The potential of soluble CD14 in discriminating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although various noninvasive markers and prediction formulas for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been reported, they are of value only in the diagnosis of the advanced fibrosis stage of NASH. In this study, we evaluated soluble CD14 (sCD14) as a diagnostic marker for discriminating NASH from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using an animal model and clinical specimens. METHODS: Serum sCD14 levels were measured in samples derived from mice with diet-induced NASH and patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Our cohort enrolled 126 patients with liver needle biopsy-proven NAFLD. RESULTS: The intestinal defense mechanism in NASH model mice was altered as a consequence of the unique gut environment. Elevated serum levels of sCD14 were observed in mice with diet-induced NASH, and the condition of the liver was exacerbated as a result of exposure to gut-derived endotoxin. We confirmed that the serum sCD14 levels in NAFL patients significantly differed from those in NASH patients. The area under the curve for distinguishing between NAFL and NASH was 0.891. Moreover, we found that serum sCD14 levels were weakly correlated with the inflammation grade based on the NAFLD activity score (NAS), the grade of fibrosis according to the Brunt fibrosis classification, and a positive correlation with the grade of ballooning based on NAS in patients with NAFLD. CONCLUSION: sCD14 could be a useful pathophysiological marker and diagnostic adjunct distinguishing NASH from NAFLD. The use of sCD14 may allow the screening and identification of high-risk groups for NASH development and support early therapeutic interventions.

Successful treatment by on-demand glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for hepatitis C flare during R-CHOP in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and malignant lymphoma, hepatitis C flare during R-CHOP can result in discontinuation of treatment. However, appropriate therapeutic strategies for managing hepatitis C flare during R-CHOP have not been established, and this issue is complicated by conflicting results regarding the use of direct-acting antivirals in patients with uncontrolled malignancies. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the first case of effective and safe treatment with on-demand 8-week glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for hepatitis C flare during R-CHOP in a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The patient completed five additional courses of R-CHOP without hepatic toxicity. A complete response of DLBCL and a sustained virological response were observed at 24 weeks after glecaprevir and pibrentasvir completion. CONCLUSION: On-demand, direct-acting antivirals could be a novel strategy for managing hepatitis C flare during R-CHOP.

Lenvatinib suppresses cancer stem-like cells in HCC by inhibiting FGFR1-3 signaling, but not FGFR4 signaling.

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a subset of cells defined by high CD44 and CD133 expression has been reported to possess cancer stem-like cell (CSC) characteristics and to be associated with a poor prognosis. Since the approval of the multikinase inhibitor, lenvatinib, for patients with unresectable HCC, two such inhibitors (sorafenib and lenvatinib) have been employed as first-line systemic chemotherapeutics for these patients. Based on differences in the kinase-affinity profiles between these two drugs, evidence has suggested that both exert different effects on HCC, although these differences are not fully characterized. In this study, using in vitro and a preclinical in vivo xenograft mouse model, we showed that lenvatinib alone (not sorafenib or the cytotoxic agent, 5-fluorouracil) diminished CD44High/CD133High CSCs in HCC. Furthermore, western blotting and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-1-4 differed between CD44High/CD133High CSCs and control cells. Analysis of the effects of selective FGFR inhibitors and FGFR small interfering RNAs on CSCs in HCC revealed that lenvatinib diminished CSCs in HCC by inhibiting FGFR1-3 signaling, however, FGFR4 signaling was not impacted. Finally, we showed that FGF2 and FGF19 were involved in maintaining CD44High/CD133High CSCs in HCC, potentially, via FGFR1-3. The findings provide novel mechanistic insights into the effects of lenvatinib on CSCs in HCC and provide clues for developing effective targeted therapies against CSCs in HCC.

