Laparoscopic double mesh repair of a large Morgagni hernia: a video vignette.

Morgagni hernia (MH) is a rare congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) that accounts for less than 2% of surgically repaired CDH in adulthood. Even if this condition is often asymptomatic, surgery is advised due to the risk of life-threatening complications such as volvulus or bowel strangulation. Surgery for MH repair can be performed by transthoracic, transabdominal, laparoscopic, or thoracoscopic approaches. Though laparoscopy has recently improved surgical outcomes, the use of prosthetic meshes and the need for reduction of the hernia sac are still the most debated issues. We present the video of a laparoscopic repair of a large MH with the use of a double mesh technique and no resection of the hernia sac.

Visceral obesity enhances inflammatory response after laparoscopic colorectal resection.

AIMS: C-reactive protein (CRP) is used for monitoring postoperative inflammation (POI) and detecting infectious complications. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of visceral obesity (VO) on acute POI measured through CRP after elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS: Pre-operative Computed tomography images of 357 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection were analyzed. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area was measured for each patient. VO was defined as VAT area >163.8 cm2 in men and >80.1 cm2 in women according to accepted sex-specific cut-offs. Postoperative outcomes and CRP values were compared between VO and non-VO groups. The most appropriate CRP value for identifying infectious complications in the two groups was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for factors affecting POI including VO. RESULTS: No differences in postoperative outcomes and infectious complications were found in VO patients (62.2% of the overall population). Both in the overall cohort and in patients without infectious complications, VO was associated with higher CRP values on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD2, POD3, and POD5. A positive correlation was found between VAT and CRP on all PODs. VO independently predicted higher CRP on POD1-3 in patients without infectious complications but not in those who developed complications. ROC curves analysis showed optimal accuracy for detection of infectious complications for CRP on POD3 in both groups, though the optimal cut-off value was higher in VO group (154 vs 136 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: VO is not associated to increased complications after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Nevertheless, it is independently associated to higher CRP in the overall population and in patients without infectious complications. Consequently, CRP values on POD3 higher than cut-offs commonly adopted in the clinical practice should be carefully evaluated in VO patients to assess the occurrence of infectious complications.

Comparison of Short-term Results after Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Standard Colectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of a Western Center Cohort.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) right colectomy is a technically demanding procedure infrequently employed in Western centers. This retrospective cohort study aims to analyze the safety of laparoscopic CME colectomy compared to standard colectomy for right-sided colon cancer in a Western series. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic CME right colectomy were compared to the ones of 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic standard right colectomy. RESULTS: No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the CME and standard right colectomy groups. No differences were demonstrated in terms of blood loss (P = 0.060), intraoperative complications (P = 1), conversion rate (P = 0.102), and operative time (P = 0.473). No deaths were observed in either group, while complication rate was 40.0% in the CME and 49.1% in the standard group (P = 0.353). Severe complications occurred in 10.0% vs. 9.1% (P = 0.842), redo surgery in 5.0% vs. 7.3% (P = 0.708), and unplanned readmission in 5.0% vs. 5.5% (P = 1) after CME and standard colectomy, respectively. A significant difference in favor of CME was observed in the total length of specimen (P < 0.001), proximal (P = 0.018), and distal margins (P = 0.037). The number of lymph nodes harvested was significantly higher in the CME group (27 vs. 22, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: In Western series, where patients have less favorable clinical characteristics, laparoscopic CME allows to obtain better quality surgical specimens and comparable short-term outcomes compared to standard right colectomy.

Clinical Significance of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Prediction of Prognosis in Node-Negative Colon Cancer: Correlation between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Poorly Differentiated Clusters.

Although stage I and II colon cancers (CC) generally show a very good prognosis, a small proportion of these patients dies from recurrent disease. The identification of high-risk patients, who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, becomes therefore essential. We retrospectively evaluated 107 cases of stage I (n = 28, 26.2%) and II (n = 79, 73.8%) CC for correlations among preoperative inflammatory markers, histopathological factors and long-term prognosis. A neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 3 (H-NLR) and a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 150 (H-PLR) were significantly associated with the presence of poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) (p = 0.007 and p = 0.039, respectively). In addition, H-NLR and PDC proved to be significant and independent survival prognosticators for overall survival (OS; p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively), while PDC was the only significant prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (CSS; p < 0.001,). Finally, the combination of H-NLR and PDC allowed an optimal stratification of OS and CSS in our cohort, suggesting a potential role in clinical practice for the identification of high-risk patients with stage I and II CC.

Simultaneous approach for patients with synchronous colon and rectal liver metastases: Impact of site of primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to investigate the impact of the site of the primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients undergone simultaneous approach for colon (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) with synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 220 patients with SCRLM operated on between Mar 2006 and Dec 2017, 169 patients (76.8%) were treated by a simultaneous approach and were included in the study. Two groups were considered according to the location of primary tumor RC-Group (n = 47) and CC-group (n = 122). RESULTS: Multiple liver metastases were observed in 70.2% in RC-Group and 77.0% in CC-Group (p = 0.233), whilst median Tumor Burden Score (TBS) was 4.7 in RC-Group and 5.4 CC-Group (p = 0.276). Severe morbidity (p = 0.315) and mortality at 90 days (p = 0.520) were comparable between RC-Group and CC-Group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar comparing RC-Group and CC-Group (48.2% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.709), but it was significantly different when considering left-CC, right-CC and RC separately (54.5% vs. 35.2% vs. 48.2%; p = 0.041). Primary tumor location (right-CC, p = 0.001; RC, p = 0.002), microscopic residual (R1) disease at the primary (p < 0.001), TBS ≥6 (p = 0.012), bilobar metastases (p = 0.004), and chemotherapy strategy (preoperative ChT, p = 0.253; postoperative ChT, p = 0.012; and perioperative ChT, p < 0.001) resulted to be independent prognostic factors at multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: In patients with SCRLM, simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases seems feasible and safe and allows satisfactory oncological outcomes both in CC and RC. Right-CC shows a worse prognosis when compared to left-CC and RC.

Effect of Age and Comorbidities on Short- and Long-Term Results in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Conflicting findings have been reported in older patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of age and comorbidities on short- and long-term results of patients undergoing laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer (LCRRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all 173 consecutive patients undergoing LCRRC at our unit (June 2005-September 2015). They were divided into two age groups as follows: <75 (n = 122) and ≥75 (n = 51) years. Comorbidities were evaluated using American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and age-related Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). RESULTS: Tumor characteristics were similar in the two groups. Comorbidity status (ASA, CCI, ACCI) was worse in elderly patients. Type of surgery performed was similar in the two groups. Medical complications were significantly higher in elderly (10.7% versus 29.4%, P = .006), while surgical complications were similar. Postoperative stay was longer in older patients (13 days versus 9 days, P = .0007). Multivariable analysis identified older age, higher CCI, and longer operative time as independent predictors of morbidity. Five years overall survival and disease-free survival were 49% and 43% in older and 84% and 77% in younger group (P < .0001). Multivariable analysis identified age, CCI, tumor, node, metastasis stage, and postoperative morbidity as independent risk factors for overall and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: LCRRC achieves excellent short- and long-term results, but age and comorbidities may significantly affect postoperative morbidity and survival.

Laparoscopic Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study on Long-term Outcome.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term results of laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer. We included all patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer from June 2005 to September 2015. A total of 159 patients were included; 33.9% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity rates were 0.6% and 26.4%, respectively. Pathologic stage was 0 in 12%, I in 39%, II in 24.5%, and III in 24.5%. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16. In 5% of patients, mesorectal excision was incomplete. Median follow-up was 59 months. Overall 5-year survival was 80%. Multivariable analysis identified older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, advanced tumor stage, and postoperative morbidity as independent risk factors for overall/disease-free survival. Local/distant recurrence rate was 4.4%/17.6%. Deaths during follow-up were 33/159 (20.8%): cancer related 54.6% and non cancer related 45.4% of patients. Laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer can yield prolonged survival and low recurrence.

