Efficacy of a Novel Prophylactic Scheme of Fosfomycin Trometamol in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Findings from a Prospective Monocentric Single-Arm Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel prophylactic scheme of fosfomycin trometamol in patients undergoing elective HoLEP (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) or TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) procedures for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia and undergoing elective HoLEP or TURP procedures during the period February 2022-June 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Two 3 g oral fosfomycin trometamol doses 12 h apart were administered at 8.00 p.m. on day -1 (i.e., the day before HoLEP or TURP procedure) and at 8.00 a.m. on day 0 (i.e., the day of the surgical procedure). The following outcomes were assessed: prevalence of fever occurring in the first 48 h after surgical procedure; prevalence of urological complications occurring after the surgical procedure; prevalence of proven urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or bloodstream infections (BSIs) at 14 days post-procedure; and prevalence of emergency department admission for UTI-related sepsis at 14 days post-procedure. Univariate analysis comparing patients with and without proven UTI, BSI, or emergency department admission at 14 days post-procedure was carried out. Overall, 96 patients (median age 70 years) undergoing HoLEP (82.3%) or TURP (17.7%) were prospectively included. Median (IQR) time of surgical procedure after the morning fosfomycin dose was 226.5 min (range 88.5-393.75 min). Fever in the post-surgical 48 h occurred in 3/96 patients (3.1%). Prevalence of proven UTI at 14 days was as low as 1.0% (1/96), whereas no patient had proven BSI or UTI-related sepsis requiring emergency department admission at 14 days. Our findings support the contention that a prophylactic scheme based on two doses of fosfomycin trometamol 12 h apart before surgical intervention may represent a valuable strategy for preventing infectious complications in urologic patients undergoing HoLEP or TURP. Larger definitive confirmatory studies are warranted.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in invasive urodynamics, a Delphi consensus of the Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD).

INTRODUCTION: Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has been confirmed. No absolute recommendations on the use of AB in case of relevant potential risk of UTI have been reported, though some categories of patients at increased infective probability after UDS have been recognized. The aim of this study is to report the experts' consensus on the best practice for the use of AB before UDS in the main categories of patients at potential risk of developing UTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on AB before UDS in males and females. A panel of experts from the Italian Society of Urodynamics, Continence, Neuro-Urology, and Pelvic Floor (SIUD) assessed the review data and decided by a modified Delphi method on 16 statements proposed and discussed by the panel. The cut-off percentage for the consensus was a ≥70% of positive responses to the survey. The study was a Delphi consensus with experts' opinions, not a clinical trial involving directly patients. RESULTS: The panel group was composed of 57 experts in functional urology and UDS, mainly urologists, likewise gynaecologists, physiatrists, infectivologists, pediatric urologists, and nurses. A positive consensus was achieved on 9/16 (56.25%) of the statements, especially on the need for performing AB before UD in patients with neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. Urine analysis and urine culture before UDS are mandatory, and in the event of their positivity, UDS should be postponed. A consensus was reached on avoiding AB in menopausal status, diabetes, age, gender, bladder outlet obstruction, high postvoid residual, chronic catheterization, previous urological surgery, lack of urological abnormalities, pelvic organ prolapse, and negative urine analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients without notable risk factors and with a negative urine test due to the potential morbidities that may result from antibiotic administration. However, AB can be used for risk categories such as neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. The evaluation of urine analysis and urine culture and postponing UDS in cases of positive tests were considered good practices, as well as performing AB in the neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression.

