Examining the impact of multilevel upper airway surgery on the obstructive sleep apnoea endotypes and their utility in predicting surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is an alternative treatment for patients who are intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, upper airway surgery has variable treatment efficacy with no reliable predictors of response. While we now know that there are several endotypes contributing to OSA (i.e., upper airway collapsibility, airway muscle response/compensation, respiratory arousal threshold and loop gain), no study to date has examined: (i) how upper airway surgery affects all four OSA endotypes, (ii) whether knowledge of baseline OSA endotypes predicts response to surgery and (iii) whether there are any differences when OSA endotypes are measured using the CPAP dial-down or clinical polysomnographic (PSG) methods. METHODS: We prospectively studied 23 OSA patients before and ≥3 months after multilevel upper airway surgery. Participants underwent clinical and research PSG to measure OSA severity (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]) and endotypes (measured in supine non-rapid eye movement [NREM]). Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Surgery reduced the AHITotal (38.7 [23.4 to 79.2] vs. 22.0 [13.3 to 53.5] events/h; p = 0.009). There were no significant changes in OSA endotypes, however, large but variable improvements in collapsibility were observed (CPAP dial-down method: ∆1.9 ± 4.9 L/min, p = 0.09, n = 21; PSG method: ∆3.4 [-2.8 to 49.0]%Veupnoea , p = 0.06, n = 20). Improvement in collapsibility strongly correlated with improvement in AHI (%∆AHISupineNREM vs. ∆collapsibility: p < 0.005; R2  = 0.46-0.48). None of the baseline OSA endotypes predicted response to surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgery unpredictably alters upper airway collapsibility but does not alter the non-anatomical endotypes. There are no baseline predictors of response to surgery.

A randomized controlled trial of oxygen therapy for patients who do not respond to upper airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who fail to respond to upper airway surgery may be successfully treated with supplemental oxygen and whether we could identify baseline physiologic endotypes (ie, collapsibility, loop gain, arousal threshold, and muscle compensation) that predict response to oxygen therapy. METHODS: We conducted a single night, randomized double-blinded cross over trial in which patients with OSA who failed to respond to upper airway surgery were treated on separate nights with oxygen therapy (4 L/min) or placebo (medical air). Effect of oxygen/air on OSA on key polysomnography outcomes were assessed: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), AHI without desaturation (ie, flow-based AHI), arousal index, and morning blood pressure. OSA endotypes were estimated from the polysomnography signals to determine whether baseline OSA physiology could be used to predict response to oxygen therapy. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in AHI and flow-based AHI on oxygen vs placebo (flow-based AHI: 42.4 ± 21.5 vs 30.5 ± 17.1 events/h, P = .008). Arousal index was also reduced on oxygen vs placebo (41.1 ± 19.5 vs 33.0 ± 15.3 events/h, P = .006). There was no significant difference in morning blood pressure between oxygen and placebo. Although 7 of 20 individuals experienced a 50% reduction or greater in flow-based AHI on oxygen (responders), there was no difference in the baseline OSA endotypes (or clinical characteristics) between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that a proportion of patients who fail to respond to upper airway surgery for OSA respond acutely to treatment with supplemental oxygen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Oxygen therapy for treating patients with residual obstructive sleep apnea following upper airway surgery; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373566; Identifier: ACTRN12617001361392.

Effect of Hypopnea Scoring Criteria on Noninvasive Assessment of Loop Gain and Surgical Outcome Prediction.

