Incidence of Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression With 2 Different Corticosteroid Minimization Strategies: ADVANCE, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: ADVANCE (NCT01304836) was a phase 4, multicenter, prospectively randomized, open-label, 24-week study comparing the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) with 2 prolonged-release tacrolimus corticosteroid minimization regimens. METHODS: All patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil and 1 bolus of intraoperative corticosteroids (0-1000 mg) as per center policy. Patients in arm 1 received tapered corticosteroids, stopped after day 10, whereas patients in arm 2 received no steroids after the intraoperative bolus. The primary efficacy variable was the diagnosis of PTDM as per American Diabetes Association criteria (2010) at any point up to 24 weeks postkidney transplantation. Secondary efficacy variables included incidence of composite efficacy failure (graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection or severe graft dysfunction: estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4) <30 mL/min per 1.73 m), acute rejection and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The full-analysis set included 1081 patients (arm 1: n = 528, arm 2: n = 553). Baseline characteristics and mean tacrolimus trough levels were comparable between arms. Week 24 Kaplan-Meier estimates of PTDM were similar for arm 1 versus arm 2 (17.4% vs 16.6%; P = 0.579). Incidence of composite efficacy failure, graft and patient survival, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate were also comparable between arms. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and acute rejection were significantly higher in arm 2 versus arm 1 (13.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.006 and 25.9% vs 18.2%, P = 0.001, respectively). Tolerability profiles were comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged-release tacrolimus, basiliximab, and mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppressive regimen is efficacious, with a low incidence of PTDM and a manageable tolerability profile over 24 weeks of treatment. A lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was seen in patients receiving corticosteroids tapered over 10 days plus an intraoperative corticosteroid bolus versus those receiving an intraoperative bolus only.

A Prospective Randomized Trial on the Effect of Using an Electronic Monitoring Drug Dispensing Device to Improve Adherence and Compliance.

BACKGROUND: Outcome after renal transplantation depends on patient compliance and adherence for early detection of complications and identification of intervention opportunities. Compliance describes the degree to which patients follow medical advice and take their medications. Adherence has been defined as the extent to which a patients' behavior coincides with clinical prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 7 to 14 days after transplantation into groups with (n = 40) and without (n = 40) an electronic medication dispenser (EMD). The EMD, which was used for the 1-year study period, recorded the date and time the patient took their medications and was monitored via a web-based application. Patients were monitored for 1 year regarding outpatient follow-up visits, emergency hospitalizations, renal biopsies, rejection episodes, renal function, and blood concentration of medications. RESULTS: Compliance in the intervention group was 97.8% (the control group was not assessed). Number of missed doses varied significantly by weekday (P = 0.033); patients were most likely to miss doses on Saturdays and Thursdays. Patients missed a total of 11 follow-up visits. During the study, 92 biopsies were performed on 55 patients (intervention group: 32 [17]; control group, 60 [38]). Biopsy-verified rejection was three times more common among controls (13 patients vs. 4; P = 0.054, not significant). Average P-creatinine level was slightly lower in the intervention group than the control group (131 vs. 150 µmol/L, not significant), whereas mean tacrolimus was similar (7.32 vs. 7.22 ng/mL, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The EMD is associated with high compliance, and there are also indications of a lower rejection rate.

The outcome of the endothelial precursor cell crossmatch test in lymphocyte crossmatch positive and negative patients evaluated for living donor kidney transplantation.

The presence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies (Abs) in kidney transplant recipients is associated with graft rejections. This study reports the results of an endothelial precursor cell crossmatch (EPCXM) test for detection of non-HLA Abs and its correlation to lymphocyte crossmatch (LXM) test results, the degree and type of sensitization, and transplantation (Tx) outcome in patients evaluated for living donor (LD) kidney transplantation (KTx). Patients were tested before any pre-transplantation (pre-Tx) treatment and at Tx. Pre-Tx treatments included B cell depletion and Ab removal. Patient records were reviewed for assessment of renal graft function, results of biopsies, and identification of complications affecting the graft. Pre-Tx sera from 32% of the LD patients had IgG and/or IgM-binding donor EPCs. Twenty-five percent of the patients were EPCXM IgM+. Of the patients with negative LXM tests, 25% had EPC Abs mainly of IgM class not reactive with HLA. There was no difference in rejection frequency or serum creatinine levels between the EPCXM+ and EPCXM- groups. The pre-Tx EPCXM+ group had significantly more patients with delayed graft function. Prospective studies with appropriate control groups are needed to establish whether pre-treatments aiming at removing anti-endothelial cell antibodies, as detected by the EPCXM pre-Tx, have a beneficial effect on short-term and long-term graft survival.