Baseline angiopoietin-2 and FGF19 levels predict treatment response in patients receiving multikinase inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are first-line systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the criteria for their selection remain unclear. METHODS: We identified patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib between August 2009 and January 2019 at the Hokkaido University Hospital. Patients who continued treatment for >2 months, underwent evaluation by computed tomography every 2-3 months, and had complete clinical data were included. Responders were patients with objective response (OR) for lenvatinib and patients with stable disease (SD) exceeding 6 months (long-SD) or OR for sorafenib. The predictive factors for treatment response, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF)19 and 21, angiopoietin 2 (ANG2), hepatocyte growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor, were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 27 and 29 patients treated with lenvatinib and sorafenib, respectively, were included. The responders for lenvatinib and sorafenib were 63% (17/27) and 38% (11/29), respectively. No significant predictive factors for treatment response were identified in patients treated with sorafenib. However, baseline serum FGF19 and ANG2 levels were significantly associated with treatment response to lenvatinib. All (9/9) patients with low baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels who received lenvatinib achieved OR. Conversely, the OR was low (13%; 1/9) in patients with high baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels. Responder rate was 40% (2/5) in patients with high baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels who received sorafenib. CONCLUSION: This study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate that baseline ANG2 and FGF19 levels may aid in selecting optimal systemic therapy for patients with unresectable HCC.

Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who do not meet the REFLECT trial eligibility criteria.

AIM: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who did not meet REFLECT eligibility criteria (phase 3 clinical trial). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib between 2018 and 2019 and had adequate clinical data were included. Objective response rate, progression-free-survival (PFS) and safety were evaluated according to meeting or not meeting the REFLECT eligibility criteria and according to the criteria of the REFLECT trial. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients included, 61% (64 of 105) did not meet the REFLECT eligibility criteria. Safety and median PFS of lenvatinib were similar between the patients who did and those who did not meet the criteria. Among the patients who did not meet the criteria, 28, 27, 14, six, seven and five had a history of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, Child-Pugh score B, HCC in ≥50% of the liver, reduced platelet count, bile duct invasion and main portal vein invasion, respectively. The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for patients with or without Child-Pugh-score B or HCC in ≥50% of the liver were similar. Although treatment outcome was not significantly different, patients with TKI treatment history tended to have longer median PFS, whereas those with main portal vein invasion tended to have shorter median PFS. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib was effective for patients who did not meet the REFLECT inclusion criteria. However, the treatment outcome may vary according to several factors, such as a history of TKI treatment and tumor invasion.

Prevalence, clinical course, and predictive factors of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy-associated hepatitis in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized anti-malignancy therapy and thus have been increasingly used. Although ICI may cause immune-related adverse events (irAE) in various organs, including the liver, the prevalence and predictive factors of irAE have not been clarified. METHODS: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients who had malignancies and were treated with ICI without other chemotherapeutic agents at Hokkaido University Hospital between 2014 and 2019 were screened. Patients were excluded if they were < 20 years old and had insufficient clinical data. RESULTS: Of the 233 patients screened, 202 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The patients were aged 25-92 years, and 60.9% were male. The patients received nivolumab (n = 137), pembrolizumab (n = 45), ipilimumab (n = 17), atezolizumab (n = 2), and avelumab (n = 1). The prevalence of any grade and grade ≥ 3 irAE hepatitis was 8.4% (17/202) and 4.0% (8/202), respectively. irAE hepatitis occurred at a median duration of 42 days in any grade and 36 days in grade ≥ 3 after ICI initiation. The clinical course of grade ≥ 3 irAE hepatitis was generally favorable; however, 50% required corticosteroid treatment and two patients required additional mycophenolate mofetil. Female sex and history of ICI treatment were significantly associated with the incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAE hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Grade ≥ 3 irAE hepatitis was observed in 4.0% of the patients who were treated with ICI. Female sex and history of ICI treatment were significantly associated with the incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAE hepatitis.

Early response and safety of lenvatinib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first-line systematic therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the results of the phase 3 clinical trial REFLECT. This trial excluded patients with a history of systemic chemotherapy, bile duct invasion, and Child-Pugh grade B. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for these patients and in the real-world setting. METHODS: Among patients who were administered lenvatinib for advanced HCC between April and October 2018 in Hokkaido University Hospital and related hospitals, we evaluated those who were followed for more than 2 months and whose treatment response was evaluated via dynamic computed tomography at baseline and 2 months after treatment initiation. Meanwhile, patients were excluded if they had decompensated liver cirrhosis, were followed up less than 2 months, or were not evaluated at 2 months. Patients were also stratified according to compliance with the REFLECT inclusion criteria for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included; more than 50% did not meet the REFLECT inclusion criteria. In total, 5 (12.2%), 20 (48.8%), 12 (29.3%), and 4 (9.3%) showed complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The objective response rate was 61.2%. The objective response rate and disease control rate were similar between patients who did and did not meet the REFLECT inclusion criteria. Moreover, the safety profile was also similar between the two patient groups. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib showed high early response rate and tolerability in patients with advanced HCC. Favorable outcomes were similarly observed in patients who did not meet the REFLECT inclusion criteria.

Tri-antennary tri-sialylated mono-fucosylated glycan of alpha-1 antitrypsin as a non-invasive biomarker for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a novel glycobiomarker for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that may lead to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we examined the diagnostic utility of tri-antennary tri-sialylated mono-fucosylated glycan of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT-A3F), a non-invasive glycobiomarker identified in a previous study of NASH diagnosis. This study included 131 biopsy-proven Japanese patients with NAFLD. We evaluated the utility of AAT-A3F in NASH diagnosis, and conducted genetic analysis to analyse the mechanism of AAT-A3F elevation in NASH. Serum AAT-A3F concentrations were significantly higher in NASH patients than in NAFL patients, and in patients with fibrosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning. Hepatic FUT6 gene expression was significantly higher in NASH than in NAFL. IL-6 expression levels were significantly higher in NASH than in NAFL and showed a positive correlation with FUT6 expression levels. The serum-AAT-A3F levels strongly correlated with hepatic FUT6 expression levels. AAT-A3F levels increased with fibrosis, pathological inflammation, and ballooning in patients with NAFLD and may be useful for non-invasive diagnosis of NASH from the early stages of fibrosis.

Assessing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by combining liver stiffness and the controlled attenuation parameter.

AIM: Ultrasound technology can now be used for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and for evaluating the amount of hepatic fat quantitatively known as the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). This study aimed to determine the applicable cut-off values of LSM and the CAP for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to investigate their clinical usefulness for assessing HCC risk in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: A total of 1054 patients (88 with primary HCC and 966 without HCC) whose LSM and the CAP were measured by transient elastography with clinically evident hepatitis C virus (419 patients), hepatitis B virus (377 patients), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (258 patients) were enrolled in this study. Subsequently, a total of 966 patients who did not have HCC initially were followed, and the usefulness of the cut-off values of LSM and CAP for HCC development were evaluated. RESULTS: In hepatitis C virus patients, the incidence of HCC development was significantly higher among those with a combination of LSM ≥8.0 kPa and CAP ≤221 dB/m than among those with other values (log-rank test 0.0239, hazard ratio 2.66, 95%CI 1.07-6.47, P = 0.0362). In non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients, the incidence of HCC development was significantly higher among those with a combination of LSM ≥5.4 kPa and CAP ≤265 dB/m than among others (log-rank test 0.0040, hazard ratio 8.91, 95% CI 1.47-67.97, P = 0.0192). CONCLUSION: In the hepatitis C virus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease groups, a combination of LSM and the CAP cut-off values would be useful for screening to identify the high-risk group for primary HCC development.

L-Carnitine Suppresses Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a major cause of secondary sarcopenia. Sarcopenia makes the prognosis worse; thus, novel therapeutic options for sarcopenia in patients with LC are urgently required as they are currently limited. In this retrospective study, 158 patients with LC were screened, and 35 of those patients who were treated with L-carnitine for more than 6 months and for whom skeletal muscle mass changes could be evaluated by computer tomography were enrolled. Of the 158 patients, 79 patients who did not receive L-carnitine supplementation served as controls. Cases and controls were propensity score matched for age, sex, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and branched chain amino acid administration, and changes in skeletal muscle mass and clinical data were compared. The 35 patients who received L-carnitine supplementation and 35 propensity score-matched patients who did not receive carnitine supplementation comprised the final enrollment. Compared with control patients, patients who received L-carnitine had significantly worse liver function, which is associated with rapid progress of skeletal muscle depletion. However, loss of skeletal muscle mass was significantly suppressed in patients receiving L-carnitine, and a significant effect was observed in patient subgroups stratified by age, sex, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and branched chain amino acid administration. The change ratios of most laboratory data, including vitamin D and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, were similar in the two groups, but ammonia levels were significantly less in those receiving L-carnitine. However, even in patients receiving L-carnitine but not showing an ammonia decrease, loss of skeletal muscle was significantly suppressed. Conclusion: L-carnitine suppresses loss of skeletal muscle mass and may therefore be a novel therapeutic option for sarcopenia in patients with LC. (Hepatology Communications 2018; 00:000-000).

