Comparison of the outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis by locking plate and compression screw in patients with severe hallux valgus or hallux valgus revision.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) is indicated for hallux rigidus, septic arthritis, severe hallux valgus (HV) or HV revision. Few studies have compared the functional and radiographic outcomes between indications. The goal of this study was to compare the results of MTP1 arthrodesis in patients with severe HV or HV revision at 6 months postoperative. The hypothesis was that there are no differences in the fusion rate, functional scores and radiological correction between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study conducted between January 1, 2018 and July 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients treated for severe HV or HV revision by MTP1 arthrodesis with a compression screw and locking plate who were at least 18 years of age. The exclusion criteria were a history of septic arthritis of MTP1 without prior HV surgery, primary hallux rigidus, rheumatoid arthritis, incomplete medical record. The functional outcomes consisted of the Foot Function Index (FFi-f) and the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score. Radiographs were made to evaluate preoperative and postoperative deformity, the correction and the fusion rate. These outcomes were compared between two groups: severe HV and HV revision. RESULTS: An analysis was done of 58 cases of MTP1 arthrodesis: 45 severe HV and 13 HV revisions. The mean patient age was 66 years, and the mean follow-up was 15.7 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative functional scores: EFAS (p = 0.85) and FFI-f (p = 0.14). At the final review, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the foot angle measurements (hallux valgus angle, p = 0.08 and intermetatarsal angle, p = 0.15) and fusion rate (p = 0.89) with a 93% fusion rate in patients with severe HV and 92% in patients with HV revision. CONCLUSION: Given the good radiographic and functional outcomes, MTP1 arthrodesis by locking plate and compression screw is indicated as a first line surgical treatment for patients with severe HV or for patients undergoing HV revision. There is no evidence of a significant difference in the functional scores, fusion rate and radiographic correction between these two indications. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV; retrospective case series.

At 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up, One-Third of Patients Have Patellofemoral Arthritis After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Gracilis Tendon Autograft.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term clinical outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) to treat recurrent patellar instability. METHODS: This was a single-center study of patients undergoing an isolated MPFLr between 2000 and 2011. All patients underwent reconstruction using hamstring autograft. The inclusion criteria were a minimum 10-year follow-up period and skeletally mature patients with more than 1 episode of patellar dislocation who underwent MPFLr without an associated bony procedure. RESULTS: A total of 54 knees were available for final analysis. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 years (range, 10-14 year). The mean age at surgery was 25 years. No patients had patellofemoral arthritis (PFA) prior to surgery. Preoperatively, the mean Caton-Deschamps index was 1.1 and the mean tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was 14.9 ± 2 mm (range, 7-17 mm). All patients had trochlear dysplasia according to the Dejour classification. At final follow-up, the mean Kujala score was 82.9 ± 15.3; mean International Knee Documentation Committee score, 78.3 ± 18.5; and mean Tegner score, 4.0 ± 1.7. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome as determined by a Kujala score lower than 80 had a higher Caton-Deschamps index preoperatively and were more likely to be female patients; however, neither factor reached significance. Of the patients, 33 (66%) had no radiographic evidence of PFA whereas 15 (30%) had Iwano stage 1 and 2 had Iwano stage 2 (4%). At final follow-up, 4 patients (7.4%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated MPFLr with gracilis tendon autograft in appropriately selected patients is an effective long-term treatment for recurrent patellofemoral instability with low rates of recurrence. One-third of patients exhibit radiographic evidence of PFA more than 10 years after isolated MPFLr. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Comparison of the functional outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures with femoral stem loosening: Locking plate fixation with or without femoral stem revision.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic fractures have become one of the main reasons for revision of total hip arthroplasty, with the treatment strategy guided by the Vancouver and SOFCOT classification systems. The main objective of this work was to compare the functional outcomes and mortality rate in patients who suffered a periprosthetic hip fracture with femoral stem loosening and who were treated either by internal fixation with locking plate only, or in combination with revision of the existing femoral stem with a cemented stem. The secondary objective was to compare the blood loss, procedure duration, length of hospital stay, living arrangements, time to weight bearing and major complications between these two treatment strategies. The starting hypothesis was that there is no difference in the functional outcomes between these two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective study of patients treated between 2013 and 2019. Thirty-six patients (54%) underwent femoral stem revision (FSR group) and 31 patients (46%) were treated by locking plate fixation only (ORIF group). In this population, 19 of the patients had been residing at a nursing home before the surgical treatment: 12 (33%) in the FSR group and 7 (23%) in the ORIF group (p=0.33). The mean preoperative Parker score was 7.03 (± 1.48) in the FSR group versus 5.19 (± 1.92) in the ORIF group. The functional outcomes at the final review were evaluated using the Parker score, HHS (Harris Hip score), WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Arthritis Index) and Oxford score. Fracture healing was determined on radiographs centered over the hip joint with the entire femur visible on AP and lateral views. All patients were reviewed at a minimum of 1 year for clinical and radiological assessments. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 28 months [12-85], the Oxford score was 40.4 (± 10.6) in the FSR group versus 37.1 (± 13.5) in the ORIF group (p=0.34), WOMAC of 45.5 (± 26.9) versus 50.5 (± 32.4) (p=0.56), and HHS of 62.7 (± 25.5) versus 60.3 (± 28.6) (p=0.79). The Parker score at the final assessment was 5.14 (± 1.96) in the FSR group versus 4.64 (± 2.17) in the ORIF group (p=0.33). In the FSR group, 10 patients were at a nursing home (34%), 6 of whom were not there initially, versus 6 in the ORIF group (43%), 5 of whom were not there initially (p=0.59). The mean operating time was 152±41.4 minutes (minimum: 85; maximum: 254) in the FSR group versus 89.2 (± 44.1) minutes (minimum: 39; maximum: 280) in the ORIF group (p<0.001). Resumption of full weight bearing occurred at 6 weeks in 21 patients (58%) in the FSR group versus 14 patients (47%) in the ORIF group (p=0.023). There were 5 major complications (14%) in the FSR group versus 7 (23%) in the ORIF group (p=0.35). Among the reviewed patients, the union rate was 86% on the latest radiographs in the FSR group versus 78% in the ORIF group. DISCUSSION: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the various functional scores, confirming our study hypothesis. Internal fixation with a locking plate appears to be an acceptable solution for treating periprosthetic hip fractures in which the femoral stem has loosened. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative retrospective study.

Coronal and sagittal alignment of the lower limb in Caucasians: Analysis of a 3D CT database.

INTRODUCTION: Lower limb alignment is a major determinant of long-term outcomes after osteotomy or total knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to define the mean values of coronal and sagittal lower limb alignment for Caucasians as a function of sex using 3D reconstructions from CT-scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis involved 586 Caucasian patients (269 males and 317 females) who had their hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA), lateral and medial proximal posterior tibial angles (LPPTA/MPPTA), posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), and non-weightbearing joint convergence angle (nwJLCA) measured. This analysis was performed using a CT-scan-based modelling system (SOMA). Differences between sexes and morphotypes (neutral, varus and valgus) were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The mean HKA was 180±2.57°, LDFA 86.1±1.87°, MPTA 86.1±2.15°, PPTA 84.6±2.58°, LPPTA 84.9±3.17°, MPPTA 85.1±3.21°, PDFA 85.3±1.50° and nwJLCA 0.82±1.32°. There was a significant difference between sexes for the HKA (180.3±2.46° and 179.0±2.52°), LDFA (85.6±1.90° and 86.8±1.61°), MPPTA (84.7±3.06° and 85. 6±3.31°). The neutral morphotype was more frequent in women than men (78% vs. 73%), the varus morphotype was more frequent in men than women (20% vs. 7.6%) and the valgus morphotype was more frequent in women than men (15% vs. 6.7%). CONCLUSION: Normal parameters for lower limb alignment in Caucasian patients were described in the coronal and sagittal planes. There was a significant influence of sex in the coronal plane, which was not found in the sagittal plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort study.