It is time to define an organizational model for the prevention and management of infections along the surgical pathway: a worldwide cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to investigate the organizational characteristics of acute care facilities worldwide in preventing and managing infections in surgery; assess participants' perception regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, antibiotic prescribing practices, and source control; describe awareness about the global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and IPC measures; and determine the role of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on said awareness. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted contacting 1432 health care workers (HCWs) belonging to a mailing list provided by the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery. The self-administered questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team. The survey was open from May 22, 2021, and June 22, 2021. Three reminders were sent, after 7, 14, and 21 days. RESULTS: Three hundred four respondents from 72 countries returned a questionnaire, with an overall response rate of 21.2%. Respectively, 90.4% and 68.8% of participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary IPC team or a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team. Local protocols for antimicrobial therapy of surgical infections and protocols for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis were present in 76.6% and 90.8% of hospitals, respectively. In 23.4% and 24.0% of hospitals no surveillance systems for surgical site infections and no monitoring systems of used antimicrobials were implemented. Patient and family involvement in IPC management was considered to be slightly or not important in their hospital by the majority of respondents (65.1%). Awareness of the global burden of AMR among HCWs was considered very important or important by 54.6% of participants. The COVID-19 pandemic was considered by 80.3% of respondents as a very important or important factor in raising HCWs awareness of the IPC programs in their hospital. Based on the survey results, the authors developed 15 statements for several questions regarding the prevention and management of infections in surgery. The statements may be the starting point for designing future evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSION: Adequacy of prevention and management of infections in acute care facilities depends on HCWs behaviours and on the organizational characteristics of acute health care facilities to support best practices and promote behavioural change. Patient involvement in the implementation of IPC is still little considered. A debate on how operationalising a fundamental change to IPC, from being solely the HCWs responsibility to one that involves a collaborative relationship between HCWs and patients, should be opened.

Redesign of a GI endoscopy unit during the COVID-19 emergency: A practical model.

The pandemic diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the world required measures to prevent and strategies to control the infection, as well as the reallocation of the hospital structures in order to take care of an increased number of infected patients. Endoscopy Units should be able to perform endoscopic procedures on COVID-19 infected as well as on noninfected patients. The aim of this manuscript is to propose a model for a fast reorganization of the endoscopy department environment in order to safely perform endoscopic procedures in this Pandemic COVID-19 scenario, according to the current advices given by the Scientific Societies.

Screening for carriage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in settings of high endemicity: a position paper from an Italian working group on CRE infections.

Introduction: A variety of national and international guidelines exist around the management of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs), but some of these are several years old and do not reflect current epidemiology and they also do not necessarily give pragmatic advice around active surveillance of CREs in countries with a high burden of cases and limited resources. This paper aims to provide a best practice position paper to guide active surveillance in a variety of scenarios in these settings, and discusses which patients should be screened, what methods could be used for screening, and how results might influence infection prevention interventions. Methods: This paper was developed as a result of a series of meetings of expert opinion leaders representing the major infectious disease and infection prevention societies in Italy and having the endorsement of AMCLI (Italian Association of Clinical Microbiology) and SITA (Italian Society for Anti-infective Therapy). There was no attempt to undertake a full systematic review of the evidence, as it was felt that this was inadequate to inform a pragmatic view on the best way forward based on current epidemiology and infection rates. Key recommendations: Key recommendations focus on the urgent need to promote measures to prevent transmission and infection, focusing on high risk patients and clinical areas, as well as outbreak situations. Active surveillance leading to appropriate infection prevention precautions plays a major role in this. Conclusions: There are limited national or international guidelines giving pragmatic advice on the most appropriate measures for active surveillance and management of colonized patients in a high-burden setting such as Italy. While individual hospitals and regions will need to formulate their own policies based on local epidemiology, this position paper attempts to highlight current best practice in this area and provide pragmatic advice for clinicians, infection prevention staff, and healthcare managers.

Clinical experience with dalbavancin for the treatment of deep sternal wound infection.

OBJECTIVES: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a complication of major heart surgery with high morbidity as well as prolonged antimicrobial treatment and hospital length of stay (LoS). Dalbavancin is a new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic active against Gram-positive micro-organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with a long half-life. This small case series assessed the feasibility of dalbavancin for the treatment of DSWI. METHODS: This was retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients treated with dalbavancin for DSWI over a 2-year period (March 2016 to April 2018) in two cardiac surgery departments in Italy. All patients with DSWI underwent surgical accurate debridement. Dalbavancin was administered during the hospital stay or in an outpatient facility. RESULTS: Among 15 patients enrolled in the study, MRSA was isolated in 7 (47%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in 6 (40%) and other coagulase-negative staphylococci in 2 (13%). Dalbavancin was administered by two infusions in 9 patients (60%), whereas 5 patients (33%) received a median of four doses. Fourteen patients received a first dose of 1000mg followed by 500mg, whereas one patient received two doses of 1500mg each. All patients were defined as clinically cured. The median hospital LoS was 13 days (interquartile range, 8-18 days). At 6 months after discharge, 14 patients (93%) showed no relapse of DSWI, whereas 1 patient recurred with a diagnosis of DSWI caused by another pathogen (Candida sp.). CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin may be an alternative option for DSWI caused by Gram-positive bacteria when first-line treatments are contraindicated or as salvage treatment.

Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus iodine for the prevention of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent health care-associated infections. One of the practices to reduce their incidence is preoperative skin antisepsis. Two of the most commonly active components used are chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine. Of 3 reviews conducted between 2010 and 2012 comparing antiseptics, 2 were in favor of chlorhexidine; however, the latest was unable to draw conclusions. PURPOSE: To verify whether recent evidence supports the hypothesis that chlorhexidine in preoperative antisepsis is more efficient than other antiseptics in reducing SSI rates. PROCEDURES: We conducted a systematic review from 2000-2014 in all languages. The primary end point was SSI incidence and secondary skin bacterial colonization. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Meta-analysis were conducted for comparable studies for both outcomes. The results of the meta-analysis, including all of the studies in which chlorhexidine was compared with iodophor, were in favor of chlorhexidine for both SSI incidence (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.92) and bacterial skin colonization (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.55). CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-quality evidence supporting the use of chlorhexidine for preoperative skin antisepsis and high-quality evidence that the use of chlorhexidine is associated with fewer positive skin cultures. Further rigorous trials will be welcomed to attain stronger evidence as to the best antiseptic to be used before surgery.

Role of ¹8F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with an implanted cardiac device: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Infective endocarditis (IE) is widely underdiagnosed or diagnosed after a major delay. The diagnosis is currently based on the modified DUKE criteria, where the only validated imaging technique is echocardiography, and remains challenging especially in patients with an implantable cardiac device. The aim of this study was to assess the incremental diagnostic role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with an implanted cardiac device and suspected IE. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 27 consecutive patients with an implantable device evaluated for suspected device-related IE between January 2011 and June 2013. The diagnostic probability of IE was defined at presentation according to the modified DUKE criteria. PET/CT was performed as soon as possible following the clinical suspicion of IE. Patients then underwent medical or surgical treatment based on the overall clinical evaluation. During follow-up, we considered: lead cultures in patients who underwent extraction, direct inspection and lead cultures in those who underwent surgery, and a clinical/instrumental reevaluation after at least 6 months in patients who received antimicrobial treatment or had an alternative diagnosis and were not treated for IE. After the follow-up period, the diagnosis was systematically reviewed by the multidisciplinary team using the modified DUKE criteria and considering the new findings. RESULTS: Among the ten patients with a positive PET/CT scan, seven received a final diagnosis of "definite IE", one of "possible IE" and two of "IE rejected". Among the 17 patients with a negative PET/CT scan, four were false-negative and received a final diagnosis of definite IE. These patients underwent PET/CT after having started antibiotic therapy (≥48 h) or had a technically suboptimal examination. CONCLUSION: In patients with a cardiac device, PET/CT increases the diagnostic accuracy of the modified Duke criteria for IE, particularly in the subset of patients with possible IE in whom it may help the clinician manage a challenging situation.

Predictive models for identification of hospitalized patients harboring KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

The production of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) by Enterobacteriaceae has become a significant problem in recent years. To identify factors that could predict isolation of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPCKP) in clinical samples from hospitalized patients, we conducted a retrospective, matched (1:2) case-control study in five large Italian hospitals. The case cohort consisted of adult inpatients whose hospital stay included at least one documented isolation of a KPCKP strain from a clinical specimen. For each case enrolled, we randomly selected two matched controls with no KPCKP-positive cultures of any type during their hospitalization. Matching involved hospital, ward, and month/year of admission, as well as time at risk for KPCKP isolation. A subgroup analysis was also carried out to identify risk factors specifically associated with true KPCKP infection. During the study period, KPCKP was isolated from clinical samples of 657 patients; 426 of these cases appeared to be true infections. Independent predictors of KPCKP isolation were recent admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), indwelling urinary catheter, central venous catheter (CVC), and/or surgical drain, ≥ 2 recent hospitalizations, hematological cancer, and recent fluoroquinolone and/or carbapenem therapy. A Charlson index of ≥ 3, indwelling CVC, recent surgery, neutropenia, ≥ 2 recent hospitalizations, and recent fluoroquinolone and/or carbapenem therapy were independent risk factors for KPCKP infection. Models developed to predict KPCKP isolation and KPCKP infection displayed good predictive power, with the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.85), respectively. This study provides novel information which might be useful for the clinical management of patients harboring KPCKP and for controlling the spread of this organism.

Combined computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case series.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis is challenging. The gold standard for prosthetic valve endocarditis diagnosis is trans-esophageal echocardiography. However, trans-esophageal echocardiography may result in negative findings or yield images difficult to differentiate from thrombus in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis. Combined computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is a potentially promising diagnostic tool for several infectious conditions and it has also been employed in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis but data are still scant. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We reviewed the charts of 6 patients with prosthetic aortic valves evaluated for suspicion of prosthetic valve endocarditis, at two different hospital, over a 3-year period. We found 3 patients with early-onset PVE cases and blood cultures yielding Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus lugdunensis, respectively; and 3 late-onset cases in the remaining 3 patients with isolation in the blood of Streptococcus bovis, Candida albicans and P. aeruginosa, respectively. Initial trans-esophageal echocardiography was negative in all the patients, while fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography showed images suspicious for prosthetic valve endocarditis. In 4 out of 6 patients valve replacement was done with histology confirming the prosthetic valve endocarditis diagnosis. After an adequate course of antibiotic therapy fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography showed resolution of prosthetic valve endocarditis in all the patients. CONCLUSION: Our experience confirms the potential role of fluoroseoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and follow-up of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

A risk prediction score for invasive mold disease in patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: A risk score for invasive mold disease (IMD) in patients with hematological malignancies could facilitate patient screening and improve the targeted use of antifungal prophylaxis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,709 hospital admissions of 840 patients with hematological malignancies (2005-2008) to collect data on 17 epidemiological and treatment-related risk factors for IMD. Multivariate regression was used to develop a weighted risk score based on independent risk factors associated with proven or probable IMD, which was prospectively validated during 1,746 hospital admissions of 855 patients from 2009-2012. RESULTS: Of the 17 candidate variables analyzed, 11 correlated with IMD by univariate analysis, but only 4 risk factors (neutropenia, lymphocytopenia or lymphocyte dysfunction in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, malignancy status, and prior IMD) were retained in the final multivariate model, resulting in a weighted risk score 0-13. A risk score of < 6 discriminated patients with low (< 1%) versus higher incidence rates (> 5%) of IMD, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99, (95% CI 0.98-0.99). During 2009-2012, patients with a calculated risk score at admission of < 6 had significantly lower 90-day incidence rates of IMD compared to patients with scores > 6 (0.9% vs. 10.6%, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: An objective, weighted risk score for IMD can accurately discriminate patients with hematological malignancies at low risk for developing mold disease, and could possibly facilitate "screening-out" of low risk patients less likely to benefit from intensive diagnostic monitoring or mold-directed antifungal prophylaxis.

Outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with chronic liver disease is increasing, the impact of human immunodeficiency virus on hepatocellular carcinoma outcome remains unclear. AIMS: This single centre study investigated whether human immunodeficiency virus infection per se affects the hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis. METHODS: Forty-eight human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 234 uninfected patients consecutively diagnosed with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma from January 2000 to December 2009 were retrospectively enrolled. Hepatocellular carcinoma was staged according to Cancer of the Liver Italian Program criteria. Survival and independent prognostic predictors were evaluated. Survivals were also compared after adjustment and matching by propensity score. RESULTS: Compared to human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected subjects, infected patients were more likely to be males, were younger, had fewer comorbidities and the tumour was more often detected during surveillance. Liver function, tumour characteristics and treatments did not significantly differ between the two groups. Nevertheless, median survival of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients was approximately half that of their counterpart (16 months [95% confidence interval: 7-25] vs. 30 months [95% confidence interval: 25-35]; p=0.0354). Human immunodeficiency virus infection, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score and hepatocellular carcinoma treatment were independently associated with mortality. Notably, human immunodeficiency virus infection doubled the risk of dying. These results were confirmed by propensity analysis. CONCLUSION: Human immunodeficiency virus infection per se worsens the prognosis of patients with virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography for diagnosis of invasive mold diseases in patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Invasive mold diseases (IMDs) of the lung remain a challenge for immunocompromised patients. Although timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial for the outcome of the infection, the poor sensitivity of microbiological techniques and the limited specificity of chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) often delay definitive diagnosis of these infections. METHODS: To explore the diagnostic utility of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for detecting angioinvasive patterns of pulmonary infection, we performed a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized trial involving 36 patients with hematological malignancies who had clinical suspicion of IMD, as defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: We found that 5 of 5 patients with proven IMD had CTPA-positive findings consistent with interruption of the arterial vessels (concordance, 100%). CTPA findings were positive in 5 of 7 patients with probable IMD (findings for 2 were considered false negative because lesions were too small or not evaluable). In 15 of 24 patients with a final diagnosis of possible IMD, CTPA findings were negative for 14 patients and were positive for 1 patient, who had septic emboli associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. CTPA findings were positive in the remaining 9 patients with a final diagnosis of possible IMD at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CTPA appears to be a promising tool to exclude the diagnosis of IMD in high-risk patients without specific findings on HRCT scans, and it is most useful in the presence of well-circumscribed lesions in which there is suspicion for IMD.

WSES consensus conference: Guidelines for first-line management of intra-abdominal infections.

Intra-abdominal infections are still associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality.A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with intra-abdominal infections may be an important factor in the quality of care. The presence of a team of health professionals from various disciplines, working in concert, may improve efficiency, outcome, and the cost of care.A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bologna on July 2010, during the 1st congress of the WSES, involving surgeons, infectious disease specialists, pharmacologists, radiologists and intensivists with the goal of defining recommendations for the early management of intra-abdominal infections.This document represents the executive summary of the final guidelines approved by the consensus conference.

Successful treatment of multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa osteomyelitis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with a combination of colistin and tigecycline.

A case of osteomyelitis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa is reported in a patient who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The patient was successfully treated by prolonged administration of a full dose of colistin and tigecycline, and surgical curettage with the positioning of resorbable calcium sulfate pellets loaded with colistin.

Update on the treatment of disseminated fusariosis: Focus on voriconazole.

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, such as subjects with hematological malignancies and patients who underwent to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT). Fusarium spp. cause a broad spectrum of infections in humans. Immunologically competent hosts show mainly localized skin infections, whereas disseminated fusariosis occurs almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients. Fusarium spp. are resistant to many antifungal agents with equivocal in vitro and in vivo susceptibility to amphotericin B. Voriconazole (VRC) is a triazole shown to be safe, well tolerated, and in vitro efficacious against Fusarium spp. Although clinical experience is limited, many case reports have shown the efficacy of VRC in the treatment of fusariosis.