Low Rates of Postoperative Complications and Revision Surgery After Primary Medial Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair.

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of early postoperative complications and revision surgery in patients who underwent primary medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair with minimum of 2-year follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review of a national insurance database was conducted to identify patients with MUCL injuries who underwent primary MUCL repair between 2015 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients >40 years of age and those who had concomitant elbow fractures or dislocations, lateral UCL injures, medial epicondylitis, elbow arthritis, or a history of previous elbow injury/surgery were excluded. The number of patients who underwent a concomitant ulnar nerve procedure (transposition or decompression) during the primary MUCL repair was recorded. Complications within 90 days of surgery and the incidence and timing of subsequent ipsilateral ulnar nerve surgery or revision MUCL surgery were assessed. Results: A total of 313 patients (63.6% male) were included. The mean age was 20.3 ± 6.9 years, and mean follow-up was 3.7 ± 1.3 years. Concomitant ulnar nerve transposition or decompression was performed in 34.2% (N = 107). The early postoperative complication rate was 7.3% (N = 23). The most common complication was ulnar neuropathy (5.8%, N = 18). Wound complications, elbow stiffness, and medial epicondyle fractures were much less common (N = 5). Sixteen of 18 (88.9%) patients with postoperative ulnar neuropathy underwent transposition or decompression at the time of primary repair. Of these 18 patients, 5 (27.8%) underwent a subsequent ulnar nerve surgery (1 primary and 4 secondary), with the majority occurring within 6 months. The incidence of revision MUCL surgery was low (1.0%, N=3), with all 3 patients undergoing MUCL reconstruction. Conclusion: There was a low incidence of early postoperative complications (7.3%) and 2-year revision MUCL surgery (1.0%) in young patients who underwent primary MUCL repair with no additional ligamentous, fracture, and dislocation-related diagnoses. All 3 (1.0%) MUCL revisions underwent reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Increased Host Bone Marrow Edema on 6-Month MRI Is a Risk Factor for Osteochondral Allograft Failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the presence of host bone marrow edema (BME) surrounding osteochondral allograft (OCA) plugs on routine 6-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to determine whether such BME is correlated with subsequent failure. METHODS: The present study was approved under our institutional review board-approved database (#2020-2123). We included patients who underwent cartilage repair with OCA for focal chondral and osteochondral defects of the distal femur by 2 senior surgeons between January 2016 and May 2021 with minimum 2-year follow-up. OCA is frequently performed with concomitant procedures, and therefore ligament reconstruction, meniscal surgery, and osteotomy were not exclusion criteria. Failure was defined as (1) poor clinical outcome with graft collapse on follow-up MRI or second-look arthroscopy, (2) primary OCA removal or revision, or (3) conversion to unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty. Routine MRI scans were performed at 6 ± 2 months postoperatively. All postoperative MRI scans were reviewed from our imaging record by 2 blinded fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were divided for analyses into 2 groups: BME ≥10 cm3 versus BME <10 cm3. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients eligible for the study, 56 patients (30 female, mean age 31.69 ± 11.34 years) had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Nonfailure cases had a mean clinical follow-up of 3.13 ± 0.93 years. The mean time from surgery to failure in our cohort was 1.67 ± 0.91 years. There were 12 (21.4%) patients with BME ≥10 cm³ and 44 (78.6%) patients with BME <10 cm³. No statistically significant differences were found between groups when compared for sex, age, body mass index, OCA size, time to MRI, mean follow-up, number of plugs, graft location, diagnosis, previous surgeries, or concomitant procedures. All OCA failures of the study cohort were in the BME ≥10 cm³ group, representing 50% of this group (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test demonstrated significant difference in survival distributions between groups (P < .001). Patients who ultimately failed had a mean BME volume of 18.49 ± 5.82 cm3, while the nonfailure group had a mean volume of 4.66 ± 4.97 cm3 (P < .001). Cutoff values around 10 cm³ in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 100% sensitivity and close to 90% specificity for OCA failure diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Host BME with a volume greater than 10 cm³ on 6-month postoperative MRI is predictive of an increased subsequent failure rate after OCA transplantation with a failure rate of 50%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: Nonoperative Management Is the First Line of Treatment for Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescents: Children Are Not Little Adults!

Adult patients undergoing hip arthroscopy who experience preoperative symptoms for a longer duration have worse outcomes postoperatively compared with those symptomatic for a shorter duration. Ongoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may lead to worse damage that may not be fully reparable and could be used as evidence for early surgery. However, the same reasoning may not be applicable to adolescents for whom nonoperative treatment remains the first line of treatment for FAI. Many newly symptomatic FAI patients may actually have biomechanically treatable pathology of their hip, core, or spine, making their FAI symptomatic, and if these biomechanical factors can be corrected, the FAI may become asymptomatic. Patients with low pelvic incidence are "hip users" who compensate for their pelvic issue by increasing hip range of motion, making them more prone to symptomatic FAI and leading to degenerative changes from impingement. Only after failure to improve after a full course of physical therapy is established should adolescent patients and parents be counseled on hip arthroscopy as an appropriate treatment option.

No Difference in Complication or Reoperation Rates Between Arthroscopic and Open Debridement for Lateral Epicondylitis: A National Database Study.

PURPOSE: To compare complication rates and 5-year reoperation rates between open debridement (OD) and arthroscopic debridement (AD) for lateral epicondylitis. METHODS: The PearlDiver MUExtr database (2010-2019) was reviewed for patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis (queried by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes) undergoing OD or AD of the common extensor tendon without repair (queried by Current Procedural Terminology codes). Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those who underwent AD and those who underwent OD. Nonoperative treatment modalities were reported for both groups within 1 year before index procedure. The rates of 90-day postoperative complications were compared, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. The 5-year reoperation rates, using laterality-specific ICD-10 codes, were also compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In total, 19,280 patients (OD = 17,139, AD = 2,141) were analyzed in this study. The most common nonoperative treatments for patients who underwent OD or AD were corticosteroid injections (49.5% vs 43.2%), physical therapy (24.8% vs 25.7%), bracing (2.8% vs 3.2%), and platelet-rich plasma injections (1.3% vs 1.0%). There were no significant differences in radial nerve injuries, hematomas, surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and sepsis events between the 2 procedures (P = .50). The 5-year reoperation rate was not significantly different between the AD (5.0%) and OD (3.9%) cohorts (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: For lateral epicondylitis, both AD and OD of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (without repair) were found to have low rates of 90-day adverse events, with no significant differences between the 2 approaches. Similarly, the 5-year reoperation rate was low and not statistically different for those treated with OD or AD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross-sectional study.

The Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Lumbar Spine Disease Is Beneficial, Yet Limited: A Systematic Review of Existing Evidence.

PURPOSE: To compare hip arthroscopy outcomes in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with concurrent symptomatic lumbar spine disease to the outcomes of arthroscopic FAI patients without spine disease. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Studies were valid for inclusion if they had an average follow-up ≥12 months and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip arthroscopy patients with and without concurrent spinal disease. Data collected included study characteristics, patient demographics, follow-up intervals, surgical indications, spinal pathology, PROMs, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. 3,107 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were evaluated: 1,056 with coexisting lumbar spine disease (spine cohort) and 2,051 control subjects without spine disease (control cohort). The average follow-up period was 24 months. Across included studies, there were 35 instances wherein postoperative PROM scores reported by each cohort were compared. In all 35 instances, the spine cohort reported inferior postoperative PROM scores with the difference being significant (P < .05) on 23 PROMs. Collectively, 23 cases were available contrasting the proportion of each cohort to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). In 22 (95.65%) of these cases, the spine cohort achieved the MCID at a lower rate than the control cohort. There were 14 PROMs, wherein intragroup analyses were reported that compared the preoperative and postoperative score reported by the spine cohort. On all 14 PROMs, the spine cohort reported significant (P < .05) improvement after arthroscopic intervention. CONCLUSION: FAI patients with coexisting lumbar spine pathology experience significant improvement from baseline state after arthroscopic intervention. However, the postoperative outcomes reported are inferior, and the improvement from arthroscopy was limited when compared to surgical control subjects with FAI and normal spinal anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

Hip-Spine Syndrome in the Nonarthritic Patient.

