Risk Factors, Imaging Findings, and Sex Differences in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is increasingly being recognized. However, data supporting diagnosis and management are scarce. We analyze a contemporary and comprehensive SCAD registry to advance the understanding of SCAD risk factors, angiographic appearance, and gender differences. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively populated database of SCAD patients seen at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) between June 2013 and October 2017. Core laboratory analysis of both coronary angiograms and computerized tomographic (CT) angiography of the extracoronary vessels was performed. Of the 113 patients, 87% were female and mean age was 47 ± 10 years. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking were present in 27%, 14%, and 22% of patients. Among females, 14%, 8%, and 9% had a history of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes, respectively. Fifteen percent had used fertility treatment and 47% of postmenopausal women had used hormone replacement therapy. Angiography showed multivessel SCAD in 42%, severe coronary artery tortuosity in 59%, and extracoronary vascular abnormalities in 100% of patients with complete CT angiographic imaging. Gender differences revealed a self-reported depression and anxiety prevalence of 20% and 32%, respectively, in women compared with 0% in men. Type 1 SCAD was more commonly diagnosed in men than women (71% vs 29%, p <0.01). In conclusion, we highlight under-recognized features of SCAD including (1) relation with pregnancy complications and exposure to hormonal therapy; (2) diffuse, multivessel process in tortuous coronaries on a background of extracoronary arterial abnormalities; and (3) gender differences highlighting the role of mental health as well as potential underdiagnoses in men.

Update on Valvular Heart Disease in Pregnancy.

OPINION STATEMENT: Valvular heart disease in women of childbearing age poses an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and management in pregnancy can be challenging. Ideally, patients with suspected valvular disease should have preconception counseling by a multidisciplinary team including cardiologists with expertise in pregnancy and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist. Preconception planning should include a cardiac assessment of maternal risk, determination of frequency of surveillance, and a cardiovascular management plan during delivery. Women with valvular heart disease should be followed closely by a cardiologist and monitored for signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure and arrhythmias. In general, stenotic lesions may become more symptomatic in pregnancy, whereas regurgitant lesions are generally well tolerated. Left-sided valvular lesions have higher complication rates than right-sided lesions. For patients with asymptomatic valvular stenosis, medical management during pregnancy may include beta blockade and/or diuretics. Exercise stress testing prior to pregnancy in sedentary patients can be helpful to unmask symptoms and determine functional capacity. Patients with symptomatic, severe left-sided valvular obstruction have a high maternal risk of cardiovascular events during pregnancy, and percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty or surgery is recommended prior to pregnancy. The type of prosthetic valve (mechanical vs bioprosthetic) should be selected after a careful discussion with the patient. Invasive procedures are generally reserved for when medical management fails. The second trimester may be the optimal time for intervention as fetal organogenesis is complete and the cardiac positioning has not been affected by the gravid uterus.