Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27651890

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Modern drug therapy accounts for a major share of health expenditure and challenges public provider resources. The objective of our study was to compare drug expenditure trends for ten major drug classes over 16 years at Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), the 2(nd) largest healthcare organization in Israel. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of drug expenditure per HMO beneficiary between the years 1998-2014. Trends in annual mean drug expenditures per MHS member were compared among 10 major drug classes. RESULTS: Average annual drug expenditure per beneficiary increased during the study period from 429.56 to 474.32 in 2014 (10.4 %). Ten drug classes accounted for 58.0 % and 77.8 % of total drug cost in 1998 and 2014, respectively. The overall distribution of drug expenditure among drug classes differed significantly between 1998 and 2014 (p < 0.001), mainly due to the increase in expenditure for cancer drugs, from 6.8 % of total drug cost to 30.3 %. In contrast, expenditures for cardiovascular drugs decreased during the same period from 16.0 to 2.7 %. Moreover, the median annual increase in net drug costs per HMO member during 1998-2014 was largest for cancer drugs (NIS 6.18/year; IQR, 1.70-9.92/year), about two-fold that of immunosuppressants, the second fastest growing drug class (NIS 2.81; IQR, 0.58-7.43/year). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous rise in anti-cancer drug expenditure puts a substantial burden on the medication budgets of public health organizations. Coordinated measures involving policy makers, physicians, and pharmaceutical companies will be required for efficient cost containment.

2.
PLoS One ; 11(5): e0154689, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27144545

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials constitute the gold-standard for evaluating new anti-cancer therapies; however, real-life data are key in complementing clinically useful information. We developed a computational tool for real-life data analysis and applied it to the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) setting. This tool addressed the impact of oncology/non-oncology parameters on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The developed tool enables extraction of any computerized information including comorbidities and use of drugs (oncological/non-oncological) per individual HMO member. The study in which we evaluated this tool was a retrospective cohort study that included Maccabi Healthcare Services members with mCRC receiving bevacizumab with fluoropyrimidines (FP), FP plus oxaliplatin (FP-O), or FP plus irinotecan (FP-I) in the first-line between 9/2006 and 12/2013. RESULTS: The analysis included 753 patients of whom 15.4% underwent subsequent metastasectomy (the Surgery group). For the entire cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 20.5 months; in the Surgery group, median duration of bevacizumab-containing therapy (DOT) pre-surgery was 6.1 months; median OS was not reached. In the Non-surgery group, median OS and DOT were 18.7 and 11.4 months, respectively; no significant OS differences were noted between FP-O and FP-I, whereas FP use was associated with shorter OS (12.3 month; p <0.002; notably, these patients were older). Patients who received both FP-O- and FP-I-based regimens achieved numerically longer OS vs. those who received only one of these regimens (22.1 [19.9-24.0] vs. 18.9 [15.5-21.9] months). Among patients assessed for wild-type KRAS and treated with subsequent anti-EGFR agent, OS was 25.4 months and 18.7 months for 124 treated vs. 37 non-treated patients (non-significant). Cox analysis (controlling for age and gender) identified several non-oncology parameters associated with poorer clinical outcomes including concurrent use of diuretics and proton-pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Our tool provided insights that confirmed/complemented information gained from randomized-clinical trials. Prospective tool implementation is warranted.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/secundário , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Mineração de Dados/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada , Biologia Computacional , Feminino , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 125(2): 505-10, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20593233

RESUMO

Endoxifen, the most active metabolite of the prodrug tamoxifen, is produced by cytochrome P450 CYP2D6. Breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen who have reduced CYP2D6 activity, related to either genetic variation or drug inhibition, may have inferior outcomes. To assess the effect of concomitant CYP2D6 inhibiting drug use on clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. We conducted a retrospective database analysis. Women with non-metastatic estrogen receptor positive tumors who had completed adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 2 years, without treatment with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors or early relapse, were included. Patients were classified as users of CYP2D6 inhibitors if they purchased strong CYP2D6 inhibiting drugs for ≥ 4 consecutive months during tamoxifen treatment. Tumors were classified as "high risk" if adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. Primary endpoint was disease free (DFS) and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). 902 patients treated with tamoxifen (median duration, 4.9 years) were followed for a median period of 5.9 years. Fifty-nine (6.5%) patients were users of CYP2D6 inhibitors (median duration, 23 months). DFS at 3 years (corresponding to 5 years after tamoxifen initiation) did not differ between users and non-users of CYP2D6 inhibiting drugs (92.7 vs. 93.0%, respectively; adjusted P = 0.44). OS at 3 years was lower in the patients using CYP2D6 inhibiting drugs: 89.4 vs. 93.8%, but after adjustment for age and comorbidities this difference was not significant (P = 0.20). Overall recurrence rates did not differ between users and non-users of CYP2D6 inhibiting drugs (11.8 vs. 19.0% respectively, P = 0.23). Concomitant prolonged therapy with strong CYP2D6 inhibiting drugs does not affect adversely DFS and recurrence rates in tamoxifen-treated early breast cancer patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6 , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Tamoxifeno/análogos & derivados , Tamoxifeno/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA