Lumbar epidural catheter insertion: the midline vs. the paramedian approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of epidural catheter insertion via the midline or the paramedian approach with regard to ease of catheter insertion, incidence of paraesthesias and efficacy of epidural block. In addition to the type of approach, the prognostic value of Patients characteristics variables with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was assessed. METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for surgery under epidural anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 15 patients each. Epidural anaesthesia was performed via a midline or paramedian approach using loss of resistance to saline. Variables measured were: time needed to identify the epidural space, time needed for and ease of epidural catheter insertion and the incidence of paraesthesias. After completion of these observations, epidural anaesthesia was established with 150 mg ropivacaine 1%. Efficacy of the epidural block was assessed by the need for intraoperative analgesics and by the patient on a three-point scale (good/fair/poor). RESULTS: Quality of sensory blockade was adequate in both groups. Catheter insertion was significantly faster using the paramedian approach. The difference between the two approaches with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was not significant, however, there was a trend towards more paraesthesias in the midline group. In the multivariate analysis, type of approach was an independent significant predictor of paraesthesias and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter insertion was faster in the paramedian group and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias with the midline approach.

Transient neurological symptoms with subarachnoid lidocaine: effect of early mobilization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although lidocaine has been used extensively for spinal anaesthesia since 1949, it has been associated with transient neurological symptoms only in the past 10 yr. It has been suggested that early ambulation after spinal anaesthesia, as opposed to traditional 24 h recumbency, might be the causative factor for the development of transient neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of early ambulation on the incidence of transient neurological symptoms after single injection spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 2%. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing minor surgery under spinal anaesthesia were included. All patients received lidocaine 60 mg. After the establishment of successful subarachnoid block, patients were randomly allocated to two groups of 30 patients. Patients in Group 1 were ambulated as soon as possible, whereas patients in Group 2 were kept recumbent until 6 h after subarachnoid injection. Two days after surgery patients were contacted by a blinded observer and interviewed of transient neurological symptoms using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were asked to express the intensity of pain/discomfort on a verbal rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of transient neurological symptoms (23% vs. 27%). In all patients, symptoms resolved completely within 6-24 h. The median pain score was 5 (range 2-8) in Group 1 and 7 (range 1-8) in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, there is no correlation between the time of ambulation after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine and the incidence of transient neurological symptoms.

Mortality associated with anaesthesia: a qualitative analysis to identify risk factors.

From a prospectively defined cohort of patients who underwent either general, regional or combined anaesthesia from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 1997 (n = 869 483), all consecutive patients (n = 811) who died within 24 h or remained unintentionally comatose 24 h after anaesthesia were classified to determine a relationship with anaesthesia. These deaths (n = 119; 15%) were further analysed to identify contributing aspects of the anaesthetic management, other factors and the appropriateness of care. The incidence of 24-h peri-operative death per 10 000 anaesthetics was 8.8 (95% CI 8.2-9.5), of peri-operative coma was 0.5 (0.3-0.6) and of anaesthesia-related death 1.4 (1.1-1.6). Of the 119 anaesthesia-related deaths, 62 (52%) were associated with cardiovascular management, 57 (48%) with other anaesthetic management, 12 (10%) with ventilatory management and 12 (10%) with patient monitoring. Inadequate preparation of the patient contributed to 30 (25%) of the anaesthesia-related deaths. During induction of anaesthesia, choice of anaesthetic technique (n = 18 (15%)) and performance of the anaesthesiologist (n = 8 (7%)) were most commonly associated with death. During maintenance, the most common factors were cardiovascular management (n = 43 (36%)), ventilatory management (n = 12 (10%)) and patient monitoring (n = 12 (10%)). In both the recovery and the postoperative phases, patient monitoring was the most common factor (n = 12 (10%) for both). For cardiovascular, ventilatory and other anaesthetic management, human failure contributed to 89 (75%) deaths and organisational factors to 12 (10%). For inadequate patient monitoring, human factors contributed to 71 (60%) deaths and organisational factors to 48 (40%). Other contributing factors were inadequate communication (30 deaths (25%) for all four aspects of the anaesthetic management) and lack of supervision (particularly for ventilatory management). Inadequate care was delivered in 19 (16%) of the anaesthesia-related deaths with respect to cardiovascular management, in 20 (17%) with respect to ventilatory management, in 18 (15%) with respect to patient monitoring and in 23 (19%) with respect to other anaesthetic management.

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effects of duration spent in the sitting position.

Sixty patients, aged 65-84 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia remained sitting for 2 (group 1, n = 15), 5 (group 2, n = 15), 10 (group 3, n = 15), or 20 (group 4, n = 15) min after completion of the subarachnoid administration of 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. They were then placed in the supine position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pinprick. Motor block was scored using a 12-point scale. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate were also recorded. Twenty minutes after the injection the upper analgesia levels were lower (P<0.05) in group 4 (median T9.0) than in the groups 1-3 (medians T6.6-T8.5). The highest obtained levels (medians T5.7-T8.0) did not differ between the groups, but occurred later (P<0.05) in group 4 (median 35 min) than in groups 1-3 (medians 19-24 min). There were no significant differences in the maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes between the four study groups.

Epidural infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after major orthopedic surgery: pharmacokinetic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Changing plasma protein concentrations may affect the protein binding and pharmacokinetics of drugs in the postoperative phase. Therefore, the authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, administered by 72-h epidural infusion to provide postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients, scheduled for major orthopedic surgery during combined epidural and general anesthesia received a bolus dose of ropivacaine (50 or 75 mg), followed by constant-rate (10 ml/h) epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (group 1) or 3 mg/ml (group 2). Total and unbound plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide and plasma concentrations of alpha1-acid glycoprotein were determined. In addition, the urinary excretion of ropivacaine and major metabolites was measured. RESULTS: Total plasma concentrations of ropivacaine increased steadily during the infusion, reaching 2.7 +/- 0.7 and 2.9 +/- 0.5 mg/l in groups 1 and 2 after 72 h constant-rate infusion. Unbound ropivacaine concentrations reached average steady state levels of approximately 0.06 and 0.07 mg/l. Total and unbound concentrations of pipecoloxylidide increased to 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 0.4 +/- 0.2 mg/l (group 1) and 1.2 +/- 0.4 and 0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/l (group 2) after 72 h infusion. alpha1-Acid glycoprotein concentrations initially decreased, but thereafter increased steadily to approximately twice the baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative increases in plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein concentrations enhance the protein binding of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide, causing divergence of total and unbound plasma concentrations.

Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia: contribution of plasma protein binding to intra-patient and inter-patient variability.

We have examined the influence of plasma protein binding on inter-individual and intra-individual variability in the effective postoperative analgesic concentration (EAC) of alfentanil and on the performance of the target-controlled infusion system used. Ten patients received standardized anaesthesia and target-controlled alfentanil for postoperative analgesia. Analgesia was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Plasma protein binding of alfentanil was assessed at four different times (on arrival in the recovery room, at 21:00 on the day of surgery and at 09:00 and 21:00 on the first postoperative day). Bias and inaccuracy were examined on the day of surgery and on the first postoperative day. Unbound fractions of alfentanil varied from 5 to 15% and varied in time. In general, the unbound fractions on the day of surgery were higher than those on the first postoperative day. Thirty-nine percent of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil (range 33-140 ng ml-1) at the onset of therapy could be explained by protein binding. At the other observation times, correlations between unbound fraction and EAC were only moderate. Bias on the day of surgery was -19% and 12% on the first postoperative day (ns). Inaccuracy was 23% and 18%, respectively (ns). We conclude that inter-individual variations in plasma protein binding can explain a significant portion of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil in the early postoperative phase.

The epidural "top-up" in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: the effect of volume versus dose.

UNLABELLED: The reinforcement of anesthesia by an epidural "top-up" in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia may be explained by a dual mechanism: a volume effect compressing the dural sac and a local anesthetic effect. The purpose of our study was to investigate the relative importance of each of these factors. Fifty patients scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five groups comprising 10 patients each. Using a needle-through-needle technique, all patients received a subarachnoid injection of 10 mg of plain bupivacaine and an epidural catheter. After the maximal level of sensory blockade as a result of the subarachnoid injection had been established, an epidural top-up was given according to the randomization code. Patients in Group 1 received 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%; patients in Group 2 received 10 mL of saline; patients in Group 3 received 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%; patients in Group 4 received 5 mL of saline; and patients in Group 5 received no epidural top-up. The maximal level of sensory blockade was then assessed for an additional 30 min. In Groups 1-4, the maximal level of sensory blockade increased significantly, whereas there was no significant increase in Group 5. There was no significant difference in the increase in the maximal level of sensory blockade among Groups 1-4. We conclude that, under the conditions of our study, there is no difference between 5 and 10 mL with regard to the volume effect of an epidural top-up in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and that to produce an additional local anesthetic effect with bupivacaine, the dose must be larger than 25 mg. IMPLICATIONS: In combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, an epidural "top-up" may increase the maximal level of sensory blockade by means of a volume effect and a local anesthetic effect. In this study, volumes of 5 and 10 mL produced a similar increase, and 25 mg of bupivacaine was insufficient to produce an additional local anesthetic effect.

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effect of site of injection on spread of analgesia.

In this randomized, observer-blind study, we have examined, in elderly patients, the effect of site of injection on analgesia levels after spinal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. Thirty male patients, aged 68-87 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery during spinal anaesthesia received 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution at either the L3-4 (n = 15) or L4-5 (n = 15) interspace. The solution was injected with the patient in the sitting position. The patient remained sitting for 2 min and was then placed in the supine horizontal position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pin-prick. The highest analgesia levels did not differ between groups (medians were approximately T7). There were no significant differences in the time to maximum cephalad spread of analgesia, maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes. We conclude that injection at the L4-5 interspace has no advantage compared with injection at the L3-4 interspace.

Mechanism of action of an epidural top-up in combined spinal epidural anesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanism of action by which an epidural top-up reinforces anesthesia in combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Thirty patients scheduled to undergo lower limb orthopedic surgery were randomly allocated to three groups of 10 patients each. In all patients, a 16-gauge Tuohy needle was introduced into the epidural space. Using the needle through needle technique, each patient received a subarachnoid injection of 10 mg plain bupivacaine 0.5% through a long 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle introduced into the subarachnoid space through the Tuohy needle. After withdrawal of the spinal needle, an epidural catheter was introduced into the epidural space. After the maximum level of sensory block after the subarachnoid injection had been established, an epidural top-up with 10 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (Group 1) or 10 mL saline (Group 2) was administered; patients in Group 3 received no epidural top-up. The maximum level of sensory block was then assessed for an additional 30 min. After the epidural top-up the maximum level of sensory block increased significantly by 4.8 +/- 1.6 segments in Group 1 and 2.0 +/- 2.0 segments in Group 2. In Group 3 there was a nonsignificant increase of 0.3 +/- 0.5 segments. Intergroup comparisons showed that this increase in Group 1 was significant compared with those in Groups 2 and 3, and that the increase in Group 2 was significant compared with that in Group 3. We conclude that the mechanism of action by which an epidural top-up reinforces anesthesia in combined spinal epidural anesthesia can be explained partly by an epidural volume effect and partly by an effect of the local anesthetic itself.

The effect of epidural administration of alfentanil on intra-operative intravenous alfentanil requirements during nitrous oxide-oxygen-alfentanil anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery.

The effects of epidural administration of alfentanil on the intravenous alfentanil dose requirements and the plasma concentrations required to suppress responses to surgical stimulation during nitrous oxide-oxygen-alfentanil anaesthesia in 20 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were studied. Before induction of anaesthesia, patients in one group (E) received an epidural injection of 1 mg alfentanil, followed by an epidural infusion of alfentanil 0.2 mg.h-1 until skin closure, whilst patients in the other group (C, control) received a continuous infusion of sodium chloride via a sham catheter in order to blind the main investigator to the treatment. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with nitrous oxide (66%) in oxygen and a 'target'-controlled intravenous infusion of alfentanil. During surgery, the 'target' alfentanil concentration was increased or decreased according to patients' responses. The number of responses to surgical stimulation was smaller in patients from group E (median 1, range 0-3) than in patients from group C (median 4, range 1-15; p < 0.005), even though the alfentanil intravenous infusion rates were smaller in group E [mean (SD): 1.6(0.5) micrograms.kg-1 min-1] than in group C [2.9(1.2) micrograms.kg-1 min-1, p < 0.02]. Both the lowest concentrations associated with no response [133(40) ng.ml-1] and the highest concentrations associated with a response [155(65) ng.ml-1] in group E were lower than those in group C [238(100) ng.ml-1, p < 0.01 and 334(163) ng.ml-1, p < 0.05, respectively]. We concluded that epidural administration of alfentanil reduces intravenous alfentanil requirements during nitrous oxide-oxygen-alfentanil anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. The results indicate a spinal mechanism of action of epidural alfentanil.

Plasma concentrations of alfentanil following epidural administration.

The plasma concentration-time profile of alfentanil following epidural administration was determined in eight patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under nitrous oxide (66%)-oxygen (33%)-halothane (0.3%) anaesthesia, supplemented with intravenous sufentanil. Alfentanil (1 mg) was administered epidurally before induction of general anaesthesia. Blood samples for the determination of plasma alfentanil concentrations by capillary gas chromatography were collected at intervals until 12 h after the epidural injection. Peak plasma concentrations [mean (SD)] were 9.7 (2.3)ng.ml-1, and were attained in a median (range) time of 90 (30-120) min. The results suggest that alfentanil is slowly absorbed from the epidural space into the general circulation.

Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil after epidural administration. Investigation of systemic absorption kinetics with a stable isotope method.

BACKGROUND: The effects of epidurally administered alfentanil may be due in part to its uptake into the systemic circulation. Therefore we examined the systemic absorption kinetics after epidural injection of alfentanil. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics were determined using a stable isotope method in ten patients, undergoing lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. After epidural injection of 0.68 mg deuterium-labeled alfentanil (alfentanil-d5), 1 mg unlabeled alfentanil was administered over 1 h by an intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected for 12 h. Concentrations of alfentanil and alfentanil-d5 were measured by a combination of gas chromatography and mass fragmentography. The systemic absorption profiles of alfentanil-d5 were determined by deconvolution of the plasma alfentanil-d5 concentrations with the biexponential unit disposition functions, derived from the intravenous data. In addition, data were analyzed by moment analysis. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) steady-state volume of distribution, total plasma clearance, elimination half-life and mean residence time, derived from the unlabeled alfentanil concentration-time data, were 43.2 +/- 19.5 1,418 +/- 129 ml/min, 119 +/- 34 min, and 103 +/- 26 min, respectively. The absorption of alfentanil-d5 was monophasic in most patients. The mean systemic availability and mean absorption time derived from the deconvolution data were 100 +/- 17% and 114 +/- 24 min. The values determined by moment analysis were 107 +/- 18% and 112 +/- 36 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After epidural administration alfentanil is slowly absorbed into the general circulation. Resulting plasma concentrations are very low and do not contribute appreciably to the systemic opioid effect.

Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a double-blind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5% and 0.75% solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb surgery.

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine as a local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Forty patients between the ages of 18 and 75 yr, scheduled for minor lower limb surgery, were studied. They were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mL glucose-free 0.5% (15 mg) or 0.75% (22.5 mg) ropivacaine in a double-blind fashion. The subarachnoid puncture was performed with a 26-gauge Quincke-point needle at the L3-4 interspace with the patients in the sitting position. The onset of analgesia to pinprick was similar with both concentrations. The median (range) upper level of analgesia obtained with the 0.5% solution was T11 (L4-T5) and was T10-11 (L4-T4) with the 0.75% solution. The duration of analgesia at T12 (P < 0.01) and the total duration of analgesia (P < 0.002) were longer in the 0.75% group. In addition, the area under the number of blocked segments versus time curve was larger with the 0.75% ropivacaine solution (P < 0.001). The incidence of complete motor block of the lower limbs was higher (P < 0.02) and the total duration of motor block longer (P < 0.002) in the 0.75% group. No unexpected adverse events were registered. We conclude that subarachnoid injection of glucose-free ropivacaine solutions results in a variable spread of analgesia, mostly accompanied by a good quality of motor block, in particular with the 0.75% solution.

Efficacy of epidurally administered sufentanil versus bupivacaine during thoracic surgery. A randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study.

The efficacy of thoracic epidural sufentanil 50 micrograms was compared with bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 5 micrograms.ml-1 (dose 40 mg) or saline, in 30 patients (n = 10 in each group) undergoing lateral thoracotomy. Sufentanil, bupivacaine or saline was administered epidurally after induction of anaesthesia with sufentanil 1 microgram.kg-1 and thiopentone 2-5 mg.kg-1. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide 66% and halothane 0.3%. Supplementary sufentanil 25 micrograms was given whenever the systolic arterial blood pressure increased more than 15 mmHg above the pre-operative value, whenever heart rate exceeded 90 beat.min-1 in the absence of hypovolaemia, or when other autonomic or somatic signs occurred. Fewer patients in the epidural sufentanil (n = 4, p < 0.005) and bupivacaine (n = 1, p < 0.001) groups required supplementary sufentanil compared to the placebo group, in which all patients needed supplementary sufentanil, but there was no statistical difference between the sufentanil and bupivacaine groups. One or more hypotensive episodes occurred in five patients in the sufentanil group, in all patients in the bupivacaine group and in no patient in the placebo group, and the differences were significant (p < 0.02).

Endocrine-metabolic response to abdominal aortic surgery: a randomized trial of general anesthesia versus general plus epidural anesthesia.

The influence of epidural anesthesia on the endocrine-metabolic response following abdominal aortic reconstruction was studied in a prospective randomized trial. Cortisol and catecholamine responses and nitrogen balance were measured in two groups of five patients receiving general anesthesia only (group 1) or general anesthesia combined with epidural bupivacaine (group 2). The study lasted from preoperatively until the first postoperative day. At 2100 hours on the day of surgery serum cortisol concentrations were higher in group 1 than in group 2 (1.41 versus 0.82 mumol/L; p < 0.01). Likewise the total perioperative hypercortisolemia, expressed as the area under the curve, was significantly higher in group 1 (11.7 versus 5.7 mumol/L/hr, p < 0.01). Intraoperative urinary excretion of epinephrine and postoperative norepinephrine excretion were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Urinary excretion of free cortisol and cumulative nitrogen balance were not different between the groups. Although the number of patients was limited and the sensory nerve block level was not measured perioperatively, this study suggests that epidural anesthesia attenuates the stress response to aortic surgery.

Computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although computer-controlled infusion (CCI) of alfentanil has been shown to be effective intraoperatively, this technique has not been validated for postoperative use. Therefore, the authors examined the efficacy of this technique in providing postoperative pain relief. The study comprised both a validation of published pharmacokinetic data sets and the definition of the minimum effective analgesic concentrations after major orthopedic surgery. METHODS: The bias and inaccuracy of the implemented pharmacokinetic data set were examined, in 20 patients who had undergone major orthopedic surgery, by determination of the median performance error (MDPE) and median absolute performance error (MDAPE). The performance of two other published pharmacokinetic data sets was also examined by simulating the plasma concentrations that would have been predicted, had these data sets been implemented. The minimum effective analgesic concentrations (MEAC) were determined at the following time points: at the onset of pain, at 9:00 PM on the day of surgery, and at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Measured plasma concentration-time profiles generally were parallel to the target concentration-time profiles. The MDPE and MDAPE obtained were 12% and 28%, respectively. The MEACs ranged from < 1 to 175 ng/ml and showed substantial interindividual variability. The median MEACs at the four study times were 59, 52, 65, and 43 ng/ml. The MEAC at 9:00 PM on the first postoperative day was significantly lower than those at the other study times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil provides adequate postoperative analgesia. The study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic data sets that are useful for intraoperative CCI of alfentanil are equally valid in the postoperative phase. Although required plasma concentrations of alfentanil are reasonably stable in time, interindividual variations are large, necessitating individual titration.

Continuous interpleural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after surgery with flank incisions: a double-blind comparison of 0.25% and 0.5% solutions.

