Vulnerable populations and the emergency ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Ventral hernias can be repaired electively; however, many circumstances require emergency repair. The association between sociodemographic status and rate of emergency repair are unclear and the Social Vulnerability Index may be a useful tool to better understanding this association. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between Social Vulnerability Index and emergency ventral hernia repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012-2018) data for patients at a level 1 trauma center. We included patients who had an open ventral hernia repair. Social Vulnerability Index was based on residential address at the time of surgery. We conducted univariate and bivariate statistics, including χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare high and low social vulnerability. RESULTS: Our sample had 1,017 patients. Patients who underwent emergency operations were older (P = .025) and had higher Social Vulnerability Index (P = .029). Patients in the high Social Vulnerability Index group were 1.5 times more likely to receive emergency surgery (P = .047). Emergency repair was also associated with increased frequency of nonhome discharge (9% vs 2%, P = .001) and higher mean work relative value unit (15.4 vs 11.9, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients requiring emergency ventral hernia repair have significantly higher Social Vulnerability Index than those undergoing elective repair. This vulnerable population also has increased cost associated with the repair and higher rates of nonhome discharge. This work provides a foundation for efforts to reach patients in high Social Vulnerability Index environments at an earlier stage to achieve earlier elective repair.

Value in Acute Care Surgery, Part 3: Defining Value in Acute Surgical Care - It Depends on the Perspective.

ABSTRACT: The prior articles in this series have focused on measuring cost and quality in acute care surgery. This third article in the series explains the current ways of defining value in acute care surgery, based on different stakeholders in the healthcare system - the patient, the healthcare organization, the payer and society. The heterogenous valuations of the different stakeholders require that the framework for determining high-value care in acute care surgery incorporates all viewpoints.

Failure rates of nonoperative management of low-grade splenic injuries with active extravasation: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

Objectives: There is little evidence guiding the management of grade I-II traumatic splenic injuries with contrast blush (CB). We aimed to analyze the failure rate of nonoperative management (NOM) of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB in hemodynamically stable patients. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study examining all grade I-II splenic injuries with CB was performed at 21 institutions from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2019. Patients >18 years old with grade I or II splenic injury due to blunt trauma with CB on CT were included. The primary outcome was the failure of NOM requiring angioembolization/operation. We determined the failure rate of NOM for grade I versus grade II splenic injuries. We then performed bivariate comparisons of patients who failed NOM with those who did not. Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17. The combined rate of failure for grade I-II injuries was 20.0%. There was no statistical difference in failure of NOM between grade I and II injuries with CB (18.2% vs 21.1%, p>0.05). Patients who failed NOM had an increased median hospital length of stay (p=0.024) and increased need for blood transfusion (p=0.004) and massive transfusion (p=0.030). Five patients (3.4%) died and 96 (66.2%) were discharged home, with no differences between those who failed and those who did not fail NOM (both p>0.05). Conclusion: NOM of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB fails in 20% of patients. Level of evidence: IV.

High-grade liver injuries with contrast extravasation managed initially with interventional radiology versus observation: A secondary analysis of a WTA multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: High-grade liver injuries with extravasation (HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav) are associated with morbidity/mortality. For low-grade injuries, an observation (OBS) first-strategy is beneficial over initial angiography (IR), however, it is unclear if OBS is safe for HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav. Therefore, we evaluated the management of HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients, hypothesizing IR patients will have decreased rates of operation and mortality. METHODS: HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients managed with initial OBS or IR were included. The primary outcome was need for operation. Secondary outcomes included liver-related complications (LRCs) and mortality. RESULTS: From 59 patients, 23 (39.0%) were managed with OBS and 36 (61.0%) with IR. 75% of IR patients underwent angioembolization, whereas 13% of OBS patients underwent any IR, all undergoing angioembolization. IR patients had an increased rate of operation (13.9% vs. 0%, p â€‹= â€‹0.049), but no difference in LRCs (44.4% vs. 43.5%) or mortality (5.6% vs. 8.7%) versus OBS patients (both p â€‹> â€‹0.05). CONCLUSION: Over 60% of patients were managed with IR initially. IR patients had an increased rate of operation yet similar rates of LRCs and mortality, suggesting initial OBS reasonable in appropriately selected HGLI â€‹+ â€‹Extrav patients.

The Effect of Social Vulnerability on Initial Stage and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is a composite metric for social determinants of health. The objective of this study was to determine if SVI influences stage at presentation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and subsequent therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NSCLC patients from our local contribution to the National Cancer Database (2011-2021) were grouped into low SVI (<75 %ile) and high SVI (>75 %ile) cohorts. Demographics, cancer-related variables, and treatment modalities were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for the impact of demographics on cancer presentation and for the impact of oncologic variables on treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,662 NSCLC patients, 435 (26 %) were defined as high SVI. Compared to the 1,227 (74 %) low SVI patients, highly vulnerable patients were more likely to be male (53.3 % vs 46.0 %, p = 0.009), non-White (17.2 % vs 9.7 %, p < 0.0001), have comorbidities (29.4 % vs 23.1 %, p = 0.009) and present at a higher AJCC clinical T, M and overall stage (all p < 0.05). These findings persisted on multivariable analysis, with highly vulnerable patients having 1.5x the odds (95 %CI: 1.23-1.86, p < 0.001) of presenting at more advanced stage. Patients with high SVI were less likely to be recommended for and receive surgery (40.9 % vs 53.2 %, p < 0.001), and this finding persisted after controlling for stage at presentation (OR 1.37, 95 %CI 1.04-1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Highly vulnerable patients present at a more advanced clinical stage and are less likely to be recommended and receive surgery, even after controlling for stage at presentation. Further investigation into these findings is warranted to achieve more equitable oncologic care.

Left out in the cold: Homicide amongst persons experiencing homelessness.

BACKGROUND: There is no American population-level study comparing the characteristics of homicides involving victims who were vs were not experiencing homelessness at time of death. We aim to identify variables surrounding homeless homicide that are unique, and intervenable. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) from 2003 to 2018 and compared the characteristics surrounding homicides of victims who were not-homeless (cohort 1) vs experiencing homelessness (cohort 2) at death. We utilized the available perpetrator data to characterize the average perpetrator for each cohort. We considered housing status to be our primary predictor and recorded NVDRS variables, such as age of victims and likelihood to know perpetrators, to be our primary outcomes. RESULTS: 81,212 Homicide Victims and 60,982 Homicide Perpetrators were included in analysis. Homeless cohort victims were more likely younger, White, male, and to have a known mental health or substance abuse disorder. PEH were also more likely to have co-morbid mental health and substance abuse disorders but were roughly half as likely to be getting treatment for said disorders. Circumstances surrounding incidents, including geographic location, mechanism of injury, and premeditation, varied; homeless cohort victims were more likely to die in random acts of violence, but were less likely to die via firearm. CONCLUSIONS: There is room for targeted interventions against homeless homicides. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, Level IV.