RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a known risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population. However, its significance in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a condition that also elevates the risk of SCD, is disputable. METHODS: A total of 9704 consecutive ACS patients with available smoking data were included in the analysis. Comprehensive patient data were obtained from the Mass Data in Detection and Prevention of Serious Adverse Events in Cardiovascular Disease research database. A composite endpoint of SCD, SCD aborted by successful resuscitation and accurate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy to otherwise potentially fatal ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia was used. Univariate, age- and sex-adjusted, and a multivariate fine-gray competing risk regression with adjustment to traditional risk factors was conducted. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 6.8 years (IQR, 4.1-10.2), and 454 (4.7%) SCD cases were identified. At the baseline, 23.7% (N = 2444) were active smokers, and 20.8% (N = 2146) were ex-smokers. In the multivariate model, active smokers had an elevated risk of 1.79 (95% CI, 1.41-2.27; P < 0.001) for future SCD. Ex-smokers had no elevated risk for SCD in fine-gray subdistribution hazard. Also, active smokers were notably younger (mean age 58.7 years) than non- or ex-smokers (71.1 years and 68.9 years, respectively, P < 0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: Active smokers had a 79% higher risk of SCD when compared with nonsmokers. Smoking cessation should be heavily encouraged after ACS. Also, a person's smoking status should be considered in further studies developing SCD and implantable cardioverter defibrillator-benefit risk scores.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The newer adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blockers ticagrelor and prasugrel are superior to clopidogrel in the long-term management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We evaluated the acute performance (prehospital loading) of these ADP receptor blockers in a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center registry study, data on all STEMI patients admitted for their first primary PCI between January 2007 and April 2020 were analyzed (n = 3218). The three ADP receptor blockers were mainly used during consecutive periods (clopidogrel 2007-2010, prasugrel 2011-2014, and ticagrelor 2014-2020), and were compared with risk factor-adjusted multivariate logistic regression for acute 3- and 7-day mortality and culprit artery flow before and after PCI. RESULTS: Of the 3218 total patients, 47.6% (n = 1532) were treated with ticagrelor, 22.1% (n = 711) were treated with prasugrel, and 30.3% (n = 975) were treated with clopidogrel. The use of ticagrelor or prasugrel as opposed to clopidogrel was associated with better culprit artery flow before PCI (odds ratio [OR] 1.21 for moderate or good flow, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.42, p = 0.022), as well as lower acute mortality (OR 0.66 for 3-day mortality, 95% CI 0.46-0.95, p = 0.025; and OR 0.71 for 7-day mortality, 95% CI 0.52-0.98, p = 0.039). The results in regard to acute mortality were highlighted among patients with short treatment delays (disappearing with longer treatment delays; p < 0.05 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: The newer ADP receptor blockers are associated with lower mortality and better culprit artery flow at presentation when compared with clopidogrel. There are no significant differences between the two newer drugs. As the drugs were mainly used during three consecutive periods, unmeasured confounding related to the development of cardiac care and changes in the population may contribute to the results.