A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, study of single-dose rituximab as induction in renal transplantation.

UNLABELLED: We performed a prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of rituximab as induction therapy, together with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The primary endpoint was defined as acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 6 months. Secondary endpoints were creatinine clearance, incidence of infections, and incidence of rituximab-related adverse event. RESULTS: We enrolled 140 patients (44 living donor and 96 deceased donor), and of those, 68 rituximab and 68 placebo patients fulfilled the study. In all the patients receiving rituximab, there was a complete depletion of CD19/CD20 cells, whereas there was no change in the number of CD19/CD20 cells in the placebo group. There were 10 treatment failures in the rituximab group versus 14 in the placebo group (P=0.348). There were eight rejection episodes in the rituximab group versus 12 in the placebo group (P=0.317) Creatinine clearance was 66+/-22 mL/min in the study group and 67+/-23 mL/min in the placebo group. There was no difference in the number of bacterial infections, cytomegalovirus infections, and BK virus infections or fungal infections. CONCLUSION: We performed a placebo-controlled study of rituximab induction in renal transplantation. There was a tendency toward fewer and milder rejections during the first 6 months in the rituximab group. Although induction with one dose of rituximab induced a complete depletion B cells, there was no increase in the incidence of infectious complications or leukopenia and it seems safe, therefore, to conduct further studies on the use of rituximab in transplantation.

Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces the incidence of acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. The Fixed-Dose Concentration Controlled trial assessed the feasibility and potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving MMF after de novo renal transplant. METHODS: Patients were randomized to a concentration-controlled (n=452; target exposure 45 mg hr/L) or a fixed-dose (n=449) MMF-containing regimen. The primary endpoint was treatment failure (a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, death, or MMF discontinuation) by 12 months posttransplantation. RESULTS: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposures for both groups were similar at most time points and were below 30 mg hr/L in 37.3% of patients at day 3. There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failure (25.6% vs. 25.7%, P=0.81) or BPAR (14.9% vs. 15.5%, P>0.05) between the concentration-controlled and the fixed-dose groups, respectively. We did find a significant relationship between MPA-area under the concentration-time curve on day 3 and the incidence of BPAR in the first month (P=0.009) or in the first year posttransplantation (P=0.006). For later time points (day 10, month 1) there was no significant relationship between area under the concentration-time curve and BPAR (0.2572 and 0.5588, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failure between the concentration-controlled and the fixed-dose groups. The applied protocol of MMF dose adjustments based on target MPA exposure was not successful, partly because physicians seemed reluctant to implement substantial dose changes. Current initial MMF doses underexpose more than 35% of patients early after transplantation, increasing the risk for BPAR.

Preapheresis immunosuppressive induction: necessary or harmful?

In ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, only a few studies have addressed the necessity, duration, and content of immunosuppressive induction therapy. At our center (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden), using a preconditioning regimen consisting of 13 days of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone, we have investigated both short- and long-term renal allograft function (up to 28 days and 1 year after transplantation, respectively) and correlated them to tacrolimus 12-hr trough levels. In summary, during the first 28 days after transplantation, renal allograft function in the ABO-incompatible group was impaired when compared with that observed in the ABO-compatible group. One possible explanation for this finding is the prolonged pretransplantation exposure to tacrolimus in the ABO-incompatible group, resulting in tacrolimus-associated renal toxicity, which slows the reduction in plasma creatinine. In fact, the day before, and also immediately after, the transplantation (for the first 3-4 postoperative days), the tacrolimus 12-hr trough levels in the ABO-incompatible group were greater than in the ABO-compatible group. Possibly, a shorter pretreatment period with tacrolimus or a reduced target tacrolimus trough level could eliminate this difference in postoperative renal allograft function. However, 1 year after transplantation, kidney allograft function in the two study groups was similar.

