The diagnostic performance of Cr/CysC for sarcopenia and its predictive value on clinical outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The utilization of the creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (Cr/CysC) represents an innovative method for predicting sarcopenia. Our objectives encompassed the evaluation of sarcopenia diagnostic accuracy for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score, as well as an exploration of the predictive value of Cr/CysC concerning clinical outcomes within hospitalized older individuals. METHODS: We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated areas under the curves (AUCs) to assess the diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, we applied univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of risk factors affecting prognosis. RESULTS: Our study included 312 participants, comprising 167 men and 145 women, with an average age of 71 years. Among males, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.717 [95% CI 0.642-0.784], 0.669 (95% CI 0.592-0.739), 0.845 (95% CI 0.781-0.896), 0.882 (95% CI 0.823-0.926), and 0.938 (95% CI 0.890-0.969), respectively. In females, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.706 (95% CI 0.625-0.779), 0.631 (95% CI 0.547-0.710), 0.763 (95% CI 0.686-0.830), 0.789 (95% CI 0.714-0.853), and 0.898 (95% CI 0.837-0.942), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, physical exercise, smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cancer, sarcopenia identified by Cr/CysC (adjusted HR = 2.176, 95% CI 1.062-4.460, P = 0.034) was independently associated with poor overall survival in hospitalized older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cr/CysC has satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia diagnosis and predictive value for poor outcomes in hospitalized older patients. The combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF may provide a more accurate screening for sarcopenia and the Ishii score may be the most accurate clinical method for detecting sarcopenia.

Diagnostic test accuracy of serum creatinine and cystatin C-based index for sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor, but its optimal screening methods remain challenging. Several new indices developed based on serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC) have been proposed to be diagnostic biomarkers for sarcopenia screening. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum Cr- and CysC-based indices for sarcopenia diagnosis. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCIE and SCOPUS from inception to 2 April 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to synthesise the pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curves of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC-AUC). RESULTS: We retrieved 936 publications and included 16 studies with 5,566 participants (mean age ranged: 51.0-78.4 years, 50.2% men). The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 7.8 to 69.5%. All included studies presented a moderate to high risk of bias. The serum Cr- and CysC-based indices showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia (pooled sensitivity: 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.75; pooled specificity: 076, 95% CI 0.67-0.83; pooled SROC-AUC: 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.81). The Cr/CysC ratio is the most widely studied index, followed by the Cr × eGFRcys index. Overall, both indicators had satisfactory and comparable performance in screening sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: Serum Cr- and CysC-based indices showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia. The most studied indices-the Cr/CysC ratio and Cr × eGFRcys index-had comparable diagnostic accuracy for evaluating sarcopenia and may serve as surrogate markers for sarcopenia. However, further validation is required to verify these findings.