Diagnosis of Primary Cardiac T-cell Lymphoma: Feasibility and Safety of Endomyocardial Biopsy Guided by Pre-acquired Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

BACKGROUND: Multimodality imaging of a cardiac mass lesion may raise suspicion of a primitive cardiac lymphoma (PCL). However, a definitive diagnosis requires histopathological confirmation. METHODS: This report describes the methodology we used to perform biopsy sampling of a cardiac mass lesion affecting a 45-year-old man. In order to increase endomyocardial biopsy diagnostic accuracy, we used pre-acquired cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images to guide the bioptome on a cardiac site overtly infiltrated by the suspected tumour. The right ventricular outflow tract was identified as the target site for biopsy sampling. To reduce the risk of the procedure, the biopsy was performed at a safe distance from the tip of a diagnostic quadripolar catheter positioned at the level of the pulmonary valve, previously identified by pacing manoeuvres. The reported approach demonstrated safety and diagnostic accuracy, allowing the identification of an extremely rare PCL subtype of T-cell origin. CONCLUSION: Biopsy sampling of a suspected tumour may be safely and accurately performed using pre-acquired CMR images to guide the bioptome on the target site. LEARNING POINTS: Multimodal imaging techniques capable of tissue characterization may raise suspicion of a primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL).However, the final diagnosis of PCL can be confirmed only by histological examination of a tissue sample.Biopsy sampling of the mass lesion may be accurately guided by previously acquired cardiac magnetic resonance images.

Temporal Trends in Invasive Management and In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

We analyzed data from 4 nationwide prospective registries of consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) admitted to the Italian Intensive Cardiac Care Unit network between 2005 and 2014. Out of 26 315 patients with ACS enrolled, 13 073 (49.7%) presented a diagnosis of non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS and had creatinine levels available at hospital admission: 1207 (9.2%) had severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30), 3803 (29.1%) mild to moderate CKD (eGFR 31-59), and 8063 (61.7%) no CKD (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patients with severe CKD had worse clinical characteristics compared with those with mild-moderate or no kidney dysfunction, including all the key predictors of mortality (P < .0001) which became worse over time (all P < .0001). Over the decade of observation, a significant increase in percutaneous coronary intervention rates was observed in patients without CKD (P for trend = .0001), but not in those with any level of CKD. After corrections for significant mortality predictors, severe CKD (odds ratio, OR: 5.49; 95% CI: 3.24-9.29; P < .0001) and mild-moderate CKD (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.52-3.59; P < .0001) remained strongly associated with higher in-hospital mortality. The clinical characteristics of patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD remain challenging and their mortality rate is still higher compared with patients without CKD.

Management of toxicities associated with targeted therapies for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach is the key to success.

PURPOSE: Agents targeting HR-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have improved patient outcomes compared with conventional single-agent endocrine therapy. Currently, approved targeted agents include everolimus and three CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Unlike the well-characterized and easily manageable safety profile of endocrine therapies, adverse events associated with targeted therapies are complex and potentially severe. Their prompt recognition and treatment, crucial for prolonged endocrine sensitivity and survival, may be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary effort and a good knowledge of drug interactions. METHODS: We reviewed the current evidence on the drug safety of targeted agents for metastatic breast cancer currently used in clinical practice in Italy, supported by the clinical experience of Italian oncologists with expertise in the field. RESULTS: All oncologists had used CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice and/or within a clinical trial. The clinical management of toxicities, including dose adjustments, treatment interruptions, and concerns regarding special populations is discussed, and the management of relevant adverse events, related to individual agents and class-specific, toxicities is reviewed. Hematologic toxicities have the greatest impact on clinical management of the disease and on patients. Although toxicities associated with the new treatments result in more visits to the physician and more time and attention with patients, they are manageable, with no need for the oncologist to consult with specialist physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence and current guidelines, we propose a series of practical recommendations for multidisciplinary clinical management of the various toxicities associated with the addition of targeted agents to endocrine therapy.

Cardiac valve calcification and use of anticoagulants: Preliminary observation of a potentially modifiable risk factor.

