Disruption of TUFT1, a Desmosome-Associated Protein, Causes Skin Fragility, Woolly Hair, and Palmoplantar Keratoderma.

Desmosomes are dynamic complex protein structures involved in cellular adhesion. Disruption of these structures by loss-of-function variants in desmosomal genes leads to a variety of skin- and heart-related phenotypes. In this study, we report TUFT1 as a desmosome-associated protein, implicated in epidermal integrity. In two siblings with mild skin fragility, woolly hair, and mild palmoplantar keratoderma but without a cardiac phenotype, we identified a homozygous splice-site variant in the TUFT1 gene, leading to aberrant mRNA splicing and loss of TUFT1 protein. Patients' skin and keratinocytes showed acantholysis, perinuclear retraction of intermediate filaments, and reduced mechanical stress resistance. Immunolabeling and transfection studies showed that TUFT1 is positioned within the desmosome and that its location is dependent on the presence of the desmoplakin carboxy-terminal tail. A Tuft1-knockout mouse model mimicked the patients' phenotypes. Altogether, this study reveals TUFT1 as a desmosome-associated protein, whose absence causes skin fragility, woolly hair, and palmoplantar keratoderma.

Congenital hypopituitarism in two brothers with a duplication of the 'acrogigantism gene' GPR101: clinical findings and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Congenital hypopituitarism (CH) can cause significant morbidity or even mortality. In the majority of patients, the etiology of CH is unknown. Understanding the etiology of CH is important for anticipation of clinical problems and for genetic counselling. Our previous studies showed that only a small proportion of cases have mutations in the known 'CH genes'. In the current project, we present the results of SNP array based copy number variant analysis in a family with unexplained congenital hypopituitarism. METHODS: DNA samples of two affected brothers with idiopathic CH and their mother were simultaneously analyzed by SNP arrays for copy number variant analysis and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) for mutation screening. DNA of the father was not available. RESULTS: We found a 6 Mb duplication including GPR101 and SOX3 on the X-chromosome (Xq26.2-q27.1) in the two siblings and their mother, leading to 2 copies of this region in the affected boys and 3 copies in the mother. Duplications of GPR101 are associated with X-linked acrogigantism (the phenotypic 'opposite' of the affected brothers), whereas alterations in SOX3 are associated with X-linked hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION: In our patients with hypopituitarism we found a 6 Mb duplication which includes GPR101, a gene associated with X- linked gigantism, and SOX3, a gene involved in early pituitary organogenesis that is associated with variable degrees of hypopituitarism. Our findings show that in duplications containing both GPR101 and SOX3, the growth hormone deficiency phenotype is dominant. This suggests that, if GPR101 is duplicated, it might not be expressed phenotypically when early patterning of the embryonic pituitary is affected due to SOX3 duplication. These results, together with the review of the literature, shed a new light on the role of GPR101 and SOX3 in pituitary function.

Unique near-complete deletion of GLI2 in a patient with combined pituitary hormone deficiency and post-axial polydactyly.

INTRODUCTION: Combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) can cause a broad spectrum of health problems, ranging from short stature only, to convulsions or even death. In the majority of patients, the cause is unknown. METHODS: The idex case had unexplained CPHD, pituitary anomalies on MRI and polydactyly. In the patients and her unaffected parents, we performed SNP array analysis and Whole Exome Sequencing, after candidate gene analysis turned out negative. RESULTS: We found a unique de novo heterozygous 229.9 kb deletion in the index case on chr. 2q14.2. This deletion covered 12 out of the 13 coding exons of the GLI2 gene, a transcription factor involved in midline formation and previously associated with CPHD. As reported GLI2 deletions and mutations show a large phenotypic variability, we performed a genotype-phenotype analysis. This revealed that GLI2 missense mutations usually present with a 'ppp-only' phenotype (pituitary anomalies ± postaxial polydactyly without brain phenotype), whereas the 'ppp-plus' phenotype (with major brain malformations and/or intellectual disabilities) is more frequent in patients with larger deletions, and those with frameshift mutations/point mutations or splice variants resulting in a stop codon (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The present case shows that a deletion of the GLI2 gene only (not affecting any of the adjacent genes) causes pituitary anomalies without brain phenotype. This suggests that brain phenotype only occurs when additional genes adjacent to GLI2 are deleted, or when mutations result in truncated GLI2 mRNA/protein. However, due to the lack of functional data for many GLI2 mutations and based on the available information regarding variable penetrance, phenotype-genotype correlations need to be made with caution.