Hip-spine syndrome refers to concurrent hip and spine pathology with overlapping symptoms. Most of the literature has studied it in relation to total hip arthroplasty literature and has been shown to increase dislocation risk. Lumbar spine and pelvic mobility have been studied less frequently in relation to nonarthritic pathologic hip states. Understanding the biomechanical relationship between the lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip can help elucidate how hip-spine syndrome affects the nonarthritic hip and how it impacts outcomes of hip arthroscopy. Changes in lumbar spine motion may be the reason certain predisposed patients develop symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or ischiofemoral impingement. Some athletes may be "hip users" with a low pelvic incidence, making them more reliant on hip motion due to less-intrinsic lumbopelvic motion. When these patients have FAI morphology, their increased reliance on hip motion makes them prone to experiencing femoroacetabular contact and concurrent symptoms. Other athletes may be "spine users," with larger pelvic incidence and more baseline lumbopelvic motion, making them less reliant on hip motion and therefore less prone to experiencing hip impingement even with hip FAI morphology. Hip-spine syndrome also appears to have an impact on patient selection, role of nonoperative treatment, and hip arthroscopy surgical outcomes. Identifying patients with concurrent pathology may allow surgeons to recommend targeted physical therapy or counsel patients better on their expectations after surgery.

Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication that may require revision ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Non-anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is thought to be a frequent cause of graft failure; however, there is a lack of evidence to support this belief. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-anatomic femoral tunnel placement is associated with increased risk of revision ACL-R. METHODS: After screening all 315 consecutive patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL-R by a single senior orthopedic surgeon between January 2012 and January 2017, 58 patients were found to have both strict lateral radiographs and a minimum of 24 months follow-up without revision. From a group of 456 consecutive revision ACL-R, patients were screened for strictly lateral radiographs and 59 patients were included in the revision group. Femoral tunnel placement for each patient was determined using a strict lateral radiograph taken after the primary ACL-R using the quadrant method. The center of the femoral tunnel was measured in both the posterior-anterior (PA) and proximal-distal (PD) dimensions and represented as a percentage of the total distance (normal center of anatomic footprint: PA 25% and PD 29%). RESULTS: In the PA dimension, the revision group had significantly more anterior femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (38% ± 11% vs. 28% ± 6%, p < 0.01). Among patients who underwent revision; those with non-traumatic chronic failure had statistically significant more anterior femoral tunnel placement than those who experienced traumatic failure (41% ± 13% vs. 35% ± 8%, p < 0.03). In the PD dimension, the revision group had significantly more proximal femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (30% ± 9% vs 38% ± 9%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 58 patients with successful primary ACL-R compared with 59 patients with failed ACL-R, anterior and proximal (high) femoral tunnels for ACL-R were shown to be independent risk factors for ACL revision surgery. As revision ACL-R is associated with patient- and economic burden, particular attention should be given to achieving an individualized, anatomic primary ACL-R. Surgeons may reduce the risk of revision ACL-R by placing the center of the femoral tunnel within the anatomic ACL footprint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Failure rates and clinical outcomes after treatment for long-head biceps brachii tendon pathology: a comparison of three treatment types.

HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND: Treatment options for the biceps brachii tendon include tenotomy, arthroscopic tenodesis, and open tenodesis. Few studies to date have compared all treatment options in the context of a rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus repair between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum of one-year follow-up was performed. Patients were separated into the following 4 groups: (1) 57 had isolated supraspinatus repair with no biceps tendon surgery (SSP); (2) 16 had supraspinatus repair and biceps tenotomy; (3) 18 had supraspinatus repair and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis; (4) 9 had supraspinatus repair and an open biceps tenodesis (SSP + OT). The primary outcome was operative time. The secondary outcomes were cost analysis, complications, patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, and strength testing. RESULTS: The operative time for the SSP + OT group was significantly longer than that of the SSP group (P < .05) but was not significantly longer than that of the other groups. The cost for the SSP group was significantly less than the cost for the SSP + OT and supraspinatus repair and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis groups (P < .05 for both), whereas the cost for the supraspinatus repair and biceps tenotomy group was significantly less than the cost for the SSP + OT group (P < .05). There were no significant differences between groups for complications, all patient-reported outcome measues, all range of motion, and all strength parameters. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Operative time is the longest in open biceps tenodesis and is significantly longer than that of isolated supraspinatus repair. No significant differences in operative times or costs were identified in patients undergoing arthroscopic vs. open biceps tenodesis. All patients, irrespective of the type of biceps tendon procedure, had excellent clinical and functional outcomes at least one year after surgery. There was no difference in clinical or functional outcomes, or complications, among the 4 groups.

