Lateral Compartment Syndrome From Inversion Injury.

A 17-year-old male presented for the evaluation of right calf pain after an inversion ankle sprain sustained while playing soccer 24 hours prior. On exam, he exhibited swelling and tenderness to palpation over his right calf, mild first web space numbness, and compartment pressures <30 mmHg. Magnetic resonance imaging was significant for findings of lateral compartment syndrome (CS). Upon admission, his exam worsened, prompting an anterior and lateral compartment fasciotomy. Intraoperative findings were significant for lateral CS, with findings of avulsed, nonviable muscle with associated hematoma. Postoperatively the patient had mild foot drop, which improved with physical therapy. Lateral CS rarely develops from an inversion ankle sprain. This presentation of CS is unique due to its mechanism, delayed clinical presentation, and limited signs of CS. Providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for CS in patients with this injury complex and continued pain beyond 24 hours without signs of ligamentous injury.

Trends in Surgical Critical Care Training Among General Surgery Residents: Pursuing an Ideal Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) provides no specific guidelines for surgical critical care (SCC) training during general surgery residency. Growing emphasis is placed on this experience with increasing case requirements and dedicated SCC content on board certification exams. METHODS: A digital survey was distributed to ACGME-accredited general surgery residencies via email. Respondents reported number and setting of critical care months during residency and rated comfort level within 5 critical care principles and overall satisfaction with their SCC experience. Study cohorts were formed to compare experiences and competencies between respondents based on setting, months, postgraduate year (PGY) level, and formal surgical intensive care unit (SICU) experience. Differences between cohorts were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test (P < .05). RESULTS: Seventy-three residents responded with 45% training at academic centers versus 46% in community hospitals. Approximately 50% completed a formal SICU rotation, while 9% reported no dedicated critical care rotation during residency. Overall, 78% felt satisfied with their SCC experience. Residents training at academic centers were more satisfied overall and felt more comfortable with ventilator management. Those who completed 5 or more months of critical care training reported greater confidence with intravenous sedation and ventilator management, while residents having a formal SICU rotation felt more confident with vasopressor and ventilator management. DISCUSSION: Variability remains within SCC training among general surgery residents with perceived benefits seen in training at academic centers and completing a formal SICU rotation. Although limited, these findings offer a foundation for developing an effective SCC curriculum.

The mentor match: A new approach to implementing formal mentorship in general surgery residency.

Mentorship is a vital component within general surgery residency that fosters success extending into future practices. Recognizing the need for formalized mentorship within our general surgery residency, a survey based match process was developed. The "Mentor Match" was developed by creating resident and faculty surveys using the six ACGME core competencies of patient care, medical knowledge, communication skills, practice based learning, system based practice and professionalism. Surveys focused on resident areas of weakness correlating to areas in which faculty expressed subjective strength. Survey results were used to match faculty mentors with resident mentees. One year after implementation, residents were surveyed to evaluate the perceived success of the match process and mentorship program. Resident participation was 100% with a survey response of 78%. Ninety-two percent of residents were satisfied with the program, 83% saw improvement in their areas of weakness and 75% felt the match process was effective in pairing mentors with mentees. In conclusion, the "Mentor Match" was an effective tool in developing a formalized mentorship program with positive results after one year of implementation.