Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 36(6): 579-84, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21989151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound guidance is increasingly used for catheter insertion and could make it more complicated to guarantee aseptic insertion of catheters. The current study evaluated the incidence of colonization of ultrasound-guided perineural catheter (US-PNC) placed for postoperative analgesia. METHODS: We evaluated prospectively for 14 months 760 ultrasound-guided catheters in a single center placed under sterile conditions. Quantitative culture of all the catheters was performed after withdrawal. Colonization was defined as ≥10(3) colony-forming units/mL. Infection was defined as the isolation of the same microorganism from the colonized catheter and from blood culture and/or culture of an abscess. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors of US-PNC colonization. RESULTS: Incidences of colonization and infections were 10.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 8.2%-14.4%) and 0.13% (95% CI, 0%-3.8%), respectively, in a total of 747 catheters. Coagulase-negative staphylococci colonization was documented in 69% of the colonized catheters. Local inflammation was more frequently noted when catheters were colonized (26.9% [95% CI, 15.2%-38.7%] versus 8.1% [95% CI, 4.2%-11.9%], P = 0.005). Independent factors for ultrasound-guided catheter colonization were duration of catheter placement more than 48 hours (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% CI, 1.1-12.7; P = 0.003), diabetes (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-9.6; P = 0.004), and antibiotic administration during the month preceding surgery (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-7.8; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although infection rate is low, there is a risk of ultrasound-guided catheter colonization that deserves careful monitoring of the insertion site in the postoperative period.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Nervo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Staphylococcus aureus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Adulto , Idoso , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Ultrassonografia
2.
Eur J Pain ; 13(6): 613-9, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793861

RESUMO

The effects of nefopam and ketamine on pain control and rehabilitation after total knee replacement were compared in a prospective, double blinded study. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.2mg kg(-1) bolus of nefopam or ketamine, followed by a 120microg kg(-1) h(-1) continuous infusion until the end of surgery, and 60microg kg(-1) h(-1) until the second postoperative day, or an equal volume of saline considered as placebo. Pain scores measured on a visual analog scale at rest and on mobilization, and patient-controlled intravenous morphine consumption, were assessed during 48h. We measured the maximal knee flexion on the third postoperative day, and the delay to obtain a 90 degrees flexion. Ketamine and nefopam reduced morphine consumption (p<0.0001). Pain scores, were lower at rest and on mobilization in the ketamine group compared to the two other groups at all times of measurement. Pain score were lower in patients receiving nefopam compared to placebo, on arrival in the recovery room and at 2h. Ketamine improved knee flexion on post operative day 3 (59 degrees [33-63] vs. 50 degrees [47-55] and 50 degrees [44-55] in ketamine, placebo and nefopam groups, respectively, p<0.0002) and decreased the delay to flex the knee at 90 degrees (9.1+/-4.2 vs. 12.3+/-4.0 days, in ketamine and placebo groups, respectively, p=0.01). Ketamine produces opioid-sparing, decreases pain intensity, and improves mobilization after total knee replacement. Nefopam achieves less significant results in that circumstances.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Dissociativos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Nefopam/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Dissociativos/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Joelho/fisiologia , Masculino , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Nefopam/administração & dosagem , Nefopam/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Pain ; 10(7): 653-8, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16324861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ketamine, a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, may reduce postoperative opioid demand and improve postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients scheduled for lumbar disk surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind study comparing three analgesic combinations that were started before surgical incision: morphine 0.1 mg kg(-1) alone (group M; n=23); ketamine 0.15 mg kg(-1) alone (group K; n=22); and a combination of morphine 0.1 mg kg(-1) with ketamine 0.15 mg kg(-1) (group KM; n=23). Postoperatively patient-controlled analgesia was provided with intravenous morphine. Morphine consumption was assessed during 24 H, and pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and on mobilisation, during the first two postoperative days. RESULTS: In group KM, less i.v. morphine was administered in the post anaesthesia care unit than in group M (median [range]: 0mg [0-2] vs. 7 mg [6-9], P=0.009). Cumulative 24 H morphine consumption was reduced by 57% in group KM vs. group M, and by 48% in group KM vs. group K. Postoperative VAS scores were lower in group KM vs. groups K and M. Maximal VAS score on mobilization was reduced in group KM compared to groups K and M (38 mm [35-45] vs. 52 mm [48-59] and vs. 59 mm [55-64], in groups KM, K and M, respectively, P=0.05 and P=0.002). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was decreased in group KM compared to group M (21.7% vs. 43.5%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Ketamine small-dose, combined with morphine improves postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid-related side effects in lumbar disk surgery.


Assuntos
Discotomia/efeitos adversos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA