Assessment of need for hemostatic evaluation in patients taking valproic acid: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Valproic acid (VPA) is a frequently prescribed anti-epileptic drug. Since its introduction side effects on hemostasis are reported. However, studies show conflicting results, and the clinical relevance is questioned. We aimed to determine the coagulopathies induced by VPA in patients who undergo high-risk surgery. The study results warrant attention to this issue, which might contribute to reducing bleeding complications in future patients. METHODS: Between January 2012 and August 2020, 73 consecutive patients using VPA were retrospectively included. Extensive laboratory hemostatic assessment (including platelet function tests) was performed before elective high-risk surgery. Patient characteristics, details of VPA treatment, and laboratory results were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: 46.6% of the patients using VPA (n = 73) showed coagulopathy. Mainly, platelet function disorder was found (36.4%). Thrombocytopenia was seen in 9.6% of the patients. Data suggested that the incidence of coagulopathies was almost twice as high in children as compared to adults and hypofibrinogenemia was only demonstrated in children. No association was found between the incidence of coagulopathies and VPA dosage (mg/kg/day). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients using VPA were diagnosed with coagulopathy, especially platelet function disorder. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the need for comprehensive laboratory testing before elective high-risk surgery in these patients.

Fibrinolysis in patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and the effect of platelet transfusion.

Essentials Bleeding in chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) might be influenced by hyperfibrinolysis. t-PA-thromboelastography is a fast and reliable assay for hyperfibrinolysis in CIT patients. Clots of CIT patients are more susceptible to t-PA induced lysis compared to healthy individuals. Besides platelets, other factors are likely to influence clot lysis in CIT patients. BACKGROUND: Bleeding events in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenic (CIT) patients with similar platelet counts might be influenced by changes in clot lysis potential. OBJECTIVES: To investigate, in an observational study, thromboelastographic lysis parameters, alterations in clot strength and susceptibility to clot lysis in CIT patients. To identify factors associated with fibrinolytic profiles, and to evaluate the effects of platelet transfusions. METHODS: Independent determinants of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA)-ROTEM lysis parameters were identified with multivariable linear regression. Clot formation, strength and lysis parameters were compared with the results of healthy individuals. Characteristics of CIT patients with and without hyperfibrinolytic profiles were compared. t-PA-ROTEM results before, 1 hour after and 24 hours after platelet transfusion were compared. RESULTS: A total of 72 consecutive CIT patients were included. t-PA-ROTEM lysis parameters correlated with changes in fibrinolytic proteins. Clot formation time was longer, maximum clot firmness was weaker and lysis times were shorter than in healthy individuals. CIT patients had low plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor levels, and 40% showed hyperfibrinolytic profiles. Platelet transfusions resulted in less hyperfibrinolytic profiles in many, but not all CIT patients. Patients without hyperfibrinolytic profiles had higher fibrinogen, factor VIII and α2 -antiplasmin levels. CONCLUSIONS: t-PA-ROTEM can be used as a fast and reliable assay to detect hyperfibrinolytic profiles in CIT patients. CIT patients have weaker clots, which are more susceptible to clot lysis, than healthy individuals. Besides platelets, other factors are likely to influence clot susceptibility to fibrinolysis in CIT patients. The impact of a hyperfibrinolytic t-PA-ROTEM profile on bleeding remains to be investigated.

Platelet Aggregation in Healthy Participants is Not Affected by Smoking, Drinking Coffee, Consuming a High-Fat Meal, or Performing Physical Exercise.

Platelet aggregation can be measured using optical aggregation (light transmission aggregometry, LTA) as well as by impedance (Multiplate analyzer). The LTA (the gold standard method) can be influenced by many preanalytical variables. Several guidelines differ in recommendations for the duration patients should refrain from smoking, coffee, fatty meals, and physical exercise prior to blood collection for performing platelet function tests. In this pilot study, the influence of smoking, coffee, high-fat meal, or physical exercise on platelet aggregation was investigated to improve patient friendliness and laboratory logistics in platelet function diagnostics. Standardized blood collection was performed when participants were fasting and after each parameter (n=5 per group). As a control for diurnal fluctuations, participants (n=6) were fasting during both blood collections. Platelet aggregation was executed using standardized methods for LTA and Multiplate analyzer. Statistical analysis of the results using Wilcoxon signed-rank test did not show any significant differences in platelet aggregation in healthy participants under different preanalytical variables. Therefore, these variables are not expected to adversely affect testing, which can avoid canceling tests for those patients who inevitably did.

The use of regression analysis in determining reference intervals for low hematocrit and thrombocyte count in multiple electrode aggregometry and platelet function analyzer 100 testing of platelet function.

Low platelet counts and hematocrit levels hinder whole blood point-of-care testing of platelet function. Thus far, no reference ranges for MEA (multiple electrode aggregometry) and PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer 100) devices exist for low ranges. Through dilution methods of volunteer whole blood, platelet function at low ranges of platelet count and hematocrit levels was assessed on MEA for four agonists and for PFA-100 in two cartridges. Using (multiple) regression analysis, 95% reference intervals were computed for these low ranges. Low platelet counts affected MEA in a positive correlation (all agonists showed r2 ≥ 0.75) and PFA-100 in an inverse correlation (closure times were prolonged with lower platelet counts). Lowered hematocrit did not affect MEA testing, except for arachidonic acid activation (ASPI), which showed a weak positive correlation (r2 = 0.14). Closure time on PFA-100 testing was inversely correlated with hematocrit for both cartridges. Regression analysis revealed different 95% reference intervals in comparison with originally established intervals for both MEA and PFA-100 in low platelet or hematocrit conditions. Multiple regression analysis of ASPI and both tests on the PFA-100 for combined low platelet and hematocrit conditions revealed that only PFA-100 testing should be adjusted for both thrombocytopenia and anemia. 95% reference intervals were calculated using multiple regression analysis. However, coefficients of determination of PFA-100 were poor, and some variance remained unexplained. Thus, in this pilot study using (multiple) regression analysis, we could establish reference intervals of platelet function in anemia and thrombocytopenia conditions on PFA-100 and in thrombocytopenia conditions on MEA.

Determinants of agreement between proposed therapeutic windows of platelet function tests in vulnerable patients.

AIMS: Therapeutic windows for residual platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease on P2Y12 inhibitors were proposed in a consensus document. We aimed to explore the level of agreement between windows for different platelet function tests (PFTs) used to classify patients in low, optimal, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity categories, and to identify variables contributing to the level of agreement. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this explorative clinical study, the VerifyNow P2Y12, Multiplate adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) 20 µmol/L ADP were performed simultaneously in 145 consecutive vulnerable patients. Measurements were performed within 6 months of percutaneous intervention. Patients were considered vulnerable if they had ≥2 risk factors for bleeding or ischaemic events. Window-agreement between PFT pairs was slight to moderate. Multiplate-VerifyNow agreed in 72 patients (50%), κ = 0.41; VerifyNow-LTA agreed in 76 patients (52%), κ = 0.36; and LTA-Multiplate agreed in 64 patients (44%), κ = 0.20. Several variables including the type of P2Y12 inhibitor, aspirin, haemoglobin level, platelet count, age, and previous stroke significantly influenced agreement between PFTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the PFTs, with accompanying therapeutic windows, are not interchangeable when determining the response to antiplatelet therapy in vulnerable coronary artery disease patients on P2Y12 inhibitors. Hence, the type of PFT can directly affect the treatment strategy, which may be especially relevant for patients with multiple factors influencing individual PFTs and thereby test agreement.