Use of Goals in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Cancer pain is multidimensional and management should be individualized to patient goals. The current standard for pain goal assessment is the personal pain goal (PPG), a numeric rating for tolerable pain intensity. However, the PPG may not accurately capture a personally meaningful goal for tailoring pain management. OBJECTIVES: Identify how pain goals are used in cancer pain management and types of goals researched. METHODS: CINAHL, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases and manual searching were used to locate research or scholarship about cancer pain goals. Authors reviewed titles, abstracts and full text to agree on the final sample. RESULTS: Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria. Study designs included: quality improvement project (1), concept analysis (1), qualitative methods (5), quantitative methods (8), and mixed methods (1). Findings included: goal setting as a key attribute of pain management; achieving personal goals as the outcome of pain management work; qualitative themes discussed personal goals related to pain management; developing a patient pain management resource including a SMART goal; using motivational interviewing to set functional pain goals; PPG assessment was feasible; and achieving PPG equated to having controlled pain when compared to the clinically important difference measure used in research (≥30%). Quantitative studies reported on PPGs only. CONCLUSION: Currently, assessments for cancer pain goals do not include function, activities, moods, medication effects, or safety that patients wish to achieve as a pain management outcome. Development and testing of multidimensional patient pain goals assessments is warranted so that goals can be consistently assessed, documented, and personally meaningful.

Mitigation of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea Using Adjunct Music Listening: A Pilot Study.

The persistence of chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) underscores the need to consider nonpharmacologic treatments such as music listening as adjunct interventions. This pilot study investigated the feasibility and overall effects of a 30-minute adjunct music listening intervention in 12 patients experiencing CIN. Music listening was started at the time participants took their as-needed antiemetic medication, and it was repeated as needed during the 5 days after chemotherapy. Data for 66 music listening engagements were collected. A significant reduction of nausea severity (t = 10.97, p < .001) and distress (t = 9.86, p < .001) was noted overall, as well as significant reductions when examining the acute and delayed phases of nausea individually. Qualitative data on study feasibility demonstrated the intervention was well received by participants and held minimal operational difficulty. Investigator feasibility data suggested good understanding of data collection tools. Improvements to the study design have been collected and will form the basis of the future randomized controlled trial.

Patient Goals in Hospice Cancer Pain Management: A Total Pain Case Scenario.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and hospice agency policies and procedures direct nursing assessment and interventions for the care of persons with cancer-related pain. Guidelines assert that pain should be assessed from a holistic perspective that considers physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects. In addition, guidelines maintain that hospice nurses should ascertain patient goals for pain management. Assessment and documentation of goals other than pain intensity goals is an area of nursing practice that has not been developed. Without inclusion of personally meaningful goals in pain assessment instruments, such goals cannot be routinely or consistently included in the hospice care plan. To address the assessment of pain and patient goals for pain management, this scenario-based article merges theoretical knowledge about pain from concept analyses with clinical guideline recommendations. Although research is needed to develop pain goal assessment tools, nurses can use this empirically based approach for asking about goals and integrating them into the plan of care.

A Comparison of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD).

BACKGROUND: There is currently no gold standard instrument for assessing pain in severely cognitively impaired adults who are unable to provide self-report. AIMS: To determine interrater reliability of the PACSLAC and PAINAD in assessing pain behaviors in patients with the same pain stimulus, determine the consistency of the reliable changes between and within the instruments and assess nurse preference for either instrument. DESIGN: A single-group, within-subjects repeated-measures design was implemented. SETTING: The study took place in a small suburban hospital. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Pain levels were observed at 24, 48, and 72 hours postsurgery using two instruments: Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD). These instruments were selected because they are among the most commonly recommended tools for clinical use. Interrater reliability was analyzed along with reliable changes in pain for each period, and the study concluded with the nurse raters completing a preference survey. METHODS: A convenience sample of 30 patients was used with a diagnosis of severe dementia rendering the patient unable to reliably express pain, 60+ years of age, recovering from hip fracture surgery. RESULTS: Greater interrater reliability was found for the PACSLAC, with reliable change potentially affected by the type and level of pain medication. The nurses' preference for the tool was split. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the PACSLAC may be the more reliable tool over the PAINAD; however, rater training and familiarity with the tool is critical.

Both Race and Insurance Type Independently Predict the Selection of Oral Opioids Prescribed to Cancer Outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that racial disparities in patients' reported analgesic adverse effects are partially mediated by the type of opioid prescribed to African Americans despite the presence of certain comorbidities, such as renal disease. AIMS: We aimed to identify independent predictors of the type of opioid prescribed to cancer outpatients and determine if race and chronic kidney disease independently predict prescription type, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic and clinical confounders. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a 3-month observational study. SETTING: Outpatient oncology clinics of an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Patients were older than 18 years of age, self-identified as African American or White, and had an analgesic prescription for cancer pain. METHODS: Cancer patients (N = 241) were recruited from outpatient oncology clinics within a large mid-Atlantic healthcare system. RESULTS: Consistent with published literature, most patients (75.5%) were prescribed either morphine or oxycodone preparations as oral opioid therapy for cancer pain. When compared with Whites, African Americans were significantly more likely to be prescribed morphine (33% vs 14%) and less likely to be prescribed oxycodone (38% vs 64%) (p < .001). The estimated odds for African Americans to receive morphine were 2.573 times that for Whites (95% confidence interval 1.077-6.134) after controlling for insurance type, income, and pain levels. In addition, the presence of private health insurance was negatively associated with the prescription of morphine and positively associated with prescription of oxycodone in separate multivariable models. The presence of chronic kidney disease did not predict type of analgesic prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Both race and insurance type independently predict type of opioid selection for cancer outpatients. Larger clinical studies are needed to fully understand the sources and clinical consequences of racial differences in opioid selection for cancer pain.

Modifiable pathways from pain to functional status: Confirmatory baseline results from a randomised trial of African American patients with cancer pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested a model of cancer-related pain and functional status in African American patients, including beliefs about the ability to control pain as a key determinant of distress and functional status. METHODS: Baseline data from a randomised clinical trial consisting of clinical and patient-reported outcomes were used. Participants were 228 African American patients experiencing moderate to severe pain within the past 2 weeks. The model comprised four latent constructs: pain, perceived control over pain, pain-related distress and functional status. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the factor structure of the measurement model. Structural equation modelling was used to estimate direct and mediated effects. RESULTS: The measurement model fit well (RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05) with all loadings significant (p < 0.05). The structural model also fit well (RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05). The complex mediated pathway from pain to functional status through perceived control over pain and pain-related distress was strong and significant (specific indirect effect = -0.456, p = 0.004). Mediation by perceived control accounted for a 47% reduction of the effects of pain on functional status. CONCLUSION: If these results hold up longitudinally, interventions to increase perceived control over pain have the potential to improve functional status by decreasing pain-related distress.

Patient-related attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management among adult Jordanian patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management among adult Jordanian patients and to explore relationships between attitudinal barriers, pain, and demographic variables. METHODS: In this descriptive correlational study a convenience sample of 150 Jordanian adults with cancer pain were recruited from the outpatient cancer clinic at a regional comprehensive cancer center in Jordan. Patients completed the Arabic version of Barriers Questionnaire (ABQ-II), the Arabic version of Brief-Pain-Inventory (ABPI), and demographic questions. RESULTS: More than half of participants were male (61%), had a mean age of 44 years and length of education 14.5 years. Mean (SD) ABQ-II total score was 2.3 (0.8), on a scale of 0-5, with higher scores indicating stronger barriers. Older patients had significantly more barriers, and scored higher on concerns about harmful effects and communication. Patients with higher education levels had significantly lower fatalistic beliefs. Patients with higher barriers had significantly higher levels of worst pain. Pain interference with life activities was positively correlated with the fatalism subscale. CONCLUSIONS: Study provides useful baseline data on barriers to management of cancer pain among Jordanian that have not been available before. This data can be used in planning and testing interventions to understand and improve patient's attitudes to cancer pain management, and allow for cross-cultural comparisons.

Experiences of Urban African Americans with Cancer Pain.

The experience of cancer pain is poorly understood from the perspective of African Americans, who experience higher levels of pain, more pain-related distress, and poorer function than Caucasians. Decreased perceived control over pain may play a greater role for African American patients, affecting pain-related distress and function. The purpose of this study was to add to the understanding of cancer pain and perceived control over pain in African Americans, from the patients' perspective. This qualitative inquiry was part of a larger mixed-methods study testing an intervention to improve pain, pain-related distress, and functional status through increasing perceived control over pain. Participants were recruited from the waiting room of an urban comprehensive cancer and interviewed in their homes. Interviews with 18 adult cancer patients who self-identified as African American and reported experiencing moderate to severe pain (>4 on a 0-10 scale) within the past two weeks were included. Qualitative interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using a constant comparative method. Two major themes emerged from this qualitative inquiry: struggles of the chronic pain experience and benefits of perceived control over pain. Each theme contained several categories. The study unveiled the participants account of both struggles of the chronic pain experience and barriers of perceived control that can be assessed for and targeted in nursing intervention. Benefits to having perceived control over pain were also illustrated in the participants' narratives.

Cancer as a Platform for Genetics Education in the Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Nursing leaders and governing agencies have long requested more genetic content in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Despite this, evidence in the literature detailing how to meet this objective is scarce. METHOD: Using a familiar health condition such as cancer, undergraduate nursing students are introduced to the multiple genetic abnormalities that underlie the cellular dysregulation leading to carcinogenesis. RESULTS: Nursing students complete the course with a knowledge of cancer and its genetic underpinnings. CONCLUSION: This approach facilitated integration of genetic content in a disease-focused nursing course.

Challenges to Recruitment of Urban African American Patients with Cancer Pain.

There are many assumptions about recruitment of African Americans to cancer studies. The population is often characterized as older, low income, with limited education, scarce resources, and distrust of the health care system. Support systems for African Americans are reported to be centered on family and church communities. Observations made during recruitment and enrollments for a longitudinal intervention study with urban African Americans with cancer pain are presented. Majority of the subjects being recruited in this study are well educated, knowledgeable about research and very open to healthcare providers and researchers. Our population is younger than anticipated and struggling with an absence of family, faith, or community supports. They are more connected in terms of phone ownership, but often difficult to contact due to interruptions in phone service, housing insecurity and time demands related to medical care for their cancer. We conclude that familiarity with cultural patterns of a population of interest is necessary, but local and individual assessment is critical to successful recruitment to research.

Nursing's role in cancer pain management.

Nurses have advanced practice, research, and education in the field of cancer pain management. This paper highlights the contributions nurses have made to pain science and practice through literature published in the past 3 years. Work accomplished by nurses is examined in the areas of pain assessment, pain management, intervention-based research, evidence-based practice, patient education, and palliative care. Nurses serve as advocates for empowering patients to engage in self-management of their pain, and offer education and support to patients and families at their most vulnerable times. Nurse researchers have been at the forefront of work to develop and test new instruments and approaches to measure pain, elucidate pain experiences through quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and gauge the quality of pain care for patients and its impact on their caregivers. This research has uncovered many patient, health care professional, and systemic barriers to effective pain control, and has offered feasible solutions to overcoming these barriers.

Perceptions of control over pain by patients with cancer and their caregivers.

The purpose of this qualitative inquiry was to broaden the context for understanding perceived control as a concept related to the cancer pain response in the homecare setting. Ten patient/caregiver dyads participated in semistructured interviews focused on questions pertaining to the patients' perceived control over their own pain as well as the caregivers' control over the patients' pain. Line-by-line analysis was used to code, categorize, and analyze the data. Six themes emerged among patients: feeling robbed of the simplest of tasks and pleasures, the pain is hungry, feeling desperate, the pain is winning, fatigue/sleep disturbances, and perceived control is soothing. For the caregivers, four main themes emerged: monitoring the suffering, feeling like an outsider, inability to control the interventions, and importance of resources. Overall, patients and their caregivers were eager to discuss how their perceived lack of control over pain affected their daily lives. The results suggest perceived control over pain is an important aspect of the pain response in the homecare setting. Nurses should evaluate perceived control over pain in patients with cancer and their caregivers and implement and test potential methods for increasing perception of control over pain.

Factors that affect functional status in patients with cancer-related pain.

Cancer-related pain in outpatient adult populations remains high and has a direct effect on functional status. Factors that affect functional status have been explored separately, but the inter-relatedness of those factors has not been examined. Using a cross-sectional design, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between pain level, beliefs about pain, symptom distress, perceived control over pain, and functional status in 304 ambulatory cancer patients who experienced cancer-related pain within the past 2 weeks. Participants completed standardized questionnaires during regularly scheduled clinic visits. Patient's pain level was positively related to increased distress and decreased perceived control over pain and functional status. Structural equation modeling indicated that symptom distress mediated the relation between pain level and functional status. Perceived control over pain had a direct effect on symptom distress and mediated the effect of beliefs about pain and pain level on symptom distress. Patients' perceived control over pain may be an important component in pain management. The direct and mediating effects of perceived control and symptom distress suggest areas of further research. Interventions to increase knowledge and decrease barriers to pain control have the potential for increasing perceived control over pain.

Knowledge of and barriers to pain management in caregivers of cancer patients receiving homecare.

Cancer treatment is increasingly being provided in outpatient settings, requiring many of the responsibilities for patient care to be undertaken by family caregivers. Pain is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms experienced by cancer patients and is a primary concern for the family caregiver. Caregivers struggle with many issues that lead to inadequate management of cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to determine pain management knowledge and examine concerns about reporting pain and using analgesics in a sample of primary family caregivers of cancer patients receiving homecare. The Barriers Questionnaire and the Family Pain Questionnaire were administered to 46 primary caregivers. Between 46% and 94% of the caregivers reported having at least some agreement with the various concerns that are barriers to reporting pain and using analgesics, and up to 15% reported having strong agreement. The areas of greatest concern were about opioid-related side effects, fears of addiction, and the belief that pain meant disease progression. Results showed that caregivers with higher pain management knowledge had significantly fewer barriers to cancer pain management, supporting the importance of increasing caregiver's knowledge of management of cancer pain.

Home care nurses' perceptions of control over cancer pain.

This qualitative study examined home care nurses' perceptions of control over cancer pain. Four major themes emerged: Being heard, feeling invisible in the pain management process; not knowing, a need for pain education; control through advocacy; and patient-related barriers to optimal pain management. This study documents the need for continued education in pain management and communication skills for home care nurses.

Disparities between black and white patients with cancer pain: the effect of perception of control over pain.

CONTEXT: Pain continues to be a problem in ambulatory patients with cancer. Disparities in minority patients with pain have been previously identified. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of perception of control over pain on disparities in pain, symptom distress, and functional status in white and black patients with cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in a large urban cancer center. PATIENTS: A total of 281 patients who reported having pain within the last month and were receiving treatment in the cancer center. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, pain-related distress, functional status, perception of control over pain. RESULTS: Black patients had significantly higher pain intensity, more pain-related distress, and reported more pain-related interference with function than white patients. Disparities in pain-related distress and functional status were significantly reduced and only disparities in pain intensity remained when perception of control over pain was held constant. CONCLUSIONS: Perception of control over pain is an important factor in understanding responses to pain. Increasing a patient's perception of control over pain may decrease disparities and increase functional status.

Improving cancer pain management by homecare nurses.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the effects of a program, directed at homecare nurses, of structured educational interventions on the management of pain and opioid-related side effects in homecare patients with cancer. DESIGN: A longitudinal multilevel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Midwestern region in the United States. SAMPLE: 202 nurses caring for patients with cancer recruited from homecare agencies. METHODS: The two-tiered educational program focused on basic and advanced pain management strategies, particularly in the area of pharmacologic options and assertive communication skills. Instruments used were the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain, the barriers questionnaire, perception of control over pain, and a demographic questionnaire. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Knowledge and attitudes about pain management, barriers to pain management, and perception of control over pain. FINDINGS: Nurses in the intervention group had a significant increase in their knowledge, a more positive attitude about pain management, fewer perceived barriers to pain management, and an increase in perceived control over pain compared to the nurses who did not receive the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The educational program Power Over Pain has beneficial effects for homecare nurses caring for patients with cancer pain. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: A need exists for homecare nurses to gain more insight into pain management strategies and enhance their advocacy skills to improve pain management for patients with cancer treated in the home.

Impact of tracheostomy or laryngectomy on spousal and caregiver relationships.

Caregiving is an important component in the management of patients with a tracheostomy or laryngectomy. The purpose of this integrative research literature review was to gain a better understanding of the impact of caregiving for adults and children with laryngectomy or tracheostomy on the patient, the family, and the caregiver. Patients who had undergone laryngectomy or tracheostomy included those with and without cancer. This integrated review of the literature on caregiving in this population demonstrates the dearth of studies on this subject. Despite the significance of the caregiving role, few studies have addressed caregiving, and those that have are primarily descriptive. Studies are needed that develop and test interventions to assist caregivers in adaptation to their role, identification of methods of decreasing caregiver burden and strain, and coordination of resources to support patients and caregivers of patients with tracheostomies and laryngectomies.