Postoperative analgesia, as assessed by visual analogue scale scores (0-10) and patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements, pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and plasma bupivacaine concentrations were studied in patients receiving interpleural blockade with bupivacaine after surgery with a flank incision. Two groups of 10 patients received either 0.5% or 0.25% bupivacaine, both with epinephrine (5 micrograms/mL). Pain relief was initiated when patients had visual analogue scale scores greater than or equal to 4. Patients received 21 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% or 0.5% in a double-blind fashion. One hour later, a continuous infusion of 5 mL/h of the study solution was started. At the same time, patient-controlled analgesia became accessible to the patients. The onset time of pain relief and the area under the visual analogue scale score-time curves over the first 8 h were similar in both groups. Patient-controlled analgesia morphine use was also similar in the 0.25% (21.3 +/- 14.6 mg) and 0.5% (21.0 +/- 16.0 mg) groups (mean +/- SD). In both groups, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved significantly within 60 min (P less than 0.05). Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 h were higher (P less than 0.001) in the 0.5% group (Cmax, 1.47 +/- 0.37 micrograms/mL; AUC, 1511 +/- 323 micrograms.mL-1.min) than those in the 0.25% group (Cmax, 0.55 +/- 0.22 micrograms/mL; AUC, 680 +/- 118 micrograms.mL-1.min) (mean +/- SD).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cognitive function after spinal or general anesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy in elderly men.

Cognitive functions in 53 elderly men who underwent a transurethral prostatectomy were assessed pre-operatively and 4 days and 3 months post-operatively. Thirteen patients had a preference for one particular type of anesthesia, and the remaining 40 were randomly allocated to receive either spinal or general anesthesia. Cognitive function was not different between the groups receiving different types of anesthesia at either time point and did not decrease post-operatively. No pre- or perioperative variable could distinguish the subgroup of patients who had a post-operative decrease of 2 points or more on the Mini-Mental State Examination. No difference in post-operative performance was found in the patient groups with pre-operative Mini-Mental State Examination scores above or under their age-specific norm. It is concluded that neither hospitalization nor the two forms of anesthesia investigated cause a decrease in cognitive function in elderly men.

Single-dose interpleural versus intercostal blockade: nerve block characteristics and plasma concentration profiles after administration of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine.

Analgesic effects and plasma concentration profiles after interpleural (IP) or intercostal (IC) administration of 21 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine (5 micrograms/mL) were studied in 24 patients (IP group: n = 12; IC group: n = 12) who had undergone cholecystectomy or renal surgery. The number of blocked dermatomes, as assessed by pinprick, was more variable between patients in the IP group (2-9 dermatomes) than in the IC group (6-8 dermatomes). The mean time intervals from the injection to two-dermatome regression and to first need for additional pain medication were 4 h (IP) and 5.5 h (IC) (P less than 0.02) and 5.3 h (IP) and 9.8 h (IC) (P = 0.002), respectively. The degree of postoperative pain was evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale. This gradually increased during the first 4 h in the IP group (P less than 0.001), but not in the IC group. Peak bupivacaine concentrations in arterial plasma were approximately 10% higher than those in venous plasma and were attained more rapidly. Peak arterial plasma concentrations after IP injection (2.07 +/- 0.53 micrograms/mL) were significantly higher (P less than 0.005) than those after IC administration (1.36 +/- 0.48 micrograms/mL). Peak venous plasma concentrations showed a similar difference (IP: 1.86 +/- 0.45 micrograms/mL; IC: 1.21 +/- 0.48 micrograms/mL; P less than 0.005). Peak concentrations were attained later after IP injection both in arterial (IP: 16.3 +/- 4.6 min; IC: 8.8 +/- 5.4 min; P less than 0.002) and venous plasma (IP: 20.0 +/- 7.1 min; IC 13.3 +/- 6.9 min; P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Gas chromatographic determination of bupivacaine in plasma using a support coated open tubular column and a nitrogen-selective detector.

A capillary gas chromatographic method for the quantitative determination of bupivacaine in plasma is described. Bupivacaine and an added internal standard were extracted from plasma with n-pentane. The extracted products were introduced into the gas chromatograph via a solid injection system. The combination of a support coated open tubular column and a nitrogen-selective detector insure a good selectivity and a high sensitivity. The coëfficient of variation at concentrations exceeding 3 ng bupivacaine/ml plasma is less than 6%. The detection limit is about 1 ng/ml.