AIMS: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) has been recently introduced in the clinical practice. Rather than interfering with vitamin K-dependent posttranscriptional modification of various proteins, DOACs selectively inhibit factors involved in the coagulation cascade. In particular, in contrast with Warfarin, Rivaroxabn does not interfere with activation of matrix Gla Protein (MGP), a potent vascular calcification Inhibitor. We herein sought to investigate the impact of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin on cardiac valve calcifications in a cohort of moderate-to advanced CKD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective, longitudinal study. Consecutive CKD stage 3b - 4 (according to KDIGO guidelines) patients from 8 cardiologic outpatient clinics were enrolled between May 2015 and October 2017. All patients received anticoagulation (100 Warfarin vs 247 Rivaroxaban) as part of their non-valvular atrial fibrillation management. Cardiac valve calcification was evaluated via standard trans-thoracic echocardiogram. 347 patients (mean age: 66 years; mean eGFR: 37 ml/min/1.73 m2) were studied. Over a mean follow-up period of 16 months, Rivaroxaban compared to Warfarin reduced both mitral and aortic valve calcifications (p < 0.001) independently of the degree of calcifications at baseline and potential confounders. Notably, Rivaroxaban use was also associated with a significant reduction in C reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study generates the hypothesis that the use of Rivaroxaban associates with a reduction of cardiac valve calcification deposition and progression as compared to Warfarin, in a cohort of CKD stage 3b-4 patients. Future endeavors are needed to confirm and to establish the mechanisms responsible for these findings.

Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation access of older heart failure patients and strategies for better implementation.

In heart failure (HF), cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may reduce decompensations, hospitalization, and ultimately mortality in long term. Many studies over the past decade have demonstrated that aerobic exercise training is effective and safe in stable patients with HF. Exercise CR resulted in a clinically important improvement in the QOL. Several clinical and psychosocial factors are associated with decreased participation in CR programs of elderly HF patients, such as perception of exercise as tiring or painful, comorbidities, lack of physician encouragement, and opinion that CR will not improve their health status. Besides low functional capacity, and chronic deconditioning may also deter patients from participating in CR programs. Recent data suggest that current smoking, a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, diabetes mellitus, and cognitive dysfunction are associated with failure to enroll in outpatient CR in older age group. Moreover the lack of availability of CR facilities or the absence of financial refunds for enrolment of CHF patients in cardiac rehabilitation programs can play a crucial role. Many of this factors are modifiable through patient education and self care strategy instruction, health providers sensibilization, and implementing economic measures in order to make CR affordable.

Evaluation of different strategies for identifying asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and pre-clinical (stage B) heart failure in the elderly. Results from 'PREDICTOR', a population based-study in central Italy.

AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies to identify systolic and/or diastolic asymptomatic LV dysfunction (ALVD), as well as pre-clinical (stage B) heart failure (HF), in a community of elderly subjects in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A sample of 1452 subjects aged 65-84 years were chosen from the original cohort of 2001 randomly selected residents of the Lazio Region (Italy), as a part of the PREDICTOR survey. All subjects underwent physical examination, biochemistry/NT-proBNP assessment, 12-lead ECG, and Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TE). Five strategies were evaluated including ECG, NT-proBNP, TE, and their combinations. Subjects older than 75 years, and with at least two additional risk factors, were defined as being high-risk for HF (435), whereas the remaining 1017 were defined at low risk. Screening characteristics and cost-effectiveness (cost per case) of the five strategies to predict systolic (EF <50% ) or diastolic ALVD and pre-clinical HF (stage B) were compared. NT-proBNP was the most accurate and cost-effective screening strategy to identify systolic and moderate to severe diastolic LV dysfunction without a difference between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Adding ECG to the NT-proBNP assessment did not improve the detection of pre-clinical LV dysfunction. TE-based screening was the least cost-effective strategy. In fact, all screening strategies were inadequate to identify stage B HF. CONCLUSIONS: In a community of elderly people, NT-proBNP is the most accurate and cost- effective pre-screening strategy to identify systolic and moderate to severe diastolic LV dysfunction.

[Cardiovascular risk profile and lifestyle habits in a cohort of Italian cardiologists. Results of the SOCRATES survey]. / Profilo di rischio cardiovascolare e stili di vita in una coorte di cardiologi Italiani. risultati della survey SOCRATES (Survey on Cardiac Risk Profile and Lifestyle Habits in a Cohort of Italian Cardiologists).

