European randomized controlled trial evaluating differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional medical management in subjects with persistent back pain ineligible for spine surgery: 24-month results.

BACKGROUND: Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation (DTM SCS) was shown to be superior to conventional SCS for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) in subjects with persistent spinal pain syndrome with previous spinal surgery (PSPS-T2) or ineligible for it (PSPS-T1). This study reports 24-month efficacy and safety of DTM SCS vs. conventional medical management (CMM) in PSPS-T1 subjects across four European countries. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with optional crossover. Subjects randomized 1:1 to DTM SCS or CMM. Primary endpoint was responder rate (% subjects reporting ≥50% CLBP relief) at 6 months. A superiority test compared responder rates between treatments. CLBP and leg pain levels, functional disability, quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction and global impression of change were evaluated for 24 months. A Composite Responder Index (CRI) was obtained using CLBP relief, disability and QoL. Incidence of study-related adverse events evaluated safety. RESULTS: A total of 55 and 57 subjects were randomized to DTM SCS and CMM respectively. DTM SCS was superior, with CLBP responder rates ≥80% and CLBP relief >5.6 cm (>70% reduction) through the 24-month follow-up. Improvements with DTM SCS in other outcomes were sustained. The CRI was >80% for DTM SCS through 24 months. Opioid medication intake decreased in subjects treated with DTM SCS. Most patients treated with DTM SCS felt satisfied and improved at the end of the study. Safety was congruent with other studies. CONCLUSION: DTM SCS is efficacious and safe during 24 months for the treatment of CLBP and leg pain in PSPS-T1 patients ineligible for spine surgery. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This randomized controlled trial shows that Differential Target Multiplexed SCS (DTM SCS) is an effective and safe long-term treatment for PSPS type 1 patients suffering from axial low back pain with or without leg pain and who are ineligible for spinal surgery. Currently, CMM treatments are their only option and provide limited benefits. Besides superior pain relief, DTM SCS provides significant improvements in functional disability, quality of life, high levels of satisfaction and perceived impression of change.

Alterations of resting-state networks of Parkinson's disease patients after subthalamic DBS surgery.

The implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients can lead to a temporary improvement in motor symptoms, known as the stun effect. However, the network alterations induced by the stun effect are not well characterized. As therapeutic DBS is known to alter resting-state networks (RSN) and subsequent motor symptoms in patients with PD, we aimed to investigate whether the DBS-related stun effect also modulated RSNs. Therefore, we analyzed RSNs of 27 PD patients (8 females, 59.0 +- 8.7 years) using magnetoencephalography and compared them to RSNs of 24 age-matched healthy controls (8 females, 62.8 +- 5.1 years). We recorded 30 min of resting-state activity two days before and one day after implantation of the electrodes with and without dopaminergic medication. RSNs were determined by use of phase-amplitude coupling between a low frequency phase and a high gamma amplitude and examined for differences between conditions (i.e., pre vs post surgery). We identified four RSNs across all conditions: sensory-motor, visual, fronto-occipital, and frontal. Each RSN was altered due to electrode implantation. Importantly, these changes were not restricted to spatially close areas to the electrode trajectory. Interestingly, pre-operative RSNs corresponded better with healthy control RSNs regarding the spatial overlap, although the stun effect is associated with motor improvement. Our findings reveal that the stun effect induced by implantation of electrodes exerts brain wide changes in different functional RSNs.

Cortical network formation based on subthalamic beta bursts in Parkinson's disease.

Recent evidence suggests that beta bursts in subthalamic nucleus (STN) play an important role in Parkinsonian pathophysiology. We studied the spatio-temporal relationship between STN beta bursts and cortical activity in 26 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Postoperatively, we simultaneously recorded STN local field potentials (LFP) from externalized DBS leads and cortical activity using whole-brain magnetoencephalography. Event-related magnetic fields (ERF) were averaged time-locked to STN beta bursts and subjected to source localization. Our results demonstrate that ERF exhibiting activity significantly different from baseline activity were localized within areas functionally related to associative, limbic, and motor systems as well as regions pertinent for visual and language processing. Our data suggest that STN beta bursts are involved in network formation between STN and cortex. This interaction is in line with the idea of parallel processing within the basal ganglia-cortex loop, specifically within the functional subsystems of the STN (i.e., associative, limbic, motor, and the related cortical areas). ERFs within visual and language-related cortical areas indicate involvement of beta bursts in STN-cortex networks beyond the associative, limbic, and motor loops. In sum, our results highlight the involvement of STN beta bursts in the formation of multiple STN - cortex loops in patients with PD.

Anesthesia for deep brain stimulation system implantation: adapted protocol for awake and asleep surgery using microelectrode recordings.

PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS), an effective treatment for movement disorders, usually involves lead implantation while the patient is awake and sedated. Recently, there has been interest in performing the procedure under general anesthesia (asleep). This report of a consecutive cohort of DBS patients describes anesthesia protocols for both awake and asleep procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease received subthalamic nucleus (STN) implants either moderately sedated or while intubated, using propofol and remifentanil. Microelectrode recordings were performed with up to five trajectories after discontinuing sedation in the awake group, or reducing sedation in the asleep group. Clinical outcome was compared between groups with the UPDRS III. RESULTS: The awake group (n = 17) received 3.5 mg/kg/h propofol and 11.6 µg/kg/h remifentanil. During recording, all anesthesia was stopped. The asleep group (n = 63) initially received 6.9 mg/kg/h propofol and 31.3 µg/kg/h remifentanil. During recording, this was reduced to 3.1 mg/kg/h propofol and 10.8 µg/kg/h remifentanil. Without parkinsonian medications or stimulation, 3-month UPDRS III ratings (ns = 16 and 52) were 40.8 in the awake group and 41.4 in the asleep group. Without medications but with stimulation turned on, ratings improved to 26.5 in the awake group and 26.3 in the asleep group. With both medications and stimulation, ratings improved further to 17.6 in the awake group and 15.3 in the asleep group. All within-group improvements from the off/off condition were statistically significant (all ps < 0.01). The degree of improvement with stimulation, with or without medications, was not significantly different in the awake vs. asleep groups (ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The above anesthesia protocols make possible an asleep implant procedure that can incorporate sufficient microelectrode recording. Together, this may increase patient comfort and improve clinical outcomes.

Motor Evoked Potentials Improve Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: One of the main challenges posed by the surgical deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedure is the successful targeting of the structures of interest and avoidance of side effects, especially in asleep surgery. Here, intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEPs) might serve as tool to identify the pyramidal tract. We hypothesized that intraoperative MEPs are useful to define the distance to the pyramidal tract and reduce the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Motor potentials were evoked through both microelectrode and DBS-electrode stimulation during stereotactic DBS surgery on 25 subthalamic nuclei and 3 ventral intermediate thalamic nuclei. Internal capsule proximity was calculated for contacts on microelectrode trajectories, as well as for DBS-electrodes, and correlated with the corresponding MEP thresholds. Moreover, the predictivity of intraoperative MEP thresholds on the probability of postoperative capsular side effects was calculated. RESULTS: Intraoperative MEPs thresholds correlated significantly with internal capsule proximity, regardless of the stimulation source. Furthermore, MEPs thresholds were highly accurate to exclude the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative MEPs provide additional targeting guidance, especially in asleep DBS surgery, where clinical value of microelectrode recordings and test stimulation may be limited. As this technique can exclude future capsular side effects, it can directly be translated into clinical practice.

Directional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Thalamic Ventral Intermediate Area for Essential Tremor Increases Therapeutic Window.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) and the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is a well-established therapy for essential tremor (ET), but it is frequently associated with side effects like dysarthria or gait ataxia. Directional DBS (dDBS) may be a way to activate fiber tracts more selectively. Is dDBS for ET superior to omnidirectional DBS (oDBS) regarding therapeutic window and clinically as effective as oDBS? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with ET treated with PSA/VIM-DBS were recruited. Therapeutic window served as primary outcome parameter; clinical efficacy, volume of neuronal activation, and total electrical energy delivered (TEED) served as secondary outcome parameters. Therapeutic window was calculated for all three dDBS directions and for oDBS by determining therapeutic thresholds and side effect thresholds. Clinical efficacy was assessed by comparing the effect of best dDBS and oDBS on tremor and ataxia rating scales, and accelerometry. Volume of neural activation and TEED were also calculated for both paradigms. RESULTS: For best dDBS, therapeutic window was wider and therapeutic threshold was lower compared to oDBS. While side effect threshold did not differ, volume of neural activation was larger for dDBS. In terms of clinical efficacy, dDBS was as effective as oDBS. CONCLUSIONS: dDBS for ET widens therapeutic window due to reduction of therapeutic threshold. Larger volume of neural activation for dDBS at side effect threshold supports the notion of persistent directionality even at higher intensities. dDBS may compensate for slightly misplaced leads and should be considered first line for PSA/VIM-DBS.

Asleep Surgery May Improve the Therapeutic Window for Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of anesthesia type in terms of asleep vs. awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery on therapeutic window (TW) has not been investigated so far. The objective of the study was to investigate whether asleep DBS surgery of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves TW for both directional (dDBS) and omnidirectional (oDBS) stimulation in a large single-center population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) undergoing STN-DBS surgery (80 asleep and 24 awake) were compared regarding TW, therapeutic threshold, side effect threshold, improvement of Unified PD Rating Scale motor score (UPDRS-III) and degree of levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) reduction. RESULTS: Asleep DBS surgery led to significantly wider TW compared to awake surgery for both dDBS and oDBS. However, dDBS further increased TW compared to oDBS in the asleep group only and not in the awake group. Clinical efficacy in terms of UPDRS-III improvement and LEDD reduction did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides first evidence for improvement of therapeutic window by asleep surgery compared to awake surgery, which can be strengthened further by dDBS. These results support the notion of preferring asleep over awake surgery but needs to be confirmed by prospective trials.

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Headache Syndromes.

Neuropathic facial pain is notoriously difficult to treat, regardless of its origin and duration. Since the first reported sphenopalatine ganglion blockade by Sluder in 1908, this ganglion has assumed an important role among the structures targeted for the treatment of facial pain. Recent years have witnessed the rise of neuromodulation over ablative procedures, including the development of an implantable stimulation device specially designed for use in the pterygopalatine fossa. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation has been demonstrated as effective and safe for refractory cluster headache, today the major indication for this therapy, but increasing evidence shows that the effect on the autonomic system and cerebral circulation could justify an even wider use of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for other chronic headache syndromes and vascular diseases.

Superiority of temozolomide over radiotherapy for elderly patients with RTK II methylation class, MGMT promoter methylated malignant astrocytoma.

BACKGROUND: O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is predictive for alkylating chemotherapy, but there are non-benefiting subgroups. METHODS: This is the long-term update of NOA-08 (NCT01502241), which compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT, n = 176) and temozolomide (TMZ, n = 193) at 7/14 days in patients >65 years old with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations were assessed in the biomarker cohort of 104 patients and in an independent cohort of 188 patients treated with RT+TMZ-containing regimens in Heidelberg. RESULTS: In the full NOA-08 cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 [7.0-10.0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9.4 [8.1-10.4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76-1.15) of TMZ versus RT. Median event-free survival (EFS) [3.4 (3.2-4.1) months vs 4.6 (4.2-5.0) months] did not differ, with HR = 1.02 (0.83-1.25). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had markedly longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18.4 [13.9-24.4] mo and 8.5 [6.9-13.3] mo) versus RT (9.6 [6.4-13.7] mo and 4.8 [4.3-6.2] mo, HR 0.44 [0.27-0.70], P < 0.001 for OS and 0.46 [0.29-0.73], P = 0.001 for EFS). Patients with glioblastomas of the methylation classes receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK I) and mesenchymal subgroups lacked a prognostic impact of MGMT in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ. It indicates favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors primarily in the RTK II subgroup.

Effectiveness and Safety of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Since it became available in the mid-2010s, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has become part of the armamentarium to treat chronic pain. To date, one randomized controlled trial, and several studies of moderate sample size and various etiologies have been published on this topic. We conducted a pooled analysis to investigate the generalizability of individual studies and to identify differences in outcome between chronic pain etiologic subgroups and/or pain location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One prospective, randomized comparative trial and six prospective, single-arm, observational studies were identified that met pre-defined acceptance criteria. Pain scores and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were weighted by study sample sizes and pooled. Safety data are reported in aggregate form. RESULTS: Our analysis included 217 patients with a permanent implant at 12-month follow-up. Analysis of pooled data showed an overall weighted mean pain score of 3.4, with 63% of patients reporting ≥50% pain relief. Effectiveness sub-analyses in CRPS-I, causalgia, and back pain resulted in a mean reduction in pain intensity of 4.9, 4.6, and 3.9 points, respectively. Our pooled analysis showed a pain score for primary affected region ranging from 1.7 (groin) to 3.0 (buttocks) and responder rates of 80% for foot and groin, 75% for leg, and 70% for back. A substantial improvement in all PROs was observed at 12 months. The most commonly reported procedural or device complications were pain at the IPG pocket site, lead fracture, lead migration, and infection. CONCLUSIONS: DRG stimulation is an effective and safe therapy for various etiologies of chronic pain.

Cervical and High-Thoracic Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is a meanwhile established but rather new technique of neuromodulation to treat chronic pain states of different origin. While being primarily used in the lumbar region, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation also can be used in the upper thoracic and cervical region with slight alterations of the surgical approach. This offers new therapeutic options especially in the treatment of neuropathic pain states of the upper extremities. Data on surgical technique, outcome and complications rates of DRG in this region are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a consecutive series of 20 patients treated with DRG stimulation in the upper thoracic and cervical region. All patients suffered from chronic neuropathic pain unresponsive to best medical treatment. Main pain etiologies were trauma, spine surgery, postherpetic neuralgia, and peripheral nerve surgery. All patients were trialed with externalized electrodes prior to permanent pulse generator implantation. Routine clinical follow-up was performed during reprogramming sessions. RESULTS: Out of all 20 patients trialed, 18 were successfully trialed and implanted with a permanent stimulation system. The average pain relief after three months compared to the baseline was of 60.9% (mean VAS 8.5 to VAS 3.2). 77.8% of the patients reported a pain relief of at least 50% after three months. One patient developed a transient paresis of the arm caused by the procedure. She completely recovered within three months. CONCLUSION: Cervical and upper thoracic DRG stimulation resulted in good overall response rates to trialing and similar pain relief when compared to DRG stimulation for groin and lower limb pain. A modified surgical approach has to be used when compared with lumbar DRG electrode placement. Surgery itself in this region is more complication prone and challenging.

Burst SCS Microdosing Is as Efficacious as Standard Burst SCS in Treating Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The burst waveform, a recent innovation in spinal cord stimulation (SCS), can achieve better outcomes than conventional tonic SCS, both for de novo implants and as a salvage therapy. Burst stimulation delivers more energy per second than tonic stimulation, which is a consideration for battery consumption. The clinical effectiveness of an energy-conserving strategy was investigated. METHODS: Subjects were experienced users of BurstDR SCS for back and leg pain. Three 2-week stimulation paradigms were presented in blinded random order: standard (continuously delivered) BurstDR, microdosing A: 5 sec of BurstDR alternating with 5 sec of no stimulation, and microdosing B: 5 sec of BurstDR alternating with 10 sec of no stimulation. The primary outcome for each paradigm was change in pain ratings, and secondary outcomes included changes in scores for quality of life, satisfaction, and preference. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects assessed all three stimulation paradigms. There were no significant differences in pain (visual analog scale) or quality of life (EQ-5D) when comparing standard burst outcomes with those of microdosing A and, separately, microdosing B. Microdosing paradigms were graded with slightly higher level of satisfaction and were generally preferred above standard burst stimulation. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the use of energy-efficient burst microdosing stimulation paradigms with alternating stimulation-on and stimulation-off periods can provide clinically equivalent results to standard burst stimulation. This is important for extending SCS battery life. Further research is needed to comprehensively characterize the clinical utility of this approach and the neurophysiological mechanisms for the maintenance of pain relief during stimulation-off periods.

Open Microsurgical Dorsal Root Ganglion Lead Placement.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG) is a new but well-established neuromodulation technique allowing new indications and superiority to pre-existing stimulation techniques such as spinal cord stimulation in selected pain etiologies. Previous surgical procedures in the implantation area pose a challenge for the percutaneous technique and are therefore considered contraindications for DRG stimulation surgery. We describe the successful open DRG electrode placement in two patients with previous surgeries suffering from severe radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis. METHODS: Percutaneous implantation attempts failed and an open laminotomy/foraminotomy followed by open lead placement was performed. Leads and loops were placed under the microscope, lead location was verified by x-ray during surgery. Leads and loops were kept in position with fibrin glue and fibrin sealant patches. No special tool was required for open lead placement. RESULTS: In both patients, surgery resulted in lead and loop placement resembling the results seen in percutaneous technique. Programming and stimulation results are similar to observations made following percutaneous techniques in one patient significantly lower stimulation amplitudes were necessary. In 18 and 12 months follow-up, respectively, lead location and paresthesia coverage were stable. CONCLUSION: The option of open electrode placement should be taken into account following unsuccessful percutaneous lead placement. A combination of fibrin sealant patch and fibrin glue may be a good option for stabilization of the lead and specially of the strain relief loops in open placement. Knowledge of basic spinal surgery techniques and experience in percutaneous DRG stimulation is necessary to perform this procedure.

Neurostimulation in tardive dystonia/dyskinesia: A delayed start, sham stimulation-controlled randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence suggests that pallidal deep brain stimulation represents a potential new therapeutic avenue in tardive dystonia/dyskinesia, but controlled and blinded randomized studies (RCT) are missing. The present RCT compares dystonia/dyskinesia severity of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with tardive dystonia using a delayed-start design paradigm. METHODS: Dystonia/dyskinesia severity was assessed via blinded videos following pallidal neurostimulation at 3 (blinded phase) and 6 months (open extension phase). Primary endpoint was the percentage change of dystonia severity (Burke-Fahn-Marsden-Dystonia-Rating-Scale, BFMDRS) at 3 months between active vs. sham neurostimulation using blinded-video assessment. Secondary endpoints comprised clinical rating scores for movement disorders. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00331669. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were randomized (1:1) to active (n = 12) or sham neurostimulation (n = 13). In the intention-to-treat analyses the between group difference of dystonia severity (BFMDRS) between active vs. sham stimulation was not significant at 3 months. Three months post-randomisation dystonia severity improved significantly within the neurostimulation by 22.8% and non-significantly within the sham group (12.0%) compared to their respective baseline severity. During the open-label extension with both groups being actively treated, significant and pronounced improvements of 41.5% were observed via blinded evaluation. Adverse events (n = 10) occurred in 10/25 of patients during the 6 months, mostly related to surgical implantation of the device; all resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION: The primary endpoint of this randomized trial was not significant, most likely due to incomplete recruitment. However, pronounced improvements of most secondary endpoints at 3 and 6 months provide evidence for efficacy and safety of pallidal neurostimulation in tardive dystonia.

Less is more - Pulse width dependent therapeutic window in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Shorter pulse widths than conventional pulse width settings may lead to reduction of side effects and therefore be a valuable therapeutic option for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). OBJECTIVE: To compare the DBS effect of shorter pulse width at 40 µs (DBS-40 µs) to conventional pulse width at 60 µs (DBS-60 µs) on the therapeutic window in ET patients. METHODS: For this prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study 9 ET patients with chronic DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM)/posterior subthalamic area (PSA) were recruited. Therapeutic window was calculated by determining efficacy and side effect thresholds for DBS-40 µs and DBS-60 µs. Tremor Rating Scales and Kinesia tremor analyses were used to compare clinical efficacy between the considered settings and deactivated DBS (DBS-OFF). Volume of neural activation (VNA) was calculated for both efficacy and side effect thresholds at each pulse width. RESULTS: DBS-40 µs showed a significantly larger therapeutic window than DBS-60 µs mainly due to higher side-effect thresholds. Both conditions significantly improved tremor compared to DBS-OFF, while efficacy was comparable between DBS-40 µs and DBS-60 µs. Moreover, VNA at efficacy threshold was smaller and less energy was required for tremor suppression with DBS-40 µs compared to DBS-60 µs. CONCLUSIONS: VIM/PSA-DBS with short pulse width represents a promising programming option for DBS in ET as it reduces side effects while maintaining efficient tremor suppression. Furthermore, our data support the notion of pulse width dependent selective modulation of distinct fiber tracts leading to widening of the therapeutic window.

Comparison of Awake vs. Asleep Surgery for Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) is usually performed as awake surgery allowing sufficient intraoperative testing. Recently, outcomes after asleep surgery have been assumed comparable. However, direct comparisons between awake and asleep surgery are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference between awake and asleep surgery comparing motor and nonmotor outcome after subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS in a large single center PD population. METHODS: Ninety-six patients were retrospectively matched pairwise (48 asleep and 48 awake) and compared regarding improvement of Unified PD Rating Scale Motor Score (UPDRS-III), cognitive function, Levodopa-equivalent-daily-dose (LEDD), stimulation amplitudes, side effects, surgery duration, and complication rates. Routine testing took place at three months and one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Chronic DBS effects (UPDRS-III without medication and with stimulation on [OFF/ON]) significantly improved UPDRS-III only after awake surgery at three months and in both groups one year postoperatively. Acute effects (percentage UPDRS-III reduction after activation of stimulation) were also significantly better after awake surgery at three months but not at one year compared to asleep surgery. UPDRS-III subitems "freezing" and "speech" were significantly worse after asleep surgery at three months and one year, respectively. LEDD was significantly lower after awake surgery only one week postoperatively. The other measures did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall motor function improved faster in the awake surgery group, but the difference ceased after one year. However, axial subitems were worse in the asleep surgery group suggesting that worsening of axial symptoms was risked improving overall motor function. Awake surgery still seems advantageous for STN-DBS in PD, although asleep surgery may be considered with lower threshold in patients not suitable for awake surgery.

High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Surgery-Naïve Patients-A Prospective Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: A multitude of evidence supporting the beneficial effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients suffering from chronic pain syndromes following spinal surgery has been published in the last decade. Evidence is scarce, however, for the use of high frequency SCS (HF-SCS) in the treatment of surgery naïve patients suffering from lower back pain (LBP). METHODS: From June 2014 to April 2015, we prospectively enrolled patients suffering from LBP alone or in conjunction with leg pain in a trial of HF-SCS. None of the patients had undergone surgical procedures of the lumbar spine. Patients suffered medically intractable LBP and were deemed ineligible for spine surgery. All patients underwent trial stimulation for at least one week. Pain levels were assessed daily during initial stay, 4 weeks later and then every 3 months. Different preprogrammed modes of HF-SCS were changed if pain persisted or increased during trial or postimplant follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Eight patients (four male, four female) underwent HF-SCS trials. Mean age was 60 ± 4.8 years. Mean numeric rating scale (NRS) baseline intensity for back pain was 8.9 ± 0.23 and 8.1 ± 0.6 for leg pain. All patients achieved meaningful reductions in pain intensities and underwent IPG implantation at a mean interval of 13 days. Mean follow-up was 306 days. Mean back pain reduction from baseline at last follow-up was -4.13 ± 0.85, and -6.2 ± 1.03 for leg pain. Two patients showed skin irritations and localized pain at the IPG site. Both patients underwent surgery to replant the IPG. No infections were seen in any of the eight patients enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort of surgery naïve patients, we were able to show good efficacy of HF-SCS with mean NRS reductions of 4.13 and 6.2 for back and leg pain, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 10 months.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy is an important part of the pain treatment algorithm for chronic disease states. The use of this option is a viable treatment strategy, but it is inherent for pain physicians to understand risk assessment and mitigation. In this manuscript, we explore evidence and mitigating strategies to improve safety with intrathecal therapy. METHODS: A robust literature search was performed covering January 2011 to October 9, 2016, in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Biomed Central, Google Scholar, Current Contents Connect, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. The information was cross-referenced and compiled for evidence, analysis, and consensus review, with the intent to offer weighted recommendations and consensus statements on safety for targeted intrathecal therapy delivery. RESULTS: The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference has made several best practice recommendations to improve care and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with intrathecal therapy through all phases of management. The United States Prevention Service Task Force evidence level and consensus strength assessments are offered for each recommendation. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal therapy is a viable and relatively safe option for the treatment of cancer- and noncancer-related pain. Continued research and expert opinion are required to improve our current pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of intrathecal drug delivery, as this will undoubtedly improve safety and efficacy.

[Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy following azathioprine and steroid treatment of pulmonary sarcoid disease]. / Progressive multifokale Leukenzephalopathie. Schwerwiegende Komplikation einer Immunsuppression.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system following reactivation of the John-Cunningham-Virus (JVC) in an immunocompromised host. This rare condition is characterized by rapid progressing neurologic symptoms often leading to death. In the following, we report on a rapid evolving deterioration of mental status due to PML in an 53-year-old man during treatment of pulmonary sarcoid disease using azathioprine and steroids. In contrast to reported lethal outcomes, our patient experienced a slow recovery of his cognitive impairment and later on of his palsy following termination of immunosuppression.

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of chronic pain is a well-established therapy. However, the requirement that paresthesia be continually felt by the patient has important downsides. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new paresthesia-free SCS paradigm, called burst stimulation, for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with FBSS and a preexisting SCS system each received three treatment allocations in random order for a period of one week: 500-Hz tonic stimulation, burst stimulation, and placebo stimulation. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were pain quality measured using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ) and safety. Additional data were collected relating to pain-related disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: The lowest mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were observed under burst stimulation. For the burst stimulation treatment group, mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were significantly decreased compared with the other treatment groups. Mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were not significantly different between 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation. Although the lowest mean ODI score was observed under burst stimulation, no significant differences were found between the ODI categories. No adverse events occurred, and burst stimulation was significantly preferred by 16 patients (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, burst stimulation resulted in significantly better pain relief and improved pain quality in the short term compared with 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation and was preferred by the majority of patients.