Thoracotomy Versus Sternotomy for Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Preterm Neonates.

BACKGROUND: To date, a posterolateral thoracotomy approach is considered the gold standard for surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), also in preterm neonates. However, a posterolateral thoracotomy approach can induce post-thoracotomy lung injury of the immature and vulnerable lungs of preterm neonates. Therefore, this study aims to compare a posterolateral thoracotomy and median sternotomy for surgical closure of PDA in preterm neonates. METHODS: Between September 2010 and November 2014, both surgical approaches were used to treat a symptomatic PDA in very and extremely preterm neonates. The hospital records of all these neonates were retrospectively reviewed to assess all-cause mortality and postoperative morbidity in both groups. RESULTS: Despite comparable preoperative patient profiles, the postoperative pulmonary complication rate was significantly lower in the median sternotomy group (52.9% vs 94.7%; P = .006). Moreover, significantly lower mean airway pressures (MAPs) were seen in the median sternotomy group directly after surgery (ΔMAP median [interquartile range], 0.00 [2.13] vs 0.80 [1.67] cmH2O; P = .025). Postoperative blood transfusion (median [interquartile range], 20 [14] vs 17 [16] mL; P = .661) rates did not differ between both approaches. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, a median sternotomy approach for surgical PDA closure is at least noninferior to a posterolateral thoracotomy approach. Given the lower postoperative pulmonary complication rate and lower postoperative MAPs directly after surgery, the median sternotomy approach may be considered superior for preterm neonates with immature and vulnerable lungs.

Successful emergent repair of a subacute left ventricular free wall rupture after acute inferoposterolateral myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial rupture is an important and catastrophic complication of acute myocardial infarction. A dramatic form of this complication is a left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR). CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old man with acute inferoposterolateral myocardial infarction and single-vessel coronary artery disease underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The circumflex coronary artery was successfully stented with a drug-eluting stent. Fifty days after PCI the patient experienced progressive fatigue and chest pain with haemodynamic instability. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a covered LVFWR of the lateral wall. The patient underwent successful emergent surgical repair of the LVFWR. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of swift PCI, mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction, such as LVFWR, are rare. The consequences, however, are haemodynamic deterioration and imminent death. This rare diagnosis should always be considered when new cardiovascular symptoms or haemodynamic instability develop after myocardial infarction, even beyond one month after the initial event. Timely diagnosis and emergency surgery are required for successful treatment of this devastating complication.

Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?

The "hybrid" approach to multivessel coronary artery disease combines surgical left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention of the remaining lesions. Ideally, the LITA to LAD bypass graft is performed in a minimally invasive fashion. This review aims to clarify the place of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in the current therapeutic armamentarium against multivessel coronary artery disease. Eighteen studies including 970 patients were included for analysis. The postoperative LITA patency varied between 93.0% and 100.0%. The mean overall survival rate in hybrid treated patients was 98.1%. Hybrid treated patients showed statistically significant shorter hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and intubation time, less packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirements, and lower in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates compared with patients treated by on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This resulted in a significant reduction in costs for hybrid treated patients in the postoperative period. In studies completed to date, HCR appears to be a promising and cost-effective alternative for CABG in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in a selected patient population.