Near-infrared fluorescence guided esophageal reconstructive surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: After an esophagectomy, the stomach is most commonly used to restore continuity of the upper gastrointestinal tract. These esophago-gastric anastomoses are prone to serious complications such as leakage associated with high morbidity and mortality. Graft perfusion is considered to be an important predictor for anastomotic integrity. Based on the current literature we believe Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGA) is an easy assessment tool for gastric tube (GT) perfusion, and it might predict anastomotic leakage (AL). AIM: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of ICGA in GT perfusion assessment and as a predictor of AL. METHODS: This study was designed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database. PubMed and EMBASE were independently searched by 2 reviewers for studies presenting data on intraoperative ICGA GT perfusion assessment during esophago-gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy. Relevant outcomes such as feasibility, complications, intraoperative surgical changes based on ICGA findings, quantification attempts, anatomical data and the impact of ICGA on postoperative anastomotic complications, were collected by 2 independent researchers. The quality of the included articles was assessed based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. The 19 included studies presented data on 1192 esophagectomy patients, in 758 patients ICGA was used perioperative to guide esophageal reconstruction. RESULTS: The 19 included studies for qualitative analyses all described ICGA as a safe and easy method to evaluate gastric graft perfusion. AL occurred in 13.8% of the entire cohort, 10% in the ICG guided group and 20.6% in the control group (P < 0.001). When poorly perfused cases are excluded from the analyses, the difference in AL was even larger (AL well-perfused group 6.3% vs control group 20.5%, P < 0.001). The AL rate in the group with an altered surgical plan based on the ICG image was 6.5%, similar to the well perfused group (6.3%) and significantly less than the poorly perfused group (47.8%) (P < 0.001), suggesting that the technique is able to identify and alter a potential bad outcome. CONCLUSION: ICGA is a safe, feasible and promising method for perfusion assessment. The lower AL rate in the well perfused group suggest that a good fluorescent signal predicts a good outcome.

Assessment of graft perfusion and oxygenation for improved outcome in esophageal cancer surgery: Protocol for a single-center prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The main cause of anastomotic leakage (AL) is tissue hypoxia, which results from impaired perfusion of the pedicle stomach graft after esophageal reconstruction. Clinical judgment is unreliable in determining graft perfusion. Therefore, an objective, validated, and reproducible method is urgently needed. Near infrared fluorescence perfusion imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) is an emerging and promising modality. This study's objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of quantification of ICG angiography (ICGA) to assess graft perfusion and to validate ICGA by comparison with hemodynamic parameters, blood and tissue expression of hypoxia-induced markers, and tissue mitochondrial respiration rates. And, second, to evaluate its ability to predict AL in patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: Patients (N = 70) with resectable esophageal cancer will be recruited for standard MIE. ICGA will be performed after graft creation and thoracic pull-up. Dynamic digital images will be obtained starting after intravenous bolus administration of ICG. The resulting images will be subjected to curve analysis and to compartmental analysis based on the adiabatic approximation to tissue homogeneity kinetic model. The calculated perfusion parameters will be compared to intraoperative hemodynamic data to evaluate the effects of patient hemodynamics. To verify whether graft perfusion represents tissue oxygenation, ICGA perfusion parameters will be compared with systemic and serosa lactate from the stomach graft. In addition, perfusion parameters will be compared to tissue expression of hypoxia-related markers and mitochondrial chain respiratory rate. Finally, the ability of functional, histological, and cellular perfusion and oxygenation parameters to predict AL and postoperative morbidity in general will be evaluated using the appropriate univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. DISCUSSION: The results of this project may lead to a novel, reproducible, and minimally invasive method to objectively assess perioperative anastomotic perfusion during MIE, potentially reducing the incidence of AL and its associated severe morbidity and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number is NCT03587532. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Ghent University, Belgium (B670201836427).

Radiologic and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts survival in patients undergoing the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of liver first approach (LFA) in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), evaluating the predictive factors of survival. METHODS: Sixty-two out of 301 patients presenting with synchronous CRLM underwent LFA between 2007 and 2016. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant treatment patients were re-evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Liver resection was scheduled after 4-6 weeks. Changes in non-tumoral parenchyma and the tumor response according to the Tumor Regression Grade score (TRG) were assessed on surgical specimens. Primary tumor resection was scheduled 4-8 weeks following hepatectomy. RESULTS: Five patients out of 62 (8.1%) showed "Progressive Disease" at re-evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 22 (35.5%) showed "Stable Disease" and 35 (56.5%) "Partial Response"; of these latter, 29 (82%) showed histopathologic downstaging. The 5-year survival (OS) rate was 55%, while the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 16%. RECIST criteria, T-stage, N-stage and TRG were independently associated with OS. Bilobar presentation of disease, RECIST criteria, R1 margin and TRG were independently associated with DFS. Patients with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better survival than those with stable or progressive disease (radiological response 5-y OS: 65% vs. 50%; 5-y DFS: 20% vs. 10%; pathological response 5-y OS: 75% vs. 56%; 5-y DFS: 45% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS: LFA is an oncologically safe strategy. Selection is a critical point, and the best results in terms of OS and DFS are observed in patients having radiological and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Long-term survival after multimodality therapy including surgery for metastatic esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Esophageal cancer (EC) remains an aggressive disease with a poor survival. Management of metastatic EC is limited to palliative chemotherapy (CT). Scientific contributions regarding the role of surgery are scarce and controversial. We analysed outcome of surgically treated metastatic EC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified surgically treated metastatic EC patients from our esophagectomy database. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical complications, pathological response, oncological outcome and mean survival of these aggressively treated stage IV cancer patients. RESULTS: Twelve stage IV patients with disease presentation limited to outfield lymph node (LN) and/or liver metastasis were treated with an aggressive multimodality treatment including surgery. Mean age was 58 years (75% male, 75% Adenocarcinomas). Median postoperative hospital stay was 15 d. Radiological anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient. In hospital, mortality was nil. Complete resection was achieved in all but one. Metastatic recurrence occurred in 64% of R0 resected patients. At date of censoring, after a median follow-up of 22 months, 50% of the surgical resected patients are still alive and 33% are free of disease recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves show a possibility to long-term survival after aggressive multimodality therapy including surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In selected metastatic EC patients, multimodality treatment including surgery has an acceptable surgical outcome with a potentially long-term survival.

Anastomotic complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation are related to radiation dose to the gastric fundus.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is increasingly used in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Some studies have suggested that CRT results in increased surgical morbidity. We assessed the influence of CRT on anastomotic complications in a cohort of patients who underwent CRT followed by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data were collected from all patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT (36 Gy combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) followed by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. On the radiotherapy (RT) planning computed tomography scans, normal tissue volumes were drawn encompassing the proximal esophageal region and the gastric fundus. Within these volumes, dose-volume histograms were analyzed to generate the total dose to 50% of the volume (D(50)). We studied the ability of the D(50) to predict anastomotic complications (leakage, ischemia, or stenosis). Dose limits were derived using receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were available for analysis. RT resulted in either T or N downstaging in 51% of patients; complete pathologic response was achieved in 11%. In-hospital mortality was 5.4%, and major morbidity occurred in 36% of patients. Anastomotic complications (AC) developed in 7 patients (13%). No significant influence of the D(50) on the proximal esophagus was noted on the anastomotic complication rate. The median D(50) on the gastric fundus, however, was 33 Gy in patients with AC and 18 Gy in patients without AC (p = 0.024). Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, the D(50) limit on the gastric fundus was defined as 29 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing neoadjuvant CRT followed by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, the incidence of AC is related to the RT dose on the gastric fundus but not to the dose received by the proximal esophagus. When planning preoperative RT, efforts should be made to limit the median dose on the gastric fundus to 29 Gy with a V(30) below 40%.

Total vs partial fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing partial fundoplication (PF) with total (Nissen) fundoplication (TF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease in terms of morbidity, efficacy, and long-term symptomatology. DATA SOURCES: A structured Medline search for published studies. STUDY SELECTION: The available literature from 1975 until June 2007 was searched using the Medical Subject Headings of the National Library of Medicine term fundoplication and the free-text terms fundoplication, surgery, and reflux. Data were analyzed using Review Manager software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England). DATA EXTRACTION: Eleven trials were identified comparing TF with PF in 991 patients. DATA SYNTHESIS: Total fundoplication resulted in a significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia (odds ratio [OR], 1.82-3.93; P < .001), bloating (OR, 1.07-2.56; P = .02), and flatulence (OR, 1.66-3.96; P < .001). No significant differences were noted in the incidence of esophagitis (OR, 0.72-2.7; P = .33), heartburn (OR, 0.48-1.52; P = .58), or persisting acid reflux (OR, 0.77-1.79; P = .45). The reoperation rate was significantly higher after TF compared with PF (OR, 1.13-3.95; P = .02). No significant differences were present in the proportion of patients experiencing a good or excellent long-term outcome (OR, 0.54-1.38; P = .53) or in the proportion of patients with a Visick I or II score (OR, 0.62-1.59; P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Partial fundoplication is a safe and effective alternative to TF, resulting in significantly fewer reoperations and a better functional outcome. The poor quality of the included trials warrants caution in the interpretation of the results of this meta-analysis.