Rationale: Unstable ventilatory control (high loop gain) is a causal factor in the development of obstructive sleep apnea. Methods for quantifying loop gain using polysomnography have been developed that predict favorable responses to upper airway surgery. However, this method is reliant on respiratory event scoring and hence may be affected by hypopnea scoring criteria.Objectives: To determine to what extent differences in hypopnea scoring influence loop gain measurement.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 46 polysomnograms before and after upper airway surgery. Polysomnograms were rescored according to three different American Academy of Sleep Medicine hypopnea definitions (2007Alternative, 2012Recommended, and 2012Acceptable criteria). Loop gain and apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHIs) were compared between criteria using linear regression and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA). Responders to surgery were classified by a 50% or greater reduction in AHI and AHIpostsurgery less than 10 events per hour. Responders were determined separately for each American Academy of Sleep Medicine criterion. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis predicting surgical outcome was performed for each loop gain measurement derived from each criterion.Results: A near-perfect agreement was found between loop gains derived using the 2007Alternative and 2012Recommended criteria (r2 = 0.99; bias = -0.003; LOA, -0.016 to 0.010). Greater variability was found for 2012Acceptable compared to the 2007Alternative (r2 = 0.70; bias = -0.015; LOA, -0.099 to 0.070) and 2012Recommended (r2 = 0.69; bias = +0.018; LOA, -0.068 to 0.104) criteria. Both 2007Alternative and 2012Recommended loop gains significantly predicted surgical response with similar areas under the curve (AUCs; 2007Alternative AUC = 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.97]; 2012Recommended AUC = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71-0.97]). 2012Acceptable loop gains were a poor predictor of surgical response (AUC = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43-0.80]).Conclusions: Loop gain measured noninvasively by polysomnography can be influenced by respiratory event scoring. We recommend caution when using the 2012Acceptable criteria with this method, because such findings may not be directly generalizable to other loop gain values derived from other scoring criteria.

Loop Gain Predicts the Response to Upper Airway Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Study Objectives: Upper airway surgery is often recommended to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who cannot tolerate continuous positive airways pressure. However, the response to surgery is variable, potentially because it does not improve the nonanatomical factors (ie, loop gain [LG] and arousal threshold) causing OSA. Measuring these traits clinically might predict responses to surgery. Our primary objective was to test the value of LG and arousal threshold to predict surgical success defined as 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and AHI <10 events/hour post surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent upper airway surgery for OSA (n = 46). Clinical estimates of LG and arousal threshold were calculated from routine polysomnographic recordings presurgery and postsurgery (median of 124 [91-170] days follow-up). Results: Surgery reduced both the AHI (39.1 ± 4.2 vs. 26.5 ± 3.6 events/hour; p < .005) and estimated arousal threshold (-14.8 [-22.9 to -10.2] vs. -9.4 [-14.5 to -6.0] cmH2O) but did not alter LG (0.45 ± 0.08 vs. 0.45 ± 0.12; p = .278). Responders to surgery had a lower baseline LG (0.38 ± 0.02 vs. 0.48 ± 0.01, p < .05) and were younger (31.0 [27.3-42.5] vs. 43.0 [33.0-55.3] years, p < .05) than nonresponders. Lower LG remained a significant predictor of surgical success after controlling for covariates (logistic regression p = .018; receiver operating characteristic area under curve = 0.80). Conclusions: Our study provides proof-of-principle that upper airway surgery most effectively resolves OSA in patients with lower LG. Predicting the failure of surgical treatment, consequent to less stable ventilatory control (elevated LG), can be achieved in the clinic and may facilitate avoidance of surgical failures.

Laryngeal penetration and aspiration in individuals with stable COPD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Swallowing is closely coordinated with breathing but in COPD altered synchronization may predispose patients to a breach of the upper airway protective mechanisms. However, aspiration during swallow has never been shown in COPD. We examined penetration of liquid material into the airway of patients with COPD and correlated it with breathing-swallow patterns. METHODS: A case-control study was performed. Patients with COPD (n = 16) were matched with normal control subjects (n = 15). Sub-mandibular videofluoroscopy was carried out during swallow of graduated volumes of barium to detect penetration (contrast enters the airway and may contact vocal folds) and aspiration (contrast passes glottis). Respiration was monitored simultaneously to gauge synchronization. Hospitalization and mortality were assessed after 36 months. RESULTS: Penetration/aspiration scores were higher in patients with COPD (3.3 ± 0.7 vs 1.6 ± 0.4 in healthy controls, P = 0.03; mean ± SE). Penetration with aspiration was observed in 4/16 patients with COPD versus 1/15 controls (P = 0.07). Penetration with or without aspiration was found in 6/16 patients (P = 0.04). Inspiration-swallow-expiration patterns were favoured in individuals with COPD (P = 0.02). Penetration/aspiration was associated with higher respiratory rates (P = 0.01), reduced hyoid elevation (P = 0.04), post-swallow larynx penetration (P = 0.05) and oxygen desaturation (P = 0.01). There was a trend for the penetration/aspiration group to have an adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Upper airway protective mechanisms may be flawed in COPD, possibly through reduced coordination of breathing with swallowing. This abnormality may contribute to COPD morbidity in a subgroup of patients.