Hemoadsorption in the critically ill-Final results of the International CytoSorb Registry.

The aim of the current paper is to summarize the results of the International CytoSorb Registry. Data were collected on patients of the intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was actual in-hospital mortality compared to the mortality predicted by APACHE II score. The main secondary endpoints were SOFA scores, inflammatory biomarkers and overall evaluation of the general condition. 1434 patients were enrolled. Indications for hemoadsorption were sepsis/septic shock (N = 936); cardiac surgery perioperatively (N = 172); cardiac surgery postoperatively (N = 67) and "other" reasons (N = 259). APACHE-II-predicted mortality was 62.0±24.8%, whereas observed hospital mortality was 50.1%. Overall SOFA scores did not change but cardiovascular and pulmonary SOFA scores decreased by 0.4 [-0.5;-0.3] and -0.2 [-0.3;-0.2] points, respectively. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels showed significant reduction: -15.4 [-19.6;-11.17] ng/mL; -17,52 [-70;44] mg/L, respectively. In the septic cohort PCT and IL-6 also showed significant reduction: -18.2 [-23.6;-12.8] ng/mL; -2.6 [-3.0;-2.2] pg/mL, respectively. Evaluation of the overall effect: minimal improvement (22%), much improvement (22%) and very much improvement (10%), no change observed (30%) and deterioration (4%). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of mortality, but there were improvements in cardiovascular and pulmonary SOFA scores and a reduction in PCT, CRP and IL-6 levels. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02312024 (retrospectively registered).

Severe hyperlactatemia in unselected surgical patients: retrospective analysis of prognostic outcome factors.

BACKGROUND: Etiology of hyperlactatemia in ICU patients is heterogeneous-septic, cardiogenic or hemorrhagic shock seem to be predominant reasons. Multiple studies show hyperlactatemia as an independent predictor for ICU mortality. Only limited data exists about the etiology of hyperlactatemia and lactate clearance and their influence on mortality. The goal of this single-center retrospective study, was to evaluate the effect of severe hyperlactatemia and reduced lactate clearance rate on the outcome of unselected ICU surgical patients. METHODS: Overall, 239 surgical patients with severe hyperlactatemia (> 10 mmol/L) who were treated in the surgical ICU at the University Medical Center Freiburg between June 2011 and August 2017, were included in this study. The cause of the hyperlactatemia as well as the postoperative course and the patient morbidity and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. Lactate clearance was calculated by comparing lactate level 12 h after first measurement of > 10 mmol/L. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate in our cohort was 82.4%. Severe hyperlactatemia was associated with death in the ICU (p < 0.001). The main etiologic factor was sepsis (51.9%), followed by mesenteric ischemia (15.1%), hemorrhagic shock (13.8%) and liver failure (9.6%). Higher lactate levels at ICU admission were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001). Lactate clearance after 12 h was found to predict ICU mortality (ANOVA p < 0.001) with an overall clearance of under 50% within 12 h. The median percentage of clearance was 60.3% within 12 h for the survivor and 29.1% for the non-survivor group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lactate levels appropriately reflect disease severity and are associated with short-term mortality in critically ill patients. The main etiologic factor for surgical patients is sepsis. When elevated lactate levels persist more than 12 h, survival chances are low and the benefit of continued maximum therapy should be evaluated.

Ogilvie's syndrome-is there a cutoff diameter to proceed with upfront surgery?

PURPOSE: Although Ogilvie's syndrome was first described about 70 years ago, its etiology and pathogenesis are still not fully understood. But more importantly, it is also not clear when to approach which therapeutic strategy. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with Ogilvie's syndrome at our institution in a 17-year time period (2002-2019) were included and retrospectively evaluated regarding different therapeutical strategies: conservative, endoscopic, or surgical. RESULTS: The study included 71 patients with 21 patients undergoing conservative therapy, 25 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy, and 25 patients undergoing surgery. However, 38% of patients (n = 8) who were primarily addressed for conservative management failed and had to undergo endoscopy or even surgery. Similarly, 8 patients (32%) with primarily endoscopic treatment had to proceed for surgery. In logistic regression analysis, only a colon diameter ≥ 11 cm (p = 0.01) could predict a lack of therapeutic success by endoscopic treatment. Ninety-day mortality and overall survival were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: As conservative and endoscopic management fail in about one-third of patients, a cutoff diameter ≥ 11 cm may be an adequate parameter to evaluate surgical therapy.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an uncommon, but life-threatening clinical entity due to late diagnosis resulting in irreversible ischemic bowel necrosis. The most common causes of AMI are the embolic occlusion and the acute thrombosis of the mesenteric circulation. Typical treatment is composed of an early revascularization of the mesenteric circulation followed by abdominal surgery for resection of nonviable intestine and restoration of the intestinal continuity, but the mortality rates remain high. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, aiming to evaluate clinical characteristics, performed surgical procedures and outcomes of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at a high volume surgical center in Germany. RESULTS: Overall, 53 patients were identified with the intraoperatively proven diagnosis of AMI. Overall hospital mortality was with 62% comparable to the literature. Nineteen patients presented with an intraoperatively verified complete and non-reversible intestinal infarction without any angiographic or surgical option for a revascularization of the mesenteric circulation or an option for intestinal resection. From the rest of the patients, 14 underwent intestinal resection of the ischemic area without restoration of intestinal continuity; the other 20 underwent resection with a primary anastomosis to restore intestinal continuity. The mortality rate of these patients with curative-intended surgery remained high (41% of patients died). Pre- and postoperative hyperlactatemia were associated with lower survival of these patients. CONCLUSION: AMI remains a life-threatening abdominal emergency. Therapeutic approaches are highly depended on acting surgeon's decision, being affected by subjectively rated bowel viability and physical condition of the affected patient. Only selected patients with good bowel viability appear to be suitable for receiving primary anastomosis. The results clearly indicate the need for further research to develop therapeutic approaches for a better management of AMI and to improve outcome of affected patients.

