Hyperthermia enhances methyl methanesulfonate-induced adaptive response in meiotic cells of grasshopper Poecilocerus pictus.

To understand the role of hyperthermia (HT) in adaptive response, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) adapted meiotic cells of Poecilocerus pictus were used. Poecilocerus pictus were treated with conditioning (L) or challenging (H) dose of MMS and 2-h time lag (TL) between these doses (L-2h-H) (combined) was employed. Different treatment schedules were used to analyse the influence of HT on MMS-induced adaptive response namely pre; inter; post-treatment and cross-adaptation. After each treatment schedules, chromosomal anomalies were analysed. The frequencies of chromosomal anomalies induced by conditioning and challenging doses of MMS were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) compared to that of the control or HT groups. The combined treatments resulted in significant reduction of chromosomal anomalies compared to additive effect of MMS (P < 0.0001). The pre, inter, post and cross-adaptation treatments with HT reduced the frequencies of chromosomal anomalies compared to the challenge and combined treatments with MMS. There is a protection against MMS-induced chromosomal anomalies by HT in in vivo P.pictus. This is the first report to demonstrate that HT enhances the MMS-induced adaptive response in in vivo meiotic cells.

Inducible Protective Processes in Animal Systems XIII: Comparative Analysis of Induction of Adaptive Response by EMS and MMS in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells.

In order to investigate the presence of adaptive response in cancerous cells, two monofunctional alkylating agents, namely, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), were employed to treat Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells in vivo. Conditioning dose of 80 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 50 mg/kg body weight of MMS and challenging dose of 240 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 150 mg/kg body weight of MMS were selected by pilot toxicity studies. Conditioned EAC cells when challenged after 8 h time lag resulted in significant reduction in chromosomal aberrations compared to challenging dose of respective agents. As has been proved in earlier studies with normal organisms, even in cancerous cells (EAC), there is presence of adaptive response to methylating and ethylating agents. Furthermore, it is also interesting to note in the present studies that the methylating agent, MMS, is a stronger inducer of the adaptive response than the ethylating agent, EMS.