Increased serum C-reactive protein and decreased urinary aquaporin 2 levels are predictive of the efficacy of tolvaptan in patients with liver cirrhosis.

AIM: Water retention, hepatic ascites, and peripheral edema are significant problems in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). Although furosemide and spironolactone are commonly used as treatment, they are often insufficient to treat hyponatremia and renal insufficiency in patients with LC. Tolvaptan (TVP) could provide an effective treatment alternative. However, predictive factors of a therapeutic response to TVP are unclear. Our aim was to examine clinical predictors of the response to TVP in patients with LC and water retention. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were treated with TVP, with therapeutic effects judged by a decrease in body weight (≥2 kg) and increase in urinary volume (≥500 mL) within 7 days. Blood biochemical tests were carried out at baseline and post-treatment, including serum soluble CD14 (sCD14) and urinary aquaporin 2 (AQP2) levels. Clinical and laboratory predictive factors of a TVP response were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The overall response to TVP was 55.8%. On univariate analyses, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, urinary blood urea nitrogen, and urinary AQP2 were predictors of the TVP response, with only serum CRP retained on multivariate analysis. A higher serum sCD14 level was strongly associated with a non-response to TVP. A decrease in urinary AQP2 to undetectable level was associated with a response. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan provides a rapid and strong effect to improve water retention in patients with LC. Baseline serum sCD14 and CRP levels are useful predictors of a response to TVP, with a decrease in urinary AQP2 during treatment indicating an early response.

A Phase I Study of Combination Therapy with Sorafenib and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sorafenib is the first molecular targeted drug approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is a potent small molecule inhibitor of multiple kinases. Combination therapy with sorafenib and other cytotoxic agents for HCC may result in additive anticancer activity. The purpose of this phase I study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with sorafenib and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and to determine the optimum dose of 5-FU for a phase II trial. METHODS: This phase I study used a conventional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU in combination with sorafenib and to determine the recommended dosage (RD) for phase II. The secondary endpoints evaluated were toxicity and the tumor response rate. All patients received 800 mg of sorafenib daily and three different dosages of 5-FU (250, 350, and 450 mg/m2/day) for 20 days by intravenous infusion in 1 month as one cycle. RESULTS: Twelve patients with advanced HCC were evaluated. The MTD of 5-FU in combination with sorafenib was 450 mg/m2/day, and 350 mg/m2/day was selected as the RD for a phase II study. Thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, and hand-foot skin reaction were observed as grade 3 adverse events. Nine patients achieved stable disease (75%), and three patients (25%) were judged to have progressive disease. The disease control rate was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with sorafenib and 5-FU appears to be well tolerated and may have the potential to be an option for advanced HCC.

Combination of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and early des-γ-carboxyprothrombin change ratio as a useful predictor of treatment response for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a potent therapeutic option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are few known predictive factors of treatment response to HAIC. We clarified the most accurate predictive factors early on in treatment. METHODS: Study subjects were 70 patients with advanced HCC who had been treated with HAIC. We assessed the relationships between patient characteristics, change ratios of early tumor markers, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. RESULTS: After two courses of HAIC, 1 (1.4%), 16 (22.9%), 30 (42.8%), and 23 (32.9%) of the 70 patients showed complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Overall survival was related to Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, extrahepatic metastasis, and the des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) response. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and DCP response as significant determinants of treatment response and PFS. Progression-free survival with a low NLR (<2.87) was significantly longer than with a high NLR (median, 8.4 months vs. 2.8 months, respectively). Progression-free survival was 7.2 months for patients with a responsive DCP (<0.7) and 2.3 months for an unresponsive DCP (≥0.7). Additionally, even with baseline high NLR, patients with responsive DCP achieved better PFS. CONCLUSION: Baseline NLR and early DCP response were significant predictors of treatment response and PFS after HAIC for patients with advanced HCC. The combination of baseline NLR and early DCP response could be accurate and useful predictive factors of response to HAIC and could help optimize treatments for patients with advanced HCC.

Hepatitis B virus X protein impairs α-interferon signaling via up-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 and protein phosphatase 2A.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) causes liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard therapy includes treatment with interferon (IFN); however, its efficacy is limited. HBV has been reported to impair IFN signaling; however, the mechanism is unclear. Here, the relationship between HBV X protein (HBx) and IFN signaling was investigated by establishing HepG2 cells, stably expressing HBx (HepG2/HBx) via retrovirus-mediated gene transfer. Subsequently, IFN negative-regulator expression and its mechanism were studied. HepG2/HBx cells showed reduced expression of IFN-stimulated genes and expressed higher levels of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) suppressor compared with control cells. Knockdown of SOCS3 and PP2A restored IFN sensitivity. Moreover, HepG2/HBx cells showed higher phosphorylation levels of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 and endoplasmic reticulum stress, which are inducers of SOCS3 and PP2A, respectively. Additionally, HBx-knockdown restored IFN sensitivity in HepG2.2.15.7 cells. It was also confirmed that SOCS3 and PP2A expression levels were up-regulated in the liver of patients with HBV infection. The results of this study demonstrated that HBx impairs IFN signaling via increased expression of SOCS3 and PP2A, a novel mechanistic insight, providing a potential therapeutic target to enhance the efficiency of IFN therapy. J. Med. Virol. 89:267-275, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Safety and efficacy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with renal impairment.

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease, renal graft failure, and hemodialysis patient mortality. However, the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV-infected patients with renal impairment is unclear. Additionally, the promising NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir has not been recommended for patients with severe renal impairment. In this prospective, multicenter study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy, with a focus on patients with renal impairment. METHODS: The study included 322 genotype 1 HCV-infected patients who received daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy. The safety and sustained virological response was examined at 12 weeks after the end of treatment and safety was evaluated according to renal function. RESULTS: Of 322 patients, 5% (16/322) and 2.5% (8/322) had chronic kidney disease stage G3b (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and stage G4/5 (eGFR, 15-29/<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), respectively. Baseline presence of the NS5A resistance-associated variant, previous simeprevir treatment, and HCV RNA titers, which were predictors of a sustained viral response, were similar between patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Notably, the 12-week sustained viral response rate was comparable in patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (100%, 24/24) and those with eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (88.9%, 265/298; P = 0.07). Treatment discontinuation rates and adverse events, including alanine aminotransferase elevation, anemia, and renal disorders, were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy for patients with renal dysfunction was highly effective and safe.

[Clinical impact of addition of bevacizumab to the first-line chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].

BACKGROUND: Combination regimens containing bevacizumab(BV)are regarded as one of the standard first-line chemotherapy (1stCTx) regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, some patients cannot be treated with BV because of the short interval from the palliative operation or other reasons. We present a study of some patients who were treated with add-on BV in the middle of the 1stCTx before disease progression(referred to as "midway BV" regimen hereafter), and here, we report the efficacy of the midway BV regimen as observed in our patients. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 74 mCRC patients, who were undergoing 1stCTx treatment at our hospital from January 2010 to September 2012. We divided the patients into 3 groups, depending on when BV was introduced in their regimen: 40, 25, and 9 patients were respectively included in the "no-BV" group (patients who were treated without BV in the 1stCTx), BV group(patients treated with BV from the 1st cycle in the 1stCTx), and the midway-BV group (patients who were initially treated without BV and then received add-on BV). The response rates of patients in the no-BV, BV, and midway-BV groups were 27.5%, 44.0%, and 55.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival time of patients in the no-BV, BV, and midway-BV groups were, respectively, 9.7 months, 9.3 months, and 12.8 months, and 20.3 months, 22.2 months, and N. R. CONCLUSION: Although few cases were analyzed and there might be many confounding factors, our study suggests that midway BV is potentially useful for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are not initially treated with BV in the first cycle of the 1stCTx regimen.