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Not Prognostic Biomarkers in Rectal Cancer Patients with Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND: Actual predictors of survival and recurrence for rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection mostly come from pathological data of surgical specimen. Recently, novel blood biomarkers have been proposed as useful tools in cancer patient management, but few and conflicting data have been reported in rectal cancer. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte (P/L) ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (N/L) ratio on survival and recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic curative resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: All consecutive patients who referred for primary rectal disease to the Department of General Surgery in Cittadella (Italy) from June 2005 to September 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with metastatic disease at surgery were excluded. P/L and N/L ratios were calculated. For patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, pre-treatment data were considered. Follow-up data were updated at December 2016. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients were included in the study, 49 (32%) received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Both P/L and N/L ratios showed poor discriminative performance on 5-year OS and DFS. Time-dependent ROC curves showed no improvements in discriminative performance of P/L and N/L ratios when considering different time endpoints. Multivariable analysis identified CEA-rather than P/L or N/L ratios-as independent predictor of OS and DFS, adjusting for age, tumor stage, and postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: Neither P/L nor N/L ratios were associated with survival after rectal cancer surgery. Further studies on large series might provide insights on the role of these inexpensive blood biomarkers in rectal cancer.

Impact of age on short-term outcomes of liver surgery: Lessons learned in 10-years' experience in a tertiary referral hepato-pancreato-biliary center.

We investigate the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy according to different age intervals, identify the clinical factors related to surgical outcomes, and propose clinical risk scores for severe morbidity and mortality based on the clinical factors.Eight hundred three patients undergoing liver resection were divided into 3 groups: young patients (YP), <65 years (n = 387), elderly patients (EP), from 65 to 74 years (n = 279); very-elderly patients (VEP), ≥75 years (n = 137).Severe morbidity was 10.6%, 12.2%, and 17.5% (P = .103), and mortality was 0.3%, 1.4%, and 4.4% (P = .002) in group YP, EP, and VEP, respectively. Ischemic heart disease, cirrhosis, major hepatectomy, biliary tract-associated procedure, and red blood cells (RBC) transfusion ≥3 U were related with severe morbidity. Ischemic heart disease, cirrhosis, major hepatectomy, and RBC transfusion were independent risk factors for postoperative mortality. Age did not result an independent factor related to mortality and severe morbidity. Two different scores were developed and have proved to be statistically related with severe morbidity and mortality. Moreover, in patients with score ≥2, severe morbidity increased from 24.2% in YP, to 29.3% in EP, and to 40.0% in VEP, P = .047. Likewise, mortality increased from 2.3% in YP, to 7.0% in EP, and to 22.7% in VEP, in patients with score ≥2, P = .017.Age alone should not be considered a contraindication for hepatectomy. We identified factors and proposed 2 scores that can be useful to stratify the risk of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. Moreover, severe morbidity and mortality increases according to the different age intervals in patients with scores ≥2.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: surgical perspectives beyond the barcelona clinic liver cancer recommendations.

The barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system has been approved as guidance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment guidelines by the main Western clinical liver associations. According to the BCLC classification, only patients with a small single HCC nodule without signs of portal hypertension or hyperbilirubinemia should undergo liver resection. In contrast, patients with intermediate-advanced HCC should be scheduled for palliative therapies, even if the lesion is resectable. Recent studies report good short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with intermediate-advanced HCC treated by liver resection. Therefore, this classification has been criticised because it excludes many patients who could benefit from curative resection. The aim of this review was to evaluate the role of surgery beyond the BCLC recommendations. Safe liver resection can be performed in patients with portal hypertension and well-compensated liver function with a 5-year survival rate of 50%. Surgery also offers good long-term result in selected patients with multiple or large HCCs with a reported 5-year survival rate of over 50% and 40%, respectively. Although macrovascular invasion is associated with a poor prognosis, liver resection provides better long-term results than palliative therapies or best supportive care. Recently, researchers have identified several genes whose altered expression influences the prognosis of patients with HCC. These genes may be useful for classifying the biological behaviour of different tumours. A revision of the BCLC classification should be introduced to provide the best treatment strategy and to ensure the best prognosis in patients with HCC.

A novel serum marker for biliary tract cancer: diagnostic and prognostic values of quantitative evaluation of serum mucin 5AC (MUC5AC).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) is a glycoprotein found in different epithelial cancers, including biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aims of this study were to investigate the role of MUC5AC as serum marker for BTC and its prognostic value after operation with curative intent. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January 2007 to July 2012, a quantitative assessment of serum MUC5AC was performed with enzyme-linked immunoassay in a total of 88 subjects. Clinical and biochemical data (including CEA and Ca 19-9) of 49 patients with BTC were compared with a control population that included 23 patients with benign biliary disease (BBD) and 16 healthy control subjects (HCS). RESULTS: Serum MUC5AC was greater in BTC patients (mean 17.93 ± 10.39 ng/mL) compared with BBD (mean 5.95 ± 5.39 ng/mL; P < .01) and HCS (mean 2.74 ± 1.35 ng/mL) (P < .01). Multivariate analysis showed that MUC5AC was related with the presence of BTC compared with Ca 19-9 and CEA: P < .01, P = .080, and P = .463, respectively. In the BTC group, serum MUC5AC ≥ 14 ng/mL was associated with lymph-node metastasis (P = .050) and American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union for Cancer Control stage IVb disease (P = .047). Moreover, in patients who underwent operation with curative intent, serum MUC5AC ≥ 14 ng/mL was related to a worse prognosis compared with patients with lesser levels, with 3-year survival rates of 21.5% and 59.3%, respectively (P = .039). CONCLUSION: MUC5AC could be proposed as new serum marker for BTC. Moreover, the quantitative assessment of serum MUC5AC could be related to tumor stage and long-term survival in patients with BTC undergoing operation with curative intent.

Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic significance of lymph node dissection (LND), the number and status of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), and the lymph node ratio (LNR) are still under debate in intrahepatic (ICC) and perihilar (PCC) cholangiocarcinoma. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prognostic value of the extent of LN dissection, the number of positive LNs, the distribution of positive LNs along different LN stations, and the LNR in a cohort of patients with ICC and PCC who underwent surgical resection and to compare the different prognostic values of lymph node involvement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done evaluating extent of LND, number, status, and location of harvested LNs in a cohort of 145 patients with cholangiocarcinoma submitted to surgical resection with curative intent from 1990 to 2012. RESULTS: Seventy patients had ICC and 75 had PCC. The median survival times of patients with N0 and N+ tumors were 42 and 19 months in ICC patients (p = 0.05) and 42 and 22 months in PCC patients (p = 0.01). In patients without LN metastases, the median survival times of patients with up to three LNs retrieved and with more than three LNs retrieved were 38 and 69 months in ICC patients (p = 0.05) and 18 and 43 months in PCC patients (p = 0.04), respectively. In N+ patients, the location of positive LNs (hepatoduodenal ligament or other regional stations) did not influence overall survival in ICC or PCC patients (p = 0.6). The median survival times of patients with LNRs of 0 and >0.25 were 43 and 19 months in ICC patients (p = 0.01); the 0-0.25 group did not reach the value. In PCC patients, median survival of 0, 0-0.25, and >0.25 groups of patients were 42, 23, and 11 months (p = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LN metastasis is a major prognostic factor after surgical resection of cholangiocarcinoma. The number of harvested LNs and the LNR showed a high prognostic value in ICC and PCC.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography (CE-IOUS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography to detect colorectal liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy compared with intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative imaging techniques. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2011, 28 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent intraoperative ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatectomy following preoperative chemotherapy. The findings were compared to preoperative imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. RESULTS: Preoperative imaging techniques detected 58 metastatic lesions in 28 patients. In 32 % of patients (n = 9), intraoperative ultrasound detected 24 missed hepatic nodules. In 14 % of patients (n = 4), contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography detected an additional six nodules and change in operative management occurred in 18 % of patients. Using univariate analysis, we found three factors significantly related to detection of additional metastases with contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography: three or more metastases before chemotherapy (p = 0.047), resolution of at least one metastasis (p = 0.011), and small liver metastases (largest lesion size ≤20 mm) after chemotherapy (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography improved both the sensitivity of intraoperative ultrasonography to detect liver metastases and the R0 hepatic resection rate.

Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks.

