Transplantation Within 6 Months of Registration does not Enhance Survival for Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Determine if timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation has emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. METHODS: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 - 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or drop out was 5.74 (3.25-7.06) months. Compared to a short wait time (0-3 months), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3-6 months) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.84; (6-9 months) HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39-1.65; (9-12 months) HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.26-1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.67-1.42; AB or B blood group HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.62-1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97). This benefit began after a 6 month waiting time minimum (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.26-1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR; 0.43 95% CI 0.20-0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

Acquired ductopenia: an insight into imaging findings.

Hepatic ductopenia is a pathologic diagnosis characterized by a decrease in the number of intrahepatic bile ducts as a consequence of various underlying etiologies. Some etiologies, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and ischemic cholangitis, often have distinctive imaging findings. In contrast, other causes such as chronic rejection following liver transplantation, drug-induced biliary injury, infection, malignancy such as lymphoma, and graft-versus-host disease may only have ancillary or non-specific imaging findings. Thus, diagnosing ductopenia in conditions with nonspecific imaging findings requires a multidimensional approach, including clinical evaluation, serological testing, imaging, and liver histology to identify the underlying cause. These etiologies lead to impaired bile flow, resulting in cholestasis, liver dysfunction, and, ultimately, cirrhosis and liver failure if the underlying cause remains untreated or undetected. In the majority of instances, individuals diagnosed with ductopenia exhibit a positive response to treatment addressing the root cause or cessation of the causative agent. This article focuses on acquired causes of ductopenia, its clinical manifestation, histopathology, imaging diagnosis, and management.

Imaging cholangiocarcinoma: CT and MRI techniques.

Cross-sectional imaging plays a crucial role in the detection, diagnosis, staging, and resectability assessment of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Despite this vital function, there is a lack of standardized CT and MRI protocol recommendations for imaging cholangiocarcinoma, with substantial differences in image acquisition across institutions and vendor platforms. In this review, we present standardized strategies for the optimal imaging assessment of cholangiocarcinoma including contrast media considerations, patient preparation recommendations, optimal contrast timing, and representative CT and MRI protocols with individual sequence optimization recommendations. Our recommendations are supported by expert opinion from members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology's Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) on Cholangiocarcinoma, encompassing a broad array of institutions and practice patterns.

Interpretation, Reporting, and Clinical Applications of Liver MR Elastography.

Chronic liver disease is highly prevalent and often leads to fibrosis or cirrhosis and complications such as liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. The diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis is crucial to determine management and mitigate complications. Liver biopsy for histologic assessment has limitations such as sampling bias and high interreader variability that reduce precision, which is particularly challenging in longitudinal monitoring. MR elastography (MRE) is considered the most accurate noninvasive technique for diagnosing and staging liver fibrosis. In MRE, low-frequency vibrations are applied to the abdomen, and the propagation of shear waves through the liver is analyzed to measure liver stiffness, a biomarker for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis. As MRE has become more widely used in clinical care and research, different contexts of use have emerged. This review focuses on the latest developments in the use of MRE for the assessment of liver fibrosis; provides guidance for image acquisition and interpretation; summarizes diagnostic performance, along with thresholds for diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis; discusses current and emerging clinical applications; and describes the latest technical developments.

Multimodality Imaging in Metabolic Syndrome: State-of-the-Art Review.

Metabolic syndrome comprises a set of risk factors that include abdominal obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein levels, and high blood pressure, at least three of which must be fulfilled for diagnosis. Metabolic syndrome has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Multimodality imaging plays an important role in metabolic syndrome, including diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessment of complications. CT and MRI are the primary tools for quantification of excess fat, including subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, as well as fat around organs, which are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. PET has been shown to detect signs of insulin resistance and may detect ectopic sites of brown fat. Cardiovascular disease is an important complication of metabolic syndrome, resulting in subclinical or symptomatic coronary artery disease, alterations in cardiac structure and function with potential progression to heart failure, and systemic vascular disease. CT angiography provides comprehensive evaluation of the coronary and systemic arteries, while cardiac MRI assesses cardiac structure, function, myocardial ischemia, and infarction. Liver damage results from a spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease ranging from steatosis to fibrosis and possible cirrhosis. US, CT, and MRI are useful in assessing steatosis and can be performed to detect and grade hepatic fibrosis, particularly using elastography techniques. Metabolic syndrome also has deleterious effects on the pancreas, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and ovaries, including increased risk for several malignancies. Metabolic syndrome is associated with cerebral infarcts, best evaluated with MRI, and has been linked with cognitive decline. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Pickhardt in this issue.

Imaging of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) continues to be a global health concern, responsible for a significant number of deaths worldwide. Although most individuals who consume alcohol do not develop ALD, heavy drinkers and binge drinkers are at increased risk. Unfortunately, ALD is often undetected until it reaches advanced stages, frequently associated with portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). ALD is now the leading indication for liver transplant. The incidence of alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early diagnosis of ALD is therefore important in patient management and determination of prognosis, as abstinence can halt disease progression. The spectrum of ALD includes steatosis, steatohepatitis, and cirrhosis, with steatosis the most common manifestation. Diagnostic techniques including ultrasound, CT, and MRI provide useful information for identifying ALD and excluding other causes of liver dysfunction. Heterogeneous steatosis and transient perfusion changes on CT and MRI in the clinical setting of alcohol-use disorder are diagnostic of severe AH. Elastography techniques are useful for assessing fibrosis and monitoring treatment response. These various imaging modalities are also useful in HCC surveillance and diagnosis. This review discusses the imaging modalities currently used in the evaluation of ALD, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and clinical applications.

Imaging of Fontan-Associated Liver Disease.

ABSTRACT: The Fontan procedure is the definitive treatment for patients with single-ventricle physiology. Surgical advances have led to a growing number of patients surviving into adulthood. Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) encompasses a spectrum of pathologic liver changes that occur secondary to altered physiology including congestion, fibrosis, and the development of liver masses. Assessment of FALD is difficult and relies on using imaging alongside of clinical, laboratory, and pathology information. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are capable of demonstrating physiologic and hepatic parenchymal abnormalities commonly seen in FALD. Several novel imaging techniques including magnetic resonance elastography are under study for use as biomarkers for FALD progression. Imaging has a central role in detection and characterization of liver masses as benign or malignant. Benign FNH-like masses are commonly encountered; however, these can display atypical features and be mistaken for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fontan patients are at elevated risk for HCC, which is a feared complication and has a poor prognosis in this population. While imaging screening for HCC is widely advocated, no consensus has been reached regarding an optimal surveillance regimen.

Imaging of Castleman Disease.

Castleman disease (CD) is a group of rare and complex lymphoproliferative disorders that can manifest in two general forms: unicentric CD (UCD) and multicentric CD (MCD). These two forms differ in clinical manifestation, imaging appearances, treatment options, and prognosis. UCD typically manifests as a solitary enlarging mass that is discovered incidentally or after development of compression-type symptoms. MCD usually manifests acutely with systemic symptoms including fever and weight loss. As a whole, CD involves lymph nodes throughout the chest, neck, abdomen, pelvis, and axilla and can have a wide variety of imaging appearances. Most commonly, lymph nodes or masses in UCD occur in the chest, classically with well-defined borders, hyperenhancement, and possible characteristic patterns of calcification and/or feeding vessels. Lymph nodes affected by MCD, while also hyperenhancing, tend to involve multiple nodal chains and manifest alongside anasarca or hepatosplenomegaly. The polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal plasma cell disorder, and skin changes (POEMS) subtype of MCD may demonstrate lytic or sclerotic osseous lesions in addition to features typical of MCD. Since a diagnosis of CD based solely on imaging findings is often not possible, pathologic confirmation with core needle biopsy and/or surgical excision is necessary. Nevertheless, imaging plays a crucial role in supporting the diagnosis of CD, guiding appropriate regions for biopsy, and excluding other potential causes or mimics of disease. CT is frequently the initial imaging technique used in evaluating potential CD. MRI and PET play important roles in thoroughly evaluating the disease and determining its extent, especially the MCD form. Complete surgical excision is typically curative for UCD. MCD usually requires systemic therapy. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Chemotherapy-associated liver morphological changes in hepatic metastases (CALMCHeM).

PURPOSE: To review imaging findings in chemotherapy-associated liver morphological changes in hepatic metastases (CALMCHeM) on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its association with tumor burden. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients with hepatic metastases who received chemotherapy and subsequent follow-up imaging where CT or MRI showed morphological changes in the liver. The morphological changes searched for were nodularity, capsular retraction, hypodense fibrotic bands, lobulated outline, atrophy or hypertrophy of segments or lobes, widened fissures, and one or more features of portal hypertension (splenomegaly/venous collaterals/ascites). The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) no known chronic liver disease; b) availability of CT or MRI images before chemotherapy that showed no morphological signs of chronic liver disease; c) at least one follow-up CT or MRI image demonstrating CALMCHeM after chemotherapy. Two radiologists in consensus graded the initial hepatic metastases tumor burden according to number (≤10 and >10), lobe distribution (single or both lobes), and liver parenchyma volume affected (<50%, or ≥50%). Imaging features after treatment were graded according to a pre-defined qualitative assessment scale of "normal," "mild," "moderate," or "severe." Descriptive statistics were performed with binary groups based on the number, lobar distribution, type, and volume of the liver affected. Chi-square and t-tests were used for comparative statistics. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association between severe CALMCHeM changes and age, sex, tumor burden, and primary carcinoma type. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common primaries were from breast (58.4%), colorectal (14.2%), and neuroendocrine (11.0%) carcinomas. Hepatic metastases were discrete in 54.8% of cases, confluent in 38.8%, and diffuse in 6.4%. The number of metastases was >10 in 64.4% of patients. The volume of liver involved was <50% in 79.8% and ≥50% in 20.2% of cases. The severity of CALMCHeM at the first imaging follow-up was associated with a larger number of metastases (P = 0.002) and volume of the liver affected (P = 0.015). The severity of CALMCHeM had progressed to moderate to severe changes in 85.9% of patients, and 72.5% of patients had one or more features of portal hypertension at the last follow-up. The most common features at the final follow-up were nodularity (95.0%), capsular retraction (93.4%), atrophy (66.2%), and ascites (65.7%). The Cox proportional hazard model showed metastases affected ≥50% of the liver (P = 0.033), and the female gender (P = 0.004) was independently associated with severe CALMCHeM. CONCLUSION: CALMCHeM can be observed with a wide variety of malignancies, is progressive in severity, and the severity correlates with the initial metastatic liver disease burden.

Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron Evaluation with MRI and Fibrosis and Fat Evaluation with US: A Practical Guide for Radiologists.

Quantitative imaging biomarkers of liver disease measured by using MRI and US are emerging as important clinical tools in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Because of their high accuracy and noninvasive nature, in many cases, these techniques have replaced liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. The most commonly evaluated imaging biomarkers are surrogates for liver fibrosis, fat, and iron. MR elastography is now routinely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and typically combined with MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification to exclude or grade hepatic steatosis and iron overload, respectively. US elastography is also widely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and has the advantage of lower equipment cost and greater availability compared with those of MRI. Emerging US fat quantification methods can be performed along with US elastography. The author group, consisting of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Liver Fibrosis Disease-Focused Panel (DFP), the SAR Hepatic Iron Overload DFP, and the European Society of Radiology, review the basics of liver fibrosis, fat, and iron quantification with MRI and liver fibrosis and fat quantification with US. The authors cover technical requirements, typical case display, quality control and proper measurement technique and case interpretation guidelines, pitfalls, and confounding factors. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for radiologists interpreting these examinations. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Unique Morphologic Findings in the Liver After Stereotactic Radiation for Cholangiocarcinoma.

