RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. RESULTS: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood's lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of immunohistochemistry-assisted Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for superficially invasive melanoma, there is a paucity of the literature investigating its effect on final defect size. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tissue sparing effect of MMS for melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-eight patients with early-stage (T1a/T1b) cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS from January 2008 to December 2018 were evaluated. Measured defect sizes after Mohs tumor extirpation were compared with anticipated defect size that would result from standard-margin wide local excision (WLE). Average actual versus anticipated defect areas were compared using a paired t-test (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: The following groups demonstrated a significantly smaller defect area for MMS-treated tumors when compared with anticipated standard-margin WLE defect: All tumors combined (13.8 cm2 vs 10.4 cm2, p < .001), tumors requiring 1 stage (13.6 cm2 vs 10.1 cm2,p < .001), and tumors requiring 2 stages (13.2 cm2 vs 10.5 cm2, p = .004). The majority of patients (83.5%, n = 274) achieved clear margins with 1 stage. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry-assisted MMS for early-stage invasive melanoma is associated with smaller final defect size and overall tissue sparing effect compared with standard WLE margins.
RESUMO
Background: Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry (MMS-I) is increasingly utilized for special site melanoma treatment. Yet, frequency and risk factors associated with upstaging of all-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I remain undefined. Objective: Determine upstaging frequency and factors associated with tumor upstaging for all-stage melanomas treated with MMS-I. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center case series, all cases of invasive and in situ melanoma treated with MMS-I between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded and compared between tumors that were and were not upstaged from their initial T stage. Results: Of the 962 melanoma MMS-I cases identified, 44 (4.6%) were upstaged, including 5.6% of in situ and 2.5% of invasive tumors. Risk factors for upstaging included lack of excisional intent at the time of initial biopsy (P < .01), nonlentigo maligna subtype (P = .03), female sex (P = .02), and initial in situ diagnosis (P = .03). Nonstatistically significant characteristics evaluated included patient age (P = .97), initial Breslow depth (P = .18), and biopsy type (P = .24). Limitations: Retrospective study design. Conclusions: All-stage cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS-I are associated with low upstaging rates. Tumor upstaging is associated with lack of excisional intent, female sex, and in situ tumors.
RESUMO
Objectives: To determine the cost of two surgical treatment approaches for vulvar Paget's disease and model the cost-effectiveness considering differences in recurrence and reoperation over time. Methods: We assessed cost-effectiveness between excision guided by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS-E) and traditional wide local excision (WLE). We examined billing data from patients with vulvar Paget's disease who underwent MMS-E (cases, n = 24, 2018-2022) or WLE (controls, n = 64, 1990-2020). We created typical treatment bundles incorporating physician-administered services and facility costs standardized to Medicare reimbursements in 2022 United States Dollars (USD). The primary measure of effectiveness was disease-free years of life. A secondary analysis estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A Markov model simulated treatment pathways over a 10-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were based on institutional recurrence rates (3-year RR 6.7 % for MMS-E vs 34.1 % for WLE). We used a willingness-to-pay threshold of 100,000 USD per QALY. Results: The cost of a single surgical episode was 34,664 USD for MMS-E and 14,969 USD for WLE. In the setting of lower recurrence rates with MMS-E, the incremental cost was 12,789 USD per disease-free year gained. A secondary analysis incorporating QALY showed an incremental cost of 72,820 USD per QALY. Conclusions: MMS-E appears to be a cost-effective treatment for vulvar Paget's disease compared to historic standard of care. Our ability to estimate quality of life gained by avoiding disease recurrence was limited by scant data for this rare condition; thus, future studies incorporating health utility values are needed to facilitate a more comprehensive analysis.