[Prevention of Surgical Site Infections]. / Prävention postoperativer Wundinfektionen.

The burden of surgical site infections (SSIs) is increasing. The number of surgical procedures continues to rise, and surgical patients present increasingly complex comorbidities. Half of SSIs are deemed preventable using evidence-based strategies. It is recommended for patients to bathe or shower prior to surgery. Hair should be removed only with a clipper. Shaving is strongly discouraged at all times. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered only when indicated, based on guidelines, and timed correctly in order to achieve a bactericidal concentration in the tissues when the incision is made. Prophylaxis must not be continued beyond surgery. For skin preparation in the operating room an alcohol-based agent plus chlorhexidine or octenidine is recommended. During surgery, glycemic control and goal-directed fluid therapy should be implemented. Normothermia should be targeted in all patients. The perioperative use of an increased fraction of inspired oxygen may reduce the risk of SSI. Using a surgical safety checklist during a team time-out immediately before surgery reduces the incidence of SSI.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Surgical Patients with Intensive Care Unit Lengths of Stay of 90 Days and Greater.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of prolonged length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) on the mortality and morbidity of surgical patients. METHODS: We performed a monocentric and retrospective observational study in the surgical critical care unit of the department of surgery at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg, Germany. Clinical data was collected from patients assigned to the ICU with a length of stay (LOS) of 90 days and greater. RESULTS: From the total of the 19 patients with ICU LOS over 90 days, ten patients died in the ICU whereas nine patients were discharged to the normal ward. The ICU mortality rate was 52%. The overall survival one year after ICU discharge was 32%. Regarding factors affecting mortality of the patients, significantly higher mortality was associated with age of the patients at the time point of the ICU admission and with postoperative need of renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high but in our opinion acceptable mortality rate in surgical patients with ICU LOS of 90 days and greater. We identified age and the need of renal replacement therapy as risk factors for mortality.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preemptive antifungal therapy for the prevention of invasive candidiasis following gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infection are at risk of invasive candidiasis (IC) and candidates for preemptive antifungal therapy. METHODS: This exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed a preemptive antifungal approach with micafungin (100 mg/d) in intensive care unit patients requiring surgery for intra-abdominal infection. Coprimary efficacy variables were the incidence of IC and the time from baseline to first IC in the full analysis set; an independent data review board confirmed IC. An exploratory biomarker analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 124 placebo- and 117 micafungin-treated patients. The incidence of IC was 8.9% for placebo and 11.1% for micafungin (difference, 2.24%; [95% confidence interval, -5.52 to 10.20]). There was no difference between the arms in median time to IC. The estimated odds ratio showed that patients with a positive (1,3)-ß-d-glucan (ßDG) result were 3.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-13.29) times more likely to have confirmed IC than those with a negative result. CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to provide evidence that preemptive administration of an echinocandin was effective in preventing IC in high-risk surgical intensive care unit patients with intra-abdominal infections. This may have been because the drug was administered too late to prevent IC coupled with an overall low number of IC events. It does provide some support for using ßDG to identify patients at high risk of IC. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01122368.

Cytokine and radical inhibition in septic intestinal barrier failure.

