Anti-CD79B Antibody-Drug Conjugate DCDS0780A in Patients with B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.

PURPOSE: Targeting CD79B using antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) is an effective therapeutic strategy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). We investigated DCDS0780A, an anti-CD79B ADC with THIOMAB technology (TDC) that consistently conjugates two anti-neoplastic molecules per antibody, in contrast with ADCs with heterogeneous loads. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase 1 study enrolled 60 patients with histologically confirmed B-NHL that had relapsed/failed to respond following ≥1 prior treatment regimens; 41 (68%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Fifty-one patients received DCDS0780A monotherapy once every 3 weeks (0.3-4.8 mg/kg); 9 received combination therapy (3.6-4.8 mg/kg) with rituximab. RESULTS: Fifty-four (90%) patients experienced adverse events related to study drug, the most common of which were blurred vision, fatigue, corneal deposits, neutropenia, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy. 4.8 mg/kg was the highest dose tested and the recommended phase II dose. The pharmacokinetic profile was linear at doses ≥1.2 mg/kg. Response rate in all-treated patients (N = 60) was 47% (n = 28), including 17 complete responses (28%) and 11 partial responses (18%). The median duration of response (15.2 months) was the same for all responders (n = 28) and patients with DLBCL (n = 20). CONCLUSIONS: DCDS0780A as the TDC format for CD79B was tested at higher doses than its ADC counterpart investigated earlier, leading to deep responses. However, dose intensity was limited by ocular toxicities seen at the higher doses indicating that the TDC format was unable, in the current study, to expand the therapeutic index for the CD79B target. The encouraging antitumor activity advocates continuation of investigations into novel ADC technologies.

An open-label phase I dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of DMUC4064A in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: MUC16 is overexpressed in the majority of human epithelial ovarian cancers (OC). DMUC4064A is a humanized anti-MUC16 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E. This trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of DMUC4064A in patients with platinum-resistant OC. METHODS: DMUC4064A was administered once every 3 weeks to patients in 1.0-5.6 mg/kg dose escalation cohorts, followed by cohort expansion at the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled and received a median of 5 cycles (range 1-20) of DMUC4064A. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 5.2 mg/kg was the RP2D based on the overall tolerability profile. The most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, constipation, blurred vision, diarrhea, and anemia. Sixteen patients (25%) experienced related grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Twenty-six patients (40%) experienced ocular toxicities. The exposure of acMMAE was dose proportional, with a half-life of ~6 days. Sixteen patients (25%) experienced confirmed objective partial response (PR or CR) starting at ≥3.2 mg/kg dose levels, while 23 (35%) patients had best responses of PR or CR. Overall, the clinical benefit rate was 42% (27 patients with a best response [confirmed and unconfirmed] of CR, or PR or SD lasting ≥6 months). Among the 54 patients with high MUC16 immunohistochemistry scores, the clinical benefit rate was 46% (25 patients). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months overall. CONCLUSIONS: In this Phase I study, DMUC4064A demonstrated a tolerable safety profile along with encouraging efficacy in the indication of platinum-resistant OC.

Phase 1b study of anti-NaPi2b antibody-drug conjugate lifastuzumab vedotin (DNIB0600A) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety and tolerability of lifastuzumab vedotin (DNIB0600A) (LIFA), an antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter phase 1b study, LIFA was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W) with starting dose 1.2 mg/kg in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. All patients received carboplatin at dose AUC 6 mg/mL·min (AUC6) Q3W for up to 6 cycles. Dose expansion cohorts were enrolled ± bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Q3W. RESULTS: Patients received LIFA at 1.2, 1.8, and 2.4 mg (n = 4, 5, and 20, respectively) with carboplatin. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was LIFA 2.4 mg/kg + carboplatin AUC6 (cycles 1-6), with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Twelve patients received RP2D with bevacizumab. All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). The most common treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, nausea, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, vomiting, hypomagnesaemia, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, and alopecia. Thirty-four (83%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs, the most frequent of which were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nine (22%) patients experienced serious AEs. Pulmonary toxicities (34%), considered a potential risk of LIFA, included one patient who discontinued study treatment due to grade 2 pneumonitis. The median duration of progression-free survival was 10.71 months (95% CI: 8.54, 13.86) with confirmed complete/partial responses in 24 (59%) patients. Pharmacokinetics of mono-therapy LIFA was similar in combination therapy. CONCLUSION: LIFA in combination with carboplatin ± bevacizumab demonstrated acceptable safety and encouraging activity in PSOC patients.

Phase Ia Study of Anti-NaPi2b Antibody-Drug Conjugate Lifastuzumab Vedotin DNIB0600A in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial assessed the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of lifastuzumab vedotin (LIFA), an antibody-drug conjugate of anti-NaPi2b mAb (MNIB2126A) and a potent antimitotic agent (monomethyl auristatin E). PATIENTS AND METHODS: LIFA was administered to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), once every 3 weeks, by intravenous infusion. The starting dose was 0.2 mg/kg in this 3+3 dose-escalation design, followed by cohort expansion at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients were treated at doses between 0.2 and 2.8 mg/kg. The MTD was not reached; 2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks was selected as the RP2D based on overall tolerability profile. The most common adverse events of any grade and regardless of relationship to study drug were fatigue (59%), nausea (49%), decreased appetite (37%), vomiting (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (29%). Most common treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicities among patients treated at the RP2D (n = 63) were neutropenia (10%), anemia (3%), and pneumonia (3%). The pharmacokinetic profile was dose proportional. At active doses ≥1.8 mg/kg, partial responses were observed in four of 51 (8%) patients with NSCLC and 11 of 24 (46%) patients with PROC per RECIST. All RECIST responses occurred in patients with NaPi2b-high by IHC. The CA-125 biomarker assessed for patients with PROC dosed at ≥1.8 mg/kg showed 13 of 24 (54%) had responses (≥50% decline from baseline). CONCLUSIONS: LIFA exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and an acceptable safety profile, with encouraging activity in patients with PROC at the single-agent RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg.

Risk of Wernicke's encephalopathy and cardiac disorders in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm.

The objectives of the study were to estimate the incidence of Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) and cardiac disorders among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and compare it with those without MPN. A total of 39,761 MPN patients were identified from the US Marketscan database. Approximately 27% of them were 65+ years of age, and 51% were male. Patients with MPN had higher rates of WE, compared to those without MPN (MPN vs. non-MPN: 1.09 vs. 0.39/1000 person-year, adjusted HR=2.19, 95%CI 1.43-3.34). Patients with MPN also had higher rates of cardiac events (congestive heart failure: MPN vs. non-MPN: 9.27 vs. 3.70/1000 person-year, adjusted HR=1.64, 95%CI 1.42-1.88; acute myocardial infarction: MPN vs. non-MPN: 10.45 vs. 5.02/1000 person-year, adjusted HR=1.44, 95%CI 1.27, 1.63; cardiac arrhythmia: MPN vs. non-MPN: 106.5 vs. 53.9/1000 person-year, adjusted HR=1.42, 95%CI 1.36-1.48). Physicians who care for patients with MPN should be aware of increased risk of WE and cardiac disorders in this population.

D-dimer assay to exclude pulmonary embolism in high-risk oncologic population: correlation with CT pulmonary angiography in an urgent care setting.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate (a) the diagnostic performance of D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism (PE) in an oncologic population by using computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography as the reference standard, (b) the association between PE location and assay sensitivity, and (c) the association between assay results and clinical factors that raise suspicion of PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained. Five hundred thirty-one consecutive patients were clinically suspected of having PE; 201 were enrolled (72 men, 129 women; median age, 61 years) and underwent CT pulmonary angiography and D-dimer assay. Relevant clinical history, symptoms, and signs were recorded. CT images were interpreted, and the location of emboli was recorded. The negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios of the D-dimer assay results were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (21%) had pulmonary emboli at CT. D-Dimer results were positive in 171 patents (85%). The NPV and sensitivity were 97% and 98%, respectively. The specificity and PPV were 18% and 25%, respectively. No association was shown between clinical history, symptoms, or signs and NPV, PPV, sensitivity, or specificity or between location of PE and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: D-Dimer results have high NPV and sensitivity for PE in oncologic patients and, if negative, can be used to exclude PE in this population. Combining the assay with clinical symptoms and signs did not substantially change NPV, PPV, sensitivity, or specificity.