Lactating Adenoma of the Breast.

Lactating adenoma is an uncommon breast palpable lesion occurring in pregnancy or lactation. Although it is a benign condition, it often requires core biopsy or even surgery to exclude malignancy. As with other solid lesions in pregnancy and lactation, lactating adenoma needs an accurate evaluation in order to ensure its benign nature. Work-up must include both imaging and histologic findings. Ultrasound evaluation remains the first step in assessing the features of the lesion. Some authors consider magnetic resonance imaging as a useful tool in cases of inconclusive evaluation after ultrasound and histologic exam in an attempt to avoid surgery. Most lactating adenomas resolve spontaneously, whereas others persist or even increase in size and must be removed. The authors present a case of a 35-year-old woman at 6 months postpartum with a lactating adenoma in her right breast. After surgical removal, breastfeeding was perfectly continued within the next 24 hours, which highlights the fact that breast surgery is most often compatible with breastfeeding.

Comparison of Screened and Nonscreened Breast Cancer Patients in Relation to Age: A 2-Institution Study.

INTRODUCTION: Screening programs for breast cancer aim to allow early diagnosis, and thus reduce mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a population screening program in a sample of women aged between 50 and 69 years in terms of recurrence, metastasis, biological profiles, and survival, and to compare their results with those of women of a wider age range who did not participate on the screening program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study in which 1821 patients with 1873 breast tumors who received surgery between 1999 and 2014 at MútuaTerrassa University Hospital and the Hospital of Terrassa in Barcelona were analyzed. A comparison was performed in the 50- to 69-year-old age group between those who participated on the screening program and those who did not. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 58 years. The mean follow-up was 72 months, and median follow-up 59 months. The screened group showed significantly better results in all prognostic factors and in specific mortality than all nonscreened groups. The specific mortality rate in the screened patients was 2.4% (12/496), local recurrence 2.8% (14/496), and metastasis at 10 years 3.6% (18/496). In the nonscreened group, younger women presented a higher rate of metastasis (16.4% [81/493]) and a shorter disease-free period (77.1% [380/493]). The age group older than 70 years had the highest number of T4 tumors (7.5% [30/403]) and the highest proportion of radical surgery (50.4% [203/403]). CONCLUSION: Patients in the screening program presented improved survival. We speculate that extending breast cancer screening programs to women younger than 50 and older than 70 years could bring about mortality benefits.

Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening.

AIM: To assess the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) accuracy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia (AN) detection in CRC screening. METHODS: We performed a multicentric, prospective, double blind study of diagnostic tests on asymptomatic average-risk individuals submitted to screening colonoscopy. Two stool samples were collected and the fecal hemoglobin concentration was determined in the first sample (FIT1) and the highest level of both samples (FITmax) using the OC-sensor™. Areas under the curve (AUC) for CRC and AN were calculated. The best FIT1 and FITmax cut-off values for CRC were determined. At this threshold, number needed to scope (NNS) to detect a CRC and an AN and the cost per lesion detected were calculated. RESULTS: About 779 individuals were included. An AN was found in 97 (12.5%) individuals: a CRC in 5 (0.6%) and an advanced adenoma (≥ 10 mm, villous histology or high grade dysplasia) in 92 (11.9%) subjects. For CRC diagnosis, FIT1 AUC was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.98) and FITmax AUC was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97). For AN, FIT1 and FITmax AUC were similar (0.72, 95%CI: 0.66-0.78 vs 0.73, 95%CI: 0.68-0.79, respectively, P = 0.34). Depending on the number of determinations and the positivity threshold cut-off used sensitivity for AN detection ranged between 28% and 42% and specificity between 91% and 97%. At the best cut-off point for CRC detection (115 ng/mL), the NNS to detect a CRC were 10.2 and 15.8; and the cost per CRC was 1814€ and 2985€ on FIT1 and FITmax strategies respectively. At this threshold the sensitivity, NNS and cost per AN detected were 30%, 1.76, and 306€, in FIT1 strategy, and 36%, 2.26€ and 426€, in FITmax strategy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Performing two tests does not improve diagnostic accuracy, but increases cost and NNS to detect a lesion.