Newer radiotherapy techniques, such as stereotactic body radiation, have been increasingly used as part of the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas, particularly as a bridge to liver transplantation. Although conformal, these high-dose therapies result in tissue injury in the peritumoral liver tissue. This retrospective study characterized the morphologic changes in the liver after stereotactic body radiation in a series of liver explant specimens with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The morphologic changes in the irradiated zone were compared against the nonirradiated background liver parenchyma to control for chemotherapy-related changes. Of the 21 cases studied, 16 patients (76.2%) had underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis, and 13 patients (61.9%) had advanced liver fibrosis. The average duration between completion of radiotherapy and liver transplantation was 33.4 weeks (range: 6.29 to 67.7). Twelve patients (57.1%) had no residual tumor in the liver. The most frequent histologic changes in the peritumoral irradiated liver tissue were sinusoidal congestion (100%), sinusoidal edematous stroma (100%), and hepatocellular atrophy (100%), followed by partial/complete occlusion of central veins (76.2%), sinusoidal cellular infiltrates (76.2%), and hepatocyte dropout (66.7%). The findings in the radiated areas were more extensive than in the background liver ( P <0.01). Sinusoidal edematous stroma was striking and dominated the histologic findings in some cases. Over time, there was less sinusoidal congestion but more hepatocyte dropout (r s =-0.54, P =0.012 and r s =0.64, P =0.002, respectively). Uncommon findings, such as foam cell arteriopathy in the liver hilum, were also observed. In summary, postradiation liver specimens have distinctive morphologic findings.

Head-to-head comparison of magnetic resonance elastography-based liver stiffness, fat fraction, and T1 relaxation time in identifying at-risk NASH.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The presence of at-risk NASH is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and complications. Therefore, noninvasive identification of at-risk NASH with an accurate biomarker is a critical need for pharmacologic therapy. We aim to explore the performance of several magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging parameters in diagnosing at-risk NASH. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This prospective clinical trial (NCT02565446) includes 104 paired MR examinations and liver biopsies performed in patients with suspected or diagnosed NAFLD. Magnetic resonance elastography-assessed liver stiffness (LS), 6-point Dixon-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and single-point saturation-recovery acquisition-calculated T1 relaxation time were explored. Among all predictors, LS showed the significantly highest accuracy in diagnosing at-risk NASH [AUC LS : 0.89 (0.82, 0.95), AUC PDFF : 0.70 (0.58, 0.81), AUC T1 : 0.72 (0.61, 0.82), z -score test z >1.96 for LS vs any of others]. The optimal cutoff value of LS to identify at-risk NASH patients was 3.3 kPa (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 82%, negative predictive value: 91%), whereas the optimal cutoff value of T1 was 850 ms (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 63%, and negative predictive value: 87%). PDFF had the highest performance in diagnosing NASH with any fibrosis stage [AUC PDFF : 0.82 (0.72, 0.91), AUC LS : 0.73 (0.63, 0.84), AUC T1 : 0.72 (0.61, 0.83), |z| <1.96 for all]. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance elastography-assessed LS alone outperformed PDFF, and T1 in identifying patients with at-risk NASH for therapeutic trials.

Primary neuroendocrine tumors and primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the liver: a proposal for a multidiscipline definition.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors and primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and pose challenges for both diagnosis and for determining whether the tumor is primary to the liver versus metastatic disease. The lack of a uniform definition for primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is also a limitation to understanding and treating these rare tumors. Recently, there have been significant histological advances in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine tumors in general, as well as significant advances in imaging for neuroendocrine neoplasms, all of which are important for their treatment. This article presents a multiple disciplinary definition and proposed guidelines for diagnosing a neuroendocrine tumor/neuroendocrine carcinomas as being primary to the liver.