Clinical experience with a new apheresis filter that specifically depletes ABO blood group antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Although living kidney donors are increasingly being used, in most centers, 30 to 40 percent of potential donors are being turned down due to ABO mismatch. A protocol for ABO-mismatched kidney transplantation without splenectomy and with antigen-specific adsorption of ABO antibodies instead of nonspecific plasmapheresis was therefore designed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The immunosuppressive protocol used at the Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, together with relevant clinical data for 11 of the studied patients, have been described previously. The protocol called for immunoadsorption of ABO antibodies on Days -6, -5, -2, and -1 and on Days +2, +5, and +8. Patient plasma was recirculated through a new apheresis filter, the Glycosorb ABO column (Glycorex Transplantation AB), containing synthetic terminal trisaccharide A or B blood group antigen linked to a Sepharose matrix. RESULTS: Since 2001, 15 patients, including 2 infants, have been successfully transplanted with ABO-mismatched kidneys from living donors. The donor-recipient blood groups were A1-O (n = 5), A2-O (n = 2), B-O (n = 4), B-A (n = 2), and A1B-B (n = 2). ABO antibody titers at transplantation did not exceed immunoglobulin G 4 or immunoglobulin M 4 levels. No humoral rejections and no late rebound of ABO antibodies were observed. No adverse effects related to immunoadsorption treatment have been recorded. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that ABO-mismatched kidney transplantations can be successfully performed without splenectomy and that ABO antibodies can be effectively and safely depleted with the Glycosorb ABO column.

The Stockholm experience with ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have previously only been performed after several pre-operative sessions of plasmapheresis followed by splenectomy, and with the conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol being reinforced with anti-lymphocyte globulin and B-cell-specific drugs. We have designed a protocol without splenectomy, based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol. METHODS: The protocol called for a 1-month pre-transplantation conditioning period, starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pre-transplantation days -6, -5, -2 and -1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients have received transplants with this protocol. The ABO-antibodies (Abs) were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level post-transplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects, and all but one patient have normal renal transplant function. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that after one infusion each of rituximab and IVIG, and antigen-specific immunoadsorption, blood-group incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with standard immunosuppression and without splenectomy, and with excellent short- and long-term results.

A case of acute vascular rejection caused by endothelial-reactive non-HLA antibodies.

We describe a female patient who, despite negative conventional cross-matches, lost her first kidney graft in an acute humoral rejection. Prior to the second, AB0-incompatible (A1B to A1) living-donor kidney transplant, the patient had negative T- and B-cell cross-matches but had a positive donor-reactive endothelial cell cross-match. Following pre-transplant protein A and GlycoSorb-ABO immunoadsorptions to remove blood group B and anti-endothelial cell antibodies, Mabthera, and IVIG administrations, she was successfully transplanted. By the second post-operative day, creatinine levels were down to 96 micromol/L from 611 micromol/L pre-operatively. On day 9 creatinine rose again, and on the same day the endothelial cell crossmatch became positive for IgG, whereas the T-cell cross-match remained negative and the anti-A1B titers remained low. A kidney biopsy taken on day 10 post-transplant showed a picture of an acute vascular, antibody-mediated rejection. Following rejection treatment and repeated protein A and Glyco-Sorb-ABO immunoadsorptions, the patient's kidney function was again normalized. The use of a recently developed kit (XM-ONE) for the detection of anti-endothelial cell antibodies allowed us to identify a patient at risk for developing acute antibody-mediated rejection as well as to monitor treatment efficacy and post-transplant complications.

Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study.

BACKGROUND: The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy. METHODS: This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147). RESULTS: The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits.

Four-year data after pediatric renal transplantation: a randomized trial of tacrolimus vs. cyclosporin microemulsion.

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) with cyclosporin microemulsion (CyA) in pediatric renal recipients. A 6-month, randomized, prospective, open, parallel group study with an open extension phase was conducted in 18 centers from nine European countries. In total, 196 pediatric patients (<18 yr) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either Tac (n = 103) or CyA (n = 93) administered concomitantly with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection (intent-to-treat). Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Excluding deceased patients (n = 9) and patients lost to follow-up (n = 31, mostly transferred to adult care), 95% of 2-yr data (159 of 167 possible patients), 87% of 3-yr data (142 of 163) and 73% of 4-yr data (114 of 156) were retrieved. At 1 yr Tac therapy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection (36.9%) compared with CyA (59.1%, p = 0.003). The incidence of corticosteroid-resistant rejection was also significantly lower with Tac (7.8% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001). At 4 yr, patient survival was similar (94% vs. 92%, p = 0.86) but graft survival significantly favored Tac (86% vs. 69%; p = 0.025, log-rank test), respectively. At 1 yr, the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Schwartz formula, ml/min/1.73 m(2)) was 64.9 +/- 20.7 (n = 84) vs. 57.8 +/- 21.9 (n = 77, p = 0.0355), at 2 yr 64.9 +/- 19.8 (n = 71) vs. 51.7 +/- 20.3 (n = 66, p = 0.0002), at 3 yr 66.7 +/- 26.4 (n = 81) vs. 53.0 +/- 23.3 (n = 55, p = 0.0022), and at 4 yr 71.5 +/- 22.9 (n = 51) vs. 53.0 +/- 21.6 (n = 44, p = 0.0001) for Tac vs. CyA, respectively. Cholesterol remained significantly higher with CyA throughout follow-up. Three patients in each arm developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was not different. Tac was significantly more effective than CyA in preventing acute rejection in pediatric renal recipients. Renal function and graft survival were also superior with Tac. Glomerular filtration rate appears to be an useful surrogate marker for long-term outcome.

