Novel CCM2 missense variants abrogating the CCM1-CCM2 interaction cause cerebral cavernous malformations.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular malformations mostly located within the central nervous system. Most deleterious variants are loss of function mutations in one of the three CCM genes. These genes code for proteins that form a ternary cytosolic complex with CCM2 as a hub. Very few CCM2 missense variants have been shown to be deleterious by modifying the ternary CCM complex stability. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the causality of novel missense CCM2 variants detected in patients with CCM. METHODS: The three CCM genes were screened in 984 patients referred for CCM molecular screening. Interaction between CCM1 and CCM2 proteins was tested using co-immunoprecipitation experiments for the CCM2 missense variants located in the phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain. RESULTS: 11 distinct CCM2 rare missense variants were found. Six variants predicted to be damaging were located in the PTB domain, four of them were novel. When co-transfected with CCM1 in HEK293T cells, a loss of interaction between CCM1 and CCM2 was observed for all six variants. CONCLUSION: We showed, using co-immunoprecipitation experiments, that CCM2 missense variants located in the PTB domain were actually damaging by preventing the normal interaction between CCM1 and CCM2. These data are important for diagnosis and genetic counselling, which are challenging in patients harbouring such variants.

Deep brain stimulation does not enhance neuroinflammation in multiple system atrophy.

Slowly progressive, levodopa-responsive multiple system atrophy (MSA) may be misdiagnosed as Parkinson's disease (PD). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is mostly ineffective in these patients and may even worsen the clinical course. Here we assessed whether neuropathological differences between patients with MSA who were treated with DBS of the subthalamic nucleus because of a misleading clinical presentation and typical disease cases may explain the more benign disease course of the former, and also the rapid clinical decline after surgery. The post-mortem assessment included the subthalamic nucleus, the globus pallidus, the thalamus and the putamen in five patients with MSA who received DBS and nine typical disease cases. There was no evidence for distinct neuroinflammatory profiles between both groups that could be related to the surgical procedure or that could explain the rapid clinical progression during DBS. Patients who received deep brain stimulation displayed a higher proportion of α-synuclein bearing neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the putamen compared with typical cases, while the number of surviving neurons was not different between groups. Our findings suggest that DBS does not induce neuroinflammatory changes in patients with MSA, at least several years after the surgery. We further hypothesize that the peculiar pattern of α-synuclein pathology may contribute to differences in the clinical phenotype, with a greater proportion of neuronal inclusions in the putamen being associated to a milder, "PD-like" phenotype with sustained levodopa response and slower disease progression.

Outcome of deep brain stimulation in slowly progressive multiple system atrophy: A clinico-pathological series and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight the risk of clinical worsening after deep brain stimulation in histologically proven multiple system atrophy (MSA) patients presenting slow and relatively benign disease progression mimicking Parkinson's disease (PD). In such cases but also in more typical MSA patients, the results of deep brain stimulation have been mostly reported as case reports and small patient series. METHODS: The present study describes the outcome of the largest series of histologically proven MSA patients who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus because they were considered as having PD at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Three patients showed significant improvement of motor signs after surgery while two did not. Clinical improvement was short-lasting and rapidly followed by the occurrence of disabling manifestations of MSA that counteracted DBS benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Together with previous reports, our study demonstrates that DBS should not be recommended for MSA patients. It also underlines that detecting subtle red flags is crucial to avoid DBS surgery in this population.