Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Anticancer Res ; 41(4): 2101-2110, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate if topical support therapy during static-intensity modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) course is able to equal the characteristic minimum risk for radiation proctitis of Image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) treatment among localized prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rectal toxicity data of the above patients were retrospectively collected throughout three different clinical periods at our Radiotherapy Deparment: from October 2011 to December 2012, prostate cancer patients were treated with sIMRT and in advance supported by means of daily topical corticosteroids; from January 2013 to November 2016, topical corticosteroids were replaced by daily hyaluronic acid enemas; from December 2016 to May 2018 eligible patients were treated with newly introduced IG-VMAT supported by only on-demand topical corticosteroids. RESULTS: Among 359 eligible patients, IG-VMAT was proven generally more effective than sIMRT supported by topical medications in terms of proctitis reduction, although without clinical and practical relevance. CONCLUSION: Topical medications might have a role in radiation proctitis prevention.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Proctite/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Administração Tópica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Beclometasona/administração & dosagem , Enema/métodos , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Proctite/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Acta Oncol ; 56(8): 1081-1088, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28534430

RESUMO

AIM: To quantify the variability between radiation oncologists (ROs) when outlining axillary nodes in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each participating center, three ROs with different levels of expertise, i.e., junior (J), senior (S) and expert (E), contoured axillary nodal levels (L1, L2, L3 and L4) on the CT images of three different patients (P) of an increasing degree of anatomical complexity (from P1 to P2 to P3), according to contouring guidelines. Consensus contours were generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method. RESULTS: Fifteen centers and 42 ROs participated. Overall, the median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.66. Statistically significant differences were observed according to the level of expertise (better agreement for J and E, worse for S); the axillary level (better agreement for L1 and L4, worse for L3); the patient (better agreement for P1, worse for P3). Statistically significant differences in contouring were found in 18% of the inter-center comparison. Less than a half of the centers could claim to have a good agreement between the internal ROs. CONCLUSIONS: The overall intra-institute and inter-institute agreement was moderate. Central lymph-node levels were the most critical and variability increased as the complexity of the patient's anatomy increased. These findings might have an effect on the interpretation of results from multicenter and even mono-institute studies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Linfonodos/patologia , Órgãos em Risco/patologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Axila , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/efeitos da radiação , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Carga Tumoral
3.
Tumori ; 100(1): 38-41, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24675489

RESUMO

AIMS: To quantify radiation treatments for bone metastases from breast cancer in three Sicilian provinces (Messina, Catania, Ragusa) with respect to the general population and the incidence and prevalence of breast cancer in this macro-area in a 8-year period. METHODS: All bone metastasis patients treated using radiotherapy in 8 radiation departments operating in the provinces of Messina, Catania and Ragusa were collected. Among these, metastases from breast carcinoma were analyzed according to year of irradiation. An analysis of breast cancer incidence and prevalence with respect to inhabitants in this macro-area was conducted using literature and census data. RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2011, irradiation was delivered in 4419 bone metastasis patients. Among these, 1617 had a primary breast cancer with a median treatment per year of 206.5 (range, 164-251); 211 patients were treated in 2004 and 206 in 2011. In 2004, there were 1,048,957 female residents in the three provinces and 1,065,422 in 2011. The reported breast cancer incidence and prevalence in Sicily was respectively 100.79/100,000 and 908.54/100,000 in 2004 and 108.41/100,000 and 1091.29/100,000 in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in both incidence and prevalence of breast cancer in Sicily. Nevertheless, it seems that there was no increment in skeletal-related events requiring irradiation in such patients in eastern Sicily radiation departments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ósseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sicília/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA