Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Access ; 19(5): 422-429, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29544403

RESUMO

The Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology (S.E.N.), vascular surgery (SEACV), interventional radiology (SERAM-SERVEI), infectious diseases (SEIMC), and nephrology nursing (SEDEN)), along with the methodological support of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, has developed the Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Hemodialysis. This article summarizes the main issues from the guideline's chapter entitled "Monitoring and surveillance of arteriovenous access." We will analyze the current evidence on conflicting topics such as the value of the flow-based screening methods for the arteriovenous access surveillance or the role of Doppler ultrasound as the imaging exploration to confirm suspected stenosis. In addition, the concept of significant stenosis and the criteria to perform the elective intervention for stenosis were reviewed. The adoption of these guidelines will hopefully translate into a reduced risk of thrombosis and increased patency rates for both arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Implante de Prótese Vascular/normas , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal/normas , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
Nefrologia ; 37 Suppl 1: 1-191, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248052

RESUMO

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Diálise Renal/métodos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/normas , Aneurisma/etiologia , Aneurisma/cirurgia , Angioplastia/métodos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/normas , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Constrição Patológica , Falha de Equipamento , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Agulhas , Exame Físico , Reologia , Espanha , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Trombose/terapia , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/efeitos adversos
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(5): 680-5, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20409679

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cryoplasty represents an alternative endovascular approach to current techniques for femoropopliteal occlusive disease treatment. Its theoretical advantage compared to angioplasty is associated with the lower appearance of recoil, dissection, and intimal hyperplasia. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of cryoplasty in femoropopliteal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients presenting with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) and Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II type A or B lesions in the femoropopliteal region were prospectively included in the study between November 2006 and April 2007. All patients but those with severely calcified lesions underwent cryoplasty (Polarcath Cryoplasty System(R)), and were followed up clinically and by Doppler ultrasound. Outcomes evaluated were technical success, patency at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, mortality, limb salvage, freedom from restenosis, and freedom from occlusion rates. Statistical analysis used Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 76 years (range, 65-89), and 81% of them were females. RISK FACTORS: 73% diabetes mellitus, 73% arterial hypertension, 64% dyslipemia, 9% smokers. Clinical: 91% CLI IV and 9% CLI III. Location of lesions: 45% popliteal; 18% superficial femoral; 18% superficial femoral and popliteal; 18% popliteal and anterior tibial. Lesion morphology: 73% stenosis, 27% occlusions. TASC II classification: 64% TASC B and 36% TASC A.Technical success: 100%. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency: 91%, 91% and 91% at 3 months; 63%, 82%, and 91% at 6 months; 55%, 73% and 91% at 12 months, respectively. Limb salvage and survival of 91% at 3, 6, and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Cryoplasty in the femoropopliteal region showed a good success rate, with no dissections or significant residual stenosis. However, primary patency and freedom from restenosis rates at 1 year are 55%, both demonstrating a low efficacy of the technique in this territory.


Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Criocirurgia , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Hemodinâmica , Isquemia/cirurgia , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/complicações , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/mortalidade , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/fisiopatologia , Constrição Patológica , Criocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Salvamento de Membro/mortalidade , Masculino , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA