Mayo Clinic Consensus Report on Membranous Nephropathy: Proposal for a Novel Classification.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a pattern of injury caused by autoantibodies binding to specific target antigens, with accumulation of immune complexes along the subepithelial region of glomerular basement membranes. The past 20 years have brought revolutionary advances in the understanding of MN, particularly via the discovery of novel target antigens and their respective autoantibodies. These discoveries have challenged the traditional classification of MN into primary and secondary forms. At least 14 target antigens have been identified, accounting for 80%-90% of cases of MN. Many of the forms of MN associated with these novel MN target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic phenotypes. The Mayo Clinic consensus report on MN proposes a 2-step classification of MN. The first step, when possible, is identification of the target antigen, based on a multistep algorithm and using a combination of serology, staining of the kidney biopsy tissue by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry, and/or mass spectrometry methodology. The second step is the search for a potential underlying disease or associated condition, which is particularly relevant when knowledge of the target antigen is available to direct it. The meeting acknowledges that the resources and equipment required to perform the proposed testing may not be generally available. However, the meeting consensus was that the time has come to adopt an antigen-based classification of MN because this approach will allow for accurate and specific MN diagnosis, with significant implications for patient management and targeted treatment.

Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy: proposal for a novel classification.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a pattern of injury caused by autoantibodies binding to specific target antigens, with accumulation of immune complexes along the subepithelial region of glomerular basement membranes. The past 20 years have brought revolutionary advances in the understanding of MN, particularly via the discovery of novel target antigens and their respective autoantibodies. These discoveries have challenged the traditional classification of MN into primary and secondary forms. At least 14 target antigens have been identified, accounting for 80%-90% of cases of MN. Many of the forms of MN associated with these novel MN target antigens have distinctive clinical and pathologic phenotypes. The Mayo Clinic consensus report on MN proposes a 2-step classification of MN. The first step, when possible, is identification of the target antigen, based on a multistep algorithm and using a combination of serology, staining of the kidney biopsy tissue by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry, and/or mass spectrometry methodology. The second step is the search for a potential underlying disease or associated condition, which is particularly relevant when knowledge of the target antigen is available to direct it. The meeting acknowledges that the resources and equipment required to perform the proposed testing may not be generally available. However, the meeting consensus was that the time has come to adopt an antigen-based classification of MN because this approach will allow for accurate and specific MN diagnosis, with significant implications for patient management and targeted treatment.

Association of Isotretinoin With Depression and Suicide: A Review of Current Literature.

Acne vulgaris, a condition that can affect people at any age, is the most common cause of referral to a dermatologist. Isotretinoin (ITT) is the most effective treatment available, but serious adverse effects, including a possible association with depression and suicide, limit its use. We review the current literature regarding the association of ITT with depression and suicide. Case reports and database studies show a clear association, and this association is biologically plausible. Although prospective studies have opposite results, limitations make them unsuitable to identify a subgroup of patients who may be at risk of developing depression or suicidal ideation with ITT. Overall, it seems some people might be at risk, particularly those with a personal or family history of mental disorder, but further studies are needed to identify those patients who would benefit from an early referral to a mental health professional when ITT is initiated. Currently, no conclusions can be drawn, and it seems appropriate to regularly screen all patients on ITT for depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation and promptly refer them to a mental health professional if any are found.

Kidney allograft fibrosis and atrophy early after living donor transplantation.

Kidney allograft failure is most often caused by chronic allograft nephropathy, a process of interstitial fibrosis (GIF) and tubular atrophy (TA). We assessed the pathology of living donor (LD) grafts compared to deceased donor (DD). Included are 321 recipients (245 LD; 76 DD) with protocol biopsies the first 2 years of transplant. In LD, GIF was present in 7%, 31%, 61% and 71% of grafts at 0, 4, 12 and 24 months. TA progressed in parallel to GIF. Compared to LD, more DD grafts had GIF at time 0 (29%, p = 0.002); thereafter the incidence of GIF was similar. In LD, GIF was associated with lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR)(1 year) (no GIF, 62 +/- 16; GIF, 49 +/- 15 mL/min/m(2) iothalamate clearance, p = 0.001) and reduced graft survival (HR = 2.2, p = 0.009). GIF in LD related to acute rejection (HR = 2.6, p = 0.01), polyoma nephropathy (OR = 4.4, p = 0.02) and lower levels of GFR 3 weeks post-transplant (HR = 0.961; p = 0.03, multivariate). However, GIF also developed in 53% of recipients lacking these covariates. Thus, GIF/TA develops in the majority of LD grafts, it is often mild but is associated with reduced function and survival. GIF frequently develops in the absence of risk factors. Lower GFR post-transplant identify patients at highest risk of GIF.

Patient and graft outcomes from older living kidney donors are similar to those from younger donors despite lower GFR.

BACKGROUND: Donor age adversely affects deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes, but its influence on living-donor transplantation is less well characterized. METHODS: Living-donor kidney transplants at a single center between 1998 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were abstracted for 52 transplants from donors aged > or =50 years and for a matched group of 104 transplants from donors aged <50 years. Survival indices were compared during the first three years' post-transplantation. Functional indices, including serial iothalamate clearances, were compared at 1, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Predonation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was lower among older donors (94 +/- 12 vs. 108 +/- 17 mL/min/SA) but post-transplant compensatory hypertrophy was similar (11.7 +/- 26.3% vs. 7.7 +/- 31.4%). Recipients of older-donor grafts were older (52.8 +/- 16.5 vs. 46.1 +/- 15.1 years) and more frequently unrelated to the donor (54% vs. 39%). Trends toward higher frequency of slow graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and polyomavirus nephropathy were observed for older-donor grafts. Three-year recipient, graft, and death-censored graft survivals were > or =90% for both groups. At 1, 12, and 24 months, serum creatinine was higher and GFR was lower among recipients of older- compared with younger-donor grafts. Other functional indices (urine total protein, serum potassium and uric acid, hemoglobin, and number of antihypertensives) were not different. Donor age correlated with graft GFR at 1, 12, and 24 months for the entire study cohort by linear regression. CONCLUSION: Older donor age does not preclude excellent results from living-donor kidney transplantation but should be appreciated as being associated with relatively lower GFR.

Acute rapamycin nephrotoxicity in native kidneys of patients with chronic glomerulopathies.

BACKGROUND: Based on its success as a transplant immunosuppressor, there is intense interest in using rapamycin in the treatment of progressive glomerulopathies involving native kidneys. However, we call attention to the potential toxicity associated with the use of rapamycin in this setting. METHODS: We conducted a study to examine the efficacy and safety of rapamycin in patients with progressive chronic renal failure. Eleven patients with either focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy, membranous nephropathy or membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis and progressive renal failure (defined as an increase in >25% of baseline serum creatinine over the last year or loss of glomerular filtration rate > or =5 ml/min/year as determined by the Cockcroft-Gault formula), proteinuria > or =1.0 g/24 h and with a creatinine clearance of > or 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) were entered into a 12 month study. Patients were treated with rapamycin, starting at 5 mg/day, orally, aiming for target blood levels of 7-10 ng/dl. All patients were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and/or an angiotensin receptor blocker, aiming to control blood pressure < or =145/90 mmHg. RESULTS: Six patients developed acute renal failure, defined as an increase in serum creatinine > or =0.5 mg/dl (baseline: 3.2+/-0.9 mg/dl; peak: 5.6+/-1.6 mg/dl; P<0.01, paired t-test). In four patients, discontinuation of the drug resulted in improvement of renal function close to baseline levels. One patient required haemodialysis and had no subsequent recovery of renal function. In another patient, renal function recovered after discontinuation of the drug and then rapamycin was resumed at a lower dose when creatinine returned to baseline. This resulted in a second acute increase in serum creatinine that failed to return to baseline when the medication was discontinued. Four other patients had the following adverse events: skin rash, severe hypertriglyceridaemia, diarrhoea and hyperkalaemia. In none of the subjects were rapamycin levels >15 ng/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin can cause nephrotoxicity in some patients with chronic glomerulopathies. Whether the toxicity is solely related to rapamycin, due to the combination of proteinuria and rapamycin, or other unknown factor use is presently undetermined.

Correlation of quantitative digital image analysis with the glomerular filtration rate in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is characterized by progressive renal functional loss and histologic abnormalities of one or more tissue compartments. In this study, correlations between histologic abnormalities and graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR, measured by iothalamate clearance), serum creatinine (SCr) and urinary protein (UPr)] were investigated using biopsies from 49 patients with newly diagnosed CAN. Extent of tubulointerstitial fibrosis (%TIF), as assessed by a semi-quantitative score, correlated significantly with GFR, SCr and UPr. The close correlation between %TIF and GFR suggested that quantitative measurement of %TIF may predict functional consequences of CAN. Calculation of %TIF by computerized digital analysis was performed using four strategies: (a) quantitation of blue material in Masson's trichrome (MT)-stained sections, (b) quantitation of red material in Sirius Red-stained sections (SR-nonpolarized), (c) quantitation of birefringent material in Sirius Red stained-sections examined under polarized light (SR-polarized) and (d) quantification of brown material in sections stained by immunoperoxidase for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Only the SR-nonpolarized score correlated significantly with GFR at the time of biopsy-diagnosis of CAN. We conclude that digital analysis strategies demonstrate variable accuracy in quantifying %TIF. Validation of the SR-nonpolarized strategy against histologic scoring and GFR supports the application of this technique to longitudinal studies of CAN.

Influence of surveillance renal allograft biopsy on diagnosis and prognosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an increasingly prevalent cause of allograft dysfunction. METHODS: In 18 histologically proven cases of PVAN managed by reduced immunosuppression, monitoring of serum creatinine, and repeated biopsy, graft outcomes were correlated with clinical and histologic indices. Six months postdiagnosis the status of each graft was classified as poor (N = 7) or satisfactory (N = 11). Poor transplant status was defined as graft loss, increased severity of PVAN on repeat biopsy, or serum creatinine>3.0 mg/dL. Diagnosis resulted from either surveillance allograft biopsies (N = 8) or biopsies performed for increased serum creatinine (nonsurveillance, N = 10). RESULTS: The surveillance biopsy group was more likely than the nonsurveillance group to have satisfactory graft status at 6 months (eight of eight vs. three of ten, P = 0.004) and had significantly lower serum creatinine at diagnosis, 3, and 6 months. Histologic scoring for chronic interstitial and tubular injury was lower in diagnostic surveillance biopsies compared to nonsurveillance biopsies (P = 0.01). Satisfactory transplant status was also associated with reduced or absent virus on repeat biopsy (P = 0.01). Poor transplant status was associated with a higher frequency of recipientneg/donorpos cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology (71% vs. 9%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Surveillance allograft biopsy provides an important means for earlier detection of PVAN and permits timely alterations to immunosuppression. Early diagnosis is associated with a lesser degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis and lower baseline and subsequent serum creatinine.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using both A2 and non-A2 living donors.

BACKGROUND: Given the scarcity of cadaveric organs, efforts are intensifying to increase the availability of living donors. The current study assessed the feasibility of using ABO-incompatible living-donor kidneys to expand the donor pool. METHODS: The authors performed 18 ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants between May 1999 and April 2001. Ten patients received living-donor kidneys from A2 and eight patients received kidneys from non-A2 blood group donors. Immunosuppression consisted of Thymoglobulin antibody induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Eight non-A2 and two A2 kidney recipients also received a pretransplant conditioning regimen of four plasmapheresis treatments followed by intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy at the time of transplantation. Antidonor blood group antibody titer was measured at baseline, pretransplant, at 1- to 3-month and 1-year follow-up, and at the time of diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. RESULTS: No hyperacute rejection episodes occurred. One-year graft and patient survival rates in the 18 ABO-incompatible recipients were only slightly lower than those of 81 patients who received ABO-compatible kidney transplants during the same period (89% vs. 96% and 94% vs. 99%, respectively). Glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine levels did not differ between the groups. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 28% of ABO-incompatible recipients, and was reversible with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and increasing immunosuppression in all patients except one. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants can achieve an acceptable 1-year graft survival rate using an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of Thymoglobulin induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone combined with pretransplant plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and splenectomy.

Living-donor kidney transplantation at Mayo Clinic--Rochester.

With the established benefits of living-donor kidney transplantation, our primary emphasis at Mayo Clinic, Rochester has been to develop protocols that allow living donation to occur even in the presence of relatively unusual or generally contraindicated situations. This approach has significantly increased the number of patients receiving kidney transplants in the past few years. Our protocols for extended criteria donors and recipients along with the exclusive use of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy have been major contributors to the increase in volume. ABO-incompatible and positive-crossmatch living-donor kidney transplant protocols also have increased the availability of transplants for our patients. Protocol biopsies have aided in the diagnosis of subclinical rejection, polyoma virus and chronic allograft nephropathy. Innovative immunosuppressive protocols such as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression have decreased rejection and improved both short and long-term renal allograft survival.