BACKGROUND: Breakdown of the intestinal barrier is a driving force of sepsis and multiple organ failure. Radical scavengers or cytokine inhibitors may have a therapeutic impact on intestinal failure. Therapeutic effects on different sites of small intestine and colon have not been compared. Therefore, we investigated time-dependent intestinal permeability changes and their therapeutic inhibition in colon and small intestine with an ex vivo model. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were either pretreated for 24 h with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) intraperitoneally alone or in combination with a radical scavenger (pyruvate or Tempol) or a cytokine inhibitor (parecoxib or vasoactive intestinal peptide). The gastrointestinal permeability was measured by time-dependent fluorescein isothiocyanate inulin diffusion using washed and everted tube-like gut segments. Blood and tissue samples were taken to investigate the development of inflammatory cytokine level (interleukin 6) in the context of cytokine inhibition and reactive oxygen species level via nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase activity in radical scavenger groups. RESULTS: After LPS treatment, mucosal permeability was enhanced up to 170% in small intestine and colon. In the small intestine the most significant reduction in permeability was found for pyruvate and parecoxib. Treatment with vasoactive intestinal peptide and parecoxib resulted in the most pronounced reduction of permeability in the colon. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that cytokine inhibitors and radical scavengers have pronounced effects in LPS-induced disrupted intestinal barrier of the colon and small intestine. Our novel model comparing different anatomic sites and different points in time after the onset of sepsis may contribute to gain new insight into mechanisms and treatment options of sepsis-related gut mucosal breakdown.

Perioperative outcome after pancreatic head resection: a 10-year series of a specialized surgeon in a university hospital and a community hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital and surgeon volume are potential factors influencing postoperative mortality and morbidity after pancreatic resection. Data on perioperative outcome of individual surgeons in different institutions, however, are scarce. We evaluated the perioperative outcome after pancreatic head resections (PHR) performed by a high-volume pancreatic surgeon in a high-volume university department and (later) in a community hospital with low prior experience in major pancreatic surgery. METHODS: We compared the results after PHR were performed by a single experienced surgeon between 2001 and October 2006 in a specialized unit of a German university hospital (n = 83; group A) with the results after PHR were performed in a community hospital between November 2006 and 2011 (n = 145; group B). Before the study period (-2001), the surgeon already had a personal caseload of >200 PHR. In addition to the 228 PHR analyzed here, the surgeon also had taught further >150 PHR to residents and consulting surgeons. Comparable surgical and perioperative techniques were applied in both series (e.g., types of resection and reconstruction, abdominal drains, early enteral feeding). The data of both series were prospectively recorded in SPSS databases. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was lower in group A (58 vs. 66 years in B; p < 0.01). Indications for PHR were pancreatic cancer (A 39 % vs. B 45 %), other periampullary cancer (A 18 % vs. B 12 %), chronic pancreatitis (A 33 % vs. B 28 %), and others (A 10 % vs. B 15 %). Most PHR were pylorus preserving (64 vs. 75 %), with oncologically indicated portal vein resections in 24 % (A) or 33 % (B). The percentage of duodenum-preserving PHR was lower in group B (14 vs. 26 % in A). Mortality of PHR was 3.6 % in group A and 2.8 % in B (p = 0.72). Overall morbidity rate was 49 % (A) or 57 % (B; p = 0.25). Using the expanded Accordion classification, complications classified as grade 4 or higher occurred in 9 % (A) and 11 % (B; p = 0.74). Postoperative pancreatic leak (any grade) was documented in 26 % (A) and 25 % (B; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon volume and a high individual experience, respectively, contribute to acceptable complication rates and low mortality rates after pancreatic head resection. An experienced surgeon can provide a good perioperative outcome after pancreatic resection even after a change of hospital or medical staff.

Minimally invasive operations for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: comparison of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy with endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy.

BACKGROUND: A "step-up" approach is currently the treatment of choice for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy (MINE) and endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy (ETG) and to compare it to open necrosectomy (ONE). METHODS: Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution from 1998 to 2010 (n = 334) were identified. From these, patients who underwent either ONE, MINE, or ETG were selected for further analysis. Statistical analysis employed 2-sided Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010, 32 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated by minimally invasive procedures including MINE (n = 14) and ETG (n = 18) or with the classic technique of ONE (n = 30). Time from onset of symptoms to intervention was less for ONE than for MINE or ETG (median, 11 vs 39 vs 54 days; P < .05). The rate of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock was greatest in ONE (93%) and MINE (71%) compared with ETG (17%; P < .05). Problems after ONE and MINE were ongoing sepsis (ONE 73% vs MINE 29% vs ETG 11%) and bleeding requiring intervention (ONE 26% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 17%). A specific complication of ETG was gastric perforation into the peritoneal cavity during the procedure (28%), requiring immediate open pseudocystogastrostomy. Laparotomy was necessary in 21% after MINE and 28% after ETG owing to specific complications or persistent infected necrosis. Overall mortality was greatest after ONE (ONE 63% vs MINE 21% vs ETG 6%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality remains high in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Operative procedures should be delayed as long as possible to decrease morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive procedures can avoid laparotomy, but also introduce specific complications requiring immediate or secondary open operative treatment. Minimally invasive procedures require unique expertise and therefore should only be performed at specialized centers.

Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major problem in colorectal surgery. METHOD: In this prospective, randomised study, we compared two kinds of wound protection, namely, "plastic ring drape" versus "standard cloth towels". One hundred one patients were randomised to the control group (wet cloth towels) and 98 to the study cohort (ring drape). SSIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. DISCUSSION: In the control group, 30 patients had an SSI, whereas 20 did so in the study group. This difference was not significant (p = 0.131). CONCLUSION: Plastic ring drape for wound protection does not guard against SSIs in colorectal surgery.

Unplanned discharges from a surgical intensive care unit: readmissions and mortality.

PURPOSE: There is great patient turnover every day on surgical intensive care units (SICUs). Surgical intensive care unit beds are provided for major elective surgery. Emergency admissions trigger unplanned discharges. Those patients are at risk for a worse outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2558 patients discharged from a 20-bed SICU within 1 year. They were followed up whether discharged electively or not. Patients readmitted to the SICU were stratified according to reason for readmission. RESULTS: Readmission rate to the SICU was 8.3% (139/1675) in elective discharges, and 25.1% (110/439) in unplanned discharges (P < .001); 50% (125/249) of all readmissions were for surgical complications. Hospital mortality was 2.28% (50/2,197) in patients not readmitted to the SICU and 13.3% (33/249) for those readmitted (P < .001). The mortality rate increased by 4% in readmissions for each year of age (P < .05, OR for death 1.04 for each year of age, 95% CI 1.010-1.071). Respiratory failure as a reason for readmission implied a 44% risk of death (P < .001, OR 11.85, 95% CI 5.11-27.45). CONCLUSIONS: Earlier-than-planned discharge from a SICU leads to a substantially higher readmission rate. Readmission correlates with an elevated risk of death. Most readmissions in a surgical clinic are due to surgical complications. Readmission for respiratory failure accounts for most of the mortality.

Debridement and drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis by a novel laparoendoscopic rendezvous maneuver: experience with 6 cases.

BACKGROUND: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a known complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Indications for treatment of WOPN are infection, a rapid increase in size, pain, or biliary or duodenal obstruction. Endoscopic transgastric treatment of pseudocysts with liquid content is successful in approximately 90% of patients; however, the treatment of WOPN is less satisfactory. OBJECTIVE: A demonstration of a novel minimally invasive approach to adequately remove and drain pancreatic necrosis. DESIGN: Between June 2004 and June 2006, a nonrandomized observational study was conducted with 6 consecutive patients. WOPN was treated by a minimally invasive laparoendoscopic rendezvous technique. SETTING: All patients were examined at the university hospital in Freiburg, Germany. PATIENTS: Six patients were treated for WOPN of an average diameter of 13 cm (range 9-20 cm). In 5 cases, the WOPN was a consequence of acute pancreatitis; there was 1 case of chronic pancreatitis. The average interval between diagnosis and initial treatment was 14 weeks (range 6-20 weeks). RESULTS: Conventional surgery was avoided in 5 patients (83%) over a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1.5-27 months). Six endoscopic sessions (range 4-11) were performed during the entire treatment period. One patient needed emergency surgery on day 4 after the intervention for a perforation because of gastric-wall separation from the necrotic cavity. There was 1 lethal gastric variceal bleeding, which occurred when a gastrostomy tube was removed 46 days after the initial treatment. LIMITATION: The small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases, minimally invasive laparoendoscopic treatment of WOPN is possible without the need of laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with severe, necrotizing pancreatitis, it is common to administer early, broad-spectrum antibiotics, often a carbapenem, in the hope of reducing the incidence of pancreatic and peripancreatic infections, although the benefits of doing so have not been proved. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study set in 32 centers within North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients with clinically severe, confirmed necrotizing pancreatitis: 50 received meropenem and 50 received placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Meropenem (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) or placebo within 5 days of the onset of symptoms for 7 to 21 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint: development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection within 42 days following randomization. Other endpoints: time between onset of pancreatitis and the development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection; all-cause mortality; requirement for surgical intervention; development of nonpancreatic infections within 42 days following randomization. RESULTS: Pancreatic or peripancreatic infections developed in 18% (9 of 50) of patients in the meropenem group compared with 12% (6 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.401). Overall mortality rate was 20% (10 of 50) in the meropenem group and 18% (9 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.799). Surgical intervention was required in 26% (13 of 50) and 20% (10 of 50) of the meropenem and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.476). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for pancreatic or peripancreatic infection, mortality, or requirement for surgical intervention, and did not support early prophylactic antimicrobial use in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.