GnRH antagonist-induced down-regulation of the mRNA expression of pituitary receptors: comparisons with GnRH agonist effects.

In order to compare the mechanism for the down regulation of the mRNA expression of pituitary receptors induced by GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) to that by GnRH agonist (GnRHa), we examined the effects of GnRHant (Cetrorelix, 333 mug/kg/day), GnRHa (leuprolide depot, 333 microg/kg), and GnRHant combined with GnRHa on LH response to exogenous GnRH, pituitary LH content, LH beta subunit mRNA, and GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) mRNA levels at 2, 5, 24, 72 hours, and 7 days after the treatment in ovariectomized rats. GnRHant significantly decreased serum LH, the LH response of the pituitary to exogenous GnRH, and the pituitary LH content compared to the control treatment, though GnRHa significantly increased serum LH. GnRHant with GnRHa significantly diminished the GnRHa-induced flare-up phenomenon. GnRHant significantly decreased LH beta mRNA and GnRH-R mRNA levels, but the magnitude of the decrease in these mRNA levels by GnRHant was significantly less than those by GnRHa until 72 hours following treatment. Prolonged treatment of GnRHant caused a marked inhibition of LH beta mRNA and GnRH-R mRNA expression, similar to that caused by GnRHa. Combination treatment with GnRHa and GnRHant was demonstrated to decrease LH beta mRNA and GnRH-R mRNA levels as much as GnRHa alone and GnRHant alone over 7 days of the treatment. The present study showed differences between GnRHant and GnRHa treatment in the reduction of GnRH-R mRNA levels up to 72 hours after the treatment, and indicated that the suppression of GnRH-R mRNA by GnRHant was the maximal by GnRHa 7 days after the treatment because more profound suppression was not observed upon additional treatment with GnRHa. The findings in the present study support the hypothesis that the mechanism by which GnRHant leads to down-regulation of the mRNA expression of pituitary receptors is similar to that of GnRHa.

Role of corticotropin-releasing hormone in ovarian steroidogenesis.

The physiologic role of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) was examined in the ovary. We investigated the effects of CRH on steroidogenesis in rat and human granulosa cells in vitro as well as the direct effects of CRH on the ovary in vivo. We further examined the gene expression of CRH in human granulosa cells. CRH significantly inhibited the production of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) in rat and human granulosa cells in vitro. These inhibitory effects were completely abolished by alpha-helical CRH, a CRH receptor antagonist. Forskolin-induced increase in E2 and P4 production was attenuated by CRH. On the other hand, CRH significantly increased serum concentrations of E2 and corticosterone in vivo in hypophysectomized rats, but this increase was completely blocked by adrenalectomy. It is probable that these effects did not result from a direct action on the ovary but were an indirect effect via the adrenal gland. Finally, by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction we demonstrated that CRH mRNA was expressed in human granulosa cells. Our findings indicate that CRH exerts inhibitory effects on steroidogenesis in rat and human granulosa cells, acting through the CRH receptor. These effects are attributed to cellular events downstream of cyclic adenosine monophosphate generation. CRH seems to modulate steroidogenesis via autocrine or paracrine actions in the ovary.

A modified hMG-GnRH method for the induction of ovulation in infertile women with severe hypogonadotropic amenorrhea.

The objective of this study was to compare, in infertile women suffering from severe hypogonadotropic amenorrhea, the therapeutic utility and the incidence of complications arising from fertility treatment by the conventional human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin (hMG-hCG) method, the hMG step-down method, the sequential hMG/gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) method and a new, modified hMG-GnRH method that has been developed by us. In the step-down method, the daily dose of hMG was decreased from 150 IU to 75 IU when the follicle diameter reached 11-13 mm. In the sequential hMG-GnRH, hMG injection was switched to pulsatile GnRH administration (20 microg/120 min SC), when the follicle diameter reached 11-13 mm. In our new modified hMG-GnRH, pulsatile GnRH was injected together with hMG. Daily hMG was stopped and the GnRH dosage was changed from 10 microg to 20 microg when the follicle diameter reached 11-13 mm. Initially, the three established methods were applied randomly to treat 34 cycles in 20 women; and subsequently, five patients who failed to conceive following treatment by sequential hMG-GnRH were then treated by the modified hMG-GnRH method. More than eight growing follicles and multiple pregnancies were observed during treatment by the conventional method. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was 25.7% with the conventional method, 20.0% with the step-down method and 0% with the sequential hMG-GnRH method; however, the rate of ovulation was only 50% with the sequential hMG-GnRH method. By contrast, with the modified hMG-GnRH method, less than three growing follicles occurred in 81.8% of patients, there was a 100% rate of ovulation, and neither OHSS nor multiple pregnancies were observed. Moreover, the modified hMG-GnRH method induced pregnancy in 3 out of 5 patients. These data indicate that this new method is favorable for the treatment of severe hypogonadotropic amenorrhea.