Photopheresis for the treatment of refractory renal graft rejection.

Acute rejection episodes still occur after kidney transplantation in spite of modern immunosuppressive protocols including combined tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The authors present seven cases of biopsy-proven acute rejection after kidney transplantation refractory to conventional rejection therapy with repeated pulses of high-dose steroids followed by polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies that responded well to photopheresis treatment. Photopheresis is an atoxic immunomodulatory apheresis-based treatment with no generalized immunosuppressive action; rather, it is directed at suppressing donor-specific T-cell clones. At the last follow-up, 9 to 43 months after transplantation, all patients had functioning grafts, with serum creatinine levels ranging from 105 to 312 microM. The authors conclude that photopheresis treatment contributed to the favorable outcome. Therefore, the authors are presently designing a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of photopheresis as an adjuvant prophylactic treatment after renal transplantation.

ABO incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy, using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab.

ABO incompatible kidney transplantations have previously only been performed after several preoperative sessions of plasmapheresis and splenectomy, with the conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol being reinforced with antilymphocyte globulin and B-cell-specific drugs, such as cyclophosphamide or deoxyspergualine. We have designed a protocol without splenectomy, based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol. The protocol calls for a 10-day pretransplantation conditioning period, starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplantation days -6, -5, -2 and -1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. Eleven patients have received transplants with this protocol. The ABO antibodies were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level post-transplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects and all patients have normal renal transplant function. We conclude that after an infusion each of rituximab and IVIG, and antigen-specific immunoadsorption; blood group-incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with excellent results using standard immunosuppression and no splenectomy.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: 1-year results of a large multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) transplantation has become an accepted therapy for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. This open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with the microemulsion (ME) formulation of cyclosporine in a clinical setting. The 1-year results are reported here. METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 European centers and one center in Israel. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus and 102 to cyclosporine-ME. All patients received concomitant rabbit anti-T-cell globulin induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term cortico-steroids. The initial daily oral doses were 0.2 mg/kg for tacrolimus, 7 mg/kg for cyclosporine-ME, and 2 to 3 g for MMF. RESULTS: The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas acute rejection was lower with tacrolimus (27.2%) than with cyclosporine-ME (38.2%; P = 0.09). Pancreas graft survival at 1 year was 91.3% with tacrolimus and 74.5% with cyclosporine-ME (P <0.0005). Renal graft survival was similar in the two study groups. There were no significant treatment-related differences in pancreatic or renal graft function. In total, 34 patients switched treatment from cyclosporine-ME to tacrolimus, but only 6 patients receiving tacrolimus required alternative therapy. Mean doses of MMF at 1 year were also lower in the tacrolimus group (1.36 vs. 1.67 g/day; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of tacrolimus therapy for uremic patients with type 1 diabetes who are undergoing SPK transplantation.

Successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Historically, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have only been undertaken after splenectomy and unspecific plasmapheresis and with quadruple drug immunosuppression plus B-cell specific drugs. We have evaluated a protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab, and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The protocol called for a 10-day pretransplant conditioning period starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplant days -6, -5, -4, and -1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. RESULTS: Four patients have received transplants with this protocol. The donor-recipient blood groups were A2/O, B/O, B/A, and A1/O. The ABO-antibodies were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level posttransplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects, and all patients have normal renal-transplant function. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that after one infusion each of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin and antigen-specific immunoadsorption, blood-group-incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with standard immunosuppression and without splenectomy.