INTRODUCTION: In this review of the literature, we analyze the indications for preoperative drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or major hepatectomy due to periampullary or proximal bile duct neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to review the literature and to report on the current management of jaundiced patients with periampullary or proximal bile duct neoplasms who are candidates for PD or major liver resection. BACKGROUND: Jaundiced patients represent a major challenge for surgeons. Alterations and functional impairment caused by jaundice increase the risk of surgery; therefore, preoperative biliary decompression has been suggested. METHODS: A literature review was performed in the MEDLINE database to identify studies on the management of jaundice in patients undergoing PD or liver resection. Papers considering palliative drainage in jaundiced patients were excluded. RESULTS: The first group of papers considered patients affected by middle-distal obstruction from periampullary neoplasms, in which preoperative drainage was applied selectively. The second group of papers evaluated patients with biliary obstructions from proximal biliary neoplasms. In these cases, Asian authors and a few European authors considered it mandatory to drain the future liver remnant (FLR) in all patients, while American and most European authors indicated preoperative drainage only in selected cases (in malnourished patients and in those with hypoalbuminemia, cholangitis or long-term jaundice; with an FLR < 30% or 40%) given the high risk of complications of drainage (choleperitoneum, cholangitis, bleeding, and seeding). The optimal type of biliary drainage is still a matter of debate; recent studies have indicated that endoscopy is preferable to percutaneous drainage. Although the type of endoscopic biliary drainage has not been clearly established, the choice is made between plastic stents and short, covered, metallic stents, while other authors suggest the use of nasobiliary drainage. CONCLUSIONS: : A multidisciplinary evaluation (made by a surgeon, biliary endoscopist, gastroenterologist, and radiologist) of jaundiced neoplastic patients should be performed before deciding to perform biliary drainage. Middle-distal obstruction in patients who are candidates for PD does not usually require routine biliary drainage. Proximal obstruction in patients who are candidates for major hepatic resection in the majority of cases requires a drain; however, the type, site, number, and approach must be defined and tailored according to the planned hepatic resection. Recently, the use of preoperative biliary drainage limited to the FLR has been a suggested strategy. However, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials should be conducted to clarify this issue.

How much remnant is enough in liver resection?

BACKGROUND: Liver resection represents the first choice of treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies, offering the patient the best chance of long-term survival. The extensive use of major hepatectomy increases the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), which is associated with a high frequency of postoperative complications, mortality and increased length of hospital stay. AIMS: The aim of this review is to investigate the different risk factors related to the occurrence of PHLF and to identify the limits for a safe liver resection in patients with normal liver and injured liver (cirrhosis, cholestasis, steatosis and post-chemotherapy liver injury). METHODS: A literature search was undertaken in PubMed and related search engines, looking for articles relating to hepatic failure following hepatectomy in normal liver or injured liver. RESULTS: In spite of improvements in surgical and postoperative management, the parameters determining how much liver can be resected are still largely undefined. A number of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors all contribute to the likelihood of liver failure after surgery. The safe limits for liver resection can be estimated from the data of the literature for patients with normal liver and for those with different types of liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative assessment that includes evaluation of liver volume and function of the remnant liver is a mandatory prerequisite before major hepatectomy. The critical residual liver volume for patients able to predict PHLF is mainly related to the presence of pre-existing liver disease and liver function. Among patients with normal liver, the limit for safe resection ranges from 20 to 30% future remnant liver of total liver volume. In patients with injured liver (cirrhosis, cholestasis or steatosis), preoperative assessment of the risk of PHLF should include future remnant liver volumetry and accurate liver function evaluation, including different dynamic liver function tests.

Surgical resection versus local ablation for HCC on cirrhosis: results from a propensity case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had great improvements in the last decades with low morbidity and mortality and good long-term results. Percutaneous local ablative therapies (LAT) such as radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection (PEI) for HCC gained consent for their efficacy and safety. In retrospective studies, patients submitted to resection (LR) or LAT frequently have important selection bias. Propensity case-matched analysis proved to reduce selection bias of retrospective studies and allow comparison between different therapies. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate survival comparing LR and LAT in two groups of cirrhotic patients with HCC matched with propensity score methods. METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-eight cirrhotic patients with HCC treated with LR or LAT with curative intent between January 1995 and December 2009 were included in the study. One hundred and eighty-one patients underwent LR, and 297 patients were treated with LAT. Tumor stage and liver function were evaluated in all patients. To balance the covariates in the two groups, a one-to-one propensity case-matched analysis was used. A multivariable logistic model based on age, gender, etiology of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh class, number of nodules, maximum diameter of nodules, and serum alpha-fetoprotein level was used to estimate propensity score. One-to-one caliper matching of LR and LAT groups was performed, generating a matched sample of 176 patients with 88 patients in each group. RESULTS: Median survival was 65.1 months (95% CI = 48.5-81.7) after LR and 37.3 months (95% CI = 29.3-45.3) after LAT (p = 0.008). For patients in Child-Pugh class A with single HCC and maximum diameter <5 cm, median survival was 65.0 months (95% CI = 58.4-71.6) for the LR group and 63.7 months (95% CI = 31.8-95.7) for the LAT group (p = 0.730). For patients in Child-Pugh class A with single HCC and diameter ≥5 cm, median survival was 79.9 months (95% CI = 40.1-119.8) for the LR group and 21.5 months (95% CI = 10.8-32.1) for the LAT group (p = 0.023). For patients in Child-Pugh class A with two to three nodules and maximum diameter ≤3 cm, mean survival was 69.3 months (95% CI 48.7-89.9) for the LR group and 45.7 months (95% CI = 22.8-68.7) for the LAT group (p = 0.168). For patients in Child-Pugh class A with two to three nodules and diameter >3 cm, median survival was 82.9 months (95% CI = 52.0-113.7) for the LR group and 18.9 months (95% CI = 6.3-31.4) for the LAT group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our propensity case-matched study confirmed that survival is similar after LR and LAT for single HCC smaller than 5 cm and for oligofocal HCC (up to three nodules) smaller than 3 cm; instead, for HCC larger than 5 cm or oligofocal HCC (up to three nodules) larger than 3 cm, surgical resection improves significantly long-term survival.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension: is liver resection always contraindicated?

AIM: To analyze the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection in cirrhosis patients, related to presence of portal hypertension (PH) and extent of hepatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 135 patients with HCC on a background of cirrhosis was submitted to curative liver resection. RESULTS: PH was present in 44 (32.5%) patients. Overall mortality and morbidity were 2.2% and 33.7%, respectively. Median survival time in patients with or without PH was 31.6 and 65.1 mo, respectively (P = 0.047); in the subgroup with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, median survival was 65.1 mo and 60.5 mo, respectively (P = 0.257). Survival for patients submitted to limited liver resection was not significantly different in presence or absence of PH. Conversely, median survival for patients after resection of 2 or more segments with or without PH was 64.4 mo and 163.9 mo, respectively (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: PH is not an absolute contraindication to liver resection in Child-Pugh class A cirrhotic patients, but resection of 2 or more segments should not be recommended in patients with PH.

Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastases are a major negative prognostic factor for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCC). Prognostic significance of the extent of LN dissection, number of metastatic LN and the lymph node ratio (LNR) are still under debate. AIMS: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prognostic value of the LN status, the total number of LNs evaluated and LNR in PCC. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2008, 62 patients with PCC submitted to surgical resection with curative intent were retrospectively evaluated. Number and status of harvested LN were recorded. RESULTS: In 53 patients (85.4%) regional lymphadenectomy was performed. Median number of LNs examined was 7 (range 1-25). Median survival was 41.9 months in patients with N0 compared with 22.7 months in 21 patients (39.6%) with N+ (P= 0.03). Median survival was 3, 18.5 and 29 months for patients with 0, 1-3 and >3 LN retrieved, respectively (P < 0.01). Five-year survival for patients above and below the LNR cut-off value of 0.25 was 0% and 22.5%, respectively (P= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: LN metastases are a major prognostic factor for survival after surgical resection of PCC. The number of LN harvested and LNR showed high prognostic value.

Does intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have better prognosis compared to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cholangiocarcinoma can be classified as intrahepatic (ICC) or perihilar (PCC). The objectives of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients with PCC and ICC, identify the main prognostic factors related to survival and compare the outcome and the prognostic factors of PCC and ICC. METHODS: Ninety-five out of 152 patients observed between January 1990 and December 2007 at Surgical Division of University of Verona Medical School underwent the resection of ICC (33 patients) or PCC (62 patients). RESULTS: Overall median survival was 24 months with a 3- and 5-year survival rate of 45% and 23%, respectively. Prognostic factors for survival were macroscopic types of the tumor, the resection of extrahepatic bile duct, radical resection, lymph node metastases, and macro-vascular invasion. Survival was related with the macroscopic type of the tumors with a 5-year survival rate of 26% and 13% for ICC and PCC, respectively. Univariate analysis identified that negative clinico-pathological factors where significant more frequently found in PCC compared to ICC. CONCLUSION: We identified that ICC have longer survival rate compared to PCC. PCC showed a higher frequency of negative clinico-pathological factors such as non-radical (R+) resection, perineural infiltration and macro-vascular invasion.