Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 60(6): 1158-1163, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34108117

RESUMO

Charcot foot (CF) is a rare complication of diabetes associated with foot deformities and foot ulcers. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a factor of poor prognosis in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). However, PAD has infrequently been studied in CF. We aimed to determine the prevalence, the characteristics and the prognosis of PAD in a large group of patients with diabetic CF. We retrospectively compared 56 patients with diabetic CF to 116 patients with diabetic foot without CF. The prevalence of PAD in patients with CF was 66.1%. Compared to patients without CF, patients with CF had similar risks to have PAD (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.50-1.94, p= .97) and neuro-ischemic DFUs (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.57-2.49, p= .65), more risk to have lesions of distal arteries (OR 4.17, 95%CI 1.76-9.94, p= .001) and less risk to need revascularization (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.06-0.36, p< .001). In patients with CF, PAD was strongly predicted by DFUs (OR 24.55, 95%CI 1.80-334.43, p= .016) and coronary artery disease (OR 17.11, 95%CI 1.75-167.43, p =.015). Survival rate and limb salvage rate in patients with CF were not worsened by PAD and by neuro-ischemic DFUs, respectively. In conclusion, we show that PAD should not be overlooked in patients with diabetic CF, especially in those having DFUs or coronary artery disease. PAD in patients with CF differed from that of patients without CF since it predominated in distal arteries and required less often revascularization.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Doença Arterial Periférica , Amputação Cirúrgica , Pé Diabético/epidemiologia , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 81(6): 567-571, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33285105

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insulinomas are usually benign, small-sized, well-encapsulated and often solitary pancreatic tumors. Currently, enucleation is the treatment of choice for sporadic solitary insulinoma if diameter is less than 2cm and the structural integrity of the pancreatic duct can be maintained. However, the procedure has a risk of postoperative complications, and especially of pancreatic fistula. There is growing interest in endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) as an effective and less invasive alternative treatment for benign sporadic insulinoma. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA in four patients with benign localized insulinoma treated in our tertiary care center between June 2018 and November 2019. EUS-RFA was performed with a EUS-guided RFA 19-gauge needle electrode (Starmed; Taewoong Medical, Seoul, South Korea) that released energy at 50W up to 100 Ohms impedance. RESULTS: The series comprised three women and one man, with a median age of 58 years (range 52-82 years). Mean tumor size was 12mm. Although three of the four patients would have been eligible for surgery, EUS-RFA was proposed to them. Symptomatic and biological improvement occurred immediately, generally straight after the procedure, in all patients, and no serious complications were observed. During the mean follow-up period of 22 months, no symptom recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report in 4 patients showed that EUS-RFA was an effective and relatively safe alternative treatment, devoid of major complications, for benign sporadic insulinoma. Larger-scale prospective multicenter studies are, however, needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness and safety of this novel technique.


Assuntos
Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Insulinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Insulinoma/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
Ann Endocrinol (Paris) ; 81(2-3): 101-109, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32413342

RESUMO

Diabetes is among the most frequently reported comorbidities in patients infected with COVID-19. According to current data, diabetic patients do not appear to be at increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population. On the other hand, diabetes is a risk factor for developing severe and critical forms of COVID-19, the latter requiring admission to an intensive care unit and/or use of invasive mechanical ventilation, with high mortality rates. The characteristics of diabetic patients at risk for developing severe and critical forms of COVID-19, as well as the prognostic impact of diabetes on the course of COVID-19, are under current investigation. Obesity, the main risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes, is more common in patients with critical forms of COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. On the other hand, COVID-19 is usually associated with poor glycemic control and a higher risk of ketoacidosis in diabetic patients. There are currently no recommendations in favour of discontinuing antihypertensive medications that interact with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors should be discontinued in patients with severe forms of COVID-19 owing to the risks of lactic acidosis and ketoacidosis. Finally, we advise for systematic screening for (pre)diabetes in patients with proven COVID-19 infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Acidose Láctica/induzido quimicamente , Acidose Láctica/epidemiologia , Acidose Láctica/virologia , Betacoronavirus/fisiologia , COVID-19 , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/induzido quimicamente , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/virologia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/terapia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Estado Pré-Diabético/complicações , Estado Pré-Diabético/diagnóstico , Estado Pré-Diabético/epidemiologia , Estado Pré-Diabético/terapia , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/fisiologia , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Suspensão de Tratamento
4.
Acta Clin Belg ; 75(4): 275-283, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023169

