Correlation between high-resolution computed tomography appearance and histopathological features in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. A real-life study.

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, a surgical biopsy is rarely required when a high-confidence radiologic interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis is made on thin-section high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Nevertheless, disowning HRCT scans diagnosed by biopsy are more common than presumed. Our study aimed to describe the concordance rate between HRCT scans and pathological diagnoses of ILDs obtained by surgical biopsy. The current guideline suggests the use of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) in patients with newly detected ILD of unknown cause. METHODS: Patients who underwent mini-invasive surgical biopsies for interstitial lung diseases from January 2018 to August 2022 were analyzed. The HRCT scans were reviewed by an observer blinded to the patient's clinical information. The concordance between histological and HRCT-scan were assessed. RESULTS: Data from 104 patients with uncertain low confidence diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases at HRCT were analyzed. Most of the patients are male (65; 62.5%). The more frequent HRCT pattern were: alternative diagnoses (46; 44.23%), UIP probable (42; 40.38%), UIP indeterminate (7; 6.73%), and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (9, 8.65%). The more common histological diagnosis was UIP definite (30; 28.84%), hypersensitivity pneumonia [HP](19; 18.44%), NSIP (15; 14.42%), sarcoidosis (10; 9.60%). In 7 (20%) cases, the final pathological finding denies HRCT-scans diagnoses; indeed, a moderate agreement was observed between HRCT-scan findings and the definitive histological diagnosis (kappa index: 0.428). CONCLUSIONS: HRCT-scan has limitations if the objective is to define interstitial lung diseases accurately. Consequently, pathological assessment should be taken into account in order to provide more accurate tailored treatment strategies because the risk is to wait from 12 to 24 months to ascertain if the ILD will be treatable as progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Undeniably true, video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (VASLB) with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is associated with a risk of mortality and morbidity that is far from nil. Nevertheless, in recent years a VASLB approach performed in awake subjects under loco-regional anesthesia (awake-VASLB) has been suggested as an effective method to obtain a highly confident diagnosis in patients with diffuse pathologies of the lung parenchyma.

Awake or intubated surgery in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Risks associated with video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (VASLB) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are not nil. Awake video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (Awake-VASLB) has been proposed as a method to obtain a precise diagnosis in several different thoracic diseases. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes of Awake-VASLB and Intubated-VASLB in patients with suspected ILDs. METHODS: From June 2016 to February 2020, all patients submitted to elective VASLB for suspected ILD were included. Differences in outcomes between Awake-VASLB and Intubated-VASLB were assessed through univariable, multivariable-adjusted, and a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Awake-VASLB was performed in 66 out of 100 patients, while 34 underwent Intubated-VASLB. The Awake-VASLB resulted in a lower post-operative morbidity (OR 0.025; 95% CI 0.001-0.35; p=0.006), less unexpected intensive care unit admission, less need for rescue therapy for pain, a reduced surgical and anaesthesiologic time, a reduced chest drain duration, and a lower post-operative length of stay. CONCLUSION: Awake-VASLB in patients affected by ILD is feasible and seems safer than Intubated-VASLB.

Tailored combined cytomegalovirus management in lung transplantation: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no univocal prophylactic regimen to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of a tailored combined CMV management approach. METHODS: After 1-year follow up, 43 LT patients receiving combined CMV prophylaxis with antiviral agents and CMV-specific IgG were evaluated in a retrospective observational study. Systemic and lung viral infections were investigated by molecular methods on a total of 1134 whole blood and 167 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy specimens. CMV immunity was assessed by ELISPOT assay. Clinical and therapeutic data were also evaluated. RESULTS: We found 2/167 cases of CMV pneumonia (1.2%), both in the donor-positive/recipient-positive (D+/R+) population, and 51/167 cases of CMV pulmonary infection (BAL positivity 30.5%). However, only 32/167 patients (19.1%) were treated due to their weak immunological response at CMV ELISPOT assay. Viremia ⩾100,000 copies/mL occurred in 33/1134 specimens (2.9%). Regarding CMV-serological matching (D/R), the D+/R- population had more CMV viremia episodes (p < 0.05) and fewer viremia-free days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous findings, our study shows a lower incidence of CMV pneumonia and viremia despite the presence of a substantial CMV load. In addition, our findings further confirm the D+/R- group to be a high-risk population for CMV viremia. Overall, a good immunological response seems to protect patients from CMV viremia and pneumonia but not from CMV alveolar replication. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.