Glenoid Radius of Curvature and Humeral Head Volume Are Associated With Postoperative Dislocation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

PURPOSE: To measure bony morphologic parameters and identify their association with arthroscopic Bankart repair failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study. The inclusion criteria were primary arthroscopic Bankart repair, no prior shoulder surgery, traumatic cause, and had a Bankart (soft tissue and bony) lesion evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The exclusion criteria were posterior labral pathology, multidirectional instability, connective tissue disorder, rotator cuff pathology, and those who underwent concomitant shoulder procedures. Patients who had a postoperative redislocation (unstable group) were compared with matched patients who did not (stable group). Data were obtained by chart review and from preoperative MRI. Comparisons were made using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, or χ2 test. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Inter-rater reliability was measured between reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients experienced a postoperative dislocation and were matched to 90 patients without a postoperative dislocation. There were no differences in demographic and radiographic variables. The radius of curvature (ROC) of the glenoid was larger (shallower) in the unstable group (23.6 mm vs 22.6 mm, P = .05). The humeral head volume (HHV) trended higher in the unstable group (68.9 mL vs 62.9 mL, P = .06). The glenoid volume was not significantly different. A greater percentage of patients with a glenoid ROC of 24.5 mm or greater (62.1% vs 26.4%, P = .0003) and an HHV of 80 mm3 or greater (60.8% vs 28.9%, P = .003) experienced a redislocation compared with patients without these factors. Patients with a glenoid ROC of 24.5 mm or more and an HHV of 80 mm3 or more had greater than 4 times the odds of redislocation (odds ratio, 4.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-14.43; P = .0098). Strong inter-rater reliability was found for the HHV, glenoid volume, glenoid ROC, and humeral head ROC measurements (r = 0.94, r = 0.88, r = 0.89, and r = 0.95, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that large ROC (shallow) glenoids in conjunction with large humeral heads may predispose patients to failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Operative Treatment of Multiligament Knee Injury.

BACKGROUND: Many factors can affect clinical outcomes and complications after a complex multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Certain aspects of the treatment algorithm for MLKI, such as the timing of surgery, remain controversial. PURPOSE: To determine the risk factors for common complications after MLKI reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 134 patients with MLKI who underwent reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients included in the review had a planned surgical reconstruction of >1 ligament based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Complications were categorized as (1) wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement, (2) arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions, (3) deep venous thrombosis, (4) need for removal of hardware, and (5) revision ligament surgery. The potential risk factors for complications included patient characteristics, injury pattern categorized according to Schenck classification (knee dislocation [KD] I-KD IV), and timing of surgery. Significant risk factors for complications were analyzed by t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; of these, 29.6% experienced at least 1 complication. Smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.28-8.02]; P = .01) and planned staged surgery (OR, 2.71 [95% CI, 1.04-7.04]; P = .04) significantly increased the overall risk of complication, while increased time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.998]; P < .01) significantly decreased the risk. Increasing time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-0.998]; P = .02) also led to a slightly but significantly decreased risk for arthrofibrosis. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that smoking, decreased time from injury to initial surgery, and planned staged procedures may increase the rate of complications. Further studies are needed to determine which changes in the treatment algorithm are most effective to reduce the complication rate in patients.

Repair of high-grade partial thickness supraspinatus tears after surgical completion of the tear have a lower retear rate when compared to full-thickness tear repair.

PURPOSE: High-grade partial thickness rotator cuff tears (i.e., those involving at least 50% of the tendon thickness) are especially challenging to treat and various treatment strategies have been described. Prior studies have demonstrated equivalent outcomes between in situ tear fixation and tear completion repair techniques. However, it is unknown how repair of completed high-grade partial thickness tears to full tears compares to repair of full-thickness tears. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome measures at least 1 year postoperatively between patients who had completion of a high-grade partial thickness supraspinatus tear to a full-thickness tear (PT) and those who had an isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tear (FT). The hypothesis of this study was equivalent retear rates as well as equivalent clinical and patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic supraspinatus repair between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up was performed. Patients were separated into two groups based on their treatment: 56 had completion of a partial thickness supraspinatus tear to full-thickness tear with repair (PT) and 44 had isolated full-thickness supraspinatus repairs (FT). The primary outcome was rotator cuff retear, which was defined as a supraspinatus retear requiring revision repair. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) including visual analog pain scale (VAS) and subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM) and strength in forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR). RESULTS: There was a significantly lower rate of retear between the PT versus FT groups (3.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.040). There were no significant differences between groups for all PROs, all ROM parameters, and all strength parameters (all n.s.). DISCUSSION: The data from this study demonstrated that the PT group had a significantly lower retear rate at 1 year follow-up than the FT group, while PROs, ROM, and strength were similar between the two groups. Patients with PT supraspinatus tears can have excellent outcomes, equivalent to FT tears, after completion of the tear, and subsequent repair with low retear rates. These findings may aid the treating surgeon when choosing between in situ fixation of the PT supraspinatus tear or completion of the tear and subsequent repair, as it allows the treating surgeon to choose the procedure based on comfort and experience level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Risk Factors for Revision Posterior Shoulder Stabilization in Throwing Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Revision posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair has inferior outcomes compared with primary surgery. Risk factors for revision in throwing athletes are unknown. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to characterize the revision rate and risk factors for revision surgery in throwing athletes. It was hypothesized that female athletes and those with smaller glenoid bone width would be at higher risk for revision surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 105 throwing athletes who underwent arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair of their throwing shoulder were reviewed at a minimum of 2-year follow-up, and patients who required a revision were compared with those who did not. Collected data compared between the revision and no-revision groups included age, sex, contact sport participation, and return to sport (RTS). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, stability, pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters including glenoid bone version, cartilage version, labral version, bone width, labral width, glenoid labral version and width weight were also compared between both groups. RESULTS: Nine throwers required revision (8.6%) at an average of 2.8 years postoperatively. There were more female athletes in the revision than no-revision group (55.5% vs 23.4%; P = .03). There was no significant difference in age, proportion of contact athletes, rotator cuff tears, glenoid bone version, cartilage version, labral version, labral version weight, bone width, labral width, or labral width weight. Both groups had similar preoperative, postoperative, and change in ASES, KJOC, pain, strength, stability, and ROM scores. The proportion of patients with full strength and with full ROM, as well as patients who were satisfied with outcomes was similar between groups. Fewer patients in the revision group returned to sports compared with those in the no-revision group (14.3% vs 83.6%; P < .001), although return to sports at same level was not significantly different between groups (14.3% vs 37.2%; P = .41). CONCLUSION: The revision rate of arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization in throwers was 8.6%. Female athletes were at higher risk for revision, and return to sports was lower in patients who underwent revision surgery.

Obesity Is Associated with Significant Morbidity after Multiligament Knee Surgery.

The objective was to report the effect of obesity, utilizing a body mass index (BMI) threshold of 35 kg/m2, on outcomes and complications of multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI). It was hypothesized that obese patients would have longer intraoperative times and hospital length of stay, greater estimated blood loss, and higher rates of wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement (I&D) and revision ligament surgery. A retrospective review was performed on 143 individuals who underwent surgery for an MLKI between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients were included if there was a plan for potential surgical repair/reconstruction of two or more ligaments. Patients with prior surgery to the affected knee or intra-articular fracture requiring reduction and fixation were excluded. Comparisons between obese and nonobese patients were made using two-sample t-test and either chi-square or Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Of 108 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 83 had BMI < 35 kg/m2 and 25 had BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Obese patients sustained higher rates of MLKI due to ultralow velocity mechanisms (28.0 vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of concomitant lateral meniscus injury (48.0 vs. 25.3%; p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing single-staged surgery, obese patients had significantly longer duration of surgery (219.8 vs. 178.6 minutes; p = 0.02) and more wound infections requiring I&D (20.0 vs. 4.8%; p = 0.03). In contrast, nonobese patients had higher rates of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or arthrolysis (25.3 vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Obese patients undergoing surgery of an MLKI have longer operative times, greater rates of wound infection requiring I&D, and lower rates of arthrofibrosis. Surgeons may consider these results when counseling patients on their postoperative course and risk for complications. Future research might focus on strategies to reduce complication rates in obese patients with MLKI. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Labral Morphology and Number of Preoperative Dislocations Are Associated With Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