OBJECTIVES: To offer a snapshot of the personal health habits of Italian cardiologists, the Survey on Cardiac Risk Profile and Lifestyle Habits in a Cohort of Italian Cardiologists (SOCRATES) study was undertaken. BACKGROUND: Cardiologists' cardiovascular profile and lifestyle habits are poorly known worldwide. METHODS: A Web-based electronic self-reported survey, accessible through a dedicated website, was used for data entry, and data were transferred via the web to a central database. The survey was divided in 4 sections: baseline characteristics, medical illnesses and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle habits and selected medication use. The e-mail databases of three national scientific societies were used to survey a large and representative sample of Italian cardiologists. RESULTS: During the 3-month period of the survey, 1770 out of the 5240 cardiologists contacted (33.7%) completed and returned one or more sections of the questionnaire. More than 49% of the participants had 1 out of 5 classical risk factors (e.g. hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, active smoking, diabetes and previous vascular events). More than 28% of respondents had 2 to 5 risk factors and only 22.1% had none and therefore, according to age and sex, could be considered at low-intermediate risk. Despite the reported risk factors, more than 90% of cardiologists had a self-reported risk perception quantified as mild, such as low or intermediate. Furthermore, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity and stress at work or at home were commonly reported, as well as a limited use of cardiovascular drugs, such as statins or aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: The average cardiovascular profile of Italian cardiologist is unlikely to be considered ideal or even favorable according to recent statements and guidelines regarding cardiovascular risk. Thus, there is a large room for improvement and a need for education and intervention.

Smoking cessation interventions after acute coronary syndromes. Results of a cross-sectional survey in the Lazio Region of Italy.

Given the limited research on Italian hospital smoking care practices, a cross-sectional survey was undertaken in April-May 2011 to describe the current status of smoking cessation interventions for ACS patients in cardiovascular institutions of the Lazio Region of Italy. Lazio is a region of central Italy with a resident population of about 5,600,000. According to the data of the Regional Health Authority, about 10.000 patients are admitted for ACS every year in this region of Italy. Acute cardiac care in the region is currently provided by 33 Cardiology Divisions. All of these units were considered as eligible for the survey. The eligible respondent for each unit was the director. A self-report questionnaire was developed based on previous studies that examined the specific features of smoking cessation care provided to hospitalised patients. Questionnaires were forwarded by the Lazio Regional Section of the Italian National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO). Completed questionnaires were received from 22 of the 33 eligible Divisions (66%). These 22 responding units currently provide acute care to about 70% of all ACS patients of the region. Responding units were more likely to represent public non-teaching hospitals (p = 0.002), while non-responders were mostly from private non-teaching institutions (p = 0.04). Response rates were not influenced by the presence of either interventional catheterization laboratory (Cathlab) or cardiac surgery within the hospitals. The survey suggest that most of cardiology units fail to provide recommended smoking care interventions to ACS patients. In particular, brief smoking cessation advice before discharge represents the only systematically implemented approach in clinical practice (22 units; 100%). Smoking cessation counselling is provided only in 9 units (40%). Specific pharmacotherapy is prescribed in selected case only in about one third of units (7 units; 32%), with varenicline being the preferred drug. Structural variables and organizational complexity have no influence on smoking care, as hospitals with Cathlab and cardiac surgery do not implement more effective strategies. Overall, this survey shows that the majority of smoking ACS inpatients may receive inadequate smoking care and that hospitals have considerable opportunity for improvement.

[After ACC/AHA and ESC Guidelines: Pre-operative cardiological evaluation in non-cardiac surgery: certainties, controversial areas and opportunities for a team approach]. / Dopo le Linee Guida ACC/AHA ed ESC: La valutazione cardiologica preoperatoria nella chirugia non cardiaca: le certezze, le aree controverse e le opportunità di una gestione in team.

A standardized and evidence-based approach to the cardiological management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has been recently defined by Task Forces of the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) that published their guidelines in 2007 and 2009, respectively. Both the recommendations moved from risk indices to a practical, stepwise approach of the patient, which integrates clinical risk factors and test results with the estimated stress of the planned surgical procedure. In the present paper the main topics of the guidelines are discussed, and moreover, emphasis is placed on four controversial issues such as the use of prophylactic coronary revascularization in patients with myocardial ischemia, the perioperative management of patients with congestive heart failure, the routine use of betablockers and statins, and, finally, the management of antiplatelet therapies in patients with coronary stents. In addition to promoting an improvement of immediate perioperative care, the preoperative cardiological evaluation should be a challenge for identifying subjects with enhanced risk of cardiovascular events, who should be treated and monitored during a long-term follow-up.

[Secondary cardiovascular prevention after acute coronary syndrome in clinical practice]. / Prevenzione cardiovascolare secondaria dopo sindrome coronarica acuta nella pratica clinica.

Secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes should be aimed at reducing the risk of further adverse cardiovascular events, thereby improving quality of life, and lengthening survival. Despite compelling evidence from large randomized controlled trials, secondary prevention is not fully implemented in most cases after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. The Lazio Region (Italy) has about 5.3 million inhabitants (9% of the entire Italian population). Every year about 11 000 patients are admitted for acute coronary syndrome in hospitals of the Lazio Region. Most of these patients receive state-of-the art acute medical and interventional care during hospitalization. However, observational data suggest that after discharge acute coronary syndrome patients are neither properly followed nor receive all evidence-based treatments. This consensus document has been developed by 11 Scientific Societies of Cardiovascular and Internal Medicine in order develop a sustainable and effective clinical approach for secondary cardiovascular prevention after acute coronary syndrome in the local scenario of the Lazio Region. An evidence-based simplified decalogue for secondary cardiovascular prevention is proposed as the cornerstone of clinical intervention, taking into account regional laws and relative shortage of resources. The following appropriate interventions should be consistently applied: smoking cessation, blood pressure control (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg), optimal lipid management (LDL cholesterol < 80 mmHg), weight and diabetes management, promotion of physical activity and rehabilitation, correct use of antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers.

Full-dose atorvastatin versus conventional medical therapy after non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with advanced non-revascularisable coronary artery disease.

AIMS: This study tested the hypothesis that the addition of full-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/day) to conventional medical treatment could reduce ischaemic recurrences after non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTE-AMI) in patients with severe and diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) not amenable to any form of mechanical revascularisation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was an open-label, randomised, controlled, blinded end-point classification trial, employing the PROBE (Prospective Open Treatment and Blinded End Point Evaluation) design. A total of 290 patients (mean age 74.6 +/- 9.6 years) with NSTE-AMI and angiographic evidence of severe and diffuse CAD, not amenable to revascularisation by either coronary surgery or angioplasty, were randomised to atorvastatin 80 mg/day (n = 144) or conventional medical treatment (n = 146). A primary end point event (combination of cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute myocardial reinfarction and disabling stroke within 12 months of randomisation) occurred in 16.0% of patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/day and in 26.7% of patients receiving conventional treatment (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.93, p = 0.027). The study was not blinded. Consequently, a bias in the assessment of clinical outcome cannot be completely excluded. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when compared with a conventional treatment strategy, full-dose therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day provides greater protection against ischaemic recurrences after NSTE-AMI in patients with severe, diffuse, non-revascularisable CAD.

[From risk charts to guidelines: tools for evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk]. / Dalle carte del rischio alle linee guida: gli strumenti per la valutazione e la gestione del rischio cardiovascolare.

Despite the wide improvement of diagnostic techniques and the introduction of effective pharmacological and instrumental therapeutic strategies aimed to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, their incidence and lethality are still elevated, with economic implications increasingly less sustainable by the public medical systems. The modern practice of cardiovascular prevention requires, thus, that diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, both at population level and on the single patient, should be more and more precise, effective, and appropriate. From this point of view, a correct global cardiovascular risk stratification assumes a preponderant relevance, in order to allow an adequate therapeutical response. For this purpose several work instruments, as risk charts and guidelines, namely dedicated to arterial hypertension and dyslipidemias, were developed and offered to clinicians interested in cardiovascular prevention. The aim of this review is to illustrate, in synthesis, those instruments, aiming to facilitate their implementation, thus reducing the actual gap between theoretical indications and the real world.

[Distribution of the global cardiovascular risk in the Italian population: results from the cardiovascular epidemiologic observatory]. / Distribuzione del rischio cardiovascolare globale nella popolazione italiana: risultati dell'Osservatorio Epidemiologico Cardiovascolare.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the 10-year cardiovascular risk categories using risk chart, recently set up by the National Institute of Health in the population examined by the Cardiovascular Epidemiologic Observatory. METHODS: 3745 men and 3664 women aged 40-69 years were classified into five risk categories (< 5 %; 5-10%; 10-15%; 15-20%; > or = 20%) taking into account age, smoking habit, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol and excluding those already under treatment for hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia or experienced a previous major cardiovascular event (1937 persons: 955 men, 982 women). RESULTS: Proportion of people estimated at risk in 10 years > or = 20% is minimal in the youngest age range, increases in adulthood, duplicates in smokers and is higher in diabetics. In non-diabetic men that proportion varies between 3.4% in non-smokers and 5.6% in smokers. All women at risk are already under specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular Epidemiologic Observatory data allowed to assess the expected proportion of individuals at risk in 10 years > or = 20%. Besides attention to high-risk individuals, preventive measures supporting a healthier lifestyle in the general population must be adopted, considering that it will produce the greatest number of events.