Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 109(7): 624-630, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807618

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Teledermatology is the most advanced clinical specialty in telemedicine. The development of teledermatology in specific countries has not been studied in depth. METHODS: Our objective was to analyze teledermatology models in clinical practice in Spain. We paid special attention to organization, technical aspects, training, and the advantages/disadvantages as seen by teledermatologists. Two surveys were carried out (2009 and 2014). RESULTS: Teledermatology was used at 25 centers in 2009 and at 70 in 2014. The extended survey was completed by 21 centers in 2009 and 41 in 2014. Store-and-forward teledermatology was the main technique (83%) in 2014. Only 12% of centers used the real-time method, and 5% used a hybrid modality. Patients lived less than 25km away in 75% of cases (urban teledermatology). Most centers used mid-range bridge cameras; only 12% used mobile phones. Teledermoscopy and tertiary teledermatology were each used in 15% of centers. Teledermatology was restricted to skin cancer in 25% of cases, and 66% of centers used it to train primary care physicians. The main advantages, assessed on a scale of 1 to 10, were prioritization in cancer screening (8.3), rapid emergency care (7.8), training of and communication with primary care physicians (7.6), screening for trivial conditions (7.6), and reduction in the number of face-to-face visits (7.6). The main disadvantages were poor image quality (6.3), fear of error (5.7), difficulty in coordinating with primary care physicians (3.8), and time commitment (3.3). Between 2009 and 2014, the number of centers using teledermatology and the number of teledermatologists increased, as did use of the store-and-forward and urban models. The technology used also improved. CONCLUSION: Teledermatology is an emerging technology that is becoming well established in Spain. More than 25% of dermatology centers in Spain have implemented a teledermatology model. Store-and-forward in an urban setting is the most widely used modality. Teledermatologists see this technology as an effective option with more advantages than disadvantages. General satisfaction is high, although there is room for significant improvement in some areas.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/métodos , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/métodos , Telefone Celular , Sistemas Computacionais , Dermatologia/educação , Dermatologia/organização & administração , Dermoscopia/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Modelos Teóricos , Fotografação/instrumentação , Médicos de Atenção Primária/educação , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Espanha , Telemedicina/instrumentação , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Saúde da População Urbana
2.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 107(7): 591-6, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27436799

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Port wine stains (PWSs) are commonly treated by the pulsed dye laser. However, treatment of hypertrophic or resistant PWSs is a major therapeutic challenge. The long-pulsed Alexandrite laser could be a safe and effective treatment for resistant PWSs, due to an increase depth of penetration of 50-75% over PDL. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a long-pulsed Alexandrite laser in patients with hypertrophic, dark and/or resistant PWSs. Pink pale resistant PWS were excluded from the study. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (age 20-75 years), phototypes I-IV on the Fitzpatrick scale, with PDL dark resistant PWSs were treated with long-pulsed Alexandrite laser. We excluded high phototypes and PDL pink resistant PWSs. All patients were treated with 3 laser sessions at settings of 3-ms pulse duration, 10-mm spot, 35-55J/cm(2), with cooling (Dynamic Cooling Device 50ms with delay 30ms). Laser sessions were repeated approximately every 2 months. Three dermatologists evaluated treatment effectiveness by means of photographs of the patients before and after laser treatment (scale from 0 to 4). Adverse events were registered. Patient satisfaction was also assessed (scale from 0 to 10). RESULTS: Mean global improvement was rated as 2.28. Long-lasting side effects included minimal scarring after blistering in 1 patient. Mean patient satisfaction was 8.5. CONCLUSIONS: Our study concludes that long-pulsed Alexandrite laser was effective for treatment of resistant PWSs, although the therapeutical window is narrow with this treatment.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Mancha Vinho do Porto/patologia , Mancha Vinho do Porto/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA