Reductions in post-hepatectomy liver failure and related mortality after implementation of the LiMAx algorithm in preoperative work-up: a single-centre analysis of 1170 hepatectomies of one or more segments.

OBJECTIVES: Post-hepatectomy liver failure has a major impact on patient outcome. This study aims to explore the impact of the integration of a novel patient-centred evaluation, the LiMAx algorithm, on perioperative patient outcome after hepatectomy. METHODS: Trends in perioperative variables and morbidity and mortality rates in 1170 consecutive patients undergoing elective hepatectomy between January 2006 and December 2011 were analysed retrospectively. Propensity score matching was used to compare the effects on morbidity and mortality of the integration of the LiMAx algorithm into clinical practice. RESULTS: Over the study period, the proportion of complex hepatectomies increased from 29.1% in 2006 to 37.7% in 2011 (P = 0.034). Similarly, the proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis selected for hepatic surgery rose from 6.9% in 2006 to 11.3% in 2011 (P = 0.039). Despite these increases, rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure fell from 24.7% in 2006 to 9.0% in 2011 (P < 0.001) and liver failure-related postoperative mortality decreased from 4.0% in 2006 to 0.9% in 2011 (P = 0.014). Propensity score matching was associated with reduced rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure [24.7% (n = 77) versus 11.2% (n = 35); P < 0.001] and related mortality [3.8% (n = 12) versus 1.0% (n = 3); P = 0.035]. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative liver failure and postoperative liver failure-related mortality decreased in patients undergoing hepatectomy following the implementation of the LiMAx algorithm.

Reliable assessment of liver function using LiMAx.

BACKGROUND: (13)C-liver function breath tests can facilitate the assessment of hepatic function in-vivo and may help surgeons to identify candidates for safe liver surgery. However, their acceptance into clinical practice is dependent on evaluation of technical efficacy and repeatability. The aims of this study were to evaluate the within-subject repeatability of the LiMAx (maximum liver function capacity) test in healthy individuals and in surgical patients to determine liver function in the perioperative workup. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The LiMAx test, which is based on intravenous injection of (13)C-methacetin at a dosage of 2 mg/kg body weight was performed in eighty-six healthy subjects to determine a reference range. Twenty-four subjects underwent repeat LiMAx testing the following day to assess within-subject repeatability. Twenty-one patients undergoing elective extra-abdominal surgery under general anesthesia (GA group) received pre- and post-operative examinations. RESULTS: The normal range of LiMAx was found to be 430 ± 86 µg/kg/h and revealed a one-sided cut-off value of 315 µg/kg/h. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the repeat LiMAx tests was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.93) in the control group and 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.60-0.92) in the group of patients with GA. CONCLUSIONS: The LiMAx test shows excellent reproducibility in subjects with normal liver function. GA has no effect on test results.