Tibial slope and medial meniscectomy significantly influence short-term knee laxity following ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine demographic, anatomic, and surgical factors associated with static and dynamic Anterior Tibial Translation (ATT) following ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that both static and dynamic ATT would be greater in knees with high tibial slope or that required meniscectomy. METHODS: The authors prospectively enrolled 280 consecutive patients that had primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts at one center for which preoperative tear type, meniscal tears, and medial tibial slope were documented. A total of 137 were excluded due to concomitant extra-articular tenodesis or surgical antecedents on either knee, and 18 were lost to follow-up, leaving 125 that were evaluated at a minimum of 6 months including: static ATT on monopodal weight-bearing radiographs, and dynamic ATT on differential stress radiographs using the Telos™ device. RESULTS: Both postoperative static and dynamic ATT were strongly associated with preoperative static and dynamic ATT (respectively, ß = 0.068 and ß = 0.50, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression confirmed that postoperative static ATT increased with tibial slope (ß = 0.24; CI 0.01-0.47; p = 0.042) and in knees that had partial medial meniscectomy (ß = 2.05; CI 0.25-3.84; p = 0.025), while dynamic ATT decreased with age (ß = - 0.11; CI - 0.16 to - 0.05; p < 0.001), and increased with tibial slope (ß = 0.27; CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.019) and in knees that had partial medial meniscectomy (ß = 2.20; CI 0.35-4.05; p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Both static and dynamic ATT following ACL reconstruction increased with tibial slope and in knees that had partial medial meniscectomy. These findings could help surgeons tailor their techniques and 'à la carte' rehabilitation protocols, by preserving the menisci and sometimes delaying full weight-bearing and return to sport in patients at risk, and hence improve outcomes and prevent graft failures. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Sexual and ethnic polymorphism render prosthetic overhang and under-coverage inevitable using off-the shelf TKA implants.

PURPOSE: Unexplained pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often result from mismatch between implant geometry and knee morphology, which depends on patient size, sex, and ethnicity. This study aimed to determine whether size, sex, or ethnicity are independently associated with distal femoral morphology in healthy Caucasian and Asian knees, and to compare anatomic ratios to those of commercially available TKA implants. METHODS: Two series of computed tomography (CT) angiograms from France (264 knees) and China (259 knees) were used to digitize osteometric landmarks at the level of the femoral epicondyles, to measure anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions at the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral zones. The aspect (ML/AP), trapezoidicity (MLp/MLa), and asymmetry (APl/APm) ratios, as well as the sulcus angle were calculated and compared to those of 9 TKA models. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether anatomic ratios were independently associated with sex, origin, or size. RESULTS: Multivariable analyses revealed that, independently from size, female knees were narrower (ß = - 0.03; p < 0.001) and more asymmetric (ß = 0.02; p < 0.001), while Chinese knees were more trapezoidal (ß = 0.04; p = 0.002) and asymmetric (ß = 0.02; p < 0.001) with shallower trochleae (ß = 6.4°; p < 0.001). Compared to native knees, most implants were too wide, and many of the recent models too 'trapezoidal'. Most prosthetic trochleae were too shallow compared to French knees, but within the third quartile of Chinese knees. CONCLUSIONS: The morphology of the distal femur depends on sex and ethnicity independently from size. The wide spectrum of morphotypes observed cannot be covered by 'off-the-shelf' TKA models, and until customized implants become more accessible, prosthetic overhang, and under-coverage remain inevitable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective comparative study.

Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes of a recent anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) system at > 3 years. The hypothesis was that its functional scores and revision rates would be at least equivalent to those reported for other 'trochlear-cutting' implants in the literature. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients that had received PFA using the same anatomic trochlear-cutting implant (KneeTech PFJ, Corin-Tornier, Montbonnot, France) with a dome-shaped patellar button and had systematic lateral facetectomy without lateral release were enrolled. Radiographic parameters collected pre-operatively included: trochlear dysplasia type and patellar height, TT-TG, patellar tilt and shape. Clinical scores collected pre-operatively and at > 3 years included: Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS). RESULTS: The initial cohort comprised 23 women (82%) and five men (18%), aged 63.3 ± 14.7 years, of which 23 had trochlear dysplasia (82%). One patient (4%) could not be reached, and three (11%) were revised to TKA due to arthritic progression, aged 77, 80 and 83 years at index operation, only one of which had trochlear dysplasia (type A). At final follow-up, none of the remaining 24 patients had complications; their OKS was 35.0 ± 10.3 and KSS symptoms and function were 19.8 ± 5.0 and 71.7 ± 13.6. CONCLUSION: The anatomic trochlear-cutting PFA granted satisfactory scores and prevented mechanical complications, but the high incidence of early revisions, all due to spread of arthritis hence to improper patient selection. PFA should be restricted to patients with trochlear dysplasia, in whom arthritis was triggered by patellar instability and maltracking rather than degenerative or age-related diseases. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Over-voluming predicted by pre-operative planning in 24% of total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies demonstrated that prosthetic overhang and over-sizing cause pain and stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but none considered volume changes within the joint capsule. This study was designed to investigate differences in volumes of resected bone compared to implanted components in TKA, and to determine the incidence and factors related to 'over-voluming'. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions were created from 100 magnetic resonance imaging scans taken to design patient-specific instruments for TKA. The preoperative simulations were used to calculate the volume ratio (VR) by dividing volume of planned components by that of planned bone resections. Uni- and multi-variable linear regressions were performed to determine associations between 'over-voluming' (VR > 1.0) and gender, implant size and version (standard versus narrow), osteophytes, resection levels, external rotation of the femoral component, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). RESULTS: The overall implant/bone volume ratio was 0.91 ± 0.11 (range 0.63-1.16) with 'over-voluming' observed in 24 knees. Multi-variable regression confirmed over-voluming to be associated with lower mLDFA (OR 0.66; CI 0.45-0.93; p = 0.026) and extensive osteophytes (OR 0.14; CI 0.03-0.61; p = 0.014), but not HKA angle (OR 0.98; CI 0.76-1.26; p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Over-voluming was observed in 24% of knees, in which the implant volume exceeded the resected volume by up to 16%. Over-voluming was associated with intra-articular femoral valgus (low mLDFA), but not directly associated with tibial deformity (mMPTA) or HKA angle. Over-voluming could be associated with prosthetic overhang or excessive tensions within the joint capsule, and, therefore, contribute to unexplained pain and stiffness following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Preoperative laxity in ACL-deficient knees increases with posterior tibial slope and medial meniscal tears.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine patient and anatomic factors that influence anteroposterior and rotational laxity in knees with ACL tears. Based on the findings of biomechanical studies, we hypothesized that static and dynamic anterior tibial translation (ATT) as well as positive pivot shift would increase with female gender, tibial slope, and meniscal tears. METHODS: The authors prospectively collected preoperative data and intraoperative findings of 417 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The exclusion criteria were: revision ACL procedures (n = 53), other surgical antecedents (n = 27), prior osteotomies (n = 7) or concomitant ligament tears on the ipsilateral knee (n = 34), and history of ACL tears in the contralateral knee (n = 45), leaving a study cohort of 251 patients. Their preoperative anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed objectively using 'static' monopodal weight-bearing radiographs and 'dynamic' instrumented differential measurements of ATT. Rotational laxity was assessed subjectively using the pivot shift test. RESULTS: Multivariable regression showed that static ATT increases only with tibial slope (ß = 0.30; p < 0.001), but dynamic ATT increases with tibial slope (ß = 0.19; p = 0.041), medial meniscal tears (ß = 1.27; p = 0.007), complete ACL tears (ß = 2.06; p < 0.001), and to decrease with age (ß = - 0.09; p < 0.001). Multivariable regression also indicated that high-grade pivot shift decreases with age (OR 0.94; p < 0.001) and for women (OR 0.25; p < 0.001), and to be higher for knees with complete ACL tears (OR 3.04; p = 0.002) or medial meniscal tears (OR 2.28; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Contrary to expectations based on biomechanical studies, static ATT was only affected by high posterior tibial slope, while dynamic ATT was affected by both high posterior tibial slopes and medial meniscal tears, but not by gender or lateral meniscal tears. Likewise, pivot shift was affected by gender and medial meniscal tears, but not lateral meniscal tears or posterior tibial slope. These findings are relevant to guide surgeons in optimizing their surgical procedures, such as conserving the menisci when possible, and rehabilitation protocols, by delaying full weight-bearing and return to sports in patients with anatomic and lesional risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study, Level IV.

Patellofemoral design enhancements reduce long-term complications of postero-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Few studies investigated whether trochlear and patellar design enhancements improve long-term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to compare the long-term survival and complication rates of two consecutive generations of the same TKA system with identical tibiofemoral geometry, but different patellofemoral designs. METHODS: The authors retrieved the records of 93 patients (104 knees) operated with the HLS II system and 116 patients (122 knees) operated with HLS Evolution system. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years noting all complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival was compared for two endpoints: (1) revision of all components and (2) revision of any component. RESULTS: From the HLS II series, the incidence of revision of all components was 6.4%, and of any component was 9.8%. From the HLS Evolution series, the incidence of revision of all components was 4.1%, and of any component was 5.1%. Comparing the survival at equivalent follow-up of 14 years, considering revision of all components, the HLS II had higher survival than the HLS Evolution (98.9% vs 95.9%), while considering revision of any component, the HLS II had lower survival than the HLS Evolution (93.0% vs 94.9%). The differences in survival of the two implants were not significant, neither at equivalent follow-up of 14 years (n.s.), nor at maximum follow-up of each cohort (n.s.). The complication rate was higher for the HLS II series compared to the HLS Evolution (28% vs 12%, p = 0.009), but patellofemoral complications were not more frequent (8% vs 6%, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Though the differences in survival of the two implants were not significant, conflicting findings are observed due to partial revisions for patellar fractures (5 in the HLS II series and 1 in the HLS Evolution series) which could be related to patellofemoral design enhancements. This study highlights the importance of patello-femoral geometry, which is often overlooked in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.