Prevalence of polypharmacy and drug interaction in older adults with rheumatic disease.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Older people with rheumatic diseases tend to have a greater number of associated comorbidities, which will require the use of more drugs, increasing the risk of hospitalizations, complications, and drug interactions. In Mexico, there has been an estimated prevalence of polypharmacy of up to 55%, however there are scarce reports on the topic in our elderly population with rheumatic diseases. We aimed to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and the association of drug interactions in patients treated for rheumatic disease. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing treatment for rheumatic diseases who were treated in geriatrics and rheumatology clinics from January to December 2021. The presence of polypharmacy and drug interactions was evaluated using the BOT Plus Pharmacological Surveillance System. The prevalence of polypharmacy and the association of drug interactions were estimated. RESULTS: We evaluated 320 patients, with a mean age of 67.05±5.8 years, predominantly female (85%). The prevalence of polypharmacy was 68.1% (n=218), of which 214 (98.1%) patients had related drug interactions; 27.1% were severe and 53.2% as moderate interactions. Factors related with increased risk of drug interactions were being exposed to hypertension increased the risk of drug interactions (POR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44-2.14; P<0.001), having osteoarthritis (POR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.42; P=0.032) and thyroid disease (POR 1.45, 95% CI 1.28-1.65; P=0.001). The most prevalent serious interactions were leflunomide-methotrexate in 27 (46.5%) patients and buprenorphine-tramadol in 8 (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of polypharmacy and drug interactions was observed in elderly patients with rheumatic diseases. The main associated factors were comorbidities, particularly high blood pressure, osteoarthritis and thyroid diseases.

Multicenter Study on the Frequency of Low Bone Mineral Density in Young Women With Breast Cancer and Associated Factors.

INTRODUCTION: Young women with breast cancer (BC) may experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss secondary to cancer treatment effects on estrogen levels. Studies assessing BMD in BC patients have had a limited representation of young women. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed the frequency of low BMD and associated factors in this age group. METHODS: Women diagnosed with stage 0-III BC at ≤40 years, treated with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy between 2010 and 2020 at 5 Mexican BC referral centers were eligible. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were collected, as well as bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) results. Low BMD was defined as lumbar or femoral neck T-score < -1.0 or Z-score ≤ -2.0. RESULTS: A total of 1259 patients were included; median age at diagnosis was 36 years (21-40). Overall, 93% received chemotherapy and 65% endocrine therapy (tamoxifen was received at some point by 61%, aromatase inhibitors by 17%, and GnRH agonists/bilateral oophorectomy by 21%). DEXA scans were documented in 254 (20%), of which 163 (64%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 58%-70%) had a low BMD report. Low BMD was associated with receiving aromatase inhibitors (Odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.13-3.24), and GnRH agonists/bilateral oophorectomy (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.21-4.21). CONCLUSION: The suboptimal frequency of BMD monitoring observed displays an alarming disregard for bone health in young patients. Thus, a high proportion of women with low BMD are potentially being missed and precluded from the opportunity to receive timely interventions. Particular focus should be put on BMD monitoring among patients treated with aromatase inhibitors, GnRH agonists or bilateral oophorectomy.

Update of the guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the Mexican College of Rheumatology 2023.

OBJECTIVE: To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A group of experts representative of different geographical regions and various medical services catering to the Mexican population with RA was formed. Questions based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) were developed, deemed clinically relevant. These questions were answered based on the results of a recent systematic literature review (SLR), and the evidence's validity was assessed using the GRADE system, considered a standard for these purposes. Subsequently, the expert group reached consensus on the direction and strength of recommendations through a multi-stage voting process. RESULTS: The updated guidelines for RA treatment stratify various therapeutic options, including different classes of DMARDs (conventional, biologicals, and JAK inhibitors), as well as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and analgesics. By consensus, it establishes the use of these in different subpopulations of interest among RA patients and addresses aspects related to vaccination, COVID-19, surgery, pregnancy and lactation, and others. CONCLUSIONS: This update of the Mexican guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of RA provides reference points for evidence-based decision-making, recommending patient participation in joint decision-making to achieve the greatest benefit for our patients. It also establishes recommendations for managing a variety of relevant conditions affecting our patients.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. METHODOLOGY: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. RESULTS: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as "no IIM" changed their classification to "Probable IIM" and 4 to "Definite IIM"; of the 16 patients classified as "probable IIM," 15 changed their classification to "Definite IIM." CONCLUSION: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.

Are the cut-offs of the rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody different to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from their primary differential diagnoses?

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) are commonly used for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although other rheumatic diseases with arthritis can test positive. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for RF and anti-CCP with the best diagnostic performance in a sample of patients with RA, compared with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS: This was a descriptive, prospective study. EUROINMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for RF isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig) A (IgA), IgG and IgM and third-generation assay IgG for anti-CCP were used in serum samples of patients with RA, other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. The cutoff with the best diagnostic performance was determined by the Youden Index and receiver operating characteristic analysis Results: Three hundred and thirty-two serum samples were analysed. The cutoffs proposed in our population were for RF in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects IgM 135 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were psoriatic arthritis (Psa) IgA 47.2 IU/mL, clinically suspicious arthralgia (CSA) IgA 39.5 IU/mL, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) IgM 180.6 IU/mL, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgA 42.6 IU/mL, primary fibromyalgia (pFM) IgM 68.6 IU/mL, osteoarthritis (OA) IgM 48 IU/mL, gout IgM 117 IU/mL and healthy IgM 16.3 IU/mL. For anti-CCP, in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects 6.95 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were Psa 6.8 IU/mL, CSA 9.95 IU/mL, pSS 20.7 IU/mL, SLE 6 IU /mL, pFM 11.8 IU/mL, OA 11.9 IU/mL, gout 5 IU/mL and healthy 5 IU/mL. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, the RA versus differential diagnosis cutoffs must be considered.

Phenotype and treatment of elderly onset compared with younger onset rheumatoid arthritis patients in international daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: To identify possible differences in baseline characteristics, initial treatment and treatment response between RA patient subgroups based on age at disease onset. METHODS: Daily practice data from the worldwide METEOR registry were used. Patients (7912) were stratified into three age-groups (age at disease diagnosis <45 years, 45-65 years, >65 years). Initial treatment was compared between the different age-groups. With Cox regression analyses the effect of age-group on time-to-switch from first to second treatment was investigated, and with linear mixed models differences in response to treatment (DAS and HAQ) between the age-groups were assessed, after correction for potential confounders. RESULTS: The >65 years age-group included more men, and more seronegative RA with somewhat higher inflammatory markers. Initial treatment choices differed only slightly between the age-groups, and the time-to-switch from initial treatment to the next was similar. DAS and HAQ improvement were dependent on the age-group, reflected by a significant interaction between age-group and outcome. The stratified analysis showed a difference of -0.02 and -0.05 DAS points and, -0.01 and 0.02 HAQ points per month in the <45 and 45-65 years age-groups as compared with the >65 year age group, a difference that did not seem clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: In this international study on worldwide clinical practice, patients with RA onset >65 years include more men and seronegative arthritis, and were initially treated slightly differently than younger patients. We observed no clinically relevant differences in timing of a next treatment step, or response to treatment measured by DAS and HAQ.

Efficacy and safety of weekly vitamin D3 in patients with fibromyalgia: 12-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled placebo trial.