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) was not used in Belgium before 2013, except for patients with cystic fibrosis. Thus, we have performed a pilot study to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of patient receiving OPAT in a Belgian setting. METHODS: The study was a prospective observational single-center study of patients receiving OPAT between 1 September 2013 and 31 December, 2017. RESULTS: We included 218 OPATs. The median age was 58 years and 71% were men. At the end of the treatment, 92% of the patients on OPAT were cured. Risk factors for treatment failure were obesity, diabetes and diabetic foot infections, longer duration of hospitalization before OPAT, and duration of OPAT >16 days. An average of 24 days of hospitalization per patient discharge was saved, which amounted to 5205 days saved during the project. During the OPAT and 30 days thereafter, 71 (32.6%) of patients were readmitted, but only 26 (12%) readmissions were directly related to OPAT. Risk factors for readmissions were diabetes and diabetic foot infections, endovascular infections, longer duration of hospitalization before OPAT, duration of OPAT >30 days, and history of hospitalizations in the year before OPAT. There were 2.3 intravenous catheter-related events per 1000 days of catheter use. Patients' level of satisfaction was high (99.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, OPAT is found to be efficacious in saving hospitalization's days, with a low rate of readmissions and complications and a high patients' level of satisfaction. We therefore conclude that OPAT is feasible and safe. BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) was not used in Belgium before 2013, except for patients with cystic fibrosis. Thus, we have performed a pilot study to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of patient receiving OPAT in a Belgian setting. METHODS: The study was a prospective observational single-center study of patients receiving OPAT between 1 September 2013 and 31 December, 2017. RESULTS: We included 218 OPATs. The median age was 58 years and 71% were men. At the end of the treatment, 92% of the patients on OPAT were cured. Risk factors for treatment failure were obesity, diabetes and diabetic foot infections, longer duration of hospitalization before OPAT, and duration of OPAT >16 days. An average of 24 days of hospitalization per patient discharge was saved, which amounted to 5205 days saved during the project. During the OPAT and 30 days thereafter, 71 (32.6%) of patients were readmitted, but only 26 (12%) readmissions were directly related to OPAT. Risk factors for readmissions were diabetes and diabetic foot infections, endovascular infections, longer duration of hospitalization before OPAT, duration of OPAT >30 days, and history of hospitalizations in the year before OPAT. There were 2.3 intravenous catheter-related events per 1000 days of catheter use. Patients' level of satisfaction was high (99.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, OPAT is found to be efficacious in saving hospitalization's days, with a low rate of readmissions and complications and a high patients' level of satisfaction. We therefore conclude that OPAT is feasible and safe.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Bélgica , Doenças Ósseas Infecciosas/tratamento farmacológico , Cateterismo Periférico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colangite/tratamento farmacológico , Colecistite/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Duração da Terapia , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso Hepático/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecção dos Ferimentos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Infect Chemother ; 25(11): 880-885, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31105001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies had shown that PET/CT can be helpfull in the management of SAB, leading to reduction of mortality. Factors associated with increased or reduced mortality are not well known. Our objective was to analyze mortality in high risk SAB patients undergoing PET/CT and to identify factors associated with mortality rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study and reviewed all cases of high risk adult SAB between 2014 and 2017. We analyzed medical records and mortality at 30 days and 90 days and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included in whom 48 undergone PET/CT. Metastatic foci was identified in 45.8% of cases (22/48). The overall mortality rate was 31.4% (32/102). The mortality rate was 16.6% (8/48) and 44.4% (24/54) in patients undergoing or not PET/CT respectively (P = 0.002). There was a signicantly difference in mortality rate at 30 days (P = 0.001), 90 days (P = 0.004) and one at 1 year (P = 0.002) between patients undergoing or not PET/CT respectively. In multivariate analysis only 18-FDGPET/CT, kidney failure and bacteremia of unknown origin were the 3 mains factors modifying mortality in patients with high risk SAB. CONCLUSION: In our study mortality rate was reduced in high risk SAB patients undergoing PET/CT. kidney failure and bacteremia of unknown origin were other factors associtated with high mortality. Our study confirm that PET/CT is a usefull tool in the management of SAB.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Idoso , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA