Circular RNAs: the next level of gene regulation.

Gene regulation is a highly complex process involving the presence and participation of many molecules and complexes that regulate gene expression in the genome, which occurs in a precise and coordinated way. Among all these regulatory molecules, the circular RNAs (circRNAs) are the most novel and peculiar family of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) as they have a circular structure, are very specific on their expression, highly conserved, and highly resistant to degradation. These molecules have been described in recent years as excellent disease markers and as potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we focused on general characteristics and on the evolution of the circRNAs, as well as on their biological functions, emphasizing on their participation in the formation of brain tumors.

Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements 1 (LINE1): The chimeric transcript L1-MET and its involvement in cancer.

Long interspersed nuclear elements 1 (LINE1) are non-LTR retrotransposons that represent the greatest remodeling force of the human genome during evolution. Genomically, LINE1 are constituted by a 5´ untranslated region (UTR), where the promoter regions are located, three open reading frames (ORF0, ORF1, and ORF2) and one 3´UTR, which has a poly(A) tail that harbors the short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) Alu and SVA. Although the intrinsic nature of LINE1 is to be copied and inserted into the genome, an increase in their mobility produces genomic instability. In response to this, the cell has "designed" many mechanisms controlling the retrotransposition levels of LINE1; however, alterations in these regulation systems can increase LINE1 mobility and the formation of chimeric genes. Evidence indicates that 988 human genes have LINE1 inserted in their sequence, resulting in the transcriptional control of genes by their own promoters, as well as by the LINE1 antisense promoter (ASP). To date, very little is known about the biologic impact of this and the L1-MET chimera is a more or less studied case. ASP hypomethylation has been observed in all studied cancer types, leading to increased L1-MET expression. In specific types of cancer, this L1-MET increase controls both low and high MET protein levels. It remains to be clarified if this protein product is a chimeric protein.

Differentially Expressed Long Non-Coding RNAs Were Predicted to Be Involved in the Control of Signaling Pathways in Pediatric Astrocytoma.

Expression changes for long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified in adult glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and in a mixture of adult and pediatric astrocytoma. Since adult and pediatric astrocytomas are molecularly different, the mixture of both could mask specific features in each. We determined the global expression patterns of lncRNAs and messenger RNA (mRNAs) in pediatric astrocytoma of different histological grades. Transcript expression changes were determined with an HTA 2.0 array. lncRNA interactions with microRNAs and mRNAs were predicted by using an algorithm and the LncTar tool, respectively. Interactomes were constructed with the HIPPIE database and visualized with the Cytoscape platform. The array showed expression changes in 156 and 207 lncRNAs in tumors (versus the control) and in pediatric GBM (versus low-grade astrocytoma), respectively. Predictions identified lncRNAs that have putative microRNA binding sites, which might suggest that they function as sponges in these tumors. Also, lncRNAs were shown to interact with many mRNAs, such as Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1 (PHLDA1) and sulfatase 2 (SULF2). For example, qPCR found long intergenic non-coding RNA regulator of reprogramming (linc-RoR) expression levels upregulated in pediatric GBM when they were compared with control tissues or with low-grade tumors. Meanwhile, PHLDA1 and ELAV-like RNA binding protein 1 (ELAV1) showed expression changes in tumors relative to the control. Our data showed many lncRNAs with expression changes in pediatric astrocytoma, which might be involved in the regulation of different signaling pathways.

Breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 miRNA profile expression after BIK interference: BIK involvement in autophagy.

B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)-interacting killer (apoptosis inducing) (BIK) has been proposed as a tumor suppressor in diverse types of cancers. However, BIK's overexpression in breast cancer (BC) and in non-small lung cancer cells (NSCLCs), associated with a poor prognosis, suggests its participation in tumor progression. In this study, we evaluated the global expression pattern of microRNAs (miRNAs), messenger RNA (mRNA) expression changes in autophagy, and autophagic flux after BIK interference. BIK gene expression was silenced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in BC cell MDA-MB-231, and BIK interference efficiency was tested by real-time PCR and by Western blotting. BIK expression levels decreased by 75 ± 18 % in the presence of 600 nM siRNA, resulting in the abolishment of BIK expression by 94 ± 30 %. BIK interference resulted in the overexpression of 17 miRNAs that, according to the DIANA-miRPath v3.0 database, are mainly implied in the control of cell signaling, gene expression, and autophagy. The autophagy array revealed downregulation of transcripts which participate in autophagy, and their interactome revealed a complex network, where hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (HGS), α-synuclein (SNCA), unc-51-like autophagy activating kinase 1/2 (ULK1/2), and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3) were shown to be signaling hubs. LC3-II expression-an autophagy marker-was increased by 169 ± 25 % after BIK interference, which indicates the involvement of BIK in autophagy. Altogether, our results indicate-for the first time-that BIK controls the expression of miRNAs, as well as the autophagic flux in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Involvement of multiple cellular pathways in regulating resistance to tamoxifen in BIK-suppressed MCF-7 cells.

Majority of women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers initially respond to hormone therapies such as tamoxifen (TAM; antagonist of estrogen). However, many tumors eventually become resistant to TAM. Therefore, understanding the various cellular components involved in causing resistance to TAM is of paramount importance in designing novel entities for efficacious hormone therapy. Previously, we found that suppression of BIK gene expression induced TAM resistance in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. In order to understand the response of these cells to TAM and its association with resistance, a microarray analysis of gene expression was performed in the BIK-suppressed MCF-7 cells and compared it to the TAM-only-treated cells (controls). Several genes participating in various cellular pathways were identified. Molecules identified in the drug resistance pathway were 14-3-3z or YWHAZ, WEE1, PRKACA, NADK, and HSP90AA 1. Further, genes involved in cell cycle control, apoptosis, and cell proliferation were also found differentially expressed in these cells. Transcriptional and translational analysis of key molecules such as STAT2, AKT 3, and 14-3-3z revealed similar changes at the messenger RNA (mRNA) as well as at the protein level. Importantly, there was no cytotoxic effect of TAM on BIK-suppressed MCF-7 cells. Further, these cells were not arrested at the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle although 30 % of BIK-suppressed cells were arrested at the G2 phase of the cycle on TAM treatment. Furthermore, we found a relevant interaction between 14-3-3z and WEE1, suggesting that the cytotoxic effect of TAM was prevented in BIK-suppressed cells because this interaction leads to transitory arrest in the G2 phase leading to the repair of damaged DNA and allowing the cells to proliferate.

Mechanisms associated with resistance to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (review).

Anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen are widely used in the clinic to treat estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer initially respond to treatment with anti-hormonal agents such as tamoxifen, but remissions are often followed by the acquisition of resistance and, ultimately, disease relapse. The development of a rationale for the effective treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer requires an understanding of the complex signal transduction mechanisms. In the present study, we explored some mechanisms associated with resistance to tamoxifen, such as pharmacologic mechanisms, loss or modification in estrogen receptor expression, alterations in co-regulatory proteins and the regulation of the different signaling pathways that participate in different cellular processes such as survival, proliferation, stress, cell cycle, inhibition of apoptosis regulated by the Bcl-2 family, autophagy, altered expression of microRNA, and signaling pathways that regulate the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the tumor microenvironment. Delineation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of resistance may aid in the development of treatment strategies to enhance response and compromise resistance.

Glycine receptor internalization by protein kinases activation.

Although glycine-induced currents in the central nervous system have been proven to be modulated by protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC), the mechanism is not well understood. In order to better comprehend the mechanism involved in this phenomenon, we tested the PKA and PKC activation effect on the specific [(3) H]glycine and [(3) H]strychnine binding to postsynaptic glycine receptor (GlyR) in intact rat retina. The specific binding constituted about 20% of the total radioligand binding. Kinetic analysis of the specific binding exhibited a sigmoidal behavior with three glycine and two strychnine binding sites and affinities of 212 nM for [(3) H]glycine and 50 nM for [(3) H]strychnine. Specific radioligand binding was decreased (60-85%) by PKA and PKC activation, an effect that was blocked by specific kinases inhibitors, as well as by cytochalasin D. GlyR expressed in the plasma membrane decreased about 50% in response to kinases activation, which was consistent with an increase of the receptor in the microsomal fraction when PKA was activated. Moreover, immunoprecipitation studies indicated that these kinases lead to a time-dependent receptor phosphorylation. Our results suggest that in retina, GlyR is cross-regulated by G protein-coupled receptors, activating PKA and PKC.