 4-152 with a median of 44 slices. Significant correlation was found between S and dose (r = 0.80). Median ESD(M) in RF ablation was 238 mGy (104-500 mGy). S had a range of 108-175 with a median of 155 slices. No significant correlation was found between S and dose. The large range of results show that a more extensive investigation should be performed. In summary, diagnostic procedures such as biopsy present patient skin doses that are relatively low. On the other hand, patient skin dose in RF ablation can be high and can reach values higher than the value that a slow verification film is capable of measuring (1.2 Gy). For these procedures, an alternative method should be investigated.

Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures.

In interventional cardiology, a wide variation in patient dose for the same type of procedure has been recognised by different studies. Variation is almost due to procedure complexity, equipment performance, procedure protocol and operator skill. The SENTINEL consortium has performed a survey in nine european centres collecting information on near 2000 procedures, and a new set of reference levels (RLs) for coronary angiography and angioplasty and diagnostic electrophysiology has been assessed for air kerma-area product: 45, 85 and 35 Gy cm2, effective dose: 8, 15 and 6 mSv, cumulative dose at interventional reference point: 650 and 1500 mGy, fluoroscopy time: 6.5, 15.5 and 21 min and cine frames: 700 and 1000 images, respectively. Because equipment performance and set-up are the factors contributing to patient dose variability, entrance surface air kerma for fluoroscopy, 13 mGy min(-1), and image acquisition, 0.10 mGy per frame, have also been proposed in the set of RLs.

Level of patient and operator dose in the largest cardiac centre in Greece.

The objective of this study was to investigate the patient and staff doses in the most frequent interventional cardiology (IC) procedures performed in Onassio, the largest Cardiac Centre in Greece. Data were collected from three digital X-ray systems for 212 coronary angiographies, 203 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCA) and 134 various electrophysiological studies. Patient skin dose was measured using suitably calibrated slow radiotherapy films and cardiologist dose using suitably calibrated thermoluminescent dosemeters placed on left arm, hand and foot. Patient median dose area product (DAP) (all examinations) ranged between 6.7 and 83.5 Gy cm2. Patient median skin dose in PTCA was 799 mGy (320-1660 mGy) and in RF ablation 160 mGy (35-1920 mGy). Median arm, hand and foot dose to the cardiologist were 12.6, 27 and 13 microSv, respectively, per procedure. The great range of radiation doses received by both patients and operators confirms the need for continuous monitoring of all IC techniques.

Radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations: a comparison between two methods.

The objective of the study was to derive a mathematical method for calculating the entrance surface dose (ESD) from exposure factors for all tube potentials used in clinical practice and to compare the calculated ESDs (ESD(C)) with those measured (ESD(TLD)) using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). The exposure parameters of 43 patients who underwent (a) posteroanterior (PA) and lateral (LAT) chest examination (13 patients), (b) supine abdomen (10 patients), (c) erectus abdomen (10 patients), or (d) urinary tract examination (10 patients) were recorded. Patient ESD was directly measured by TLDs and calculated from exposure factors. The differences between ESD(C) and ESD(TLD) were quite small and could be explained by the uncertainties involved in both methods, in all but the PA chest examination where the ESD(C) was about 50% larger than ESD(TLD). However, in PA chest the ESD(TLD) was close to the minimum detectable dose of TLDs, questioning the accuracy of ESD(TLD). Further investigation showed that using the high tube potential technique (130 kV) in the PA chest examination resulted in very short exposure times, in the region of 4 ms. In such short exposure times, the X-ray generator operation presented stability problems that led to loss of output linearity and consequently to false calculation of ESD. The calculation method offers a reliable and cheap alternative to the measurement of ESD by TLD, provided that the exposure times are not as short as in the PA chest examinations recorded in this study, so that the output linearity with tube current-time product (mAs) is maintained.

Radiation dose measurements to the interventional cardiologist using an electronic personal dosemeter.

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of an electronic personal dosemeter (EPD) worn by a senior cardiologist in an Interventional Cardiology (IC) Laboratory of a busy cardiac centre and how the results could help in the evaluation of radiation protection equipment used. Patient samples consist of 28 patients (10 coronary angiographies (CAs) and 18 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs)). Patient dose was measured with a dose-area product (DAP) meter. Cardiologist radiation dose value written on the EPD as well as the protective equipment used was collected. Between patient and cardiologist dose, a significant correlation was found in CA and a moderate correlation in PTCA. Mean cardiologist effective dose E per procedure was found to be 0.2 microSv in CA and 0.3 microSv in PTCA. EPD proved to be an easy, direct and straightforward way to measure the radiation dose that the cardiologist receives in an IC laboratory.