A Narrative Review on the Clinical Utility of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Colposcopy constitutes a pivotal step in the diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; nevertheless, the method has several inherent and external limitations. Electrical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) has been among the adjuncts that have been developed to increase the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy. EIS is based on the principle that the trajectory of electrical current alters depending on the consistency of the tissues. In the present study, we investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of EIS by means of searching the available evidence. Our search yielded 17 articles during the period 2005-2023. Subsequently, we focused on the performance metrics of the included studies. The general concept is that EIS, in combination with colposcopy, is a method with increased sensitivity and specificity in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as compared to colposcopy alone. However, we documented a heterogeneous distribution of these and other metrics, including the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, we located potential confounders that might hamper the measurements of EIS and, as such, warrant further investigation in future research. We conclude that future studies should be directed towards randomized multicentric trials, whereas the advent of artificial intelligence might improve the diagnostic accuracy of the method by helping incorporate a large amount of data.

Evaluation of IOTA-ADNEX Model and Simple Rules for Identifying Adnexal Masses by Operators with Varying Levels of Expertise: A Single-Center Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Objectives The discrimination of ovarian lesions presents a significant problem in everyday clinical practice with ultrasonography appearing to be the most effective diagnostic technique. The aim of our study was to externally evaluate the performance of different diagnostic models when applied by examiners with various levels of experience. Methods This was a diagnostic accuracy study including women who were admitted for adnexal masses, between July 2018 and April 2021, to a Greek tertiary oncology center. Preoperatively sonographic data were evaluated by an expert gynecologist, a 6 th and a 1 st year gynecology resident, who applied the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SR) and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model to discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. The explant pathology report was used as the reference diagnosis. Kappa statistics were used for the investigation of the level of agreement between the examined systems and the raters. Results We included 66 women, 39 with benign and 27 with malignant ovarian tumors. ADNEX (with and without "CA-125") had high sensitivity (96-100%) when applied by all raters but a rather low specificity (36%) when applied by the 1st year resident. SR could not be applied in 6% to 17% of the cases. It had slightly lower sensitivity, higher specificity, and higher overall accuracy, especially when applied by the 1st year resident (61% vs. 92%), compared to ADNEX. Conclusion Both ADNEX and SR can be utilized for screening in non-oncology centers since they offer high sensitivity even when used by less experienced examiners. In the hands of inexperienced examiners, SR appears to be the best model for assessing ovarian lesions.

Leiomyoma originating from left round ligament presents as symptomatic inguinal hernia.

Leiomyomas may develop at extra-uterine locations and pose diagnostic dile mmas. This is a case of a fibroma originating from the left round ligament presenting as a symptomatic inguinal hernia.