PURPOSE: To develop a method to measure capsule and labral volume on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict surgical failure after primary Bankart repair. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on patients undergoing primary anterior arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Surgical failure was defined as a recurrent dislocation event. Cases were matched to controls based on age and sex in a 1:2 ratio. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) arthrograms were analyzed by 2 trained reviewers using Vitrea software to measure labral and capsular volume with a 3-dimensional model. Labral size was also qualitatively measured on axial images. A "diffusely small" labrum was defined as labral height less than the width of the glenoid tidemark cartilage. RESULTS: Of the 289 patients who had an arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2006 to 2015, 33 who had a postoperative dislocation met the inclusion criteria and were matched to 62 control patients who did not. There was no difference between groups with regard to age (P = .88), sex (P = .82), contact sport participation (P = .79), proportion of overhead athletes (P = .33), proportion of throwers (P = 1), surgical positioning in lateral decubitus (P = .18), or number of repair anchors used (P = .91). The average number of preoperative dislocations was significantly higher in the failure group (3.2 vs. 2.0, P < .0001). In patients with normal labrum morphology, the odds of having surgical failure increased by 26% for a 1-unit increase in the number of prior dislocations (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.55). The case and control groups had similar labral and capsular volume as measured in Vitrea. The failure group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with a diffusely small labral morphology (47% vs. 17%, P = .03). Controlling for number of preoperative dislocations, the odds of having a diffusely small labral morphology was 3.2 times more likely in the case group than the control group (95% CI 1.259 to 8.188). Interrater reliability between 2 independent reviewers was excellent for measurement of capsule volume (r = 0.91) and good for measurement of labral volume (r = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel method of measuring labral and capsule volume with high interrater reliability. An increased number of recurrent dislocations prior to primary Bankart repair was associated with increased odds of recurrent instability after surgery. The OR for failure also increased with increasing number of preoperative dislocations. Diffusely small labral morphology was associated with having a postoperative redislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (case-control study).

Minimally Invasive Fixation for Spinopelvic Dissociation: Percutaneous Triangular Osteosynthesis with S2 Alar-Iliac and Iliosacral Screws: A Case Report.

CASE: Traumatic U- and H-type sacral fractures are often unstable, causing spinopelvic dissociation. We describe a minimally invasive approach that allows percutaneous spinopelvic fixation of unstable H-type sacral fractures using a triangular osteosynthesis construct with S2 alar-iliac screws. We present the case of a patient with traumatic lumbopelvic dissociation who underwent percutaneous S2 alar-iliac and iliosacral screw fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined percutaneous S2 alar-iliac and iliosacral screw fixation is a safe option for spinopelvic fixation and avoids the soft-tissue compromise of open approaches. The triangular osteosynthesis construct provides adequate pelvic anchor points to allow immediate weight-bearing.

