Treatment with SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Extensive Coronary Artery Disease: Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium-glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2-I) have shown solid benefits in reducing cardiovascular mortality and admissions for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease. However, no specific studies exist in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, observational study including patients with T2DM and a new diagnosis of extensive CAD (defined as left main disease or three main coronary vessel disease). Patients were recruited from 2015 until 2020, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. The primary outcome was to compare all-cause mortality in patients treated with or without SGLT2-I at discharge and adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included: 104 (24.7%) were treated with SGLT2-I and 316 (75.3%) were not (non-SGLT2-I group). The presentation was acute coronary syndrome in 44.3%. The mean age was 71.2 ± 10.5 years. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 51.5 ± 12.5%, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 73.9 ± 22 ml/min. After a mean follow-up of 3 ± 1.6 years, all-cause mortality was 16.4%, and cardiovascular mortality was 9.5%. After IPTW, the risk of all-cause death was lower in the SGLT2-I group with a hazard ratio of 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.81), p = 0.016. With regard to secondary outcomes, patients in the SGLT2-I group were associated with less renal function deterioration but an increase in unplanned revascularizations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM and extensive CAD, treatment with SGLT2-I after discharge was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death.

Conservative, surgical, and percutaneous treatment for mitral regurgitation shortly after acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high mortality rates and has inconclusive recommendations in clinical guidelines. We aimed to report the international experience of patients with secondary MR following acute MI and compare the outcomes of those treated conservatively, surgically, and percutaneously. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective international registry of consecutive patients with at least moderate-to-severe MR following MI treated in 21 centres in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The registry included patients treated conservatively and those having surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) or percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using edge-to-edge repair. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A total of 471 patients were included (43% female, age 73 ± 11 years): 205 underwent interventions, of whom 106 were SMVR and 99 PMVR. Patients who underwent mitral valve intervention were in a worse clinical state (Killip class ≥3 in 60% vs. 43%, P < 0.01), but yet had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with those treated conservatively [11% vs. 27%, P < 0.01 and 16% vs. 35%, P < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.46, P < 0.01]. Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement was performed earlier than PMVR [median of 12 days from MI date (interquartile range 5-19) vs. 19 days (10-40), P < 0.01]. The immediate procedural success did not differ between SMVR and PMVR (92% vs. 93%, P = 0.53). However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher in SMVR than in PMVR (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.03 and 31% vs. 17%, P = 0.04; adjusted HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.55-9.07, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention may mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR. Percutaneous mitral valve repair can serve as an alternative for surgery in reducing MR for high-risk patients.

Safety and Feasibility of MitraClip Implantation in Patients with Acute Mitral Regurgitation after Recent Myocardial Infarction and Severe Left Ventricle Dysfunction.

Patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after myocardial infarction (MI) have an increased risk of mortality. Transcatheter mitral valve repair may therefore be a suitable therapy. However, data on clinical outcomes of patients in an acute setting are scarce, especially those with reduced left ventricle (LV) dysfunction. We conducted a multinational, collaborative data analysis from 21 centers for patients who were, within 90 days of acute MI, treated with MitraClip due to severe MR. The cohort was divided according to median left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)-35%. Included in the study were 105 patients. The mean age was 71 ± 10 years. Patients in the LVEF < 35% group were younger but with comparable Euroscore II, multivessel coronary artery disease, prior MI and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Procedure time was comparable and acute success rate was high in both groups (94% vs. 90%, p = 0.728). MR grade was significantly reduced in both groups along with an immediate reduction in left atrial V-wave, pulmonary artery pressure and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.51 and 19% vs. 12%, p = 0.49) and neither was the 3-month re-hospitalization rate. In conclusion, MitraClip intervention in patients with acute severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) due to a recent MI in an acute setting is safe and feasible. Even patients with severe LV dysfunction may benefit from transcatheter mitral valve intervention and should not be excluded.