Imaging Features in the Liver after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Historically, radiation therapy was not considered in treatment of liver tumors owing to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, development of highly conformed radiation treatments such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased use of radiation therapy in the liver. SBRT is indicated in treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors with outcomes comparable to those of other local therapies, especially in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After SBRT, imaging features of the tumor and surrounding background hepatic parenchyma demonstrate a predictable pattern immediately after treatment and during follow-up. The goals of SBRT are to deliver a lethal radiation dose to the targeted liver tumor and to minimize radiation dose to normal liver parenchyma and other adjacent organs. Evaluation of tumor response after SBRT centers on changes in size and enhancement; however, these changes are often delayed secondary to the underlying physiologic effects of radiation. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SBRT should allow better understanding of the typical imaging features in detection of tumor response and avoid misinterpretation from common pitfalls and atypical imaging findings. Imaging features of radiation-induced change in the surrounding liver parenchyma are characterized by a focal liver reaction that can potentially be mistaken for no response or recurrence of tumor. Knowledge of the pattern and chronology of this phenomenon may allay any uncertainty in assessment of tumor response. Other pitfalls related to fiducial marker placement or combination therapies are important to recognize. The authors review the basic principles of SBRT and illustrate post-SBRT imaging features of treated liver tumors and adjacent liver parenchyma with a focus on avoiding pitfalls in imaging evaluation of response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Fibrosis, Fat, and Iron.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a large and ever-growing problem in both the US and world health care systems. While histologic analysis through liver biopsy is the gold standard for hepatic parenchymal evaluation, this is not feasible in such a large population of patients or as a way of monitoring change over time. This review discusses MRI-based techniques for assessing hepatic fibrosis, hepatic steatosis, and hepatic iron content, with discussions of both current techniques and future advancements.

Vulvar glomangioma: A case report and literature review.

GLMN is a gene that encodes a critical protein necessary for normal vascular development. Mutations of GLMN predispose individuals to development of glomangiomas, with nearly 100% penetrance by age 30. Glomangiomas are tumors of the glomus body, a thermoregulatory arterial-venous shunt composed of modified smooth muscle cells. Vulvar glomangioma is an exceedingly rare cause of chronic pelvic pain, that may be easily confused for other conditions such as Bartholin's gland abscess or deep angiomxyomas, thereby delaying diagnosis and treatment. Glomangiomas have characteristic pathologic and imaging findings which may aid diagnosis. We herein describe the case of a 24-year-old female who developed chronic pelvic pain in the setting of a vulvar glomangioma. We further delineate the magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy findings critical to her diagnosis, and the appropriate steps taken for surgical management. She was found to harbor a heterozygous GLMN mutation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of such a case in the medical literature.

Eosinophilic Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Associated Abdominal Viscera: Imaging Findings and Diagnosis.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract that are characterized by tissue eosinophilia and end-organ dysfunction or damage. Primary EGIDs are associated with atopy and other allergic conditions, whereas secondary EGIDs are associated with underlying systemic diseases or hypereosinophilic syndrome. Within the spectrum of EGIDs, eosinophilic esophagitis is the most prevalent. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and eosinophilic colitis are relatively uncommon. Eosinophilic infiltration of the liver, biliary tree, and/or pancreas also can occur and mimic other inflammatory and malignant conditions. Although endoscopic evaluation is the method of choice for eosinophilic esophagitis, radiologic evaluation of the esophagus plays an important role in the assessment of disease severity. CT and MR enterography are the modalities of choice for demonstrating specific forms of eosinophilic gastroenteritis. CT and MRI are important in the detection of abdominal visceral involvement in EGIDs. Diagnosis is often challenging and relies on symptoms, imaging findings, histologic confirmation of tissue eosinophilia, and correlation with peripheral eosinophilia. Imaging is crucial for identifying characteristic organ-specific findings, although imaging findings are not specific. When promptly treated, EGIDs usually have a benign clinical course. However, a delayed diagnosis and associated surgical interventions have been associated with morbidity. Therefore, a radiologist's knowledge of the imaging findings of EGIDs in the appropriate clinical settings may aid in early diagnosis and thereby improve patient care. An overview of the clinical features and imaging findings of EGIDs and the eosinophilic disorders of associated abdominal viscera is provided. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.