A longitudinal study of children who received renal transplants 10-20 years ago.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported on our 10-year experience of renal transplantation in children in the cyclosporine era, that is, from December 1981 until December 1991. In this paper, we report on the same children observed for another 10 years. METHODS: Of 53 children who received a renal transplant between 1981 and 1991, 47 survived and were observed for 10 to 20 years. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, prednisolone, and azathioprine. Yearly clinical examinations were performed. RESULTS: Overall, actual patient survival is 91%, 89%, and 89%, and actual graft survival 85%, 77%, and 66% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. No patients have died during the last 10 years. Twenty-six grafts were lost over 20 years. Thirteen of those were lost during the present follow-up (10-20 years): 11 in chronic rejection and 2 because of development of renal cell carcinoma. No other malignancies were noted. Mean glomerular filtration rate decreased from 58+/-19 at 1 year (n=42) to 44+/-16 mL/min/1.73 m2 body surface area at 10 (n=33) years. Hypertension was treated in 46%, 40%, and 66% of the children at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively; two of them showed left ventricular hypertrophy 10 years after transplant. Minor cataracts without visual disturbance were found in 45% of patients. All children except three with mental retardation are, or have been, attending normal day care or normal school. CONCLUSION: Social integration is good, and severe complications are scarce, even when renal transplantation occurred at a very young age.

Effects of immediate switch from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus at first acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: A number of institutions have reported favorable results in renal transplant patients after conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to tacrolimus at the time of acute rejection, but no prospective, controlled study has been performed to date. Here, we report the first randomized study comparing patients whose therapy was changed at a first episode of acute rejection to tacrolimus with those who were maintained on CsA microemulsion (ME). METHODS: This 3-month, prospective, open, multicenter, parallel-group study was conducted at 15 centers in seven European countries. In total, 119 renal graft recipients experiencing a first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode while receiving CsA-ME were randomized (1:1) to start tacrolimus-based therapy (n=61) or to continue CsA-ME-based therapy (n=58). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable for both groups. The initial rejection episode responded to steroid treatment in 93.4% (tacrolimus) and 63.8% (CsA-ME) (P=0.001), respectively. In patients at risk, the incidence of recurrent rejection events within 3 months was significantly lower with tacrolimus therapy (5/57, 8.8%) compared with CsA-ME therapy (15/44, 34.1%) (P=0.002). Patient and graft survival were similar in both study groups 3 months after randomization. The most frequently reported adverse events were increased serum creatinine (29.5% vs. 22.4%), hypertension (24.6% vs. 22.4%), and urinary tract infection (18.0% vs. 20.7%) for tacrolimus versus CsA-ME. Tremor was more common in tacrolimus treated-patients (17.4% vs. 2.1%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion to tacrolimus therapy benefited the resolution of acute rejection episodes and significantly reduced the risk of recurrent rejection compared with continuation of CsA-ME.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation.

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) with the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (CyA) in children undergoing renal transplantation. A 6-month, randomized, prospective, open, parallel group study with an open extension phase was conducted in 18 centers from nine European countries. In total, 196 pediatric patients (<18 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either Tac ( n=103) or CyA microemulsion ( n=93) administered concomitantly with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection. Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Tac therapy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection (36.9%) compared with CyA therapy (59.1%) ( P=0.003). The incidence of corticosteroid-resistant rejection was also significantly lower in the Tac group compared with the CyA group (7.8% vs. 25.8%, P=0.001). The differences were also significant for biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (16.5% vs. 39.8%, P<0.001). At 1 year, patient survival was similar (96.1% vs. 96.6%), while 10 grafts were lost in the Tac group compared with 17 graft losses in the CyA group ( P=0.06). At 1 year, mean glomerular filtration rate (Schwartz estimate) was significantly higher in the Tac group (62+/-20 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), n=84) than in the CyA group (56+/-21 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), n=74, P=0.03). The most frequent adverse events during the first 6 months were hypertension (68.9% vs. 61.3%), hypomagnesemia (34.0% vs. 12.9%, P=0.001), and urinary tract infection (29.1% vs. 33.3%). Statistically significant differences ( P<0.05) were observed for diarrhea (13.6% vs. 3.2%), hypertrichosis (0.0% vs. 7.5%), flu syndrome (0.0% vs. 5.4%), and gum hyperplasia (0.0% vs. 5.4%). In previously non-diabetic children, the incidence of long-term (>30 days) insulin use was 3.0% (Tac) and 2.2% (CyA). Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was observed in 1 patient in the Tac group and 2 patients in the CyA group. In conclusion, Tac was significantly more effective than CyA microemulsion in preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation in a pediatric population. The overall safety profiles of the two regimens were comparable.