A Comparative Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transabdominal Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Uterine Fibroids.

Uterine fibroids often cause symptoms of pelvic pain, pressure, and bleeding and a significant cause of morbidity for women of reproductive age. A new, Food and Drug Administration approved noninvasive treatment option is magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery, which has the potential to become a treatment of choice for selected patients. The purpose of the study was to compare and evaluate the usefulness of MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of uterine fibroids. A cross sectional study was carried out in the department of Radiology & Imaging of Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, during the period of January' 2010 to December 2011. A total number of 40 consecutive patients having suspected uterine fibroids underwent MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography and they were followed up from the admission upto the tissue diagnosis of uterine fibroids for histopathological correlation were included in this study. The test of validity of MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosis of uterine fibroids was calculated. In the diagnosis of uterine fibroids, USG was 88.2% sensitive, 66.7% specific, 85.0% accurate, 93.8% positive predictive values and 50% negative predictive values. However MRI was 97.1% sensitive, 83.3% specific, 95.0% accurate, 97.1% positive predictive values and 83.3% negative predictive values for prediction of uterine fibroids. The study shows that the MRI is more efficient diagnostic modality than transabdominal ultrasonography in detecting uterine fibroid presence and evaluation.

Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Mass.

In Indian subcontinent, all types of nasopharyngeal masses are rare. However, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is not uncommon in Bangladesh. It is very important to differentiate malignant from benign lesions early in the disease process. In recent years, CT is the primary diagnostic screening modality for the detection of nasopharyngeal pathology. This cross sectional study was carried out in the Department of Radiology & Imaging, BSMMU in collaboration with Department of otolaryngology of the same hospital from July 2012 to June 2014. Sensitivity of CT scan in diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was 100%, specificity was 93.10%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.94%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% and accuracy was 96.67%. Sensitivity of CT scan in diagnosis of benign angiofibroma was 78.26 %, specificity was 89.19%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 81.82%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.84% and accuracy was 85% of CT scan. CT scan findings of the present study correlated well in most of the cases with the histopathological evaluations. Considering the high validity parameter it can come to a conclusion that CT scan is as highly effective as histopathology in diagnosis of nasopharyngeal mass.