Knee Flexion Angle During Graft Fixation for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of knee flexion angle during graft fixation on outcomes and complications following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS: Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE) were searched from database inception to January 2018. After screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient demographics, fixation technique, graft selection, outcomes, and complications were extracted from the included studies. The studies were grouped based on flexion angle used during graft fixation: low (0°-30°) and high (45°-90°) flexion angle group. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were used to assess the quality of each included study. Descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (of 3,399) were included and were either cohort (n = 1) or case series (n = 17) study designs. A total of 556 patients with a mean age of 23.6 years (range, 10-60 years) underwent MPFL reconstructions, with 458 patients in the 0° to 30° fixation group and 98 in the 45° to 90° fixation group. The mean Kujala score improved from 45 to 72.9 (365 patients) preoperatively to 83 to 94.5 (460 patients) postoperatively for the 0° to 30° fixation group and from 53.3 to 72 preoperatively to 92.2 to 95.2 postoperatively for the 45° to 90° fixation group (98 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The knee flexion angle during MPFL graft fixation ranges from 20° to 90°. Graft fixation at low and high knee flexion angles during MPFL reconstruction showed excellent patient-reported outcomes and low patellar redislocation rates overall, with no clear differences between the 2 groups based on the currently available data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Long-Term Survival Analysis and Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term survivorship rates and functional outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) in patients with minimum 10-year postoperative follow-up. METHODS: Two reviewers independently searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed from database inception for literature related to MAT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Data are reported in a narrative summary fashion with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 658 patients and 688 MATs were included. Mean age of patients was 33.1 years (range 14-66), of whom 63% were male. Mean survivorship rates were 73.5% at 10-year and 60.3% at 15-year follow-up, with 2 studies reporting 19- and 24-year survivorship of 50% and 15.1%, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 36 to 60.5 and 61 to 75, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner scores ranged from 1 to 3 and 2.5 to 4.6, respectively. Postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subset scores were as follows: Pain: 61.6 to 76.3; Symptoms: 57.9 to 61.8; Function in Daily Living: 68.5 to 79.9; Sport and Recreation: 33.9 to 49.3; Quality of Life: 37.3 to 45.9. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores ranged from 46 to 77. Regarding surgical technique, 194 MAT bone-fixation technique (53.8%) and 165 MAT suture-only fixation techniques (46.2%) were reported. The most common type of allograft used was cryopreserved (54.5% of the allografts). The most frequent concomitant procedures performed with MAT were to address chondral (20.8% of the cases) and ligament injuries (12.4% of the cases), and realignment procedures (9.4% of the cases). The most common complications observed that were not directly related to concomitant procedures were meniscal allograft partial tears (11.1%), arthrofibrosis (3.6%), and infection (2.0%). Several criteria were used among studies to define failure of MAT, the most common parameters being removal of meniscal allograft (8/11 studies) and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (7/11 studies). CONCLUSIONS: MAT can yield good long-term survivorship rates, with 73.5% and 60.3% of allografts remaining functional after 10 and 15 years, respectively. Functional outcomes 10 years after MAT were fair and improved compared with preoperative scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Intercondylar Notch Measurement During Arthroscopy and on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Small intercondylar notch size is associated with increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and increased difficulty of ACL reconstruction. When encountering a small notch during surgery, some surgeons may resort to a notchplasty, which has been shown to have associated morbidity. The ability to predict notch size on preoperative imaging could allow the orthopaedic surgeon to anticipate surgical difficulty such as an oversized graft and graft impingement and possibly avoid a notchplasty. Many methods have been proposed for measuring intercondylar notch size, but they do not correlate with intraoperative measurements or they utilize computed tomography scanning, which is not readily obtained before ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a method of notch measurement on preoperative radiography and magnetic resonance imaging that match intraoperative arthroscopic measurements. The method presented here can be used to identify narrow intercondylar notches, prepare for potential intraoperative challenges, and formulate surgical plans such as for graft choice in individualized ACL reconstruction.

Surgical Fracture Repair in Chronic Renal Failure Patients on Hemodialysis An Analysis of Complications and Hospital Quality Measures.

In end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis (HD), it is known that renal bone disease has a negative impact on postoperative complication rate of fracture repair compared to non-ESRD patients. Previous studies have examined complications following surgical hip fracture repair in ESRD patients on HD. However, there is paucity of information outside of hip fracture repair. This study was undertaken to investigate complications associated with surgical fracture repair in ESRD patients on hemodialysis and to compare quality measures with a control group for various fracture types. Data of all consecutive ESRD patients on HD was collected prospectively starting in 2013. Charts of 2,558 ESRD patients on HD from 2010 to 2013 were also reviewed. Thirty-four patients who underwent surgical fracture repair were included in the study. Additionally, 1,000 patients without ESRD who underwent fracture repair were also identified, and a random sample of 267 patients was selected for inclusion as a control group. Primary outcomes were major complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo complication rating system for orthopaedic surgery. Secondary outcomes were minor complications, defined by the same method. Demographic information and hospital quality measures, such as hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition, were also collected. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of BMI, ethnicity, or gender distribution. The ESRD patients were older than control patients (62.6 versus 46.8 years; p > 0.01). Overall, the complication rate in the ESRD group was 14.7% compared to 3% in the control group (p < 0.05) while the rate of major complications was similar (5.8% versus 2.2%, p = 0.2). The rate of minor complications was higher in the ESRD group though this did not reach statistical significance (8.8% versus 1%, p = 0.07). Median LOS was significantly higher in the ESRD group (15.9 versus 6.4 days; p < 0.01), and patients in the ESRD group were less likely to be discharged to home (29.4% versus 78%; p < 0.01). Surgical fracture repair in ESRD patients can be performed with similar major complication rate as a control group. However, the higher rate of minor complications and poorer hospital quality measures in the ESRD group must be taken into account as we move toward "pay for performance" and bundled payment initiatives for orthopaedic trauma patients.