Anticoagulation management during pulmonary endarterectomy with cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary endarterectomy requires cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, which may prolong the activated clotting time. We investigated whether activated clotting time-guided anticoagulation under these circumstances suppresses hemostatic activation. METHODS: Individual heparin sensitivity was determined by the heparin dose-response test, and anticoagulation was monitored by the activated clotting time and heparin concentration. Perioperative hemostasis was evaluated by thromboelastometry, platelet aggregation, and several plasma coagulation markers. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in this study. During cooling, tube-based activated clotting time increased from 719 (95% confidence interval = 566-872 seconds) to 1,273 (95% confidence interval = 1,136-1,410 seconds; p < 0.01) and the cartridge-based activated clotting time increased from 693 (95% confidence interval = 590-796 seconds) to 883 (95% confidence interval = 806-960 seconds; p < 0.01), while thrombin-antithrombin showed an eightfold increase. The heparin concentration showed a slightly declining trend during cardiopulmonary bypass. After protamine administration (protamine-to-heparin bolus ratio of 0.82 (0.71-0.90)), more than half of the patients showed an intrinsically activated coagulation test and intrinsically activated coagulation test without heparin effect clotting time >240 seconds. Platelet aggregation through activation of the P2Y12 (adenosine diphosphate test) and thrombin receptor (thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 test) decreased (both -33%) and PF4 levels almost doubled (from 48 (95% confidence interval = 42-53 ng/mL) to 77 (95% confidence interval = 71-82 ng/mL); p < 0.01) between weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and 3 minutes after protamine administration. CONCLUSION: This study shows a wide variation in individual heparin sensitivity in patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Although activated clotting time-guided anticoagulation management may underestimate the level of anticoagulation and consequently result in a less profound inhibition of hemostatic activation, this study lacked power to detect adverse outcomes.

Microvascular Alterations During Cardiac Surgery Using a Heparin or Phosphorylcholine-Coated Circuit.

OBJECTIVE: Heparin biocompatible coating frequently is used to reduce inflammation and blood coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in cardiac surgery. Whether heparin coating is protective or damaging to the vascular endothelium is unclear. The authors investigated whether heparin-coated (HC) circuits are associated with better preservation of microcirculatory perfusion and glycocalyx dimensions compared with nonheparin phosphorylcholine-coated (PC) circuits. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized blinded study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: PC (n = 13) versus HC circuits (n = 13). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sublingual microcirculatory perfusion was measured before, during, and after CPB using sidestream dark field imaging and analyzed for perfused vessel density and perfused boundary region, an inverse parameter for glycocalyx dimensions. Onset of CPB was associated with an increase in perfused boundary region in the PC group that continued until the third postoperative day (2.0 ± 0.2 to 2.5 ± 0.2 µm; p = 0.018). This was paralleled by increased plasma syndecan-1 levels in the PC group. Contrastingly, both parameters remained unaltered in the HC group compared with baseline levels. CPB decreased perfused vessel density in both groups (CPB v pre-CPB: PC: 17 ± 2 to 13 ± 2 mm/mm2, p = 0.006; HC: 16 ± 2 to 11 ± 2 mm/mm2, p = 0.003) and remained equally altered in the first 3 postoperative days. CONCLUSION: The use of an HC circuit is associated with better preservation of the endothelial glycocalyx compared with PC circuits, whereas microcirculatory perfusion was disturbed equally in both groups. Hence, CPB-induced microcirculatory perfusion disturbances seem to be coating independent.

A Pharmacokinetic Model for Protamine Dosing After Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated postoperative hemostasis of patients subjected to conventional protamine dosing compared with protamine dosing based on a pharmacokinetic (PK) model following cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: In 56 patients, protamine was dosed in a fixed ratio (CD), while 62 patients received protamine based on the PK model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in heparin administration (414±107 mg (CD) v 403±90 mg (PK); p = 0.54), whereas protamine dosing was considerably different with a protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio of 1.1±0.3 for the CD group and 0.5±0.1 for the PK group (p<0.001). The changes in activated coagulation time (ΔACT) values (ACT after protamine minus preoperative ACT;+17±77 s v+6±15 s; p = 0.31) were equal between groups. Yet, the thromboelastometric intrinsically activated coagulation test clotting time (CT; 250±76 s v 203±44 s; p<0.001) and intrinsically activated coagulation test without the heparin effect CT (275±105 v 198±32 s; p<0.001) were prolonged in the CD group. Median packed red blood cell transfusion (0 [0-2] v 0 [0-0]), fresh frozen plasma transfusion (1 [0-2] v 0 [0-0]), and platelet concentrate transfusion (0 [0-1] v 0 [0-0]) were different between the fixed ratio and PK group, respectively (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patient-tailored protamine dosing based on a PK model was associated with a reduction in protamine dosing, with better hemostatic test results when compared with fixed-ratio protamine dosing.

Effect of high or low protamine dosing on postoperative bleeding following heparin anticoagulation in cardiac surgery. A randomised clinical trial.

While experimental data state that protamine exerts intrinsic anticoagulation effects, protamine is still frequently overdosed for heparin neutralisation during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Since comparative studies are lacking, we assessed the influence of two protamine-to-heparin dosing ratios on perioperative haemostasis and bleeding, and hypothesised that protamine overdosing impairs the coagulation status following cardiac surgery. In this open-label, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery were assigned to a low (0.8; n=49) or high (1.3; n=47) protamine-to-heparin dosing group. The primary outcome was 24-hour blood loss. Patient haemostasis was monitored using rotational thromboelastometry and a thrombin generation assay. The low protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio group received less protamine (329 ± 95 vs 539 ± 117 mg; p<0.001), while post-protamine activated clotting times were similar among groups. The high dosing group revealed increased intrinsic clotting times (236 ± 74 vs 196 ± 64 s; p=0.006) and the maximum post-protamine thrombin generation was less suppressed in the low dosing group (38 ± 40 % vs 6 ± 9 %; p=0.001). Postoperative blood loss was increased in the high dosing ratio group (615 ml; 95 % CI 500-830 ml vs 470 ml; 95 % CI 420-530 ml; p=0.021) when compared to the low dosing group, respectively. More patients in the high dosing group received fresh frozen plasma (11 % vs 0 %; p=0.02) and platelet concentrate (21 % vs 6 %; p=0.04) compared to the low dosing group. Our study confirms in vitro data that abundant protamine dosing is associated with increased postoperative blood loss and higher transfusion rates in cardiac surgery.

Moderate hyperoxic versus near-physiological oxygen targets during and after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The safety of perioperative hyperoxia is currently unclear. Previous studies in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery suggest reduced myocardial damage when avoiding extreme perioperative hyperoxia (>400 mmHg). In this study we investigated whether an oxygenation strategy from moderate hyperoxia to a near-physiological oxygen tension reduces myocardial damage and improves haemodynamics, organ dysfunction and oxidative stress. METHODS: This was a single-blind, single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Fifty patients were randomised to a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) target of 200-220 mmHg during cardiopulmonary bypass and 130-150 mmHg during intensive care unit (ICU) admission (control group) versus lower targets of 130-150 mmHg during cardiopulmonary bypass and 80-100 mmHg at the ICU (conservative group). Primary outcome was myocardial injury (CK-MB and Troponin-T) at ICU admission and 2, 6 and 12 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Weighted PaO2 during cardiopulmonary bypass was 220 mmHg (interquartile range (IQR) 211-233) vs. 157 (151-162) in the control and conservative group, respectively (P < 0.0001). During ICU admission, weighted PaO2 was 107 mmHg (86-141) vs. 90 (84-98) (P = 0.03), respectively. Area under the curve of CK-MB was median 23.5 µg/L/h (IQR 18.4-28.1) vs. 21.5 (15.8-26.6) (P = 0.35) and 0.30 µg/L/h (0.25-0.44) vs. 0.39 (0.24-0.43) (P = 0.81) for Troponin-T. Cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index, creatinine, lactate and F2-isoprostane levels were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to moderate hyperoxia, a near-physiological oxygen strategy does not reduce myocardial damage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Conservative oxygen administration was not associated with increased lactate levels or hypoxic events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry NTR4375, registered on 30 January 2014.

Individualized heparin and protamine management improves rotational thromboelastometric parameters and postoperative hemostasis in valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether a tailored approach to heparin and protamine management improved thromboelastometric parameters after cardiopulmonary bypass and reduced postoperative blood loss compared with activated coagulation time (ACT)-based fixed target heparin and protamine management. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective valve surgery (n = 38). INTERVENTIONS: Heparin and protamine management were based either on the ACT (n = 19) or hemostasis management system (HMS) measurements (n = 19; HMS Plus; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The target ACT for initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass was 480 seconds. Study variables included rotational thromboelastometry EXTEM (extrinsic coagulation), HEPTEM (intrinsic coagulation with heparinase), and FIBTEM (fibrin part of clot formation) tests and 24-hour blood loss. The use of HMS reduced the median protamine-to-heparin ratio from 1.00 (1.00-1.00) to 0.62 (0.56-0.66; p<0.001). The ACT group showed a prolonged postbypass clotting time for both EXTEM (86 ± 13 seconds v 78 ± 10 seconds; p = 0.05) and HEPTEM (217 ± 58 seconds v 183 ± 24 seconds; p = 0.03) tests. There was a moderate correlation between protamine dosing with the EXTEM and HEPTEM clotting time (r = 0.42; p = 0.009 and r = 0.38; p = 0.02, respectively). The number of patients with more than 450 mL/24 hours was higher in the ACT than in the HMS group (42% v 12%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized heparin and protamine management decreased the protamine-to-heparin ratio, improved postbypass thromboelastometric hemostatic parameters, and reduced the incidence of severe blood loss compared with an ACT-based strategy, supporting the added value of this approach for hemostatic optimization during cardiac surgery.