Breakthrough rhinocerebral mucormycosis in a liver transplant patient receiving caspofungin.

Zygomycetes are among the most frequent causes of non-Aspergillus mycelial fungal infections in transplant recipients. We have described a single case of breakthrough zygomycosis. A young Japanese woman presented because of idiopathic fulminant hepatitis and renal failure. On the third day of admission, she underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. A considerable amount of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were transfused during surgery. On posttransplant day 2, Candida albicans was isolated from respiratory secretions; prophylactic caspofungin was prescribed. During the next 6 days, C albicans was isolated from tracheal secretions, surgical wound, and exudates and stools. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was diagnosed day 4. Her renal function did not improve during the postoperative period; the patient continued on hemodialysis. On day 28, a dark blue eschar due to zygomycosis was detected on the skin of the nose. Tracheal and nasal exudates yielded Rhizopus sp. The patient died 12 hours later due to multiorgan failure with hypothermia. The fatal evolution in this case may be related to a presumed brain infarction after progressive vessel fungal invasion. The presented case had 2 risk factors related to zygomycosis. A high index of suspicion is required in transplant recipients with risk factors for zygomycosis. Early diagnosis and surgery with appropriate systemic fungal drugs (amphotericin B) are mandatory to improve the prognosis.

Right adrenal metastases of hepatocarcinoma after liver transplantation: case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common malignancies globally, accounting for nearly one million new cases per year. Although the treatment of extrahepatic metastases from primary liver tumors is essentially palliative, a solitary metastasis from such tumors offers a possibility of cure by surgical resection. The adrenal gland is an uncommon site for metastasis from primary liver tumors. METHODS: We report a liver transplantation case of HCC and hepatitis B virus in a 23-year-old man with an excellent postoperative result. However, because an increased alpha-fetoprotein was evident and complete radiologic and blood tests were performed, all of which were normal. Three years posttransplantation, a right adrenal mass was identified by CT. PAAF was performed as well as adrenalectomy for a solitary adrenal metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: The patient underwent adrenalectomy for the right adrenal metastasis at 3 years following liver transplantation for HCC. He is presently alive and disease-free 24 months after adrenalectomy. CONCLUSION: Carefully selected patients with solitary metastasis from HCC may be considered for resection.

Five-year follow-up of a trial comparing Tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion in liver transplantation.

We evaluate 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial that compared cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-me) and Tacrolimus (Tac) for primary immunosuppression. One hundred one adult patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to receive Tac (n = 50) or CsA-me (n = 51). The most frequent indication for the procedure was cirrhosis due to virus C followed by alcoholism. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86%, 75%, and 72%, respectively; there was no significant difference between CsA-me versus Tac arms. Acute rejection occurred in 30 cases (30%), independent of the type of primary immunosuppression. Serious adverse events were reported significantly more among patients under CsA-me (48 episodes) than under Tac (32 episodes). Nineteen patients were switched to the other calcineurin inhibitor. The switch was much more frequent from CsA-me to Tac (n = 15; 29.4%), mainly because of lack of efficacy (n = 10; 19.6%). There were no cases of chronic rejections in the Tac arm. Four patients were switched from Tac to CsA-me for side effects; only 1 remains alive, after treatment was changed from CsA-me to an antimetabolite. There were no statistical differences in renal dysfunction, diabetes, hypertension, neurologic disorders, new-onset malignancies, or infections. There were no differences in survival or rejection among the intention-to-treat groups. Serious adverse events, total patients with switch of calcineurin inhibitor, as well as switches due to lack of efficacy, were statistically more frequent under CsA-me. Tacrolimus seems to be a more appropriate drug to be used for primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Therapy of intractable pruritus with MARS.

INTRODUCTION: Pruritus is the most disabling symptom in patients with cholestatic liver diseases. Many drug therapies have been used for the treatment of these diseases, with different outcomes. The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) has been used in the treatment of intractable pruritus in cholestatic syndromes. We report our experience with MARS in 3 patients with intractable pruritus on the waiting list: 2 liver transplant recipients and a patient with primary biliary cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: Two middle-aged women and 1 middle-aged man, who were recipients of an orthotopic liver transplant for primary biliary cirrhosis, underwent three (n = 2) and two (n = 1) 6-hour sessions of MARS due to medically uncontrollable pruritus. All noted marked improvement of pruritus, with decreased bilirubin levels, but this improvement lasted only a few days in all cases. We observed no changes in transaminase or albumin levels, or prothrombin time. Complications included an episode of angina due to anemia caused by jugular catheter bleeding, and thrombocytopenia in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: MARS is an effective treatment for intractable pruritus in cholestatic liver diseases, although its beneficial effect is short. This extracorporeal liver device is safe, because most related adverse events are mild.

Effectiveness of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with liver HCV cirrhosis.

Clearance of HCV before transplantation could avoid recurrence of hepatitis C in the liver allograft, thereby improving graft and patient survival. We report our experience with combined therapy for patients with HCV cirrhosis, including 12 patients with biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis (n = 7) or previous cirrhotic complications (n = 5). The Child-Pugh score was A in eight patients and B in four. Two patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. Genotype distribution was 1a (n = 2), 1b (n = 8) or 3 (n = 1). Patients received peginterferon alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg once weekly) and ribavirin (10.6 g/kg per day) for 48 weeks (genotype 1) or 24 weeks (genotype 3). Twenty-one months after beginning therapy all the patients remained alive; three have undergone liver transplantation. In one patient treatment was discontinued after 2 months due to cachexia. End-of-treatment virologic response was achieved in five patients (41.7%) and sustained virologic response in three patients (25%). Patients who cleared the virus had negative PCR 4 weeks after beginning therapy. All patients had adverse events. The most common clinical events were asthenia, weight loss, fever, and anorexia. Infectious complications resolved in three patients (25%). Hematologic events were common. Seven of 11 patients (63.6%) who completed therapy required dose reduction. We conclude that therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with HCV cirrhosis has a similar effectiveness to previous treatments. A virologic response 1 month after the beginning of therapy could be a main predictor of a sustained response.

Efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional therapies on patients waiting for liver transplantation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different locoregional therapies in patients with HCC on the waiting list for liver transplantation. From October 2001 to July 2003, 13 patients, all men, with HCC diagnosed by cytology, were transplanted at our center. Locoregional therapies were percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiofrequency microwave ablation (RFA). PEI was employed in seven patients, TACE in five (one of them associated with PEI) and RFA in one. Efficacy was evaluated by determining the percentage of tumoral necrosis in the liver explant. Five tumors were T4, four T3, three T2, and one T1. Ten were well differentiated, two moderately differentiated, and one undifferentiated. One patient died due to primary graft malfunction. After a median posttransplant follow-up of 15 months, 12 patients are alive with no sign of tumor recurrence. Most patients with solitary nodules <4 cm who received PEI had 90% to 100% tumor necrosis. Larger tumors had 25% to 30% necrosis. TACE was employed in six patients with large and/or multiple tumors, obtaining 20% to 50% tumor necrosis. RFA was employed in one case obtaining 85% necrosis (tumor of 4 cm). No serious complications occurred with any technique. According to our experience, PEI and RFA are effective locoregional therapies to treat hepatocellular carcinomas of <4 cm in patients on the waiting list. For larger tumors, their association with other techniques, such as TACE, seems adequate.

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes in a Spanish liver transplant unit.

INTRODUCTION: Among the at least six major identified genotypes of HCV, genotype 1b, the one associated with a poorer prognosis, is the most prevalent in Spain. We aimed to compare the distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in our liver transplant unit with that of the other HCV patients at our institution (n = 413) in order to assess whether genotype 1b is more prevalent among patients with more severe liver disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients of mean age 56 years included 81 (75%) OLT recipients and 27 (25%) with HCV cirrhosis. Determination of HCV genotypes was made with the Inno-LiPA HCV III. RESULTS: The overall distribution of genotypes was: 1b, 93 patients (86.1%); 1a; eight patients (7.4%); 3, four patients (3.7%); 4; two patients (1.9%), and 2; one patient (0.9%). The distribution was similar among patients with cirrhosis and OLT. Genotype 1b patients were older. Eleven (78.6%) of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma had genotype 1b. In the control group the distribution was: 1b, 287 patients (69.5%); 1a, 54 patients (12.1%); 3, 41 patients (9.9%); 4, 20 patients (4.8%), and genotype 2, 11 patients (2.7%). This differences in the distribution of genotypes between our population and the control group was statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Genotype 1b, the most prevalent genotype in our liver transplant unit, included older patients in whom hepatocellular carcinoma was common, perhaps due to their higher prevalence of cirrhosis.

Adefovir dipivoxil therapy in liver transplant recipients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of cirrhosis worldwide. One effective strategy to prevent recurrence or transmission of HBV infection after liver transplantation exists is prescription of Lamivudine, although it is associated with high resistance rates. Adefovir dipivoxil (AD) is a nucleotide analogue of adenosine that has achieved significant results in virologic, biochemical, and clinical parameters in lamivudine-resistant HBV-infected patients. Between 1990 and 2003 7 adult recipients of orthotopic liver transplants who experienced lamivudine-resistant HBV infection (pretransplantation or posttransplantation) were enrolled in a prospective study to administer AD for 48 weeks. At baseline they showed serum HBV DNA between 2.2 x 10(6) and 1.1 x 10(8) copies/mL. After 48 weeks of AD treatment, the median time-weighted average change in serum HBV DNA (log 10 copies/mL) was -3.19 (SD, 1.65). In 3 patients with HBV, DNA was undetectable (<400 copies/mL) at the end of the follow-up. HBe antigen seroconversion was observed in 1 patient. No significant adverse effects were recorded, except for renal functional impairment in 1 patient who had previous renal insufficiency. In our study, adefovir was an effective drug to suppression HBV replication in liver transplant recipients with lamivudine-resistant HBV. Excluding renal function abnormalities, tolerance of the drug was excellent. None of the patients developed resistance to adefovir. Therapy with AD in liver transplant recipients is effective and safe, although renal function should be monitored closely.

Liver recipients undergoing hepatic transplantation and subsequent retransplantation: a comparison between clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In order to establish a rational strategy for organ distribution and optimal patient management, we postulate it is mandatory not only to understand the pathophysiology of failing grafts but also to better recognize the baseline clinical characteristics of the recipients shortly before receiving a second liver allograft. METHODOLOGY: Between March 1986 and December 1997, 1061 patients underwent 1087 orthotopic liver transplantation at three Hospitals in Madrid (122 retransplants). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-90), 40.6% of the recipients were alive and survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 62%, 53%, and 46%. Almost 50% of the recipients were UNOS 1 before retransplantation. In comparison to p-OLT (15% UNOS 1), it is clearly shown that the retransplants have been performed in the sickest patients with more adverse prognostic indicators (higher AST, bilirubin, creatinine serum levels, higher Child-Pugh score, higher rate of ascites and lower serum levels of albumin and prothrombin activity). CONCLUSIONS: Liver retransplantation is acceptable and significant differences in recipients' baseline characteristics suggest an impact on lower survival.

Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Spanish experience.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative treatment for nondisseminated irresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC) carries a 0% 5-year survival rate. The role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in these patients is controversial because the survival rate is lower than that for other indications for transplantation and the lack of available donor organs. The aim of this paper was to review the Spanish experience in OLT for HCC and identify prognostic factors for survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients undergoing OLT for HCC over 13 years. RESULTS: The actuarial survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82%, 53%, and 30%, respectively. The main cause of death was tumor recurrence (53%). In the univariate analysis, the factors for a poor prognosis were vascular invasion (P<.001) namely 0% survival at 3 years when present versus 63% and 35% at 3 and 5 years, respectively, when it was not; and stages III to IVA (P<.05), namely 15% survival at 5 years versus 47% for stages I to II. Lymph node and perineural invasion also reduce survival. In the multivariate analysis, the factors for poor prognosis included vascular invasion (P<.01) and stages III to IVA (P<.01). CONCLUSION: OLT for nondisseminated irresectable HCC has higher survival rates at 3 and 5 years than palliative treatments, especially with initial stage tumors, which means that more information is needed to better select cholangiocarcinoma patients for transplantation.

Liver transplantation for peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: Spanish experience.

INTRODUCTION: Palliative treatment for nondisseminated unresectable peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) carries a 0% 5-year survival rate. The role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in these patients is controversial because the survival rate is lower than with other indications for transplantation and the lack of available donor organs. The aim of this paper was to review the Spanish experience in OLT for PCC to identify prognostic factors for survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients undergoing OLT in Spain for PCC over a period of 13 years. RESULTS: The actuarial survival rates were 77%, 65%, and 42% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The main cause of death was tumor recurrence (35%). Prognotic factors for an adverse outcome were pTNM classification (P<.05) in the univariate analysis and perineural invasion (P<.05) and stages III or IVA (P<.05) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: OLT for nondisseminated irresectable PCC displays higher survival rates at 3 and 5 years than palliative treatments, especially for tumors in the initial stages, which means that more information is needed to help better select PCC patients for transplantation.

Usefulness of chemotherapy as prophylaxis of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in advanced hepatocellular carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of chemotherapy as prophylaxis of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is controversial. AIM: Our goal was to assess the outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemotherapy after liver transplant. METHODS: Ten patients with liver transplants performed between 1993-2002 were men of mean age 55 years. The etiology of cirrhosis was hepatitis C in four patients, alcoholic cirrhosis in four, and cryptogenic cirrhosis in two. Immunosuppressive therapy was cyclosporine in five patients and tacrolimus in five. The chemotherapy regimen used adriamycin (20 mg/m2 weekly for 20 weeks). Six patients were stage IVA and four stage III. Hepatocellular carcinoma was known in five patients and incidental in the other five. Pathology revealed well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in six patients and moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in four. Five patients had vascular invasion. RESULTS: After a mean posttransplant follow-up of 28 months, six patients (60%) were alive without tumor recurrence, three (30%) had died from tumor recurrence and one due to P. carinii pneumonia. Disease-free survival among patients with stage III was 50% and 80% for stage IVA. Three patients with vascular invasion died of tumor recurrence, and the other two are alive and free of disease. Disease-free survival rates were 83% in patients with well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and 25% in those with moderately differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Tolerance of chemotherapy was good with two withdrawals due to nephrotoxicity and myelotoxicity and one death from pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The use of adriamycin in patients undergoing liver transplant due to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma may be useful to prevent tumor recurrence; it is well tolerated. The presence of vascular tumor invasion and a lower grade of histologic differentiation were associated with a poor prognosis.

De novo malignancies and liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: De novo tumors (DNTs) are the leading cause of late death among liver transplant recipients with an incidence of 5% to 15%, which is significantly greater than the general population. In this retrospective study, we compared this complication in liver transplant recipients to sex- and age-matched controls. PATIENTS: Among 410 patients who received liver allografts between March 1986 and December 2000, 32 (7.8%) developed a DNT. Epidermoid tumors were the most frequent histologic lineage. A complete response was observed in 19 patients (59.4%), a partial response in eight (25%), and no response in five (15%). Survival was lower among liver transplant recipients than controls, a difference that was statistically significant. Treatment consisted of surgery in 76.7%, radiotherapy in 16.7%, chemotherapy in 13.3%, and reduction of immunosuppression in 10%. RESULTS: The mean survival time in transplant patients of 122.97 months (95% CI; range 98-147 months) was significantly shorter than controls, 156.5 months (95% CI; range 141-171 months). About 50% of patients were smokers (active or ex-smokers), compared to 20.7% of controls (P=.049). Significant differences were also found when the three subgroups (smokers, previous smokers, and nonsmokers) were analyzed separately (P=.013). Patients were smokers (active or nonactive) among 45% of cases of skin tumors; 60% of hematological tumors; 71.4% of epidermoids; and 33% of sarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: DNTs, a complication of long-term immunosuppression in patients after liver transplantation, most frequently presented as skin tumors and PTLD. Occurrence of a DNT was an adverse prognostic factor for survival. Smoking represents an independent risk factor for these tumors.

Cardiovascular morbidity and obesity in adult liver transplant recipients.

There is a direct relationship between the grade of obesity and mortality based on the increased cardiovascular diseases, cancer, etc. However, the results of studies in renal and liver allograft recipients relating obesity to morbidity and mortality are contradictory. A retrospective cohort study of 170 patients transplanted between March 1987 and July 1997 showed obesity to be identified in 77 (45.3%) patients. During the mean follow-up of 5 years posttransplantation, 16 (9.4%) patients experienced cardiovascular complications, including 10 patients with ischemic cardiac syndromes (five acute infarctions and five angina), five patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents, and one patient with intermittent lower limbs claudication. The prevalence of obesity at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years after transplantation was 58.2%, 56.9%, 60.3%, 59.5%, and 66.4%, respectively. Compared with the baseline value, the BMI was increased at 1 year posttransplantation (25.78), a significant difference. No significant differences were found between the mean BMI values of patients with and without cardiovascular diseases, or overweight and morbidly obese patients compared to the normal weight population. Among liver transplant recipients, obesity was a frequent complication after transplantation, but it was not clearly associated with increased morbidity and mortality secondary to cardiovascular disease.