Updated threshold, renewed problems: should the diagnostic criteria of polycythemia vera be reconsidered? A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This aim of this study was to evaluate hemoglobin and hematocrit values of polycythemia vera and secondary polycythemia patients with updated World Health Organization thresholds. In addition, by determining our own threshold values, we aimed to demonstrate the necessity of bone marrow biopsy and genetic analysis to be used for further diagnosis in patients with high-normal hematocrit and hemoglobin values. METHODS: A cross-sectional and retrospective study was performed with the medical records of patients from Eskisehir City Hospital hematology clinics and outpatient clinics between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020. The study included patients with polycythemia, divided into two groups according to polycythemia vera and secondary polycythemia. A bone marrow biopsy was performed on patients with either Janus kinase mutation positivity and/or subnormal erythropoietin levels. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to find threshold values, and the diagnostic efficiency of these values in differentiating World Health Organization thresholds in 2008 and 2016 was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included. The median age was 43.5 years (min: 18; max: 84). The hematocrit value of 54.1 was predicted to diagnose polycythemia vera with a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 80%. Subsequent analysis revealed that an hemoglobin value of 17.7 was indicative of diagnosing polycythemia vera with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 63%. The mean follow-up length was 6.4 months (2-12). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that modified World Health Organization criteria might lead to unnecessary additional tests for polycythemia vera patients with high-normal hemoglobin and hematocrit values.

Comparing therapeutic effects of alternate day versus daily oral iron in women with iron deficiency anemia: A retrospective cohort study.

In order to replenish iron stores and bring hemoglobin (Hb) levels back to normal, oral iron is the primary treatment option for women with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). This study investigated the efficacy and side effects of daily versus alternate-day, given single doses versus double doses oral iron supplementation for treating IDA. A retrospective cohort study was performed between 2021 and 2022, including 120 patients. Study group were divided into 4 age-sex-matched groups; Group I (n = 30) and Group II (n = 30) which were received ferrous sulphate tablets daily in single or double doses, respectively, containing 60 mg of elemental iron each. Groups III (n = 30) and IV (n = 30) were received a single and double dose on alternate days, respectively. The primary outcome was the mean difference in Hb from baseline at week 4. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects were accepted as a secondary outcome. The daily single dose and alternate day double dose groups had median Hb changes of 2.3 (2.1) and 2.6 (1.8) g/dL. The differences in Hb between Groups I and II, I and III, and Groups IV and II, IV and III were significant (P < .001, P = .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). There is no significant difference between groups regarding improving iron parameters such as serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and ferritin. The incidence of GI side effects were greater in double doses than in single doses of daily or alternate-day therapies (43.3% and 30% vs 10% and 3.3%). Daily or alternate-day double dose resulted in more side effects but less therapeutic efficacy in women with IDA. To find the best supplementation method, randomized controlled trials with a larger sample of participants, longer study lengths, and various iron doses may be helpful.

Predictors of 3-month mortality with muscle ultrasound and palliative prognostic tools among patients admitted to palliative care units.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prognostic factors are an important issue in progressive and life-limiting diseases. This study evaluate 3-month mortality in patients admitted to the palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: In this study, the patient's demographics, comorbidities, nutritional status, and laboratory values were recorded. The palliative performance scale (PPS), the palliative prognostic index (PPI), and the palliative prognostic (PaP) score were calculated. The rectus femoris (RF) cross-sectional area (CSA), RF muscle thickness, gastrocnemius (GC) medialis muscle thickness, pennation angle and fascicle length of the GC were measured by ultrasound for survival prediction. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients enrolled during the study period, with a mean age of 73.6 ± 13.3 years and a 3-month mortality rate of 59.1%. The findings of a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model based on age, gender, C-reactive protein level and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 scores as covariates revealed the PPI and the PaP score to be significant predictors of 3-month mortality. In addition, in the unadjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the CSA of the RF muscle was also found to be a significant predictor of 3-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Findings revealed that the combined use of the CSA of the RF, the PPI, and the PaP score are reliable predictors of mortality in patients admitted to the PCU.