INTRODUCTION: FM is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the presence of generalized pain. There are contradictory results regarding the prevalence and supplementation effect of vitamin D deficiency on FM patients. We aim to determine the safety and efficacy of a 12-week vitamin D supplementation on FM patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. We included female participants of 18 years old or older, who met 1990 or 2010 ACR criteria for fibromyalgia. The Spanish validated FIQ and the VAS of pain were applied at baseline. The participants were then randomized to receive placebo or 50,000 IU of Vitamin D3 PO, weekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS: We included 80 patients. There was no statistical difference in the initial and final FIQ between both groups. The FIQ delta also did not prove to be different at the end of the study. The increase in vitamin D levels in the intervention group was corroborated. Regarding serious adverse effects, none was reported in both groups. There was no statistical difference in minor adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study conducted to measure the efficacy and safety of vitamin D exclusively in patients with FM, we found that there is no evidence of a trend in favor of vitamin D treatment, since we did not observe improvement in the VAS of pain or FIQ. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT03369379 Key Points • There are conflicting results in vitamin D to treat fibromyalgia. • In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we did not find a difference in the VAS nor FIQ with vitamin D supplementation. • The increase in vitamin D levels in the intervention group was corroborated.

Body mass index and treatment survival in patients with RA starting treatment with TNFα-inhibitors: long-term follow-up in the real-life METEOR registry.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether there is an association between body mass index (BMI) category and survival of various tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-life longitudinal international registry. METHODS: Data from 5230 patients with RA starting treatment with any TNFi were selected from the METEOR registry. Patients were divided into six BMI categories: 3.7% underweight, BMI<18.5 kg/m2; 46% normal weight, BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2; 32% pre-obesity, BMI 25-30 kg/m2; 13% obesity class I, BMI 30-35 kg/m2; 3.4% obesity class II, BMI 35-40 kg/m2; and 1.6% obesity class III, BMI >40 kg/m2. Time on treatment in the different BMI categories was compared for all TNFi combined and for the infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept separately, using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses. Cox regression analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, with follow-up censored at 5000 days. RESULTS: Patients in obesity class II (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.54) and III (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.18) and underweight patients (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.58) showed statistically significantly shorter TNFi survival than normal weight patients. The effect in underweight patients was strongest for infliximab (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.76), the effect in overweight patients was strongest for infliximab (category II (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.26); category III (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.71)) and etanercept (category II (HR 1.27 95% CI 0.98 to 1.65); category III (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.55)). No significant effect modification from reported pain was found. CONCLUSION: Both underweight and overweight patients discontinued TNFi treatment earlier than normal weight patients, without evidence of reported pain as the main determinant. It remains uncertain what determines TNFi survival in individual patients.

Physician-patient alignment in satisfaction with psoriatic arthritis treatment in Latin America.

INTRODUCTION: Physician-patient misalignment may exist in real-life clinical practice. We aimed to assess physician and patient treatment satisfaction levels and associated degree of misalignment in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHOD: Data from a cross-sectional survey of patients and their physicians conducted in Latin America were analyzed. Physician-reported and patient-reported satisfaction levels with current PsA treatment, alignment in satisfaction levels, and factors associated with satisfaction misalignment were assessed through bivariable and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 179 physician-patient pairs were analyzed. Physicians reported satisfaction with current disease control in 87.7% (n = 157) of cases; patients reported satisfaction in 91.1% (n = 163 of cases). A total of 82.1% of physician-patient pairs were aligned. Compared with aligned patients, misaligned patients were older and more likely to have moderate or severe disease, deteriorating or unstable disease, a past hospital procedure, current or past psoriasis symptoms, greater current pain, a current acute episode, poorer health and quality of life, greater impairment, poorer medication compliance, to consider PsA a major daily burden, and to believe that PsA treatments were ineffective. Misaligned patients were less likely to be in remission. Logistic regression analysis revealed that misaligned patients were older, and more likely to consider PsA a major daily burden and PsA treatments as ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of treatment satisfaction and alignment were observed among PsA patients and their physicians in Latin America. Patients in this study nevertheless experienced a considerable clinical and quality-of-life burden, especially the misaligned patients. Addressing misalignment may lead to improved PsA disease control.Key points• High treatment satisfaction was observed among PsA patients and their treating physicians in Latin America.• Patients experienced a considerable clinical and quality-of-life burden, especially the misaligned patients.• One-fifth of physician-patient pairs were misaligned regarding satisfaction.• Understanding and addressing misalignment may improve outcomes in this patient population.